Skip to main content

Android NFC CVE-2026-0081

| EUVDEUVD-2026-37568 CRITICAL
Missing Authorization (CWE-862)
2026-06-17 google_android
10.0
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: google_android
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Trick user into installing malicious app
  2. Delivery
    App invokes unchecked NFC interface
  3. Exploit
    Spoofed NFC event delivered to system handler
  4. Execution
    Privileged action executed without permission
  5. Impact
    Local privilege escalation achieved

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Attacker must have code execution as an unprivileged local app on the target Android device (e.g., a sideloaded or malicious Play-distributed app); no NFC permission, no root, and no user interaction are required, and the NFC subsystem must be present and enabled in the device build. Exploitation is constrained to on-device local privilege escalation against Android builds predating the Android 17 bulletin patch level - it is not reachable from the network, not reachable from another device over NFC radio, and does not apply to devices already at the patched SPL.

Impact

Signals are mixed and should be interpreted with care. The reported CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N with VC:H/VI:H/VA:H and SC/SI/SA:H, score 10.0) is inconsistent with the description, which explicitly states 'local escalation of privilege' - AV should almost certainly be L (local app on device), not N, so the headline 10.0 overstates real-world reach. EPSS, KEV, and POC data are not provided in the input: there is no indication of active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Realistic risk is moderate-to-high on unpatched Android devices because exploitation requires only a locally installed app with no user interaction, which fits malware and supply-chain-app threat models, but it is not remotely reachable from the network. Treat as a standard monthly Android Security Bulletin priority rather than an emergency remote RCE.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A user installs a seemingly benign app from a sideload or low-reputation store; the app, holding no NFC-related permissions, invokes the unchecked code path to dispatch or receive spoofed NFC events to a privileged system handler. The handler acts on the forged event - for example, triggering a payment-related intent or a tag-dispatch flow tied to elevated capabilities - giving the app effective access it should not have. No user interaction with NFC hardware is required.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 17, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Google Android's NFC subsystem allows an unprivileged local app to spoof NFC events because of a missing permission check, granting capabilities normally reserved for privileged components. No user interaction is required, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, though the issue is tracked in the Android Security Bulletin for Android 17. Despite the CVSS 4.0 vector encoding AV:N, the description clearly describes a local Android attack surface.

RemediationAI

Apply the Android security patch level referenced in the Android Security Bulletin at https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/android-17 - Patch available per vendor advisory; an exact fixed build string was not included in the input data, so administrators should match their device's security patch level to the bulletin's listed SPL. For fleets, push the updated SPL via MDM and confirm devices report the patched security_patch property; for OEM-customized builds, wait for the vendor's matching monthly update. Compensating controls while patching: restrict sideloading and enforce Play Protect / app vetting to reduce the chance of a malicious local app reaching the device (trade-off: friction for users installing internal apps), and disable NFC on devices that do not require it via MDM policy (trade-off: breaks tap-to-pay, transit cards, and tag-based workflows). No network-level mitigation applies because exploitation is on-device.

Affected VersionsENISA

Android 17

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw lies in Android's NFC stack, the framework component that brokers Near Field Communication intents, tag dispatch, and host card emulation between system services and apps. Android enforces access to NFC events through permission-gated callbacks (typically guarded by signature-level or NFC-related permissions); when a code path omits the corresponding permission check, any installed app can deliver or receive NFC events as if it held those rights. No CWE is assigned in the input, but the behavior is the classic Missing Authorization / Missing Permission Check pattern (CWE-862-class) within an Android system service. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:android:*:* indicates the issue is in the Android platform itself rather than a single OEM build, so any device running an affected AOSP-derived release is in scope until the vendor patch is applied.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (google_android) PRIMARY 10.0 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local app on device (AV:L), no special conditions (AC:L), requires unprivileged app install so PR:L, no user interaction, full impact via privileged NFC action.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (google_android).

CVSS VectorVendor: google_android

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
High
Subsequent system: Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

In NFC, there is a possible way to spoof an NFC event due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Google Android's NFC subsystem contains a critical privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2026-0081, CVSS 10.0) allowing local applications to bypass security controls without user interaction, affecting all NFC-enabled Android devices in enterprise deployments. No vendor patch currently exists, requiring immediate interim mitigation strategies. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the unpatched status and maximum severity classify this as an urgent organizational risk.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: disable NFC functionality on devices where operationally feasible, restrict third-party application installation via mobile device management controls, implement principle of least privilege for app permission grants, establish continuous monitoring for unauthorized NFC subsystem activity, and maintain real-time inventory of affected devices for rapid deployment of vendor patches upon release.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 87% exploitable
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

50
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +50
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy