Adobe Experience Manager
CVE-2025-64847
MEDIUM
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privileged AEM user
-
DeliveryInject script into vulnerable form field
-
ExploitPayload stored server-side
-
ExecutionVictim browses affected page
-
PersistScript executes in victim browser
-
ImpactSession/credential theft in victim context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an authenticated low-privileged AEM account (PR:L) with the ability to enter/store content into one of the vulnerable form fields, plus a victim who must subsequently browse to the page rendering that field (UI:R). Affects Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23 and earlier, AEM Cloud Service, and AEM 6.5 LTS. Exploitation is limited by both the authentication requirement and the mandatory victim interaction; it is not exploitable pre-auth or without a victim viewing the injected content. Payload persists server-side once stored, so no timing/race is needed. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but low-priority issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, base 5.4 MEDIUM) shows the flaw is network-reachable but doubly gated: it requires an authenticated low-privileged attacker (PR:L) to store the payload and requires a victim to browse to the affected page (UI:R). The scope change (S:C) reflects the classic XSS crossing from the app into the victim's browser context, but impact is capped at C:L/I:L with no availability impact. Exploitation signals reinforce low urgency: EPSS is 0.20% (9th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code was identified. No SSVC framing is provided in the input. All signals are internally consistent - no conflict between the CVSS vector and the description, both point to a stored client-side XSS. Bottom line: a real, patch-worthy defect in an enterprise CMS but not a high real-world priority; it warrants routine patching rather than emergency response. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged AEM author or form-editor with content-entry rights injects a malicious JavaScript payload into a vulnerable form field, which AEM stores and later renders unescaped. When a higher-privileged user or other visitor browses to the page containing that field, the script executes in their browser, enabling session-token theft or actions in the victim's authenticated context. No public POC or active exploitation has been identified. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 26, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23 and earlier, AEM 6.5 LTS, and AEM Cloud Service lets a low-privileged authenticated author persist malicious JavaScript into vulnerable form fields, which then executes in the browser of any user who visits the page rendering that field. Exploitation requires both an authenticated low-privilege AEM account capable of storing content and a victim who subsequently views the affected page, so it is not reachable pre-authentication and cannot fire without victim interaction. Scored CVSS 3.1 5.4 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N), EPSS is low at 0.20% (9th percentile), and no public exploit or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis - this is a genuine but low-priority issue.
RemediationAI
Apply the fixed Adobe Experience Manager release identified in Adobe security bulletin APSB25-115 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb25-115.html), which is the authoritative source for the corrected version for the AEM 6.5 service-pack line and the AEM 6.5 LTS track; AEM Cloud Service instances are addressed by Adobe through managed updates, so confirm with Adobe that the environment has received the bulletin's fix if it has not already been rolled out. If immediate patching is not possible, reduce exposure by tightening author permissions so that only fully trusted accounts can author or submit content into form fields, since exploitation requires an authenticated low-privilege account plus stored content (PR:L) - the trade-off is reduced contributor flexibility and the need to audit existing roles and permissions. Audit and purge pre-existing stored form content for injected scripts, because remediation of the code does not remove payloads already persisted. Deploy a Content Security Policy on AEM author and publish tiers that restricts script-src and blocks inline script execution, acknowledging that CSP is a defense-in-depth layer that can break legitimate AEM components and rich form behavior and must be tested in a staging environment. As a lower-confidence compensating control, apply WAF or reverse-proxy filtering for script-bearing input to form endpoints and monitor for anomalous script content in authored pages, recognizing that encoding bypasses can evade signature-based filtering and that this does not address payloads already stored server-side.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-79, improper neutralization of input during web page generation, in Adobe Experience Manager's form-field rendering path. Because the payload is stored server-side and re-rendered to every subsequent visitor rather than reflected in a single response, the weakness is a persistent (stored) XSS rather than a reflected one, and no timing or race condition is required for successful delivery. The CVSS vector's scope-changed component (S:C) reflects that the injected script runs in the victim's browser under the AEM origin's security authority, distinct from the vulnerable component, which is why the impact is rated low for confidentiality and integrity (C:L/I:L) but the blast radius extends beyond the vulnerable page context. The PR:L metric confirms the attacker must already hold a low-privileged AEM account with permission to author or store content in the vulnerable field, while UI:R reflects the mandatory victim interaction. Affected deployment surfaces are the on-premise/managed AEM 6.5 line (CPE cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*), AEM 6.5 LTS (cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:6.5:-:*:*:*:lts:*:*), and the Adobe-managed AEM Cloud Service (cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:*:*:*:*:aem_cloud_service:*:*:*). Attackers would typically target authoring and preview/publish pages where authored form content is rendered to other users, including administrators, making session-token theft or administrative action abuse the primary post-exploitation concern.
Know when Experience Manager gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Network-reachable stored XSS requiring a low-privileged authoring account (PR:L) and victim page view (UI:R); scope changes to the browser (S:C) with limited C/I and no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (adobe).
CVSS VectorVendor: adobe
DescriptionCVE.org
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
More in Experience Manager
View allSitecore Experience Manager, Platform, and Commerce versions 9.0 through 10.4 contain a Zip Slip vulnerability that allo
Sitecore PowerShell Extensions through version 7.0 allows authenticated users to upload arbitrary files including ASPX w
Dispatcher before 4.1.5 in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 does not properly implement a URL filter, wh
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability that al
Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) and Experience Platform (XP) versions 10.1 through 10.4.1 contain a hardcoded administr
The Servlets Post component 2.3.6 in Apache Sling, as used in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0, allows r
Multiple Sitecore products allow remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remote
Adobe Experience Manager 6.2 and earlier has a malicious file execution vulnerability. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilit
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Sitecore Sitecore Experience Manager (XM), S
An issue was discovered in Sitecore Experience Platform (XP), Experience Manager (XM), and Experience Commerce (XC) 8.0
An issue in the MVC Device Simulator of Sitecore Experience Platform (XP), Experience Manager (XM), and Experience Comme
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB