Skip to main content

Security Verify Access CVE-2026-11927

| EUVDEUVD-2026-78892 MEDIUM
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') (CWE-74)
2026-09-15 ibm GHSA-g7h8-9v8x-r726
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach public reverse proxy endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Craft request with injected parameters
  3. Exploit
    Proxy forwards tainted params downstream
  4. Execution
    Third-party service processes injected values
  5. Impact
    Integrity of downstream request compromised

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Input neutralization, injection prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Requires that the IBM Security Verify Identity Access / Security Verify Access reverse proxy (WebSEAL) component be deployed and actively proxying requests to back-end or third-party services - the injection occurs in the proxy's construction of onward requests. Exploitation is unauthenticated and network-reachable (PR:N, AV:N, UI:N), but AC:H reflects that impact depends on how the specific downstream third-party service interprets the injected parameters; the flaw itself does not directly compromise the proxy's own confidentiality/availability. Limiting factors: value is realized only when a downstream service acts on the injected parameters, and the target must be running an affected version below the listed interim-fix levels.

Impact

This is a moderate-priority issue, not an urgent one. The CVSS vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N, 6.5 Medium) shows a network-reachable, unauthenticated flaw with high integrity impact but only low confidentiality and no availability impact - consistent with parameter injection that lets an attacker manipulate the content/integrity of requests the reverse proxy forwards to third-party services rather than directly reading data or crashing the system. The AC:H rating is the key mitigating signal: successful exploitation depends on the specific behavior of the downstream third-party service and how the injected parameters are interpreted, so it is not a trivial one-shot attack. Exploitation-likelihood signals reinforce lower urgency: EPSS is 0.15% (5th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code is identified - no public exploit identified at time of analysis. No SSVC decision data is provided in the input. Signals are consistent (medium CVSS, low EPSS, no KEV/POC all point the same direction), so despite the I:H component this reads as a real-but-non-critical hardening issue rather than an actively exploited emergency. A patch is available from IBM, making remediation straightforward.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote unauthenticated attacker crafts an HTTP request to the IBM Verify Identity Access reverse proxy (WebSEAL) containing specially-formatted parameters that are not properly sanitized before the proxy constructs an onward request to a back-end or third-party service. The injected parameters alter the semantics of that downstream request - for example smuggling additional query/body parameters - potentially causing the third-party service to act on attacker-controlled input. No public exploit code is known, and the AC:H rating reflects that success depends on the downstream service's parameter handling.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 20, 2026

Parameter injection in the IBM Security Verify Access (Verify Identity Access) reverse proxy - the WebSEAL component - lets unauthenticated, network-reachable attackers have crafted parameters carried into requests the proxy constructs toward back-end or third-party services, potentially manipulating how those downstream services interpret the call. Only deployments below the listed interim-fix levels (Verify Identity Access 11.0.0 through 11.0.3 Interim Fix 001 and Security Verify Access 10.0.0 through 10.0.9.2 Interim Fix 001, plus their container variants) are affected, and realized impact depends heavily on the behaviour of the downstream service, which is why this is scored AC:H with a limited confidentiality but high integrity effect rather than an urgent, broadly weaponizable flaw. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is only 0.15% (5th percentile), so this is a moderate-priority issue to schedule rather than an emergency; the vendor has published patch guidance.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: IBM documents fixes for this issue in its support advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286188, so the primary action is to move the proxy above the affected interim-fix levels - i.e. update Verify Identity Access 11.0.0 through 11.0.3 Interim Fix 001 and Verify Identity Access Container 11.0.0 through 11.0.3 Interim Fix 001, and Security Verify Access 10.0.0 through 10.0.9.2 Interim Fix 001 and Security Verify Access Container 10.0.0 through 10.0.9.2 Interim Fix 001, to the vendor-supplied fix level named in that advisory; do not assume a version number beyond what IBM publishes, and restart the WebSEAL/container instances after applying it. Where patching must be staged, the practical compensating controls follow directly from the fact that the flaw only matters when injected parameters reach a service that acts on them: restrict who can reach the WebSEAL proxy listeners with network ACLs or a WAF in front of it and strip or reject unexpected parameters, accepting the trade-off that legitimate clients passing unusual or unvalidated parameters may break; harden the downstream third-party and back-end services so they validate, canonicalize, and reject unexpected parameters themselves, which does not fix the proxy but removes the integrity payoff attackers are after; and temporarily disable or limit proxy forwarding paths to third-party services that cannot validate input, at the cost of losing that integration until patching is complete. Monitor WebSEAL and downstream logs for anomalous parameter patterns, since exploitation is unauthenticated and may be silent, and note that with EPSS at 0.15% (5th percentile) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, this can be scheduled within a normal patch cycle rather than treated as an emergency.

