Skip to main content

Adobe Experience Manager CVE-2025-64580

MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2025-12-10 psirt@adobe.com
5.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: adobe
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged AEM account
  2. Delivery
    Inject malicious script into form field
  3. Exploit
    Payload stored in application
  4. Execution
    Victim browses to affected page
  5. Impact
    Script executes in victim browser context

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated low-privileged account (PR:L) in Adobe Experience Manager with the ability to submit or edit content in the vulnerable form fields, and requires victim user interaction (UI:R): a separate user must browse to the page containing the injected field for the stored JavaScript to execute. Limiting factors: the attacker cannot act fully unauthenticated, the payload only fires against users who view the affected page (favoring higher-privileged victims such as reviewers/administrators), and impact is confined to the victim's browser session (C:L/I:L/A:N), not direct server compromise. Affected deployments include AEM 6.5.23 and earlier, AEM 6.5 LTS, and AEM Cloud Service per the published CPEs.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity stored XSS (CVSS 5.4, CWE-79) with multiple signals pointing to limited real-world urgency rather than a top priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) shows network reachability and low complexity, but exploitation is gated by two meaningful requirements: the attacker needs low-privileged authenticated access (PR:L) to inject into form fields, and a victim must interact by browsing to the affected page (UI:R). The scope change (S:C) reflects that injected script executes in the victim's browser context rather than the vulnerable component itself, which is why confidentiality and integrity impact are only Low and availability is None. Exploitation signals are weak: EPSS is 0.25% (15th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or widespread automation. The signals are broadly consistent - low EPSS, no KEV, no POC, and a partial-impact CVSS all align - so this reads as a genuine but lower-tier issue appropriate for routine patch cycles, with priority raised only in environments where many lower-privileged content authors share AEM instances with privileged reviewers/administrators.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged AEM content author or form editor injects malicious JavaScript into a vulnerable form field, which is stored by the application. When a higher-privileged user (e.g., an administrator or reviewer) later browses to the page containing that field, the script executes in their browser, enabling session/cookie theft or actions performed as the victim. No public exploit code has been identified, so an attacker would need to craft the payload themselves.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23 and earlier, in the 6.5 LTS line, and in AEM Cloud Service lets a low-privileged authenticated account inject malicious JavaScript into form fields that is later rendered in the browser of any user who visits the affected page. An attacker therefore needs a valid low-privileged author-level account (PR:L) plus a victim who browses the poisoned page (UI:R); successful execution is scoped to the victim's browser session, with low confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact (CVSS 5.4). No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, there is no CISA KEV listing, and EPSS is low at 0.25% (15th percentile), so this rates as a moderate-severity, limited-urgency item rather than an emergency patch.

RemediationAI

Apply Adobe's fix for this issue as documented in the vendor advisory APSB25-115 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb25-115.html), which is the authoritative source for the exact patched release; because the affected range is stated as 6.5.23 and earlier, installations should be upgraded to the fixed build Adobe lists in that advisory and should also verify whether the AEM Cloud Service instance has received the automatic service-side update. Where immediate upgrade is not possible, compensating controls should target the authoring path and the rendering of untrusted content: restrict author-level accounts capable of creating or editing form fields to the minimum trusted population and review them for stale or over-privileged users, harden AEM's built-in XSS protection/AntiSamy sanitizer policy so that script-bearing markup is stripped from stored form content (accepting that aggressive policies can strip legitimate rich-text formatting in existing content), and deploy a restrictive Content Security Policy on AEM publish pages to block inline script execution (with the caveat that CSP must be tested against custom components that rely on inline scripts). Because the payload only fires against users who view the poisoned page, monitoring and rate-limiting form submissions plus alerting on unexpected script content in authored fields can shorten the exposure window for high-privileged reviewers and administrators who are the most valuable victims.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This is a persistent (stored) cross-site scripting flaw in the CWE-79 class, rooted in insufficient output encoding or sanitization of user-supplied content that Adobe Experience Manager persists and later reflects into HTML pages. AEM is Adobe's enterprise content management and digital asset management platform, and the vulnerable surface is its form-building capability (adaptive/AEM Forms components and similar content-editable fields) where content authored by one user is rendered to other users. The scoped-change metric in the CVSS vector (S:C) indicates the injected script executes in a security context different from the vulnerable component, so the payload can act against the victim's session rather than the author's own. The published CPE strings identify three affected deployment shapes: the general adobe:experience_manager product line, the aem_cloud_service edition, and the explicit 6.5 LTS release marker, confirming that both on-premise/managed 6.5.x installations and the hosted Cloud Service are in scope.

Know when Experience Manager gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (adobe) PRIMARY 5.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Stored XSS requires an authenticated low-privileged author (PR:L) and a victim viewing the page (UI:R); script runs in the victim browser (S:C) with limited C/I impact and no availability effect.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (adobe).

CVSS VectorVendor: adobe

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely deployed enterprise CMS used by large organizations
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

27
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +27
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:*:*:*:*:aem_cloud_service:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:6.5:-:*:*:lts:*:*:*
CVE-2025-34510 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 17

Sitecore Experience Manager, Platform, and Commerce versions 9.0 through 10.4 contain a Zip Slip vulnerability that allo

CVE-2025-34511 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 17

Sitecore PowerShell Extensions through version 7.0 allows authenticated users to upload arbitrary files including ASPX w

CVE-2016-0957 HIGH POC
7.5 Feb 10

Dispatcher before 4.1.5 in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 does not properly implement a URL filter, wh

CVE-2025-53690 CRITICAL POC
9.0 Sep 03

Sitecore Experience Manager/Platform through version 9.0 contains a deserialization vulnerability enabling code injectio

CVE-2025-49533 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 08

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability that al

CVE-2025-34509 HIGH POC
7.5 Jun 17

Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) and Experience Platform (XP) versions 10.1 through 10.4.1 contain a hardcoded administr

CVE-2016-0956 HIGH POC
7.5 Feb 10

The Servlets Post component 2.3.6 in Apache Sling, as used in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0, allows r

CVE-2025-53693 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 03

Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in Sitecore Sitecore Ex

CVE-2023-35813 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 17

Multiple Sitecore products allow remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remote

CVE-2025-53691 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 03

Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Sitecore Experience Manager (XM), Sitecore Experience Platform (XP) a

CVE-2017-3108 CRITICAL
9.8 Aug 11

Adobe Experience Manager 6.2 and earlier has a malicious file execution vulnerability. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8

CVE-2025-54249 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Sep 09

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilit

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy