Skip to main content

Adobe Experience Manager CVE-2025-64538

CRITICAL
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2025-12-10 psirt@adobe.com
9.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: adobe
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Craft malicious page targeting DOM sink
  2. Delivery
    Phish authenticated AEM user to visit
  3. Exploit
    Victim browser executes injected script
  4. Execution
    Steal session tokens in AEM origin
  5. Impact
    Session takeover / act as victim

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires user interaction (UI:R): a victim - realistically an authenticated AEM author/user whose session is worth taking over - must visit an attacker-crafted malicious page or click a crafted link that feeds attacker-controlled input into a vulnerable client-side DOM sink in AEM. No authentication is required of the attacker (PR:N) and no special AEM server configuration is named in the advisory, so default deployments of AEM 6.5.23 and earlier, AEM Cloud Service, and AEM 6.5 LTS are in scope. The primary limiting factor is the social-engineering step needed to make a victim load the malicious content; impact (session takeover) is greatest against users already holding valuable AEM sessions.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N, base 9.3) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated DOM-based XSS whose only gating factor is user interaction (the victim must visit a crafted page). The high score is driven by the scope change (S:C) plus C:H/I:H, which Adobe justifies via session takeover - realistic for XSS in an authoring/CMS context. However, the real-world exploitation signals are muted: EPSS is only 0.64% (48th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing (no confirmed active exploitation), and no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis. This is a case where a high CVSS score reflects potential impact rather than demonstrated exploitation likelihood - the UI:R requirement and the need to socially engineer a victim into loading attacker-controlled DOM content meaningfully lower practical risk versus a no-interaction flaw. Note also that the 'arbitrary code execution' language and the 'RCE' tag are misleading: this is client-side script execution in the victim's browser (session takeover), not server-side code execution on the AEM host. Treat as a medium-priority patch item: genuinely impactful if a targeted phishing/social-engineering chain succeeds against authenticated AEM users, but not evidence of mass or automated exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a malicious web page (or a link with attacker-controlled DOM sink input) and lures an authenticated AEM user into visiting it; the injected script executes in the victim's browser in the AEM origin context, allowing session token/cookie theft and session takeover. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and the low attack complexity (AC:L) means the technical bar is low once a victim is induced to click. Success hinges entirely on the required user interaction.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 25, 2026

DOM-based cross-site scripting in Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23 and earlier, the AEM Cloud Service, and the AEM 6.5 LTS release lets unauthenticated remote attackers run arbitrary script in the context of a victim's browser, which can lead to session takeover and high confidentiality and integrity impact. The only gating factor is user interaction (CVSS UI:R): a victim - realistically an authenticated AEM author or admin holding a valuable session - must load an attacker-crafted page or link that feeds attacker-controlled input into a vulnerable client-side DOM sink. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and there is no CISA KEV listing; EPSS is 0.64% (48th percentile), indicating low near-term exploitation probability by mass scanning, though the 9.3 base score and AEM's role as an enterprise content platform keep it a priority patching target.

RemediationAI

Apply the fixed release identified in Adobe security bulletin APSB25-115 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb25-115.html) - patch status is "Patch available per vendor advisory"; upgrade AEM 6.5 deployments to the latest 6.5 service pack listed there (anything above 6.5.23), and confirm that AEM Cloud Service and AEM 6.5 LTS instances have received the automatic channel update, since pre-patch installations remain exploitable indefinitely. Until upgrading is possible, deploy a Content Security Policy with restrictive script-src that blocks inline and untrusted-script execution (effective against most DOM-sink payloads but can break legitimate AEM authoring components and third-party integrations if not tuned with nonces/hashes), terminate or virtually patch reflected payloads at a WAF/reverse proxy (only partially effective against DOM-based XSS because the payload may never traverse the server), and audit custom client-side components and templates for unsafe DOM sinks (innerHTML, document.write, eval, jQuery .html()) to add contextual output encoding. Reduce blast radius by enforcing short session lifetimes, HttpOnly/Secure cookies, and re-authentication for privileged administrative actions so a hijacked author session cannot be leveraged for broader content or configuration changes, and require phishing-resistant MFA on author accounts to blunt the social-engineering step this attack depends on.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This is a CWE-79 improper neutralization of input during web page generation, specifically the DOM-based variant: rather than being reflected or stored by the AEM server, the payload is processed entirely in the browser when client-side JavaScript reads attacker-influenced data from a source (URL fragment, query string, DOM property, postMessage, or similar) and writes it into an unsafe sink such as innerHTML, document.write, or an eval-like construct. Because the AEM application code itself performs the unsafe write, server-side output encoding does not mitigate it. The CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N vector confirms a network-reachable, low-complexity attack requiring no attacker authentication but requiring victim interaction, with a scope change (S:C) that reflects the script escaping the vulnerable component into the victim's browser security context. The CPE strings cover the mainline aem 6.5 branch (all versions up to and including 6.5.23), the aem_cloud_service channel, and the 6.5 lts release, meaning default enterprise deployments across on-premise, managed services, and cloud are all in scope.

Know when Experience Manager gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (adobe) PRIMARY 9.3 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 9.3 CRITICAL

Network DOM-XSS, no attacker auth (PR:N) but victim interaction required (UI:R); execution in browser crosses into the AEM security context (S:C) enabling session takeover (C:H/I:H), no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (adobe).

CVSS VectorVendor: adobe

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts into a web page that are executed in the context of the victim's browser. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality and integrity impact as high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted malicious page.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A critical DOM-based cross-site scripting weakness in Adobe Experience Manager (6.5.23 and earlier, AEM Cloud Service, and AEM 6.5 LTS) allows an attacker-crafted page or link to execute script in the browser of an AEM author or administrator, potentially handing over an authenticated privileged session. Because AEM underpins customer-facing digital properties and internal content workflows, a successful session takeover could expose or allow tampering with published content and administrative functions. Leadership should care because the affected population is privileged platform users rather than the general public, and no vendor patch is currently available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict AEM author/admin interfaces to trusted networks or VPN, enforce short privileged session timeouts and re-authentication, deploy a strict Content Security Policy and apply output encoding/sanitization to client-side DOM sinks, warn administrators and authors against loading untrusted pages or links while authenticated, and monitor for anomalous session activity or unauthorized content modification. Note that no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 52% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely-deployed enterprise CMS across large-brand and government web properties
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

47
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:*:*:*:*:aem_cloud_service:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:adobe:experience_manager:6.5:-:*:*:lts:*:*:*
CVE-2025-34510 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 17

Sitecore Experience Manager, Platform, and Commerce versions 9.0 through 10.4 contain a Zip Slip vulnerability that allo

CVE-2025-34511 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 17

Sitecore PowerShell Extensions through version 7.0 allows authenticated users to upload arbitrary files including ASPX w

CVE-2016-0957 HIGH POC
7.5 Feb 10

Dispatcher before 4.1.5 in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 does not properly implement a URL filter, wh

CVE-2025-53690 CRITICAL POC
9.0 Sep 03

Sitecore Experience Manager/Platform through version 9.0 contains a deserialization vulnerability enabling code injectio

CVE-2025-49533 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 08

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability that al

CVE-2025-34509 HIGH POC
7.5 Jun 17

Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) and Experience Platform (XP) versions 10.1 through 10.4.1 contain a hardcoded administr

CVE-2016-0956 HIGH POC
7.5 Feb 10

The Servlets Post component 2.3.6 in Apache Sling, as used in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0, allows r

CVE-2025-53693 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 03

Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in Sitecore Sitecore Ex

CVE-2023-35813 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 17

Multiple Sitecore products allow remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remote

CVE-2025-53691 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 03

Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Sitecore Experience Manager (XM), Sitecore Experience Platform (XP) a

CVE-2017-3108 CRITICAL
9.8 Aug 11

Adobe Experience Manager 6.2 and earlier has a malicious file execution vulnerability. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8

CVE-2025-54249 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Sep 09

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilit

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy