Adobe Experience Manager
CVE-2025-64800
MEDIUM
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privileged AEM user
-
DeliveryInject script into vulnerable form field
-
ExploitPayload stored in repository
-
ExecutionVictim browses affected page
-
PersistScript executes in victim browser
-
ImpactSession/credential theft in victim context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated low-privileged account on the AEM instance (PR:L, e.g. an author/content-contributor role) with the ability to submit data into one of the vulnerable form fields, plus a second victim user who must navigate to the page rendering that stored field (UI:R). This is a stored XSS, so the payload persists and fires on page view rather than requiring a crafted link. Limiting factors: it is not exploitable pre-authentication, impact is confined to client-side script execution in the victim's browser (C:L/I:L, no server RCE, no availability impact), and it depends on the attacker having write access to a susceptible field - so instances that restrict authoring privileges materially reduce exposure. |
| Impact | This is a high-CVSS-context product but genuinely low real-world priority. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.4 (MEDIUM) is well-calibrated: the vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N reflects a stored XSS that is double-gated - it requires an authenticated low-privileged attacker (PR:L) to inject the payload AND a victim to browse to the affected page (UI:R), with only Low confidentiality/integrity impact and no availability impact. EPSS reinforces the low urgency at 0.20% (9th percentile), among the lowest exploitation-probability signals. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public proof-of-concept identified. All signals are consistent and point the same direction - no conflicts between CVSS, EPSS, and exploitation status. The scope change (S:C) is the standard XSS convention (payload executes in the browser DOM, a different security authority than the Sling/OSGi server), not evidence of server compromise. Bottom line: real but low priority; patch in normal cycle rather than emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged AEM author or content contributor injects a malicious JavaScript payload into a vulnerable form field. The script is stored and later executes in the browser of another user (e.g., an admin or reviewer) who navigates to the page rendering that field, enabling session/token theft or actions in the victim's authenticated context. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 26, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) 6.5.23 and earlier lets an authenticated low-privileged user - such as an author or content contributor with write access to a vulnerable form field - persist malicious JavaScript that then executes in the browser of any user who later loads the affected page. The assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) confirms two prerequisites: an attacker account on the AEM instance (PR:L) and a separate victim who browses to the injected page (UI:R); because the payload is stored, no crafted link is needed and the script re-fires on each page view. Impact is limited to client-side execution within the victim's browser session (C:L/I:L, no server-side code execution and no availability impact), and with no CISA KEV listing, no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and a low EPSS score of 0.20% (9th percentile), this is a low real-world priority despite the high-value nature of the platform.
RemediationAI
Apply the fixed release referenced in Adobe's security bulletin APSB25-115 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb25-115.html); the specific patched build for your deployment channel is not enumerated in the supplied data, so confirm it against that advisory for your 6.5.x or AEM as a Cloud Service track before upgrading, and note that upgrading does not remove already-stored malicious payloads - injected content must be identified and purged from the repository separately. Where patching cannot be done immediately, reduce exposure by tightening authoring entitlements so that only trusted users hold write access to form fields and author-facing dialogs (this directly removes the PR:L precondition, though it does not fix the underlying output encoding flaw), and enable a strict Content-Security-Policy on the publish tier to block inline script execution (side effect: legitimate inline scripts and third-party integrations may break and require nonce/hash allowlisting). Deploying AEM Dispatcher with strict filter rules and a WAF that flags script-bearing payloads in form submissions adds defense in depth, and setting session cookies to HttpOnly/Secure limits cookie theft by any residual XSS (though it does not prevent in-session state-changing attacks). If no vendor-released patch is confirmed for your version at time of analysis, treat the author-privilege restriction plus CSP as the interim controls and monitor APSB25-115 for the fixed version, since configuration alone cannot remediate the unencoded output path.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation, i.e. cross-site scripting) in the stored/persistent variant. AEM stores authored content - including form field values submitted through AEM Sites/Forms components and author-side dialogs - in its JCR content repository and renders that content into HTML pages served by the publish tier. Because the vulnerable field does not adequately encode or sanitize stored input before output, script content supplied by a low-privileged author survives persistence and is reflected into the DOM of every subsequent page render. The scope-change metric (S:C) reflects that the injected script executes in the security context of the AEM page origin rather than the attacker's, enabling actions such as reading the victim's session data, performing state-changing requests as the victim, or defacing the rendered page. The CPE data identifies three in-scope deployment flavors: the generic on-premise adobe:experience_manager product line, the aem_cloud_service edition, and the 6.5 LTS channel (cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:6.5:-:*:*:lts), meaning both managed cloud and long-term-support on-premise customers share the flaw. Attack complexity is low (AC:L) and the vector is network-reachable (AV:N), so the practical barrier is purely the availability of a low-privileged authoring account with write access to a susceptible field.
Know when Experience Manager gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Network-reachable stored XSS needing a low-priv author to inject (PR:L) and a victim to view the page (UI:R); scope changes to the browser DOM with limited C/I impact and no availability effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (adobe).
CVSS VectorVendor: adobe
DescriptionCVE.org
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
More in Experience Manager
View allSitecore Experience Manager, Platform, and Commerce versions 9.0 through 10.4 contain a Zip Slip vulnerability that allo
Sitecore PowerShell Extensions through version 7.0 allows authenticated users to upload arbitrary files including ASPX w
Dispatcher before 4.1.5 in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 does not properly implement a URL filter, wh
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability that al
Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) and Experience Platform (XP) versions 10.1 through 10.4.1 contain a hardcoded administr
The Servlets Post component 2.3.6 in Apache Sling, as used in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0, allows r
Multiple Sitecore products allow remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remote
Adobe Experience Manager 6.2 and earlier has a malicious file execution vulnerability. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilit
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Sitecore Sitecore Experience Manager (XM), S
An issue was discovered in Sitecore Experience Platform (XP), Experience Manager (XM), and Experience Commerce (XC) 8.0
An issue in the MVC Device Simulator of Sitecore Experience Platform (XP), Experience Manager (XM), and Experience Comme
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB