Skip to main content

Apex One CVE-2025-71215

| EUVDEUVD-2025-209917 HIGH
Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition (CWE-367)
2026-05-21 trendmicro GHSA-rjc8-fqvx-g34c
7.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: trendmicro
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain low-privileged local code execution
  2. Delivery
    Target iCore signature-verification path
  3. Exploit
    Race file swap after check, before use
  4. Execution
    Privileged service loads malicious file
  5. Impact
    Execute code with elevated privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture TOCTOU prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target macOS host (explicitly stated by the vendor) and to target the Trend Micro Apex One (mac) agent's iCore signature-verification flow. The core prerequisite is winning a TOCTOU race window in that verification routine - replacing or altering the verified file between the check and its use - which is what makes the flaw exploitable. Limiting factors that reduce realistic risk: the vector is local only (AV:L), the attacker needs pre-existing low-privileged access (PR:L), exploitation is high-complexity and race-dependent (AC:H) so success is probabilistic rather than deterministic, and the issue is specific to the macOS Apex One agent - Windows or non-Apex-One deployments are not implicated by this CVE.

Impact

Signals are internally consistent and point to a genuine-but-not-urgent issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.0 High) requires local access, already-held low privileges, and a high-complexity race window, while granting total confidentiality/integrity/availability impact - matching SSVC's Technical Impact: total. Countervailing signals reduce priority: EPSS is 0.01% (2nd percentile), SSVC Exploitation is none, Automatable is no (the TOCTOU race is not reliably scriptable at scale), and there is no KEV listing. A ZDI advisory (ZDI-26-141) exists, but an advisory is not the same as public exploit code, and no POC is confirmed. Net: a legitimate local EoP worth patching on managed endpoints, not an internet-facing emergency. No conflicts between vector and description were found - both agree the flaw is local and requires prior low-privileged code execution.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has an unprivileged shell on a macOS endpoint (via phishing, a separate app bug, or a rogue local user) launches a process that repeatedly targets the file the iCore service verifies, then races to replace that file with a malicious payload in the narrow gap between the signature check and its use. On a successful race, the privileged iCore service acts on the attacker-controlled content, yielding code execution at elevated privilege. No public POC is identified, and the high attack complexity means the race may require many attempts to win.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: Vendor states no customer action required.
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 23, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Trend Micro Apex One (mac) agent stems from a race condition in the iCore service's signature verification routine, letting a low-privileged local attacker on affected macOS installations swap a verified file after the check but before use to run code with elevated (root-level) privileges. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and SSVC/EPSS signals both indicate exploitation has not been observed; Trend Micro credited its own team with the report and states the issue was already remediated through ActiveUpdate/SaaS releases in mid-to-late 2025.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: Trend Micro states the vulnerability was addressed through ActiveUpdate and SaaS updates in mid-to-late 2025, specifically SaaS 2507 and the 2005 Yearly Release, so the primary action is to ensure managed macOS agents have received current ActiveUpdate components and are running on the 2507/2005 (or later) build; consult https://success.trendmicro.com/en-US/solution/KA-0022458 and the ZDI advisory https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-26-141/ to confirm your build is remediated. Because delivery is via the product's own update channel, verify that ActiveUpdate connectivity is healthy on endpoints and force an update check rather than assuming auto-update completed. As an interim compensating control on any endpoint that cannot be immediately updated, restrict and monitor local code execution by non-privileged users (application allowlisting, limiting interactive/local accounts) to remove the attacker's required foothold, accepting the trade-off that this constrains legitimate local tooling; no standalone standalone patch beyond the update trains is required.

Affected VersionsENISA

TrendAI Apex One (Mac) NA <NA

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected component is the iCore service of the Trend Micro Apex One endpoint-protection agent for macOS (CPE cpe:2.3:a:trend_micro,_inc.:trendai_apex_one_(mac)). The root cause is CWE-367, Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU): the service validates a file's cryptographic signature at one moment (time-of-check) but then acts on that file later (time-of-use), leaving a window in which an attacker who can influence the referenced path or file contents substitutes malicious content that never underwent verification. Because the iCore service runs at high privilege to perform security operations, winning this race lets an unprivileged process have privileged code loaded or executed, a classic pattern for privilege escalation in signature-gated update/loader logic.

Know when Trend Micro gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (trendmicro) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local vector and pre-existing low privileges give AV:L/PR:L; the TOCTOU race window makes success probabilistic, so AC:H; privileged service compromise yields C/I/A:H with unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (trendmicro).

CVSS VectorVendor: trendmicro

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVE Published
May 21, 2026 - 13:02 cve.org
HIGH 7.0
CVE Published
May 21, 2026 - 13:02 nvd
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

A time-of-check time-of-use vulnerability in the Trend Micro Apex One (mac) agent iCore service signature verification could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations.

Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.

The following information is provided as informational only for CVE references, as these were addressed already via ActiveUpdate/SaaS updates in mid to late 2025 (SaaS 2507 & 2005 Yearly Release).

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Trend Micro Apex One for macOS is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation that could grant administrative access; however, no public exploit has been identified. Trend Micro released remediation via automatic updates (mid-2025), so organizations on current versions face minimal risk; only unpatched systems remain exposed.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch: Trend Micro Apex One ActiveUpdate/SaaS remediation (mid-to-late 2025). For systems pending patch application, restrict local system access and administrative privileges to minimize exploitation risk.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely deployed enterprise endpoint security; macOS agent is a smaller subset
Service Type
Hosted
Vendor-managed, no client patch needed
Social Media
4
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
Vendor states no customer action required
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

CVE-2016-7552 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 12

On the Trend Micro Threat Discovery Appliance 2.6.1062r1, directory traversal when processing a session_id cookie allows

CVE-2016-7547 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 12

A command execution flaw on the Trend Micro Threat Discovery Appliance 2.6.1062r1 exists with the timezone parameter in

CVE-2017-11394 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 03

Proxy command injection vulnerability in Trend Micro OfficeScan 11 and XG (12) allows remote attackers to execute arbitr

CVE-2017-11391 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 03

Proxy command injection vulnerability in Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Virtual Appliance 9.0 and 9.1 allows remote att

CVE-2017-11392 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 03

Proxy command injection vulnerability in Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Virtual Appliance 9.0 and 9.1 allows remote att

CVE-2016-6267 HIGH POC
8.8 Jan 30

SnmpUtils in Trend Micro Smart Protection Server 2.5 before build 2200, 2.6 before build 2106, and 3.0 before build 1330

CVE-2017-6398 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 14

An issue was discovered in Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security (Virtual Appliance) 9.1-1600. Rated high severity (C

CVE-2017-7896 MEDIUM POC
6.1 Apr 18

Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security Virtual Appliance (IMSVA) 9.1 before CP 1644 has XSS. Rated medium severity (CV

CVE-2017-14078 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 22

SQL Injection vulnerabilities in Trend Micro Mobile Security (Enterprise) versions before 9.7 Patch 3 allow remote attac

CVE-2016-3987 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 12

The HTTP server in Trend Micro Password Manager allows remote web servers to execute arbitrary commands via the url para

CVE-2012-1461 MEDIUM
4.3 Mar 21

The Gzip file parser in AVG Anti-Virus 10.0.0.1190, Bitdefender 7.2, Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5

CVE-2012-1459 MEDIUM
4.3 Mar 21

The TAR file parser in AhnLab V3 Internet Security 2011.01.18.00, Avira AntiVir 7.11.1.163, Antiy Labs AVL SDK 2.0.3.7,

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy