Ruijie RG-BCR860 CVE-2025-56088
HIGHAttack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to RG-BCR860 web UI
-
DeliverySend crafted POST to action_service
-
ExploitInject shell command via service.lua
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary OS commands
-
ImpactFull device compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires network access to the RG-BCR860 device management interface AND valid authentication at low privilege (PR:L), after which a crafted POST request to the action_service action in /usr/lib/lua/luci/controller/admin/service.lua triggers OS command injection (CWE-78). The key limiting factor is that this is NOT unauthenticated - an attacker must first possess or obtain credentials to the LuCI admin web service, so risk concentrates on devices with weak/default/shared credentials or whose management interface is exposed to untrusted networks. No special non-default feature toggle is indicated in the description; the vulnerable controller appears to be part of the standard admin service. No user interaction is required (UI:N). |
| Impact | This is a credible but not top-tier emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity OS command injection requiring only low-level authenticated privileges, yielding full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) - consistent with a CWE-78 flaw in a LuCI web controller. Publicly available exploit code exists (per the referenced GitHub write-up), which raises practical risk, and the EPSS score of 3.46% at the 89th percentile indicates above-average but not extreme predicted exploitation activity. The vulnerability is NOT in CISA KEV, so there is no confirmation of active in-the-wild exploitation - the signals align as 'public PoC + moderate-high EPSS, no confirmed active exploitation.' The main tempering factor is PR:L: exploitation requires valid (even if low-privilege) authentication to the device, meaning this is not a pure unauthenticated takeover. Net: a real priority for anyone operating RG-BCR860 devices, especially internet-exposed management interfaces, but the authentication requirement and absence of KEV listing suggest it is not yet subject to mass automated exploitation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has valid low-privilege credentials (or obtained them via default/weak passwords) to the RG-BCR860 management web interface sends a crafted POST request to the action_service endpoint in service.lua, injecting shell metacharacters that are passed to an OS command. Because a public PoC exists, the payload and endpoint are documented, lowering the skill needed. Successful injection executes arbitrary commands with the privileges of the LuCI/web backend, typically leading to full device compromise. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
OS command injection in Ruijie RG-BCR860 firmware lets an authenticated remote attacker execute arbitrary commands on the device by sending a crafted POST request to the action_service action handled in /usr/lib/lua/luci/controller/admin/service.lua. The CVSS 3.1 vector (8.8, AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) shows the attacker must already hold low-privilege credentials for the LuCI management interface, so risk concentrates on gateways with weak, default, or shared admin passwords or with the management web service exposed to untrusted networks. Publicly available exploit code exists and EPSS is 3.46% (89th percentile); there is no CISA KEV listing, so this is not confirmed active exploitation.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch was identified at time of analysis, so the researcher write-up at https://github.com/flegoity/Ruijie-Multiple-Devices-Vulnerability-Reports-for-CVE/blob/main/CVE-2025-56088.md (with supporting OneDrive material referenced from NVD) is the only authoritative technical source to track while awaiting a Ruijie firmware update. Because exploitation requires valid low-privilege authentication (PR:L), the highest-value compensating control is credential hygiene: immediately replace default, shared, or weak admin passwords with unique strong ones and remove accounts that do not need management access, accepting the operational cost of distributing and rotating credentials. Second, eliminate the AV:N attack path by blocking Internet exposure of the LuCI management web service (typically TCP 80/443) with upstream firewall rules or ACLs and confining admin access to a trusted management VLAN or VPN; the trade-off is loss of convenient remote administration. Third, if remote management is not required, disable WAN-side management in the device UI entirely, and log/monitor for anomalous POST requests to the action_service endpoint since successful exploitation may otherwise go unnoticed. These measures only reduce exposure and do not remove the underlying injection flaw, so applying a vendor firmware fix as soon as it becomes available remains the only complete remediation.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-78 OS command injection in the embedded LuCI management stack that ships with the RG-BCR860 firmware. LuCI is the Lua-based MVC web framework used by OpenWrt-derived firmware, where controller files map HTTP routes to Lua handler functions; here the 'action_service' action in /usr/lib/lua/luci/controller/admin/service.lua takes attacker-controlled POST parameters and passes them unsanitized into a shell execution primitive (such as os.execute, io.popen, or LuCI's sys.exec), so shell metacharacters are interpreted with the privileges of the web service, typically root on an embedded router. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms a network-reachable, low-complexity path that requires only low-privilege authentication and no user interaction, resulting in full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the device. The CPE cpe:2.3:o:ruijie:rg-bcr860_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the affected artifact as the router firmware image itself rather than a discrete application, and the vulnerable controller is part of the standard admin service rather than an optional feature toggle.
Know when Rg Bcr860 Firmware gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable web endpoint (AV:N), straightforward crafted POST (AC:L), requires authenticated low-privilege access to admin service (PR:L), no interaction (UI:N); OS command execution gives full C/I/A.
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
DescriptionCVE.org
OS Command Injection vulnerability in Ruijie RG-BCR RG-BCR860 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted POST request to the action_service in file /usr/lib/lua/luci/controller/admin/service.lua.
Executive ViewAI
Ruijie RG-BCR860 branch gateway routers are affected by a high-severity command injection flaw (CVE-2025-56088) that allows anyone holding valid low-privilege management credentials to run arbitrary commands on the device, effectively handing over full control of the gateway. Because these devices typically sit at the network edge routing branch traffic, a compromise could expose internal networks, allow traffic interception or redirection, and serve as a foothold for lateral movement. Leadership should care because no vendor patch is currently available, publicly available exploit code exists, and the practical barrier to entry is low wherever default, weak, or shared administrator passwords remain in use or the management interface is reachable from untrusted networks.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: remove or firewall off internet/untrusted-network exposure of the LuCI management interface; restrict management access to a dedicated administrative VLAN or jump host with MFA; eliminate default, weak, and shared admin passwords and rotate all low-privilege credentials; monitor and alert on POST requests to the action_service action handled by /usr/lib/lua/luci/controller/admin/service.lua; segment affected gateways so a compromise cannot reach sensitive internal networks; and consider replacement or added inspection at the network edge for devices that cannot be isolated.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
More in Rg Bcr860 Firmware
View allOS command injection in the Ruijie RG-BCR860 router firmware (build 2.5.13-r2224) lets attackers with a valid low-privil
Authenticated attackers with low-privilege access can execute arbitrary OS commands on Ruijie RG-BCR860 routers by sendi
OS command injection in Ruijie RG-BCR860 firmware allows authenticated attackers with network access to the LuCI web man
OS command injection in the Ruijie RG-BCR860 wireless router (firmware 2.5.13) lets an authenticated attacker execute ar
A vulnerability was found in Ruijie RG-BCR860 2.5.13 and classified as critical. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.2), this vu
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub
Exploit-DB