Skip to main content

QNAP QTS CVE-2025-66279

| EUVDEUVD-2025-210100 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-06-10 qnap GHSA-vpcm-92g9-vgwx
8.6
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: qnap
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Identify internet-exposed QNAP NAS
  2. Delivery
    Obtain administrator credentials
  3. Exploit
    Authenticate to QTS/QuTS hero admin UI
  4. Install
    Submit crafted input to vulnerable endpoint
  5. C2
    Trigger OS command injection (CWE-78)
  6. Execute
    Execute arbitrary commands on appliance
  7. Impact
    Exfiltrate data or deploy ransomware

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires valid QNAP administrator credentials on a vulnerable QTS or QuTS hero build (PR:H in the CVSS 4.0 vector) and network reachability to the appliance's administrative web/API interface; no user interaction is required (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L/AT:N). Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the admin account requirement excludes anonymous internet scanners, devices behind 2-step verification raise the bar further, and appliances whose management interface is restricted to LAN/VPN are not remotely reachable. The vulnerable surface is the QNAP NAS management plane on the firmware versions enumerated in the EUVD record; appliances already on QTS 5.2.9.3410 build 20260214, QuTS hero h5.2.9.3410 build 20260214, h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520, or h6.0.0.3397 build 20260206 or later are not exposed.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N indicates network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation with no user interaction, but explicitly requires administrator privileges, which sharply narrows the realistic attacker population to insiders, credential thieves, or chained post-auth bypasses. There is no EPSS score, no SSVC determination, and no KEV listing in the supplied data, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, so this is not currently a mass-exploitation candidate. However, QNAP NAS devices have a strong history of being internet-exposed and targeted by ransomware actors who routinely pair credential abuse with post-auth command injection, so the practical risk is materially higher for any appliance whose admin panel is reachable from untrusted networks. No conflicting signals are present in the supplied data; the main missing inputs are EPSS, POC availability, and any independent confirmation of in-the-wild use.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has phished, brute-forced, or reused leaked credentials to obtain a QNAP administrator account logs into the QTS or QuTS hero web interface over the network and submits a crafted value to a management endpoint that passes input into a shell command. The injected payload executes as the privileged management process, allowing the attacker to deploy ransomware, exfiltrate stored data, install persistent backdoors, or pivot into the LAN; no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the bug class is well understood and trivially weaponizable once credentials are in hand.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 10, 2026

Authenticated command injection in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero allows a remote attacker holding administrator credentials to execute arbitrary OS commands on the NAS appliance. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.6 reflects high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, though exploitation requires high privileges (PR:H). No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; QNAP has released fixed builds across affected QTS and QuTS hero branches.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patches are available: upgrade QTS to 5.2.9.3410 build 20260214 or later, QuTS hero h5.2 to h5.2.9.3410 build 20260214 or later, QuTS hero h5.3 to h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520 or later, and the QuTS hero 6.0 line to h6.0.0.3397 build 20260206 or later, following QNAP advisory https://www.qnap.com/en/security-advisory/qsa-26-10. Until firmware is applied, restrict reachability of the administrative web/API interface by binding it to a management VLAN or VPN and blocking inbound WAN access (trade-off: remote administration via myQNAPcloud or port-forwarded HTTPS will break), enforce strong unique passwords plus 2-step verification on every administrator account to make the PR:H requirement materially harder to satisfy, and rotate admin credentials if any exposure to untrusted networks has occurred. Disable or remove unused administrator accounts to shrink the attack surface, and review system event logs for unexpected admin logins or shell command execution as a detective control.

Affected VersionsENISA

QuTS hero h5.2.0 <h5.2.9.3410 build 20260214
QTS 5.2.0 <5.2.9.3410 build 20260214
QuTS hero h5.3.0 <h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520
QuTS hero ? <h6.0.0.3397 build 20260206

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

QTS and QuTS hero are QNAP's NAS operating systems used on consumer and SMB storage appliances; QuTS hero is the ZFS-based variant. The flaw maps to CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command), meaning an administrative web/API interface passes attacker-controlled input into a shell or process invocation without adequate sanitization. CPE data identifies the affected products as cpe:2.3:a:qnap_systems_inc.:qts and cpe:2.3:a:qnap_systems_inc.:quts_hero across multiple branches (5.2, 5.3, and 6.0 lines of QuTS hero, plus QTS 5.2). Because NAS devices typically expose management interfaces over HTTP(S), successful injection runs in the context of the administrative service, which on QNAP appliances is typically high-privileged.

Know when Qts gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (qnap) PRIMARY 8.6 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (qnap) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: qnap

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Patch available
Jun 10, 2026 - 05:01 EUVD
CVSS changed
Jun 10, 2026 - 04:22 NVD
8.6 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Jun 10, 2026 - 03:05 nvd
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands.

We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.9.3410 build 20260214 and later QuTS hero h5.2.9.3410 build 20260214 and later QuTS hero h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520 and later QuTS hero h6.0.0.3397 build 20260206 and later

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

QNAP QTS and QuTS hero NAS systems contain a remote command injection vulnerability (CVSS 8.6) exploitable only by authenticated administrators, with no confirmed public exploit activity. An attacker with stolen or leveraged administrator credentials could execute arbitrary system commands, potentially compromising critical storage infrastructure, data, and backups. Rapid patch deployment across all affected appliances is essential to mitigate this high-severity risk.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 33% exploitable
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +43
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

More in Qts

View all
CVE-2014-6271 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 24

GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which

CVE-2014-7169 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 25

GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of

CVE-2017-6361 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 23

QNAP QTS before 4.2.4 Build 20170313 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors. Rated criti

CVE-2017-6360 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 23

QNAP QTS before 4.2.4 Build 20170313 allows attackers to gain administrator privileges and obtain sensitive information

CVE-2017-13067 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 14

QNAP has patched a remote code execution vulnerability affecting the QTS Media Library in all versions prior to QTS 4.2.

CVE-2017-6359 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 23

QNAP QTS before 4.2.4 Build 20170313 allows attackers to gain administrator privileges and execute arbitrary commands vi

CVE-2017-5227 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 23

QNAP QTS before 4.2.4 Build 20170313 allows local users to obtain sensitive Domain Administrator password information by

CVE-2017-7876 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 15

This command injection vulnerability in QTS allows attackers to run arbitrary commands in the compromised application. R

CVE-2019-7193 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 05

This improper input validation vulnerability allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary code to the system. Rated criti

CVE-2023-39296 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 05

A prototype pollution vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. Rated high sever

CVE-2017-17028 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 21

A buffer overflow vulnerability in external device function in QNAP QTS version 4.2.6 build 20171026, 4.3.3.0378 build 2

CVE-2017-17033 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 21

A buffer overflow vulnerability in password function in QNAP QTS version 4.2.6 build 20171026, 4.3.3.0378 build 20171117

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy