Skip to main content

TrueConf Server CVE-2025-66824

HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2025-12-30 cve@mitre.org
8.7
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Authenticate with low-privilege TrueConf account
  2. Delivery
    Navigate to Create/Edit Conference interface
  3. Exploit
    Inject XSS payload into meeting_room field
  4. Install
    Payload stored persistently on server
  5. C2
    Victim with active session visits Conference Info page
  6. Execute
    Injected script executes in victim browser context
  7. Impact
    Harvest session token and achieve full ATO

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The attacker must hold an authenticated TrueConf Server account with at least the privilege level required to create or edit conferences (PR:L per CVSS vector). No elevated administrative role is required to inject the payload. A victim user with an active authenticated session must subsequently visit the Conference Info page of the poisoned conference (UI:R per CVSS vector) - because the payload is stored server-side, this trigger is passive and persistent rather than requiring real-time attacker interaction. Exploitation is bounded to TrueConf Server version 5.5.2.10813 on Windows per available CPE data; other versions or non-Windows platforms are not confirmed vulnerable. No special network position or man-in-the-middle capability is required beyond authenticated HTTP/HTTPS access to the TrueConf Server instance.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.7 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N) accurately reflects the severity: the attack is network-accessible, requires low complexity, and demands only a low-privilege account - a low bar in a conferencing platform where many users can create meetings. The Scope:Changed flag elevates the score because the injected payload executes in victim browsers rather than the attacker's own context. The publicly available PoC on GitHub materially lowers the skill threshold for exploitation. No EPSS data was provided in the input, and the CVE is not in CISA KEV, so confirmed widespread active exploitation is not established at this time - however, the combination of stored XSS, ATO impact, low complexity, and public PoC makes this a genuine operational priority for any organization running this platform. No patch version was identified in the available references, which increases urgency for compensating controls.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a low-privilege TrueConf account - such as a regular employee in a corporate deployment - navigates to the conference creation interface and injects a JavaScript payload (e.g., a cookie-stealing script) into the Meeting Location field. The payload is stored on the server. When a higher-privileged user, such as an administrator, opens the Conference Info page for that meeting, the script executes silently in their browser, exfiltrating their session token to the attacker and granting full account takeover. A public PoC demonstrating this technique is available at https://github.com/x00nullbit/CVE-References/blob/main/CVE-2025-66824/README.md.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 20, 2026

Stored XSS in TrueConf Server 5.5.2.10813 on Windows enables authenticated low-privileged users to inject malicious JavaScript via the meeting_room parameter in the conference creation/editing interface. The payload persists server-side and executes in any victim's browser upon visiting the Conference Info page, enabling full Account Takeover (ATO). A publicly available proof-of-concept exploit exists; the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch or patched version was identified in the available data - references include only the PoC repository and the vendor homepage at https://trueconf.com, with no dedicated security advisory. Organizations should actively monitor https://trueconf.com for a security bulletin and apply any released update immediately upon availability. As a compensating control, restrict the conference creation and editing functionality to a minimal set of trusted users via role-based access controls, reducing the population of principals who can inject a stored payload - note this does not eliminate risk if any authorized user is compromised. Deploying a WAF with strict XSS filtering on TrueConf Server endpoints can block common injection patterns, though WAF bypasses exist and this control should not be treated as a permanent remediation. The definitive fix requires server-side input validation and context-aware output encoding on the meeting_room field at the application layer.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

TrueConf Server is a Windows-based video conferencing platform (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:trueconf:trueconf_server:5.5.2.10813:*:*:*:*:windows:*:*). The vulnerability is rooted in CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation), specifically the persistent/stored variant. The meeting_room parameter in the Create/Edit Conference workflow accepts user-supplied input that is stored without adequate sanitization or output encoding. When TrueConf Server subsequently renders the Conference Info page, it reflects the raw stored value into the HTML DOM, allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution in any authenticated user's browser context. The CVSS Scope:Changed (S:C) metric correctly captures the cross-user nature of the impact: the attacker's injected code runs in a different security principal's browser session.

Know when Trueconf gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 8.7 HIGH

PR:L reflects required authenticated conference-creator access; S:C captures cross-user browser context compromise enabling ATO; A:N because XSS imposes no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

DescriptionNVD

A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Meeting location field of the Create/Edit Conference functionality in TrueConf Server v5.5.2.10813. The injected payload is stored via the meeting_room parameter and executed when users visit the Conference Info page, allowing attackers to achieve full Account Takeover (ATO). This issue is caused by improper sanitization of user-supplied input in the meeting_room field.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

TrueConf Server 5.5.2.10813 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows authenticated users to inject malicious code into conference workflows, resulting in full account takeover when administrators or other users access affected conference pages. The vulnerability directly threatens videoconferencing platform integrity and administrator account security, as low-privileged users can escalate privileges through account hijacking. With publicly available exploit code and no vendor patch released, immediate access controls are critical.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) restrict conference creation and editing to administrator-level accounts; (2) implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to prevent malicious script execution; (3) deploy input validation or Web Application Firewall rules blocking injection patterns in the meeting_room parameter; (4) enable detailed audit logging for conference operations and authentication events; and (5) maintain secure backups enabling recovery from account compromise.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 80% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise video conferencing platform with limited market share
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

64
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

Affected Products (CPE)NVD

cpe:2.3:a:trueconf:trueconf_server:5.5.2.10813:*:*:*:*:windows:*:*

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy