Skip to main content

PickPlugins Question Answer CVE-2026-10207

| EUVDEUVD-2026-49734 HIGH
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-07-28 security@wordfence.com GHSA-2mj4-7p84-mjc9
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Access public-facing WordPress site with plugin enabled
  2. Exploit
    Craft HTTP GET request with malicious id parameter
  3. Execution
    wp_unslash() strips WordPress escaping, input concatenated directly into SQL
  4. Impact
    Extract sensitive database information.

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No special conditions - remote unauthenticated exploitation against default configurations of PickPlugins Question Answer plugin. The id GET parameter exposed in the user profile template is directly vulnerable without any required user interaction or elevated privileges.

Impact

CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) indicates high-severity information disclosure with low attack complexity and no privileges or user interaction required. Despite the high score, SSVC analysis shows exploitation status as 'none', automatable 'yes', and technical impact 'partial' (only confidentiality affected). No exploit code is publicly available, and there are no known active exploitation reports. The risk is moderate: while the vulnerability is easy to exploit for data theft, the plugin's limited install base and lack of known attacks temper the real-world urgency. However, any exposed instance is at risk of database compromise.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker identifies a WordPress site with the vulnerable plugin active. They send a crafted GET request to a user profile page (e.g., /user-profile/?user=1&id=...), injecting SQL payloads via the id parameter. Successful exploitation extracts database contents such as user credentials or other sensitive data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 29, 2026

SQL injection in PickPlugins Question Answer for WordPress up to 1.2.73 permits unauthenticated remote attackers to extract sensitive database information via the unsanitized 'id' GET parameter. The vulnerability is automatable, requires no user interaction, and exposes confidential data. No public exploit code or active exploitation is known at this time, but the high CVSS score and low attack complexity warrant prompt attention.

RemediationAI

Update the PickPlugins Question Answer plugin to a patched version beyond 1.2.73 once released. As the exact fixed version is not confirmed in the provided data, consult the Wordfence advisory for the latest secure release. If an immediate update is not possible, disable the plugin entirely or apply a web application firewall rule to block or sanitize malicious 'id' parameter values on user profile pages. Note that disabling the plugin removes its functionality entirely, which may be acceptable in low-usage scenarios.

Affected VersionsENISA

PickPlugins Question Answer 0 ≤1.2.73

Affected Packages

euvd pickplugins_question_answer no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability resides in the user profile template of the PickPlugins Question Answer WordPress plugin, built with PHP. The 'id' GET parameter in templates/user-profile/user-profile.php and user-profile-hook.php is processed using wp_unslash(), which strips WordPress's magic quotes escaping, and then directly concatenated into a SQL query without using parameterized queries or escaping. This classic SQL injection (CWE-89) allows attackers to manipulate the database queries executed in the qa_user_profile_card() function. The CPE data indicates the affected component is the PickPlugins Question Answer plugin, versions up to 1.2.73.

Know when WordPress gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (wordfence) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit via GET request, no user interaction, only confidentiality impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The PickPlugins Question Answer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection in versions up to and including 1.2.73. This is due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input via the 'id' GET parameter in the user profile template combined with the use of wp_unslash() which removes WordPress's magic quotes protection, followed by direct concatenation into a SQL query without proper escaping or prepared statements in the qa_user_profile_card() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into existing queries, which can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche WordPress plugin, limited install base
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

CVE-2016-10033 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 30

The mailSend function in the isMail transport in PHPMailer before 5.2.18 might allow remote attackers to pass extra para

CVE-2016-10045 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 30

The isMail transport in PHPMailer before 5.2.20 might allow remote attackers to pass extra parameters to the mail comman

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2024-8353 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 28

The GiveWP - Donation Plugin and Fundraising Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-11749 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 05

The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2026-63030 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Remote code execution in WordPress 6.9.x (before 6.9.5) and 7.0.x (before 7.0.2) arises from a REST API batch endpoint r

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy