Skip to main content

Sauter wsc server CVE-2025-41722

HIGH
Use of Hard-coded Credentials (CWE-798)
2025-10-22 info@cert.vde.com
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: cert
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach wsc server over network
  2. Exploit
    Extract hard-coded private key
  3. Execution
    Forge authenticated SOAP messages
  4. Impact
    Impersonate trusted device / intercept traffic

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Credential externalization
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Persistence, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No special conditions - remote unauthenticated exploitation against affected Sauter devices running the wsc server component, which uses a hard-coded certificate to validate SOAP message authenticity; network reachability of the wsc service is the only prerequisite (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N). Limiting factors: the product is niche building-automation/OT equipment typically on segmented networks rather than the open internet, and the direct impact is confidentiality only (private-key disclosure) - leveraging the key for impersonation or MITM is a secondary step. The key being hard-coded means it is likely identical across units, so one successful extraction scales to the whole fleet.

Impact

Multiple signals point to a genuine but non-urgent issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes a remotely reachable, unauthenticated, low-complexity flaw, and the CWE-798 (hard-coded credentials) classification with a C:H/I:N/A:N impact is internally consistent: the vulnerability leaks a secret (private keys / hard-coded certificate) rather than directly altering or disabling the system. However, the exploitation-likelihood signals pull sharply the other way - EPSS is only 0.27% (18th percentile), the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, and no public POC was supplied. This is therefore a high-CVSS but currently low-observed-risk issue typical of niche OT/building-automation gear. One important nuance the base score understates: because the certificate/key is hard-coded (and therefore almost certainly shared across the device fleet), a single extraction can compromise the trust model of every deployed unit, and the stolen key can be used to forge or authenticate SOAP messages downstream - so the real-world I-impact is higher than the I:N in the vector suggests. Patch/affected-version data and any KEV/POC status are absent from the input, so prioritization should be driven by whether these Sauter devices are internet-exposed, not by an active-exploitation signal.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker with network access to a device's wsc server extracts the hard-coded private key / certificate material from the software. Having obtained the key, the attacker can forge or authenticate SOAP messages as a trusted party and, because the key is shared across devices, replay the same attack against the entire fleet. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 18, 2026

Hard-coded certificate key material in the wsc server component on Sauter devices can be extracted by unauthenticated remote attackers, undermining the authenticity checks applied to SOAP messages. The assessed impact is confidentiality-only (C:H/I:N/A:N), and exploitation requires only network reachability to the wsc service. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is 0.27%; because the key is hard-coded, a single extraction may weaken trust assumptions across affected units.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; consult CSAF advisory VDE-2025-060 at https://sauter.csaf-tp.certvde.com/.well-known/csaf/white/2025/vde-2025-060.json for fixed firmware/software and vendor update instructions. Until a fix is available, restrict network access to the wsc/SOAP service using firewall ACLs or VLAN segmentation so only trusted management and integration hosts can reach it, accepting that this may disrupt legitimate building-automation integrations. If SOAP-based wsc functionality is not required, disable the service, with the trade-off of losing remote management/integration capability. Apply any vendor-provided certificate/key replacement or rotation procedure and monitor for unexpected SOAP clients, noting that unsupported key changes may break compatibility.

Affected ProductsAI

Sauter devices running the wsc server component are affected according to CSAF advisory VDE-2025-060, available at https://sauter.csaf-tp.certvde.com/.well-known/csaf/white/2025/vde-2025-060.json. The provided data does not include CPE strings or specific model and version ranges, so exact affected firmware/software versions should be confirmed against the vendor CSAF document; any deployed unit exposing the wsc service should be treated as potentially affected until confirmed otherwise.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The wsc server is a SOAP-facing component on Sauter devices, and its validation of SOAP message authenticity depends on a certificate whose private key is embedded in the software rather than uniquely provisioned per device. This maps to CWE-798 (Use of Hard-coded Credentials): an attacker who obtains the software can recover the key material and potentially forge SOAP messages that pass the server's authenticity check. Because the credential is hard-coded, the same key is likely shared across affected units, so exposure is not limited to a single device. The available data does not provide CPE identifiers or a precise model/version matrix; CSAF advisory VDE-2025-060 is the authoritative source for exact scope.

Know when Sauter gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (cert) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Network-reachable wsc service with no auth or user interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); impact is disclosure of private keys, so C:H with I:N/A:N and no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (cert).

CVSS VectorVendor: cert

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The wsc server uses a hard-coded certificate to check the authenticity of SOAP messages. An unauthenticated remote attacker can extract private keys from the Software of the affected devices.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Sauter devices running the wsc server component carry hard-coded certificate key material that could allow network-reachable attackers to undermine trust in SOAP message authenticity and potentially access sensitive operational data across affected units. Because no vendor-released patch is identified and a single key extraction may weaken trust assumptions fleet-wide, leadership should treat this as a high-priority exposure and trust-risk issue.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; restrict network reachability to the Sauter wsc service, segment affected devices, disable wsc where not required, monitor SOAP authentication anomalies and unexpected peers, and treat the hard-coded certificate key material as exposed pending vendor guidance.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 82% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
Sauter building-automation/OT controller software, industry-specific not general IT
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy