Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with low-privilege account
-
ExploitIdentify another user's folders/applications
-
ExecutionSend delete request lacking authorization check
-
ImpactTarget objects destroyed (availability loss)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization verification
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to hold a valid, low-privileged authenticated account on an IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 or 2.1 instance (PR:L) that is network-reachable (AV:N); no user interaction and no special non-default configuration is indicated by the data. The specific trigger is invoking folder/application delete functionality where the server performs improper functional-level access control, allowing the request to act on objects owned by other users. The key limiting factor is the authentication prerequisite - an anonymous/external attacker cannot exploit this; it is realistically an insider or compromised-credential threat, and impact is limited to deletion (integrity/availability) rather than data disclosure. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity authorization flaw (CWE-285, improper functional-level access control) with CVSS 7.1 driven primarily by the A:H availability impact - an attacker can destroy other users' folders and applications. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) indicates network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation requiring only low-privilege authenticated access with no user interaction, which is consistent with the description's 'remote authenticated attacker.' No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC was provided in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation - this appears to be a vendor-reported (IBM) issue rather than a priority threat under active attack. The realistic risk is contained because exploitation presupposes a valid account on the Planning Analytics instance; the main danger is a malicious or compromised internal user causing destructive, cross-tenant data loss. Note the input 'Authentication Bypass' tag conflicts with both CWE-285 and the explicit requirement for an authenticated attacker - this is an authorization/access-control defect, not an authentication bypass. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged but authenticated user of IBM Planning Analytics issues application-level requests to delete folders and applications that belong to other users, which the server fails to authorize against the requester's identity. No public exploit code was identified; exploitation requires only a valid account and low attack complexity, enabling destructive tampering with other tenants' or colleagues' content. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 12, 2026
Authenticated low-privileged users on IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 can delete folders and applications belonging to other users because the platform enforces access control at the wrong functional level. The flaw carries a CVSS v3.1 score of 7.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H), with the risk driven almost entirely by the high availability impact of destroyed workspaces rather than by any data disclosure. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires a valid account on a network-reachable instance, making this most realistically an insider or compromised-credential threat.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released fixes are available per the IBM advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7291604; apply the Planning Analytics fix pack or interim fix listed there for your 2.0.x or 2.1.x deployment, since no standalone version-level fix data was supplied with this record and IBM's node pages define the exact build. Until patching is complete, the most effective compensating control is to minimize the population of accounts holding delete privileges and to segregate applications and folders across distinct user groups so that one compromised account cannot reach objects owned by others - the trade-off is reduced collaboration flexibility and additional administration overhead for entitlement reviews. Restrict network reachability of the Planning Analytics server and Workspace to trusted internal segments or VPN, accepting that this limits legitimate remote and mobile access, and enable audit or logging trails on content deletion so destructive actions can be attributed. Because the impact class is loss of availability and integrity of planning content, maintain tested backups of the TM1 data directory and the Planning Analytics content store so that deleted folders and applications can be restored if the authorization gap is exercised before patching; be aware that restore is disruptive and may roll back legitimate changes made after the backup. Note that no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so compensating controls are precautionary rather than incident-driven.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-285, Improper Authorization, specifically a failure of functional-level access control: the Planning Analytics server authenticates the caller and permits a delete operation on folders and applications, but does not verify that the caller owns or is entitled to the specific target object. This is the classic distinction between function-level checks (can this user call the delete function at all) and object-level checks (may this user delete this particular object) - the former is present, the latter is missing or misapplied. IBM Planning Analytics is the TM1-based OLAP planning and analytics platform, whose Workspace and server components manage user-owned folders, books, and applications; the destructive delete primitive at issue therefore touches persisted content rather than transient session state. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:ibm:planning_analytics:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, indicating the CPE dictionary treats the product line generically rather than enumerating fixed version ranges, so the authoritative scope must be taken from the IBM advisory. The CVSS vector shows scope unchanged (S:U) and no confidentiality impact (C:N), confirming the exposure is limited to unauthorized modification/deletion (I:L) and denial of service to affected content (A:H).
Know when Planning Analytics gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Network-reachable (AV:N) with an authenticated low-privilege account (PR:L); deleting others' objects yields A:H and some I:L tampering, with no disclosure so C:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorVendor: ibm
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to delete folders and applications belonging to other users due to improper functional level access control.
Executive ViewAI
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 contain an access-control flaw that lets authenticated low-privileged users delete folders and applications owned by others, creating a high availability risk for shared planning and reporting workspaces. Because exploitation requires only a valid account, the most realistic threat is an insider or compromised credential, and leadership should care about disruption to business-critical planning cycles and recovery costs. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and Patch available per vendor advisory.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Planning Analytics
View allIBM Planning Analytics 2.0.0 through 2.0.8 is vulnerable to a configuration overwrite that allows an unauthenticated use
Authentication bypass and privilege escalation in IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 allow an unauthenticated remote att
IBM Planning Analytics Local 2.0 could allow a remote attacker to upload arbitrary files, caused by the improper validat
Improper authentication in IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 allows an attacker who already holds valid low-privilege c
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to malicious file upload in the My Account Portal. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.
Path traversal in IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files from the host and
Authenticated remote code execution in IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 stems from a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to a Remote File Include (RFI) attack. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vul
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is potentially vulnerable to CSV Injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerabilit
Arbitrary file write via path traversal in IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.3), this vul
Cross-site request forgery in IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 Local enables network-based attackers to force authenti
EUVD-2026-98081
GHSA-pq2h-53rx-hm3r
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB