Adobe Experience Manager
CVE-2025-64829
MEDIUM
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-priv AEM author account
-
DeliveryInject script into vulnerable form field
-
ExploitPayload stored in AEM repository
-
ExecutionVictim browses affected page
-
PersistScript executes in victim browser session
-
ImpactSteal session tokens / act as victim
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a low-privileged authenticated AEM account (PR:L) able to submit/edit content in the affected form fields, plus victim interaction (UI:R): a user must browse to the page rendering the injected field for the stored script to execute. Applies to AEM 6.5.23 and earlier, including AEM Cloud Service and AEM 6.5 LTS. Limiting factors: the attacker needs an existing account with content-authoring capability, the payload only fires when a victim visits the affected page, and impact is confined to Low confidentiality/integrity in the victim's browser (no availability impact, no direct server compromise). |
| Impact | All available signals point to a genuine-but-low real-world priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, base 5.4 MEDIUM) reflects a stored XSS that is double-gated: it requires low-privilege authentication (PR:L) to inject the payload AND victim user interaction (UI:R) - a victim must browse to the page containing the poisoned form field. The scope change (S:C) correctly captures that injected script executes in the victim's browser security context rather than the server's, but confidentiality and integrity impacts are only Low (C:L/I:L) and availability is unaffected (A:N). Exploitation likelihood signals are weak and mutually consistent: EPSS is just 0.20% (9th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code is identified. No SSVC decision data was provided. There is no conflict between signals here - a low EPSS aligns with the absence of KEV/POC and with the practical friction of needing both an authenticated foothold and victim interaction. This is a legitimate defect to patch in the normal cycle, not an emergency. The main risk amplifier is deployment context: AEM is a high-value enterprise CMS, and a low-priv author account (common in large content teams) turning into stored script execution against higher-privileged reviewers/admins is a plausible privilege-escalation stepping stone. Note the input contains no explicit patch version - remediation maps to Adobe bulletin APSB25-115. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged AEM author or content contributor injects a malicious JavaScript payload into a vulnerable form field. When a higher-privileged user (e.g., an editor or administrator) later browses to the page rendering that field, the script executes in their authenticated browser session, enabling session/token theft or actions on their behalf. No public exploit code has been identified, and exploitation requires both the authenticated foothold and the victim visiting the affected page. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 26, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23 and earlier allows a low-privileged authenticated author to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields, which then executes in the browser of any user who visits the page rendering that field. Per the CVSS vector (PR:L/UI:R, scope changed), exploitation requires an existing AEM account with content-authoring rights plus victim interaction, and the resulting impact is confined to Low confidentiality and integrity loss in the victim's browser with no availability or server-side compromise. There is no confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and the EPSS score of 0.20% (9th percentile) indicates a low predicted likelihood of exploitation in the near term.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to the fixed Experience Manager release identified in Adobe security bulletin APSB25-115 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb25-115.html), which is the authoritative source for the exact patched version for AEM 6.5, AEM 6.5 LTS, and AEM as a Cloud Service; patch availability is confirmed by the vendor advisory, though an exact fix version string is not independently provided in the supplied data. Since AEM Cloud Service is updated on a continuous basis, confirm that your instance has received the update associated with APSB25-115. Where immediate upgrade is not possible, compensating controls include tightening author permissions so that only trusted, minimal groups can create or edit form-field content (this reduces but does not eliminate the insider/low-privilege vector and may disrupt legitimate content workflows), deploying a Content Security Policy that restricts inline and third-party script execution on AEM publish pages (a strong mitigation for XSS payload delivery, with the trade-off that poorly scoped CSP can break legitimate AEM client libraries and component scripts and requires testing), and applying Dispatcher or WAF rules that filter script-bearing payloads in submitted form content (which can produce false positives on legitimate rich-text content). Also consider a one-time content scan for injected scripts in stored form fields, since stored XSS payloads persist until the content is cleaned or re-saved.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a CWE-79 cross-site scripting issue, specifically the stored (persistent) variant, arising from insufficient sanitization or output encoding of user-supplied content written into AEM form fields. Because the payload is persisted server-side in the content repository, it is served back to every visitor of the affected page, so a single injection by a low-privileged author can repeatedly affect other users. The CVSS scope change (S:C) reflects that while the vulnerable component is the AEM authoring/rendering path, the security impact is realized in the victim's browser session, enabling session-data theft, UI redressing, or actions performed as the victim within the AEM context. CPE data identifies the affected surface as Adobe Experience Manager across the 6.5 track (including the 6.5 LTS channel), the general 6.5 release line, and AEM Cloud Service, which means both self-hosted and cloud-managed deployments are in scope. The stored nature raises the value of any successful injection compared with reflected XSS, but the requirement for an authenticated authoring account and the need for a victim to browse to the crafted page materially limit practical exploitation.
Know when Experience Manager gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Stored XSS injected by an authenticated low-priv user (PR:L) that fires only when a victim views the page (UI:R); browser-context execution gives S:C with Low C/I and no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (adobe).
CVSS VectorVendor: adobe
DescriptionCVE.org
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
More in Experience Manager
View allSitecore Experience Manager, Platform, and Commerce versions 9.0 through 10.4 contain a Zip Slip vulnerability that allo
Sitecore PowerShell Extensions through version 7.0 allows authenticated users to upload arbitrary files including ASPX w
Dispatcher before 4.1.5 in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 does not properly implement a URL filter, wh
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability that al
Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) and Experience Platform (XP) versions 10.1 through 10.4.1 contain a hardcoded administr
The Servlets Post component 2.3.6 in Apache Sling, as used in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0, allows r
Multiple Sitecore products allow remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remote
Adobe Experience Manager 6.2 and earlier has a malicious file execution vulnerability. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilit
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Sitecore Sitecore Experience Manager (XM), S
An issue was discovered in Sitecore Experience Platform (XP), Experience Manager (XM), and Experience Commerce (XC) 8.0
An issue in the MVC Device Simulator of Sitecore Experience Platform (XP), Experience Manager (XM), and Experience Comme
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB