Skip to main content

GeoVision GV-ASManager CVE-2026-108983

| EUVDEUVD-2026-104030 CRITICAL
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-10-19 GV GHSA-4688-jpp9-vr89
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: GV
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach GeoWebServer.exe default port
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted request with injected OS command
  3. Exploit
    Command injection executes payload
  4. Execution
    Run arbitrary commands on host
  5. Impact
    Full compromise of access-control server

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation targets the GV-ASmanager web server component (GeoWebServer.exe) on its default connection ports, so the condition is that this web service is network-reachable from the attacker - the typical deployment for a centrally managed access-control server. Per the CVSS vector (PR:N, UI:N), no authentication or user interaction is required, and AC:L indicates no special timing or configuration prerequisites. The primary limiting factor is exposure: risk is contained where the GeoWebServer management interface is restricted to an internal/management network rather than exposed to untrusted networks. The exact vulnerable parameter, endpoint, and affected version range are not specified in the available data and should be confirmed against the GeoVision advisory.

Impact

Multiple signals point to high priority but with significant data gaps. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw with full C:H/I:H/A:H impact, consistent with CWE-78 OS command injection yielding code execution - hence the 9.8 base score. EPSS is not provided, the CVE is NOT listed in CISA KEV, and no POC is referenced, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. The description is extremely thin ('a vulnerability is in Web Server default connection ports under the process name GeoWebServer.exe') and does not actually describe the injection mechanism, so the CWE-78 classification and full-impact claim rest on the tags and CVSS vector rather than a detailed vendor writeup - verify with the GeoVision advisory. Net: treat as a real high-severity issue for GV-ASmanager operators because unauthenticated RCE on a management web service is serious, but note that real-world exploitation probability is unquantified (no EPSS/KEV/POC) and the affected product has a limited deployment footprint, which caps aggregate risk relative to a mass-market product.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network access to the GV-ASmanager web interface (GeoWebServer.exe) sends a crafted request to a default-listening connection port, injecting OS commands that the server executes without authentication. This yields command execution in the context of the web server process, enabling full compromise of the access-control management host. No public proof-of-concept is currently referenced, and the low attack complexity (AC:L) means exploitation would be straightforward once the injection point is known.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 19, 2026

Command injection in GeoVision GV-ASManager's GeoWebServer.exe allows unauthenticated remote attackers who can reach the default web ports to execute arbitrary OS commands with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8 and the weakness class is CWE-78, but no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV entry is present in the supplied data. Because the management web service is typically central to access-control operations, exposed instances should be treated as high priority while the exact affected version range and vulnerable endpoint are confirmed against GeoVision's advisory.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the supplied data; check https://www.geovision.com.tw/cyber_security.php for the fixed GV-ASManager release and apply it as soon as available. Until then, restrict GeoWebServer.exe default ports to trusted management networks using firewall ACLs, VPN, or network segmentation, because exposing the web interface to untrusted networks is the main prerequisite for exploitation; this may limit remote administration from outside the management zone. If the web interface is not required, stop or disable the GeoWebServer service, accepting that browser-based management and related integrations will be unavailable. Monitor web server and OS logs for command-injection indicators and unusual child processes spawned by GeoWebServer.exe, and validate the exact affected version and endpoint against the advisory.

Affected VersionsENISA

GV-ASManager 6.3.0

Affected Packages

euvd gv_asmanager no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

GV-ASManager is GeoVision's access-control management platform, and the vulnerable component is its web server process GeoWebServer.exe listening on default connection ports. CWE-78 (OS Command Injection) means user-controlled input reaches a shell or process-execution path without adequate neutralization, allowing an attacker to run arbitrary operating-system commands under the web server's privileges. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms network reachability, low attack complexity, no required privileges, and no user interaction, with high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-asmanager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies GV-ASManager as the affected product but does not specify a version range or the vulnerable parameter.

Know when Gv Asmanager gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (GV) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

CWE-78 command injection on a network web service with PR:N/UI:N per the stated vector yields OS command execution and therefore full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (GV).

CVSS VectorVendor: GV

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability is in Web Server default connection ports under the process name GeoWebServer.exe .

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

GeoVision's GV-ASManager access-control management platform contains a critical command-injection flaw (CVE-2026-108983) that could allow an attacker reaching its web interface to execute arbitrary operating-system commands on the server. Because this platform governs badge access, door control, and audit records, a compromise could enable tampering with physical access rights, disruption of building security operations, and exposure of sensitive security data. Leadership should treat any internet-facing or broadly reachable instance as urgent, especially since no vendor patch is currently available and risk reduction depends on network and monitoring controls.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include restricting network access to GeoWebServer web ports via firewall rules and allow-listing, isolating ASManager on a dedicated management VLAN, disabling the web interface where not operationally required, deploying WAF rules targeting command-injection patterns, enforcing least-privilege service accounts, and monitoring for anomalous process or web activity on ASManager hosts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche access-control management software from a specialized surveillance vendor
Social Media
4
Sightings
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact
Very High

Priority Score

49
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

Related Vulnerabilities in GeoWebServer Command Injection and Stack Overflow

View all 2

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy