Skip to main content

Sunhillo SureLine CVE-2026-112350

| EUVDEUVD-2026-111361 HIGH
Path Traversal (CWE-22)
2026-10-27 VulnCheck GHSA-q7gg-whqr-w8f9
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach radarUpdater.cgi over network
  2. Exploit
    Inject traversal sequence in filename parameter
  3. Execution
    Read /etc/shadow and private keys as root
  4. Impact
    Reuse SSH/TLS keys for full device compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No special conditions - remote unauthenticated exploitation against the radarUpdater.cgi endpoint, which lacks authentication checks and does not sanitize the filename parameter, affecting SureLine versions 8.0.0 up to (not including) 9.1.5. The only practical limit is that the device's SureLine web/CGI interface must be reachable over the network from the attacker; there is no user-interaction, authentication, or non-default-configuration requirement per the CVSS vector (PR:N/UI:N). A further scoping limit is that the direct flaw grants file read only (VC:H, VI:N/VA:N) - it is not direct code execution - but disclosure of the root SSH key, TLS private key, and credential files makes full compromise a realistic follow-on.

Impact

This is a credible near-term priority rather than a CVSS-inflated non-issue, though the signal set is incomplete. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw requiring no user interaction, which maximizes exploitability, and the vuln.today decision label is 'this_week' - a prioritized but not emergency urgency. The impact profile is narrow by design: VC:H with VI:N/VA:N means the primary direct consequence is confidentiality loss (arbitrary file read as root), not direct code execution or integrity/availability damage - yet because the readable files include /etc/shadow, the web user database, the root SSH private key, and the device TLS private key, the practical outcome is credential/key disclosure that enables full follow-on compromise, so the low raw I/A metrics understate real-world severity. EPSS is not provided and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, so there is no confirmed active exploitation signal; exploitation status is therefore 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis,' with the caveat that a VulnCheck advisory exists and may contain technical detail. The main gaps: no EPSS probability to gauge likelihood of mass exploitation, and no independent confirmation of a working exploit, so treat the 'this_week' label as the strongest urgency signal and patch on that cadence.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker with network access to a SureLine device's web interface sends a crafted request to the radarUpdater.cgi endpoint with directory traversal sequences in the filename parameter, retrieving the root SSH private key and TLS private key. The attacker then uses those keys to authenticate directly to the device and impersonate its TLS identity, escalating a file-read bug into full system compromise. No public working exploit is confirmed, though a VulnCheck advisory for the issue exists.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026

Unauthenticated remote file read in Sunhillo SureLine before 9.1.5 exposes sensitive system files, including /etc/shadow, the web user database, the root SSH private key, and the device TLS private key. The radarUpdater.cgi endpoint lacks authentication checks and does not sufficiently sanitize the filename parameter, allowing directory traversal sequences to read arbitrary files with root privileges. SureLine versions 8.0.0 up to but not including 9.1.5 are affected; a vendor patch is available, and no public exploit was identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Sunhillo SureLine to version 9.1.5 or later; the vendor lists a patch as available, and 9.1.5 is the first version outside the affected range. Confirm the fixed build through the vendor product page at https://www.sunhillo.com/product/sureline/ and review the VulnCheck advisory at https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/sunhillo-sureline-path-traversal-via-radarupdater-cgi. If immediate upgrade is not possible, reduce exposure by restricting network reachability to the SureLine web/CGI interface, including radarUpdater.cgi, to trusted management networks; this lowers attack surface but does not correct the missing authentication and filename sanitization, so the upgrade remains the complete fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

SureLine 8.0.0 <9.1.5

Affected Packages

euvd sureline fix: 9.1.5

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The issue is a CWE-22 path traversal in the radarUpdater.cgi CGI endpoint of Sunhillo SureLine. The endpoint is reachable over the network but missing authentication checks, and the filename parameter is insufficiently sanitized, so traversal sequences can escape the intended directory and read files as root. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:sunhillo_corporation:sureline:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers SureLine versions in the affected range, with EUVD specifying SureLine 8.0.0 through versions before 9.1.5. The assessed CVSS:3.1 vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N: remote unauthenticated exploitation with no user interaction and a confidentiality-only direct impact. Disclosure of credential and key material makes follow-on full system compromise a realistic risk, but the direct flaw is file read rather than code execution.

Know when Sureline gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Unauthenticated network request with no user interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); arbitrary root-level file read gives C:H, but the direct flaw does not modify or disrupt the system, so I:N/A:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 27, 2026 - 20:03 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 27, 2026 - 19:43 cve.org
HIGH 8.7

DescriptionCVE.org

Sunhillo SureLine before 9.1.5 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the radarUpdater.cgi endpoint that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files with root privileges due to missing authentication checks and insufficient sanitization of the filename parameter. Attackers can use directory traversal sequences to access sensitive files such as /etc/shadow, the web user database, the root SSH private key, and the device's TLS private key, leading to full system compromise.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Sunhillo SureLine versions prior to 9.1.5 contain a high-severity unauthenticated file-read vulnerability that could allow attackers to access critical system files, including /etc/shadow, the web user database, and private keys. This exposes sensitive credentials and cryptographic material, potentially leading to broader compromise of the product and dependent systems. Leadership should prioritize patching because exploitation could undermine the confidentiality and integrity of the product and the data it protects.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.9%
Top 39% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche air-traffic/radar surveillance data comms appliance, not general enterprise
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.9%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy