CTERA Portal CVE-2025-52196
HIGHAttack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain access to portal file handling
-
DeliveryUpload crafted HTML with internal-target iframe
-
ExploitServer renders and fetches iframe URL
-
ExecutionServer-side request hits internal resource
-
ImpactExfiltrate internal response data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to get a crafted HTML file containing an <iframe> into a context where CTERA Portal 8.1.x (build 8.1.1417.24) parses or renders it, so the server follows the iframe's source URL and issues the attacker-directed HTTP request; the realistic prerequisite is the ability to upload or share an HTML file into the portal, which typically implies an authenticated/provisioned account despite the NVD PR:N rating. Limiting factors: the vulnerability is confined to the specific 8.1.x build identified, impact is confidentiality-only (S:U, no integrity/availability), and SSRF reach depends on the portal server's network position and egress controls to internal services. |
| Impact | The NVD CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N = 7.5) frames this as a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated SSRF with high confidentiality impact and no integrity or availability impact - consistent with CWE-918. However, the signals conflict: the description requires an attacker to supply 'a crafted HTML file containing an iframe,' which implies the attacker must get that file into the portal (upload/preview/share), a capability that in CTERA Portal typically requires an authenticated account - this contradicts the PR:N (unauthenticated) rating and should be verified with the vendor. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no confirmed POC flag are present in the input, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation; one of the two references is a GitHub gist (simonecris) that plausibly contains a write-up or proof-of-concept but its exploit status is not confirmed by the input. SSVC-style read: exploitation = none observed, automatable = likely no (requires crafting/placing an HTML file and a limited single-version target), technical impact = partial (confidentiality-only SSRF, S:U). Net: this is a legitimate but moderate-priority issue - a high-ish CVSS confidentiality SSRF constrained to a single narrow product build, not an urgent mass-exploitation threat absent any EPSS/KEV signal. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker places a crafted HTML file containing an <iframe> pointing at an internal URL (e.g., a cloud metadata endpoint or internal service) where the CTERA Portal server processes or renders it, causing the server to issue an attacker-controlled HTTP request from its trusted network position. The referenced GitHub gist may provide a proof-of-concept, but its exploit status is not confirmed by the input data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 05, 2026
Server-side request forgery in CTERA Portal 8.1.x (specifically build 8.1.1417.24) allows an attacker to make the portal server issue arbitrary HTTP requests by supplying a crafted HTML file whose embedded iframe points at an attacker-chosen URL. NVD scores this 7.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N), while our independent assessment keeps the high confidentiality impact but raises the privilege requirement to PR:L, because a realistic attacker must first get the HTML file into a context the portal parses or renders - typically an upload or share operation that requires an authenticated/provisioned account. Impact is confidentiality-only (no integrity or availability effect), the flaw is confined to the identified 8.1.x build, no public exploit code is confirmed in the available data, and no CISA KEV listing indicates active exploitation.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version is specified in the available intelligence, so the first action is to consult the CTERA knowledge base at https://kb.ctera.com/docs/81x-portal for the fixed portal build and upgrade away from 8.1.1417.24 as soon as an update is published; patch status should be treated as unconfirmed rather than negative. Until then, the highest-value compensating control is network egress restriction on the portal server: apply firewall or forward-proxy allow-listing so the portal can only reach the specific external services it legitimately needs, which directly defeats the SSRF but may break cloud connectors, remote backup and federated sharing features that rely on broader outbound access. Additional measures with their own trade-offs include disabling or blocking server-side HTML rendering and HTML file preview/upload where the product allows it (reduces SSRF reach but degrades collaboration workflows), requiring and auditing authentication for all upload and share operations given the assessed PR:L prerequisite, placing portal instances in a segmented VLAN with no routability to management interfaces or cloud metadata endpoints such as 169.254.169.254, and monitoring outbound HTTP logs from portal hosts for requests to unexpected internal addresses. Review the linked public write-up at https://gist.github.com/simonecris/99baeb07fe6e1803d461e44031819cd3 for reproduction details that can inform detection rules.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This is a classic CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery in CTERA Portal, a web-based enterprise file services and collaboration portal. The portal accepts HTML content (for example as an uploaded or shared file) and, when that content is rendered or previewed, follows the URL referenced by an <iframe> element from the server side rather than solely in the client browser. Because the request originates from the portal server, the attacker inherits that server's network position and can probe internal-only services, cloud metadata endpoints, or other hosts unreachable from the public internet. The affected artifact is pinned by CPE cpe:2.3:a:ctera:ctera:8.1.1417.24, indicating the specific 8.1.x build rather than the whole product line. The CVSS vector confirms network reachability (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no user interaction (UI:N) and scope unchanged (S:U), with the only impact being high confidentiality loss (C:H) and none to integrity or availability - the expected signature of an SSRF used for internal reconnaissance and data exfiltration rather than for code execution. Practical exploitability therefore depends heavily on the portal server's egress filtering and network segmentation.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Supplying an HTML file to the portal realistically needs an authenticated account (PR:L); low complexity, server-side fetch with no user interaction, confidentiality-only SSRF impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
DescriptionCVE.org
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Ctera Portal 8.1.x (8.1.1417.24) allows remote attackers to induce the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests via a crafted HTML file containing an iframe.
Executive ViewAI
CTERA Portal 8.1.x (build 8.1.1417.24), the enterprise file collaboration and sharing platform, is affected by a server-side request forgery flaw that allows an attacker to leverage the portal as a relay for reaching internal network services and confidential content that should never be externally reachable. Because the vulnerable system commonly sits at the center of business file-sharing workflows, the impact is a quiet confidentiality exposure of data entrusted to the platform, with no service disruption to signal that a breach has occurred. Leadership should care because no vendor patch is currently available, meaning risk must be managed through network controls and monitoring until CTERA releases a fix.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce strict outbound egress filtering or an allowlisting forward proxy on portal appliances to block requests to internal, loopback, link-local, and cloud metadata addresses; segment portal servers into a restricted network zone with least-privilege internal reachability; disable or restrict HTML upload, rendering, and share features where business use allows; limit the number of authenticated or provisioned accounts that can upload or share content; and enable enhanced logging with alerting on anomalous portal-originated outbound connections.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub
VulDB
Exploit-DB