Skip to main content

MaxKey CVE-2025-6517

| EUVDEUVD-2025-18913 LOW
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2025-06-23 cna@vuldb.com
2.1
CVSS 4.0 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to MaxKey management
  2. Delivery
    Navigate to SAML metadata URL handler
  3. Exploit
    Submit crafted POST with internal URL
  4. Execution
    Server sends SSRF request to internal resource
  5. Impact
    Access internal service or data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The attacker must have low-privilege access to the MaxKey management interface (PR:L). No user interaction is required (UI:N). The attack is network-based (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no special attack requirements (AT:N). The vulnerability is triggered via the 'post' argument in the SAML20DetailsController's Add function. Limiting factor: exploitation requires authentication, so unauthenticated remote attackers cannot exploit this directly.

Impact

CVSS 4.0 base score is 2.1 (Low) with vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L, indicating low impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. EPSS score is 0.11% (30th percentile), suggesting low exploitation probability. A public exploit is available, but no active exploitation has been reported (not in CISA KEV). The SSVC decision framework would likely rate this as 'Medium' priority due to automatable exploitation but low impact. Overall, this is a low-risk issue despite the public exploit.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated attacker with low privileges sends a crafted POST request to the SAML metadata URL handler, specifying an internal IP address (e.g., http://192.168.1.1/admin). The server makes a request to that internal resource, potentially exposing sensitive data or allowing further attacks. A public exploit is available, simplifying exploitation.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Jul 26, 2026

Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in Dromara MaxKey up to 4.1.7 allows authenticated attackers to make internal network requests via the Meta URL handler. A public exploit exists, but exploitation requires low privileges and no user interaction. EPSS score is low (0.11%), indicating limited active exploitation risk.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Mar 15, 2026 - 22:10 CVSS 6.3

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch is available as the vendor did not respond. As a workaround, restrict access to the SAML metadata URL handler by implementing network-level controls (e.g., firewall rules to block outbound requests from the MaxKey server to internal networks) or disable the Meta URL feature if not required. Input validation should be added to sanitize URLs and prevent requests to private IP ranges. These mitigations may impact SSO functionality that relies on metadata imports.

Affected VersionsENISA

MaxKey 4.1.3
MaxKey 4.1.1
MaxKey 4.1.2
MaxKey 4.1.5
MaxKey 4.1.7
MaxKey 4.1.0
MaxKey 4.1.4
MaxKey 4.1.6

Affected Packages

euvd maxkey no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a server-side request forgery (CWE-918) in the SAML20DetailsController.java file of MaxKey, an open-source single sign-on (SSO) system. The affected component is the Meta URL Handler, which processes user-supplied URLs without proper validation, enabling attackers to forge requests to internal systems. CPE data confirms all MaxKey versions up to 4.1.7 are affected.

Know when Maxkey gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 2.1 LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

PR:L due to required authentication; no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

5
Severity Changed
Apr 29, 2026 - 01:11 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
Apr 29, 2026 - 01:11 NVD
6.3 (MEDIUM) 2.1 (LOW)
PoC Detected
Sep 30, 2025 - 18:19 vuln.today
Public exploit code
CVE Published
Jun 23, 2025 - 18:15 nvd
MEDIUM 6.3
CVE Published
Jun 23, 2025 - 18:15 cve.org
LOW 2.1

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was found in Dromara MaxKey up to 4.1.7 and classified as critical. This issue affects the function Add of the file maxkey-webs\maxkey-web-mgt\src\main\java\org\dromara\maxkey\web\apps\contorller\SAML20DetailsController.java of the component Meta URL Handler. The manipulation of the argument post leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Organizations using Dromara MaxKey should be aware of moderate risk from CVE-2025-6517, a server-side request forgery vulnerability rated CVSS 6.3. Users could be tricked into performing unintended actions. Proof-of-concept code is publicly available. Organizations should apply vendor updates when available and monitor for exploitation.

Business Impact: Low
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. If patching is delayed: implement egress filtering, block metadata endpoints.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 70% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
Niche SSO product, limited enterprise deployment
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Low

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy