EUVD-2026-49986
GHSA-hm7v-8wcp-3gjm
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorVendor: redhat
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
A flaw was found in CRIU's handling of restartable sequences (rseq) during checkpoint/restore. A malicious process inside a container can register an rseq critical section that hijacks CRIU's parasite code injection during checkpoint, allowing it to spoof the process credentials saved in the checkpoint image. On restore, the container process gains elevated capabilities and zeroed UIDs/GIDs.
The practical impact on Red Hat products is limited by several factors: checkpoint/restore requires root privileges (podman) or cluster-admin RBAC (OpenShift) to trigger and cannot be initiated from within the container itself; on OpenShift prior to 4.17 the feature required explicit opt-in, and on 4.17+ the kubelet checkpoint API RBAC is not configured by default; OpenShift enforces user namespaces by default for regular workloads (hostUsers is gated behind admin-only SCCs), which makes the spoofed capabilities namespace-scoped and ineffective for privilege escalation; SELinux type enforcement (container_t) blocks privilege transitions independently of capabilities; seccomp filters persist through checkpoint/restore and cannot be corrupted via the parasite; and kernel mount namespace ownership checks on RHEL 9/10 kernels prevent mount-based container escape even with spoofed capabilities.
AnalysisAI
Privilege escalation in CRIU allows a malicious container process to spoof credentials during checkpoint, resulting in elevated capabilities upon restore. On Red Hat platforms, effective exploitation is mitigated by mandatory access controls, user namespaces, and the requirement for privileged checkpoint initiation. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
More in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
View allHeap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash
Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h
Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft
Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo
Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter
Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a
Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe
HTTP request smuggling in Undertow (the embedded web server underpinning JBoss EAP, Red Hat Data Grid, and Apache Camel
HTTP request smuggling in Red Hat Undertow allows remote unauthenticated attackers to bypass front-end security controls
Out-of-bounds read in the GnuTLS DTLS handshake reassembly logic lets remote unauthenticated attackers trigger an intege
HTTP request smuggling in Undertow allows remote unauthenticated attackers to send `\r\r\r` as a header block terminator
Local privilege escalation in Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 through 10 and OpenShift Containe
Same weakness CWE-269 – Improper Privilege Management
View allSame technique Privilege Escalation
View allVendor StatusVendor
Share
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today