Affected VersionsENISA

Verify Identity Access 11.0.0 ≤11.0.3 Interim Fix 001
Security Verify Access Container 10.0.0 ≤10.0.9.2 Interim Fix 001
Verify Identity Access Container 11.0.0 ≤11.0.3 Interim Fix 001
Security Verify Access 10.0.0 ≤10.0.9.2 Interim Fix 001

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected technology is IBM's WebSEAL reverse proxy, the access-management front end shipped in Security Verify Access (formerly Verify Identity Access) and its container editions. WebSEAL terminates client connections and re-issues requests on behalf of the client to protected back-end applications and to third-party services, which means it re-assembles request parameters as part of that forwarding logic. CWE-74 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component, i.e. generic injection) describes the root cause: the proxy does not adequately neutralize attacker-controlled parameter material before embedding it into the onward request, so special elements supplied by the client can be interpreted as structure by the receiving service. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N is consistent with that root cause - the attack surface is network-reachable and needs no authentication or user interaction, but integrity (I:H) is the real exposure because the downstream service may act on the injected parameters, while the proxy's own confidentiality and availability are largely untouched (C:L/A:N). The CPE data confirms the scope spans both on-premises and containerized builds: ibm:verify_identity_access, ibm:security_verify_access, ibm:verify_identity_access_container, and ibm:security_verify_access_container. EUVD records the affected ranges as Verify Identity Access 11.0.0 through 11.0.3 Interim Fix 001, Verify Identity Access Container 11.0.0 through 11.0.3 Interim Fix 001, Security Verify Access 10.0.0 through 10.0.9.2 Interim Fix 001, and Security Verify Access Container 10.0.0 through 10.0.9.2 Interim Fix 001.

Know when Verify Identity Access gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Unauthenticated network-facing proxy (PR:N/AV:N); AC:H because impact hinges on downstream service behavior; injection corrupts request integrity (I:H) with minor info exposure (C:L) and no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
Sep 20, 2026 - 01:22 NVD
6.5 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Sep 15, 2026 - 17:20 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Security Verify Identity Access reverse proxy may allow parameters to be injected in requests to third party services.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise IAM access-management/WebSEAL appliance, common but not ubiquitous
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

CVE-2026-78401 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated remote code execution affects IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity A

CVE-2026-78406 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Remote code execution is achievable in IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 1

CVE-2025-36087 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 13

Hard-coded credentials in IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0 through 10.0.9 and 11.0.0, and in Verify Identity Access Con

CVE-2026-11928 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 15

An out-of-bounds write in IBM Verify Identity Access (and its predecessor branding, IBM Security Verify Access, plus bot

CVE-2026-4101 CRITICAL
9.8 Apr 01

Authentication bypass in IBM Verify Identity Access and IBM Security Verify Access (versions 10.0-10.0.9.1 and 11.0-11.0

CVE-2025-36356 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 06

Local privilege escalation in IBM Security Verify Access and Verify Identity Access 10.0.x/11.0.x allows an authenticate

CVE-2026-11921 CRITICAL
9.1 Sep 15

IBM Verify Identity Access (formerly IBM Security Verify Access) in container and appliance deployments can silently fai

CVE-2026-16916 HIGH
8.8 Oct 08

Remote code execution is possible in IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.

CVE-2026-19482 HIGH
8.8 Oct 08

Arbitrary command execution in IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 thro

CVE-2026-18740 HIGH
8.8 Oct 08

Authenticated argument injection in IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0

CVE-2026-78388 HIGH
8.8 Oct 08

Cross-site request forgery in IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 throu

CVE-2026-12004 HIGH
8.7 Aug 12

Format string injection in IBM Security Verify Access (10.0-10.0.9.2) and IBM Verify Identity Access (11.0-11.0.3, inclu

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy