Skip to main content

aThemeArt Theme Helper CVE-2026-111413

| EUVDEUVD-2026-102870 HIGH
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (CWE-352)
2026-10-16 Patchstack GHSA-p56v-fw4v-4cvh
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Lure authenticated admin to malicious page
  2. Exploit
    Browser auto-submits forged plugin request
  3. Execution
    Missing CSRF token check bypassed
  4. Impact
    Unauthorized state change executed on site

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Anti-CSRF tokens, SameSite cookies
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated WordPress user - in practice an administrator or other privileged user of a site running aThemeArt Theme Helper version 1.0.8 or earlier - to be logged in and then tricked (UI:R) into visiting an attacker-controlled page or link that submits the forged request. The limiting factors are significant: the targeted user must have an active authenticated session, must interact with attacker-supplied content, and the forged action is constrained to whatever privileged operation the plugin exposes without a CSRF nonce. There are no special server-side configuration prerequisites noted; the flaw stems from the plugin's missing CSRF token validation rather than an optional feature, but successful impact depends on the victim's privilege level.

Impact

The input CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 8.8) indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw requiring user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. However, the vulnerability class is CWE-352 (CSRF), which is inherently interaction-dependent: exploitation requires tricking a logged-in user (typically an administrator) into submitting a forged request, so the real-world barrier is higher than the headline 8.8 suggests. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the provided data - all three exploitation-probability signals are absent, not negative, so exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. There is no conflict between the signals, but the high C/I/A ratings assigned to a CSRF are optimistic and depend entirely on what privileged action the forged request performs, which the vague description does not specify. Overall this is a credible but not urgent issue: a high-CVSS WordPress plugin flaw with no evidence of active or automated exploitation, affecting a low-footprint plugin.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a malicious web page or email containing a forged request targeting the aThemeArt Theme Helper plugin and lures a logged-in WordPress administrator into visiting it. When the authenticated admin's browser automatically submits the request, the plugin performs a state-changing action without verifying a valid nonce/CSRF token. No public exploit code is identified in the provided data at the time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 16, 2026

Cross-site request forgery in the aThemeArt Theme Helper WordPress plugin (all versions up to and including 1.0.8) allows a remote attacker with no credentials of their own (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N) to induce a logged-in privileged WordPress user - typically an administrator - to submit a forged request to the site, causing state-changing plugin actions to execute with the victim's authority. The flaw is a missing CSRF token check (CWE-352); the forged action is limited to operations the plugin exposes without nonce validation, and exploitation hinges on the victim having an active authenticated session and being tricked into interacting with attacker-supplied content (UI:R). A Patchstack advisory is the only public reference, and no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis. Note that the supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (8.8, C:H/I:H/A:H) is more severe than our independent assessment (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L), which reflects that impact is bounded by the victim's privilege level and by which nonce-less plugin endpoints exist.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch is identified in the available data for CVE-2026-111413; the advisory only enumerates the vulnerable range through 1.0.8, so the primary action is to check the vendor/WordPress plugin repository and the Patchstack advisory at https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/athemeart-theme-helper/vulnerability/wordpress-athemeart-theme-helper-plugin-1-0-8-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve for a fixed release, and if none exists, deactivate and remove the plugin until one is published - the trade-off is loss of any theme-helper functionality the plugin provides. If the plugin must remain enabled, apply compensating controls that specifically defeat the CSRF path: restrict access to /wp-admin/ and admin-ajax.php by IP allowlist or HTTP authentication so that a forged cross-site request from an attacker-controlled page cannot reach the vulnerable handler with a valid session (drawback: breaks legitimate remote administration and any front-end AJAX behavior); deploy a WAF rule that requires a valid WordPress nonce/referer on the plugin's state-changing endpoints (drawback: false positives on legitimate admin traffic and ongoing rule maintenance); and set WordPress authentication cookies to SameSite=Lax or Strict via a plugin or server header so cross-site submissions do not carry the session (drawback: may affect SSO and federated login flows). Operationally, minimize exposure by ensuring administrators do not browse untrusted links or pages while logged into the WordPress dashboard and by using a separate browser profile for site administration, and add monitoring or alerting on unexpected changes to plugin settings, since a successful CSRF leaves no attacker-side authentication trail beyond the victim's own session logs.

Affected VersionsENISA

aThemeArt Theme Helper 0 ≤1.0.8

Affected Packages

euvd athemeart_theme_helper no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The aThemeArt Theme Helper is a WordPress plugin distributed through the WordPress plugin ecosystem and is identified here by the CPE cpe:2.3:a:athemeart:athemeart_theme_helper:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, which describes the plugin as the affected product across all listed versions. WordPress plugins commonly expose privileged functionality through admin-side pages and admin-ajax.php or the REST API; WordPress's standard defense against CSRF is per-request token validation via check_admin_referer(), check_ajax_referer(), or the nonce field in admin forms, which ties the request to the user's session and to a short-lived token. CWE-352 identifies the root cause as the absence (or incorrect application) of that anti-CSRF token validation in one or more state-changing handlers, so that a browser cross-site request originating from a third-party page carries the victim's ambient WordPress authentication cookies and is accepted as legitimate. Because the mechanism abuses the victim's existing session rather than bypassing authentication, the attacker never needs WordPress credentials; however, the attacker must know or guess the target endpoint and parameters, and successful abuse is capped by what that endpoint is permitted to change on behalf of the victim.

Know when Athemeart Theme Helper gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.3 MEDIUM

CSRF is network, low-complexity, unauthenticated-but-interaction-required (UI:R); impact lowered to L across C/I/A because the description specifies no concrete high-impact action.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in aThemeArt aThemeArt Theme Helper athemeart-theme-helper allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects aThemeArt Theme Helper: from n/a through 1.0.8.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The aThemeArt Theme Helper WordPress plugin, versions up to and including 1.0.8, contains a high-severity cross-site request forgery flaw that could let a remote attacker with no credentials induce a logged-in privileged user to perform unauthorized plugin actions. Because no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, affected organizations should treat any WordPress site using this plugin as an urgent risk-reduction priority. Leadership should care because successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized changes in site state, undermining website integrity, operational trust, and stakeholder confidence.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor patch; deactivate or remove aThemeArt Theme Helper versions up to and including 1.0.8 where possible; restrict administrator accounts to least privilege and enforce MFA; require re-authentication for sensitive plugin actions; block cross-origin state-changing requests with WAF rules; monitor logs for unauthorized plugin or state changes.

Threat Intelligence Overview

Prevalence
Low
niche WordPress theme-helper plugin, limited install base
Social Media
2
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS N/A
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy