FortiExtender CVE-2025-64153
HIGHAttack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain high-privilege admin session
-
DeliverySend crafted HTTP request to vulnerable endpoint
-
ExploitInject OS command via unneutralized input
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary commands on FortiExtender OS
-
ImpactFull device compromise and pivot
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold a high-privilege (administrative) authenticated session on the FortiExtender device (CVSS PR:H) and network reachability to its management/HTTP interface. The trigger is a specific crafted HTTP request to a feature that improperly neutralizes special shell characters (CWE-78). Limiting factors: (1) high-privilege authentication is mandatory, so only administrators or attackers who have already compromised admin credentials/sessions can exploit it; (2) the management interface must be network-accessible to the attacker - restricting admin access to trusted management networks substantially reduces exposure; (3) only FortiExtender firmware 7.6.0-7.6.3, 7.4.0-7.4.7, and all 7.2.x / 7.0.x builds are affected. No user interaction is required (UI:N). |
| Impact | This is a moderate-priority, authenticated-only command injection flaw. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N, base 7.2 HIGH) is internally consistent with the description: network-reachable via a specific HTTP request, low complexity, but requiring high privileges (PR:H), which strongly caps real-world risk since the attacker must already hold an administrative/high-privilege session on the FortiExtender management interface. EPSS is 1.71% (77th percentile) - elevated above the median but not indicative of mass exploitation, which aligns with the PR:H barrier. There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC referenced in the provided data, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or public exploit code. No SSVC decision data was supplied. The signals are therefore consistent rather than conflicting: a genuine post-authentication RCE on a network appliance (which matters for defense-in-depth and privilege-boundary integrity), but not a drop-everything internet-wide emergency given the authentication requirement. The practical risk is a privileged admin (or a credential-theft/session-hijack attacker who has already obtained admin access) escalating from configuration control to full OS command execution on the device. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already obtained high-privilege (administrative) access to a FortiExtender's management interface sends a crafted HTTP request to a vulnerable endpoint that fails to neutralize shell metacharacters, causing injected OS commands to run with the device's privileges. No public proof-of-concept is referenced in the provided data. Because CVSS specifies AV:N/AC:L, the request itself is simple and remotely deliverable once authenticated, making this a realistic privilege-boundary bypass for a compromised or malicious admin. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
OS command injection in Fortinet FortiExtender firmware lets an attacker who already holds a high-privilege administrative session run arbitrary operating-system commands on the device by sending a crafted HTTP request to the management interface. All builds of 7.0.x and 7.2.x are affected along with 7.4.0 through 7.4.7 and 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, and successful exploitation yields full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 3.1 base 7.2, AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Exploitation is gated behind admin authentication, so only administrators or attackers who have already stolen admin credentials/sessions can trigger it; no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is 1.71% (77th percentile).
RemediationAI
Treat Fortinet PSIRT advisory FG-IR-25-739 (https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-739) as the source of truth and upgrade to the fixed firmware build it designates for your branch; the provided data does not enumerate an exact patched version, so no version number should be assumed, and deployments on the 7.0.x and 7.2.x branches - which are affected in all releases - may require migrating to a currently supported train if no fix is published for them. Until you can upgrade, the most effective control is reducing exposure of the management surface: restrict the FortiExtender administrative/HTTP interface to a dedicated, trusted management VLAN or out-of-band network via firewall policy and interface-level trusted-host/administrator-address settings, which directly addresses the network reachability precondition and has the operational side effect of requiring VPN or jump-host access for administrators. Because exploitation requires a high-privilege authenticated session, also rotate and tighten admin credentials, enforce multi-factor authentication where supported, remove unused administrative accounts, review logs for anomalous administrative HTTP requests, and invalidate any sessions that may have been obtained through prior credential theft; each of these reduces the chance an already-positioned attacker can reach the vulnerable handler but does not remove the underlying flaw, so patching remains the only complete fix.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a classic OS command injection (CWE-78) in the FortiExtender firmware's web-based management/HTTP stack, where user-supplied input from a specific HTTP request is passed into a shell command without neutralizing special elements such as command separators, pipes, or substitution characters. Because the vulnerable code executes with the privileges of the underlying appliance process, an attacker who can reach the request handler with a high-privilege authenticated session can chain shell metacharacters into that request to run arbitrary commands on the FortiExtender device, escaping the intended HTTP-facing logic and reaching the underlying OS. The CPE data (cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortiextender_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) confirms the affected component is FortiExtender firmware rather than a separate application; the operating system image itself carries the vulnerable handler. The CVSS vector's PR:H reflects that this is not a pre-authentication bug: the attacker must already be an authenticated administrator, which shifts the threat model toward post-compromise privilege escalation, malicious/rogue insiders, credential theft, and lateral movement from a compromised management plane rather than mass opportunistic internet scanning.
Know when Fortiextender Firmware gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Remotely reachable HTTP endpoint (AV:N/AC:L) but requires an existing administrative session (PR:H); OS command execution yields full C:H/I:H/A:H with no scope change.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionNVD
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Fortinet FortiExtender 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiExtender 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiExtender 7.2 all versions, FortiExtender 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via a specific HTTP request.
Executive ViewAI
A command-injection vulnerability in Fortinet FortiExtender firmware (all 7.0.x and 7.2.x builds, 7.4.0-7.4.7, and 7.6.0-7.6.3) would let anyone holding a high-privilege administrator session run arbitrary operating-system commands on the device, yielding complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on that unit. The practical exposure is therefore concentrated in organizations that expose FortiExtender management interfaces or have weak administrative credential and session hygiene, since an attacker must first obtain admin access. Leadership should treat this as a manageable but real risk to cellular/WAN edge connectivity and any networks reachable through the device; no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: remove public exposure of the FortiExtender management interface and restrict administrative access to trusted internal or out-of-band networks; enforce multi-factor authentication; rotate admin credentials and invalidate lingering sessions; apply least-privilege administrative roles; segment affected devices away from sensitive internal networks; and monitor management-interface and system logs for anomalous command execution until a fixed firmware build is available.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
Affected Products (CPE)NVD
More in Fortiextender Firmware
View allAn improper access control in Fortinet FortiExtender 4.1.1 - 4.1.9, 4.2.0 - 4.2.6, 5.3.2, 7.0.0 - 7.0.4, 7.2.0 - 7.2.4 a
An OS command injection vulnerability in FortiExtender 4.1.0 to 4.1.1, 4.0.0 and below under CLI admin console may allow
A buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiExtender 7.6.0 t
A debug messages revealing unnecessary information vulnerability in Fortinet FortiExtender 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, FortiExt
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB