Adobe Experience Manager
CVE-2025-64553
MEDIUM
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privileged AEM user
-
DeliveryInject script into vulnerable form field
-
ExploitPayload stored in AEM
-
ExecutionVictim browses affected page
-
ImpactScript executes in victim browser origin
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an authenticated low-privileged AEM account (PR:L) with access to author/edit the vulnerable form fields, plus victim user interaction (UI:R) - a second user must browse to the page containing the injected field for the payload to fire. Impact is limited to script execution in the victim's browser within the AEM origin (C:L/I:L, no availability impact). Applies to AEM 6.5.23 and earlier, AEM Cloud Service, and AEM 6.5 LTS per the CPE data. The dual requirement of prior authentication and victim interaction meaningfully limits real-world exploitability against hardened, access-controlled AEM author environments. |
| Impact | This is a high-CVSS-context-but-low-real-risk issue. The CVSS 3.1 base score is only 5.4 (Medium), and every signal reinforces low practical urgency: EPSS is 0.20% (9th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code has been identified. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) shows the attack is double-gated - it requires an authenticated low-privileged account (PR:L) AND victim user interaction (UI:R) - with only low confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact. The scope change (S:C) reflects that injected script executes in the victim's browser origin rather than only the vulnerable component, which is standard for stored XSS. No signals conflict: low EPSS, no KEV, and no POC all agree with the modest base score. This is a routine hardening/patch-cycle item, not an emergency. The sole reference is the Adobe advisory APSB25-115; no independent EPSS-elevating or exploitation evidence exists. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged authenticated AEM author account injects malicious JavaScript into a vulnerable form field. The payload is stored, and when another user (e.g., an author, reviewer, or admin) later browses to the page containing that field, the script executes in their browser session, enabling session/context theft within the AEM origin. No public POC has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 25, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) 6.5.23 and earlier, AEM Cloud Service, and AEM 6.5 LTS allows an authenticated low-privileged user with rights to edit form fields to persist malicious JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser within the AEM origin when the victim views the affected page. Successful abuse is bounded by two prerequisites: a valid low-privileged AEM account (PR:L) and victim interaction (UI:R), so a second user must browse to the poisoned form field for the payload to fire; impact is limited to client-side script execution with low confidentiality and integrity effects and no availability impact. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV); EPSS is 0.20% (9th percentile), indicating low predicted exploitation likelihood in the near term, though the stored (persistent) nature of the XSS means any single successful injection can affect many downstream viewers of the page.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the fix referenced in Adobe security bulletin APSB25-115 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb25-115.html), which addresses the stored XSS in AEM 6.5.23 and earlier; the bulletin should be consulted for the exact fixed service pack or cumulative fix version for the 6.5/LTS track, and AEM Cloud Service customers should note that remediation is delivered through Adobe's managed update channel. Until the update is applied, the most effective compensating control is to reduce who can author or edit the affected form fields - restrict AEM author and form-editing permissions to trusted users and review existing ACLs, since the vulnerability requires a low-privileged account to inject the payload (trade-off: this narrows legitimate content-authoring workflows and may require role re-mapping). Additional layered mitigations include enforcing a Content Security Policy that disallows inline and untrusted script sources on AEM author and publish pages, deploying WAF/Dispatcher rules that reject or encode script-bearing input to form endpoints (trade-off: aggressive input filtering can break legitimate form content and must be tuned to avoid false positives), and auditing existing form definitions and content nodes for previously injected payloads that could remain stored after patching. As no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.20%), these controls are proportionate to a moderate, authentication-and-interaction-gated risk rather than an emergency; nevertheless, the persistent nature of stored XSS means any injected payload should be hunted and removed as part of remediation.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation), specifically the stored/persistent variant: user-supplied data written into AEM form fields is later rendered into pages without adequate output encoding or sanitization. Unlike reflected XSS, the payload is persisted server-side (e.g., in an AEM form component or content node) and re-served to every user who loads the page, which is why a single injection by a low-privileged author can affect other authors, reviewers, or publish-side visitors. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N confirms network reachability, low attack complexity, required low-privileged credentials, required user interaction, and a scope change (S:C) - the executed script runs in the security context of the AEM origin and can act beyond the vulnerable component (for example, reading content or performing actions as the victim session). CPE data identifies the affected codebase as Adobe Experience Manager across three deployment tracks: the on-premise/managed 6.5 line (cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:*:*:*:*:-), the cloud edition (cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:*:*:*:*:aem_cloud_service), and the long-term-support branch (cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:6.5:-:*:*:*:lts). Because the vulnerable component is the web authoring/form layer itself, exploitation occurs within normal AEM traffic over HTTP(S) and does not require unusual protocols or ports.
Know when Experience Manager gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Stored XSS needs an authenticated author (PR:L) to inject and victim browsing (UI:R); script runs cross-context (S:C) with limited C:L/I:L and no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (adobe).
CVSS VectorVendor: adobe
DescriptionCVE.org
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
More in Experience Manager
View allSitecore Experience Manager, Platform, and Commerce versions 9.0 through 10.4 contain a Zip Slip vulnerability that allo
Sitecore PowerShell Extensions through version 7.0 allows authenticated users to upload arbitrary files including ASPX w
Dispatcher before 4.1.5 in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 does not properly implement a URL filter, wh
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability that al
Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) and Experience Platform (XP) versions 10.1 through 10.4.1 contain a hardcoded administr
The Servlets Post component 2.3.6 in Apache Sling, as used in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0, allows r
Multiple Sitecore products allow remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remote
Adobe Experience Manager 6.2 and earlier has a malicious file execution vulnerability. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilit
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Sitecore Sitecore Experience Manager (XM), S
An issue was discovered in Sitecore Experience Platform (XP), Experience Manager (XM), and Experience Commerce (XC) 8.0
An issue in the MVC Device Simulator of Sitecore Experience Platform (XP), Experience Manager (XM), and Experience Comme
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB