Skip to main content

Zimbra Collaboration CVE-2025-62763

MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2025-10-21 cve@mitre.org
5.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to Zimbra account
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious chat proxy request
  3. Exploit
    Trigger SSRF via chat proxy
  4. Execution
    Reach internal/restricted services
  5. Impact
    Exfiltrate or manipulate internal responses

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated session on Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS before 10.1.12) with access to the chat feature; exploitation leverages the configuration of the chat proxy to issue server-side requests. Limiting factors: valid credentials are needed (PR:L, so not remote-unauthenticated), the chat proxy functionality must be configured/reachable, and the realistic impact depends on what internal services are reachable from the Zimbra host. No user interaction by a victim is required.

Impact

This is a moderate, authenticated SSRF (CWE-918) in Zimbra Collaboration, and the signals are internally consistent at the lower-mid tier. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N, base 5.0) indicates a network-reachable but authenticated (PR:L) flaw with a scope change - consistent with a proxy pivoting requests into internal systems - but with only low integrity impact and no confidentiality or availability impact claimed. The EPSS score of 0.26% (16th percentile) is low, indicating no significant observed exploitation activity. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Collectively these put this below top patch priority in isolation: it is not a high-CVSS-but-overrated issue so much as a genuinely mid-severity authenticated bug. The caveat worth flagging: SSRF of this class frequently carries real confidentiality impact (reading internal metadata/services) even though the vendor/NVD vector sets C:N - defenders should not assume zero data exposure. Given Zimbra's history as a repeatedly and aggressively targeted enterprise platform, chaining potential makes patching to 10.1.12 advisable despite the modest standalone score.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated Zimbra user abuses the misconfigured chat proxy to coerce the server into issuing attacker-controlled requests to internal network resources (e.g., cloud metadata endpoints or internal-only services), using the server as a pivot behind the firewall. Because scope is changed, responses or side effects can reach systems the attacker could not otherwise access. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires valid account access.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026

Server-side request forgery in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) before 10.1.12 lets an authenticated user who can reach the chat feature abuse the misconfigured chat proxy to make the Zimbra server issue requests to internal or otherwise unreachable network services. The vulnerability carries a CVSS of 5.0 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C) and is rated low by threat intelligence signals - EPSS is only 0.26% (16th percentile) and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis - because the attacker must already hold valid credentials and the chat proxy must be configured and reachable. Exploitation requires no victim interaction, but real-world impact is bounded by which internal services the Zimbra host can reach; our independent assessment rates the confidentiality impact as low (C:L/I:N) rather than the integrity impact NVD records.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade Zimbra Collaboration Suite to version 10.1.12 or later, as documented in the vendor patch release notes at https://blog.zimbra.com/2025/10/patch-release-update-zimbra-10-1-12/ and https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Releases/10.1.12. Until the upgrade can be scheduled, the most effective compensating control is to disable or block the chat proxy entirely if the chat feature is not in active use - this removes the vulnerable code path but sacrifices chat functionality for all users; note that the SSRF is only exploitable by an authenticated account, so tightening mailbox/account provisioning and reviewing privileged or shared accounts reduces the pool of possible attackers. Network-layer controls also materially reduce impact given the Scope:Changed rating: place the Zimbra host in a segmented VLAN with egress filtering that denies server-initiated traffic to RFC1918 ranges, loopback, link-local, and cloud metadata addresses (169.254.169.254), and restrict what internal services the Zimbra host can reach - the trade-off is that legitimate chat backend communications must be explicitly allow-listed to avoid breaking chat. Monitor Zimbra logs for anomalous outbound requests originating from the chat proxy process, and consult https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories for any updated vendor guidance or hotfixes applicable to older release branches.

Affected ProductsAI

Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) versions before 10.1.12 are affected, specifically where the chat proxy feature is deployed and configured; the flaw is fixed in the 10.1.12 release. No CPE enumeration accompanied the advisory data, so version identification should be done against the vendor's own documentation at https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Releases/10.1.12 and the release's Security Fixes section (https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Releases/10.1.12#Security_Fixes). Administrators should consult the Zimbra Security Center (https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center) and the Zimbra Security Advisories page (https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories) to confirm whether a given installation, including any 9.x or earlier branch, falls inside the affected range, and should verify their current build via the Zimbra version banner or zmcontrol -v before applying updates.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The issue is a classic server-side request forgery (CWE-918) rooted in the configuration of Zimbra's chat proxy component. The chat proxy is the intermediary that Zimbra's chat service uses to forward client requests toward the chat backend (tyipcally a separate service/port on the internal network), and its trust boundaries and target resolution logic are is what breaks: because the proxy accepts user-controlled request parameters and does not adequately restrict the destination, an authenticated user can redirect those requests to arbitrary hosts, including loopback, RFC1918 addresses, or cloud metadata endpoints. The CVSS:3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N) confirms the attack is network-reachable, low complexity, and requires low privileges - i.e. an authenticated account, not an unauthenticated internet attacker - with no victim user interaction. The Scope:Changed rating indicates the vulnerable chat proxy can affect resources beyond its own security authority (the internal network it fronts), which is precisely the SSRF trust-boundary escape. Given the vector, the practical exposure is information disclosure from reachable internal services (our assessment favors C:L over NVD's I:L), and the severity therefore hinges heavily on network segmentation around the Zimbra host. No CPE data was supplied, but the affected code path is version-bound to ZCS builds prior to 10.1.12.

Know when Zimbra gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY 5.0 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.0 MEDIUM

Authenticated chat user (PR:L) sends network requests (AV:N/AC:L/UI:N); proxy pivots to internal systems (S:C); SSRF typically discloses internal responses so C:L rather than vendor's I:L.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.12 allows SSRF because of the configuration of the chat proxy.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely deployed enterprise email/collaboration suite, frequently targeted
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

25
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +25
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

More in Zimbra

View all
CVE-2026-73570 HIGH POC
8.9 Aug 13

Remote code execution in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.20 enables unauthenticated network attackers to execute

CVE-2022-37393 HIGH POC
7.8 Aug 16

Zimbra's sudo configuration permits the zimbra user to execute the zmslapd binary as root with arbitrary parameters. Rat

CVE-2021-35209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 02

An issue was discovered in ProxyServlet.java in the /proxy servlet in Zimbra Collaboration Suite 8.8 before 8.8.15 Patch

CVE-2025-71275 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 24

A critical unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration Suite PostJournal service

CVE-2015-6541 HIGH POC
8.8 Apr 08

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Mail interface in Zimbra Collaboration Server (ZCS) be

CVE-2022-41347 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 26

An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.x and 9.x (e.g., 8.8.15). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this

CVE-2013-7217 CRITICAL
10.0 Dec 26

Unspecified vulnerability in Zimbra Collaboration Server 7.2.5 and earlier, and 8.0.x through 8.0.5, has "critical" impa

CVE-2024-27443 MEDIUM POC
6.1 Aug 12

An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 9.0 and 10.0. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.1), this vulnerability

CVE-2026-93643 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 25

Unauthenticated remote attackers who can reach an existing publicly shared Briefcase document can abuse unsigned save fi

CVE-2023-29382 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 06

An issue in Zimbra Collaboration ZCS v.8.8.15 and v.9.0 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the sfdc_preaut

CVE-2023-29381 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 06

An issue in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) v.8.8.15 and v.9.0 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges and obtain sen

CVE-2022-32294 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 11

Zimbra Collaboration Open Source 8.8.15 does not encrypt the initial-login randomly created password (from the "zmprove

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy