Skip to main content

IBM i CVE-2026-17069

| EUVDEUVD-2026-58389 HIGH
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (CWE-352)
2026-08-13 ibm GHSA-2pm2-c9xh-qfxq
7.3
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege IBM i credentials
  2. Delivery
    Access IBM i web interface over network
  3. Exploit
    Craft request bypassing CSRF token validation
  4. Execution
    Submit forged state-changing request
  5. Impact
    Achieve unauthorized high-impact data access or modification

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Anti-CSRF tokens, SameSite cookies
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid authenticated session with at least low-privilege credentials on the target IBM i system (confirmed by CVSS PR:L). The attack is conducted over the network (AV:N) against the IBM i web services layer where CSRF token validation is performed. No victim user interaction is required (UI:N), distinguishing this from classic browser-driven CSRF attacks. Limiting factors: an unauthenticated attacker cannot exploit this flaw; access to the IBM i web interface must be reachable from the attacker's network position; and the vulnerability is constrained to IBM i versions 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6. Environments where IBM i web services are firewalled from untrusted networks and where low-privilege account provisioning is tightly controlled face materially reduced risk.

Impact

The CVSS 8.1 High score is driven by network-accessible attack vector (AV:N), low complexity (AC:L), low-privilege requirement (PR:L), and high confidentiality and integrity impact (C:H/I:H). No EPSS data was provided in source intelligence, limiting probabilistic exploitation forecasting. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog and no POC exists per available data. The PR:L requirement is a meaningful friction point - exploitation is limited to accounts with at least some valid authentication on the IBM i system, reducing exposure compared to unauthenticated flaws. However, for environments where IBM i web services are internet-facing or accessible by a broad internal user base, a compromised low-privilege account is a realistic entry point. The absence of user interaction (UI:N) removes the social engineering dependency typical of CSRF, making this straightforward to automate once access is obtained. On balance, this is a genuine priority for IBM i shops due to the high impact rating, but the authentication barrier tempers urgency relative to unauthenticated equivalents.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a valid low-privilege IBM i account connects to the web-facing interface of an affected IBM i system and submits a crafted request that omits or presents an invalid CSRF token, which the server incorrectly accepts. The attacker leverages this bypass to perform unauthorized state-changing operations - such as modifying configuration, accessing protected data, or altering user settings - achieving high confidentiality and integrity impact without requiring any interaction from a privileged victim. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 13, 2026

Improper anti-CSRF token validation in IBM i 7.3 through 7.6 enables remote authenticated attackers to bypass CSRF security controls, resulting in high confidentiality and integrity compromise (CVSS 8.1). The flaw is rooted in the server's failure to correctly validate CSRF tokens on state-changing requests, allowing a low-privileged authenticated attacker to forge or replay requests without victim interaction. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and IBM has released a patch via advisory 7283569.

RemediationAI

IBM has released a patch addressing this vulnerability; apply the fix detailed in IBM support advisory 7283569 at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283569. The exact patched version or PTF (Program Temporary Fix) number should be confirmed directly from that advisory, as it was not independently enumerated in the available source data. As a compensating control pending patch application, restrict access to IBM i web-facing services to the minimum required user population - particularly limiting external or internet-facing exposure of the affected web interfaces. Enforcing strict network segmentation (e.g., allowing access only from trusted internal subnets) reduces the attack surface, though it does not eliminate the vulnerability for internal authenticated users. Note that restricting access may impact legitimate administrative workflows if IBM i web services are used for routine operations.

Affected VersionsENISA

i 7.4
i 7.6
i 7.5
i 7.3

Affected Packages

euvd i no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

IBM i (formerly AS/400/iSeries) is IBM's proprietary midrange operating system primarily serving enterprise workloads in finance, retail, and insurance sectors. The affected CPE (cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) spans versions 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6. CWE-352 (Cross-Site Request Forgery) identifies the root cause: the application's web-facing layer fails to properly validate anti-CSRF tokens on incoming requests. Unlike classic browser-based CSRF, the CVSS UI:N metric indicates this bypass does not require luring a victim user - the authenticated attacker (PR:L) can directly submit requests that circumvent CSRF controls, bypassing a security mechanism intended to prevent unauthorized state changes.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY HIGH
NVD 7.3 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Low-privilege authentication (PR:L) required; no victim interaction needed for token bypass; no availability impact from CSRF exploitation.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
Aug 17, 2026 - 15:52 NVD
8.1 (HIGH) 7.3 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Aug 13, 2026 - 19:55 nvd
HIGH 8.1

DescriptionNVD

IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of anti-CSRF tokens.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A CSRF token validation flaw in IBM i systems (versions 7.3-7.6) allows authenticated attackers to bypass security controls and perform unauthorized actions, potentially compromising confidential data and system integrity; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Organizations using these systems face elevated risk of unauthorized transactions, data manipulation, and regulatory compliance exposure. Immediate patching is required.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 91% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise midrange OS, dominant in banking and retail verticals
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy