Adobe Experience Manager
CVE-2025-64576
MEDIUM
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged AEM account
-
DeliveryInject script into form field
-
ExploitPayload stored persistently
-
ExecutionVictim browses affected page
-
ImpactScript executes in victim browser
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated low-privileged AEM account with the ability to write to a vulnerable form field (PR:L), making this an insider-or-compromised-credential vector rather than fully anonymous. It is a STORED XSS, so the attacker must have access to a form/content field that persists input. Execution is gated by victim user interaction (UI:R): the malicious script only fires when a separate victim navigates to the page rendering the tainted field. Affected deployments are AEM 6.5.23 and earlier, AEM 6.5 LTS, and AEM Cloud Service per the CPE data. These limiting factors - required authentication, required victim browsing, and only Low confidentiality/integrity impact - meaningfully reduce real-world risk below the network-exploitable appearance of AV:N. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but moderate-priority issue, not a top-tier emergency. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.4 (Medium) reflects the real constraints encoded in the vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N: although the attack vector is network-based with low complexity, exploitation requires an authenticated low-privileged account (PR:L) AND victim user interaction (UI:R), with only Low confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact. The changed scope (S:C) correctly captures that injected script executes in a separate victim's browser context. The exploitation signals are consistent and point to low urgency: EPSS is only 0.25% (15th percentile), the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, and no public exploit code was identified in the provided data. There is no conflict between signals here - a low EPSS, absence of KEV listing, and no POC all reinforce that widespread or active exploitation is not currently indicated. The main residual risk is the product's broad enterprise footprint and the fact that stored XSS in a CMS form field can be persistent and reach multiple downstream page visitors once planted. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged authenticated user (e.g., a content author or form editor) injects malicious JavaScript into a vulnerable Adobe Experience Manager form field, where it is stored persistently. When another user - potentially a higher-privileged administrator or site visitor - later browses to the page containing that field, the script executes in their browser session. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, so this scenario is inferred from the description and CVSS vector rather than a demonstrated PoC. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23 and earlier, AEM 6.5 LTS, and AEM Cloud Service allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to inject malicious JavaScript into persistent form fields, which then executes in the browser of any user who views the affected page (CVSS 3.1 base 5.4, AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). Exploitation is not anonymous: it requires valid low-privilege credentials with permission to write to a vulnerable form field plus a separate victim browsing to the tainted page, and it is not confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) with no public exploit identified at time of analysis and a low EPSS of 0.25% (15th percentile). The impact is bounded to low confidentiality and integrity within the victim's browser session, but the changed scope (S:C) means injected script can act beyond the vulnerable component.
RemediationAI
Primary fix: apply the AEM update released under Adobe security bulletin APSB25-115 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb25-115.html); Adobe's bulletin is the authoritative source for the patched build, and because the provided data does not include an independently confirmed exact fixed version number, verify the target build against APSB25-115 before scheduling the upgrade rather than assuming 6.5.24 or any specific number. If immediate patching is not possible, the highest-value compensating controls are to tighten ACLs so that only trusted, non-low-privileged accounts can author or submit content into form fields and component dialogs, and to restrict author-tier access to the AEM author instance behind VPN or IP allowlisting (trade-off: reduces legitimate author mobility and can disrupt distributed editorial workflows). Deploying a strict Content Security Policy on AEM publish/author responses with script-src limited to trusted hosts will blunt most stored-XSS payload execution but can break inline-script-dependent custom components and requires testing. Input validation/sanitization on form submission endpoints and HTML-encoding of rendered field values reduces recurrence of this class, though retrofitting it into custom components carries a regression risk for legitimate rich-text content. Because exploitation requires victim interaction, user education and browser-side defenses are secondary but not substitutes for patching; monitor AEM audit logs for low-privilege accounts writing unexpected script-bearing content into form fields as a detection measure.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation), specifically the stored (persistent) variant, in Adobe Experience Manager's authoring and content-rendering layer. Because the payload is persisted server-side in a form/content field rather than reflected in a single response, it is rendered to every user who later opens the affected page, which is why the vector carries UI:R (a distinct victim must browse to the page) and S:C (the executed script can reach resources outside the AEM component's security scope, e.g. session tokens or cross-application actions in the victim's browser). CPE data confirms the affected surface spans the general AEM 6.5 track (cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:-:6.5:-:*:*:*:*:*:*), the AEM Cloud Service edition, and the 6.5 LTS release channel, so both self-hosted and cloud-hosted deployments are in scope. The PR:L element reflects that writing the payload requires an authenticated author-tier account rather than anonymous access, making this an insider-or-compromised-credential scenario; the net effect of PR:L plus UI:R plus only Low C/I impact is a materially lower real-world risk than the network-facing AV:N metric alone would suggest.
Know when Experience Manager gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Authenticated low-privileged author can inject (PR:L), stored payload fires only when a victim views the page (UI:R), and cross-context script execution in the victim browser justifies S:C with C:L/I:L.
Primary rating from Vendor (adobe).
CVSS VectorVendor: adobe
DescriptionCVE.org
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
More in Experience Manager
View allSitecore Experience Manager, Platform, and Commerce versions 9.0 through 10.4 contain a Zip Slip vulnerability that allo
Sitecore PowerShell Extensions through version 7.0 allows authenticated users to upload arbitrary files including ASPX w
Dispatcher before 4.1.5 in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 does not properly implement a URL filter, wh
Sitecore Experience Manager/Platform through version 9.0 contains a deserialization vulnerability enabling code injectio
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability that al
Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) and Experience Platform (XP) versions 10.1 through 10.4.1 contain a hardcoded administr
The Servlets Post component 2.3.6 in Apache Sling, as used in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0, allows r
Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in Sitecore Sitecore Ex
Multiple Sitecore products allow remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remote
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Sitecore Experience Manager (XM), Sitecore Experience Platform (XP) a
Adobe Experience Manager 6.2 and earlier has a malicious file execution vulnerability. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilit
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB