Skip to main content

Qingteng Security Toolbox CVE-2026-105044

| EUVDEUVD-2026-106928 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-10-21 mandiant-cve@google.com GHSA-9g2h-r3hx-cgvq
8.5
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: google
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain console administrator credentials
  2. Delivery
    Access Security Toolbox feature
  3. Exploit
    Inject OS command metacharacters
  4. Execution
    Commands relayed to attached clients
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code on managed endpoints

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires authenticated access as a console administrator to the Qingteng Host Adaptive Security Platform (Host Monitoring) V3.0 management console; the attacker then injects OS commands through the Security Toolbox feature, which are relayed to and executed on attached/managed client endpoints. Limiting factors: administrative console privileges are required (per the description), the CVSS vector indicates adjacent-network rather than Internet-wide reachability (AV:A), and the issue is fixed in Security Toolbox build 20260929. Note the input CVSS vector lists PR:N, contradicting the description's authenticated-administrator requirement - the description's privileged prerequisite is the more conservative and likely-correct constraint for defenders.

Impact

This is CWE-78 OS command injection in the Security Toolbox component of Qingteng Host Adaptive Security Platform (Host Monitoring) V3.0, carrying a vendor CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.5 (High). A critical conflict exists in the input: the CVSS 4.0 vector asserts PR:N (no privileges required), yet the description explicitly states the flaw requires 'an authenticated console administrator' - these directly contradict, and the description-based prerequisite (privileged administrator) should be treated as authoritative, meaning the practical privilege barrier is much higher than PR:N implies and the true severity is lower than 8.5 suggests. The vector is AV:A (adjacent network), not fully remote/Internet-facing, further constraining reach to the management/console network. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. Net assessment: this is a real but operator-dependent abuse-of-trust issue (a privileged console admin pivoting to arbitrary code execution on managed clients) rather than a mass-exploitable, Internet-reachable emergency - prioritize patching but it does not warrant drop-everything urgency, and the PR:N/description-authentication discrepancy should be verified with the vendor/Mandiant advisory.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A user with authenticated console-administrator access to the Qingteng Host Adaptive Security Platform management console abuses the Security Toolbox feature, injecting OS command metacharacters into a field that is passed unsanitized to a shell. The injected commands execute on attached/managed client endpoints, letting the attacker run arbitrary code across the fleet of monitored hosts. No public exploit code was identified, so exploitation currently requires an insider or a compromised administrator credential plus adjacent-network access to the console.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 21, 2026

OS command injection in Qingteng Security Toolbox, as shipped in Qingteng Host Adaptive Security Platform (Host Monitoring) V3.0 before build 20260929, allows an authenticated console administrator to execute arbitrary commands on attached client endpoints. The vendor CVSS 4.0 score is 8.5 (High), with adjacent-network reachability and administrative console privileges limiting exposure; the input vector lists PR:N, which conflicts with the description's authenticated-admin prerequisite. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Security Toolbox to build 20260929 or later within Qingteng Host Adaptive Security Platform (Host Monitoring) V3.0; the vendor-released fix is documented in Mandiant disclosure MNDT-2026-0038 at https://github.com/mandiant/Vulnerability-Disclosures/blob/master/2026/MNDT-2026-0038.md. Until patched, restrict management-console access to trusted admin VLANs or VPN and limit console-administrator accounts to least privilege, accepting that this may disrupt legitimate remote administration. Enable audit logging and alerting for Security Toolbox command executions and unexpected command activity on attached clients, understanding that such monitoring can generate operational noise; do not rely on network placement alone because the assessed vector is adjacent-network (AV:A).

Affected VersionsENISA

Host Adaptive Security Platform 0 <20260929

Affected Packages

euvd host_adaptive_security_platform fix: 20260929

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-78 OS command injection is the root cause: the Security Toolbox feature in Qingteng Host Adaptive Security Platform (Host Monitoring) V3.0 incorporates administrator-supplied input into an OS command without adequate neutralization of shell metacharacters. Because the platform relays management actions to attached clients, successful injection under a console administrator session can result in command execution on managed endpoints rather than only the management server. The supplied CVSS 4.0 vector is AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N with high integrity and availability impact and scope change, but the description and independent assessment require console administrator privileges (PR:H), so defenders should treat authentication as a prerequisite. No CPE identifiers were provided to narrow affected builds beyond Security Toolbox versions before 20260929.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (google) PRIMARY 8.5 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:H/SA:H
vuln.today AI 8.4 HIGH

Requires an authenticated console administrator (PR:H) over the adjacent management network (AV:A); command injection executes on separate attached clients, a scope change (S:C) with full code execution (C/I/A:H).

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (google).

CVSS VectorVendor: google

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
Low
Subsequent system: Integrity
High
Subsequent system: Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 21, 2026 - 02:01 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 21, 2026 - 01:17 cve.org
HIGH 8.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command in Security Toolbox versions before 20260929 in Qingteng Host Adaptive Security Platform (Host Monitoring) V3.0 allows an authenticated console administrator to execute arbitrary commands on attached clients via OS command injection

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Qingteng Host Adaptive Security Platform (Host Monitoring) V3.0 builds before 20260929 carry an OS command-injection flaw in the Security Toolbox that could allow a console administrator to run arbitrary commands on managed endpoints, putting endpoint fleet integrity and lateral-movement risk on the leadership agenda. No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the product's position in endpoint management means access to the administrative console should be tightly controlled while remediation is planned.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Restrict Qingteng Security Toolbox console access to essential trusted administrators, enforce least privilege and strong authentication, segment management consoles from general networks, disable unused admin accounts, review console and endpoint command-execution logs, isolate affected Host Monitoring V3.0 instances if the toolbox is not essential, and obtain vendor mitigation guidance while planning upgrade to build 20260929 or later.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.9%
Top 40% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche regional host-security platform, limited enterprise deployment outside China
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.9%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

43
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy