Skip to main content

CherryTree CVE-2026-118693

| EUVDEUVD-2026-112494 MEDIUM
Absolute Path Traversal (CWE-36)
2026-10-28 VulnCheck GHSA-237p-f2v6-hfc2
5.6
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Deliver crafted .ctd/.ctz/.ctx document to victim
  2. Exploit
    Victim opens and saves it in CherryTree
  3. Execution
    Helper reads ~/.ssh/id_rsa and embeds it into document
  4. Impact
    Attacker extracts sensitive file from returned document

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Absolute path validation
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to open an attacker-supplied CherryTree document in one of the XML-based formats (.ctd, .ctz, .ctx) on CherryTree ≤1.7.2 AND to save it - the embed happens at save time (UI:A active interaction). The crafted embedded-file node must specify an absolute or ~/ path and carry no inline data. Disclosure only pays off when the victim subsequently returns or shares the saved document back to the attacker (AT:P), and is limited to files the victim's own account can read. The vector is local (AV:L): there is no network or default-configuration remote path, and the attacker must choose/guess the target file path (e.g., ~/.ssh/id_rsa). These interaction and round-trip requirements materially limit real-world risk below the raw confidentiality impact.

Impact

Severity is moderate, and the signals agree on that. The supplied CVSS 4.0 base score is 5.6 with vector AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N: a local vector (AV:L) with an attack requirement (AT:P) and active user interaction (UI:A), yielding high confidentiality impact only (VC:H) and no integrity or availability impact. This is not a remotely automatable flaw - it requires a victim to open and save an attacker-crafted document, and realistically also to return or share the resulting file, which is why AT:P and UI:A are set. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month' (a routine-patch priority, not act_now/emergency). No EPSS score is provided, there is no CISA KEV listing, and the input contains no confirmed exploit-code marker (references are a GitHub issue report and the VulnCheck advisory, not verified working exploit code), so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' Net: a genuine but user-interaction-gated local file-disclosure issue of medium real-world urgency, not a mass-exploitation threat. One caveat to verify: PR:N marks the document-crafting as unauthenticated, but actual disclosure depends on the victim's own file-read permissions and on the victim handing the saved document back to the attacker.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker sends a victim a crafted CherryTree note file (.ctd, .ctz, or .ctx) containing an embedded-file XML node whose 'filename' attribute is an absolute or ~/ path such as ~/.ssh/id_rsa and that carries no inline data. When the victim opens the document in CherryTree (≤1.7.2) and saves it, CtStorageXmlHelper::_create_image_from_xml trusts the attribute and reads that local file, embedding its contents into the saved document; the sensitive data then leaks once the victim returns or shares the file. No public exploit code is identified in the provided sources.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026

CherryTree through 1.7.2 will embed local files chosen by an attacker into a saved note document through a path traversal flaw in XML-based document formats (.ctd, .ctz, .ctx). An attacker supplies a crafted document containing an embedded-file node whose 'filename' attribute is an absolute path or a ~/ path with no inline data; when the victim opens it and then saves, CherryTree reads that path under the victim's account and writes the contents into the document. Impact is confidentiality-only, limited to files the victim can read, and pays off only if the saved document later returns to the attacker. No confirmed actively exploited status (not in CISA KEV) and no verified working exploit code is referenced at time of analysis - the linked GitHub issue is a public defect report - and the moderate 5.6 CVSS:4.0 score aligns with the assessed CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N rating.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch is identified at time of analysis: the only upstream artifact referenced is the public issue https://github.com/giuspen/cherrytree/issues/2944 and its linked source files in v1.7.2, and neither EUVD nor VulnCheck lists a fixed release, so administrators should track that issue for the version that corrects CtStorageXmlHelper::_create_image_from_xml before relying on an upgrade. Because the file read occurs at save time rather than at open time, the most effective compensating control follows directly from the mechanism: treat every .ctd, .ctz and .ctx document from an untrusted source as unsafe to save - open such documents only in a disposable session, and if the content must be retained, do not re-save the original document; instead copy text out into a new, locally created note, accepting that this manual step is error-prone for large notes and loses embedded assets. Returning a saved untrusted document to its sender is what completes the disclosure, so avoid round-tripping untrusted documents. Additionally, run CherryTree as a low-privilege account whose readable files do not include SSH private keys, cloud credentials or password stores, and tighten permissions on sensitive files (for example, keep ~/.ssh/id_rsa at mode 600 owned by a different account than the one used for untrusted documents); this reduces the value of a successful embed but does not stop the traversal itself, and restricting permissions too broadly can break legitimate tooling that expects to read those files. The vendor advisory and upstream issue should be monitored for the exact fixed version before declaring the environment clean.

Affected VersionsENISA

cherrytree 0 ≤1.7.2

Affected Packages

euvd cherrytree no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CherryTree stores rich-text notes in several formats, three of which are XML-based: .ctd, .ctz and .ctx. In that XML representation, image and other binary content can either be carried inline or referenced by a 'filename' attribute. CtStorageXmlHelper::_create_image_from_xml (src/ct/ct_storage_xml.cc, roughly lines 648-692 in v1.7.2) parses that attribute and accepts it without validating that the referenced path stays within a legitimate document or asset directory, and ct_image.cc (lines 757-767) handles reading the file from disk whenever no inline data is present. That is CWE-36 (Absolute Path Traversal): an absolute path such as /etc/passwd, or a tilde-expanded path such as ~/.ssh/id_rsa, is honoured as-is. The consequence is unusual for a traversal bug - the file is not overwritten but ingested: the read happens at document save time, so the attacker-controlled path is resolved against the victim's own filesystem and the file content is embedded into the attacker's document. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:giuspen:cherrytree:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* and EUVD range 'cherrytree 0 ≤ 1.7.2' both describe an unbounded affected range up to and including 1.7.2, i.e. every release before whatever fix may ship. Because the path resolution uses the victim's privileges, scope is unchanged (S:U) and integrity and availability are unaffected (VI:N/VA:N); the trigger requires the victim to open the document and then actively save it (UI:A) and requires the attacker to specify or guess the target path plus a later round trip to retrieve the saved document (AT:P). The vector is local (AV:L) with no network or default-configuration remote path described in the available sources.

Know when Cherrytree gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 5.6 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 5.5 MEDIUM

Local document-based attack requiring the victim to open and save a crafted file (AV:L, UI:R); crafting needs no authentication (PR:N); arbitrary readable files are disclosed (C:H) with no integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Active
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

CherryTree through 1.7.2 contains a path traversal vulnerability in CtStorageXmlHelper::_create_image_from_xml that trusts unvalidated embedded-file 'filename' attributes in XML documents. Attackers can craft a .ctd, .ctz, or .ctx document with an absolute or ~/ filename and no data, so saving embeds files like ~/.ssh/id_rsa into the document.

Threat Intelligence Overview

Prevalence
Low
niche open-source desktop note-taking app, limited enterprise footprint
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS N/A
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy