Skip to main content

Linux CVE-2025-37791

MEDIUM
2025-05-01 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
Information Disclosure Linux Dell
5.5
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
Share

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY
5.5 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
SUSE
MEDIUM
qualitative
Red Hat
5.5 MEDIUM
qualitative

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Analysis Generated
Mar 17, 2026 - 20:45 vuln.today
Patch released
Mar 17, 2026 - 20:45 nvd
Patch available
CVE Published
May 01, 2025 - 14:15 nvd
MEDIUM 5.5

DescriptionNVD

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ethtool: cmis_cdb: use correct rpl size in ethtool_cmis_module_poll()

rpl is passed as a pointer to ethtool_cmis_module_poll(), so the correct size of rpl is sizeof(*rpl) which should be just 1 byte. Using the pointer size instead can cause stack corruption:

Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: ethtool_cmis_wait_for_cond+0xf4/0x100 CPU: 72 UID: 0 PID: 4440 Comm: kworker/72:2 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE 6.11.0 #24 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R760/04GWWM, BIOS 1.6.6 09/20/2023 Workqueue: events module_flash_fw_work Call Trace: <TASK> panic+0x339/0x360 ? ethtool_cmis_wait_for_cond+0xf4/0x100 ? __pfx_status_success+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_status_fail+0x10/0x10 __stack_chk_fail+0x10/0x10 ethtool_cmis_wait_for_cond+0xf4/0x100 ethtool_cmis_cdb_execute_cmd+0x1fc/0x330 ? __pfx_status_fail+0x10/0x10 cmis_cdb_module_features_get+0x6d/0xd0 ethtool_cmis_cdb_init+0x8a/0xd0 ethtool_cmis_fw_update+0x46/0x1d0 module_flash_fw_work+0x17/0xa0 process_one_work+0x179/0x390 worker_thread+0x239/0x340 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xcc/0x100 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>

AnalysisAI

A stack corruption vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel's ethtool CMIS CDB module due to incorrect buffer size calculation in the ethtool_cmis_module_poll() function. The vulnerability affects Linux kernel versions across multiple releases including 6.15-rc1 and 6.15-rc2, and can be triggered by local users with low privileges to cause a kernel panic and denial of service. A patch is available from the Linux kernel maintainers, and the EPSS score of 0.05% indicates low real-world exploitation probability despite the high CVSS score.

Technical ContextAI

The vulnerability resides in the Linux kernel's ethtool subsystem, specifically in the CMIS (Common Management Interface Specification) CDB (Command Download Block) implementation. The root cause is a sizing error where sizeof(rpl) is used instead of sizeof(*rpl) when passing a pointer to the ethtool_cmis_module_poll() function. Since rpl is a pointer, sizeof(rpl) returns the pointer size (typically 8 bytes on 64-bit systems) rather than the intended 1-byte size of the underlying data structure. This causes an out-of-bounds write that corrupts the kernel stack, triggering the kernel's stack protector mechanism and resulting in a panic. The affected CPE entries (cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) indicate this affects the Linux kernel broadly, with specific confirmed impact on versions 6.15-rc1 and 6.15-rc2. This is classified as a buffer overflow memory corruption issue (CWE classification pending).

RemediationAI

Upgrade the Linux kernel to a patched version containing one of the following commits: 61765e1b417a23371c3735e3cddf4ad9354ed2e9, 7eb0a0072f966bb0b01d8b7d529d9743a7187bd1, or f3fdd4fba16c74697d8bc730b82fb7c1eff7fab3 (available from https://git.kernel.org/stable/). Most Linux distributions will provide patched kernel packages through their standard update mechanisms; check with your distribution's security advisories and apply kernel updates when available. For systems unable to immediately patch due to operational constraints, limit the use of ethtool CMIS operations or restrict network interface module firmware operations to trusted administrators, though this is a workaround rather than a true mitigation. The fix itself is straightforward (changing sizeof(rpl) to sizeof(*rpl)) and has been integrated into stable kernel branches.

More in Dell

View all
CVE-2012-2962 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Jul 30

SQL injection vulnerability in d4d/statusFilter.php in Plixer Scrutinizer (aka Dell SonicWALL Scrutinizer) before 9.5.2

CVE-2014-8420 CRITICAL POC
9.0 Nov 25

The ViewPoint web application in Dell SonicWALL Global Management System (GMS) before 7.2 SP2, SonicWALL Analyzer before
CVE-2012-3951 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 31

The MySQL component in Plixer Scrutinizer (aka Dell SonicWALL Scrutinizer) 9.0.1.19899 and earlier has a default passwor
CVE-2014-4977 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Jul 16

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Dell SonicWall Scrutinizer 11.0.1 allow remote authenticated users to execute

CVE-2026-22769 CRITICAL
10.0 Feb 17

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines prior to 6.0.3.1 HF1 contains hardcoded credentials (CVE-2026-22769, CVSS 10.0) t
CVE-2014-125113 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in Dell (acquired by Quest) KACE K1000 System Management Appliance vers
CVE-2012-2626 MEDIUM POC
5.0 Jul 31

cgi-bin/admin.cgi in the web console in Plixer Scrutinizer (aka Dell SonicWALL Scrutinizer) before 9.5.0 does not requir
CVE-2014-8272 MEDIUM POC
5.0 Dec 19

The IPMI 1.5 functionality in Dell iDRAC6 modular before 3.65, iDRAC6 monolithic before 1.98, and iDRAC7 before 1.57.57

CVE-2016-9683 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 22

The SonicWall Secure Remote Access server (version 8.1.0.2-14sv) is vulnerable to a Remote Command Injection vulnerabili
CVE-2016-9682 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 22

The SonicWall Secure Remote Access server (version 8.1.0.2-14sv) is vulnerable to two Remote Command Injection vulnerabi
CVE-2016-9684 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 22

The SonicWall Secure Remote Access server (version 8.1.0.2-14sv) is vulnerable to a Remote Command Injection vulnerabili
CVE-2017-10955 HIGH
8.8 Oct 19

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of EMC Data Protection

Same technique Information Disclosure

View all
CVE-2019-2725 CRITICAL POC
9.8
CVE-2021-34523 CRITICAL POC
9.0
CVE-2013-2251 CRITICAL POC
9.8
CVE-2017-5638 CRITICAL POC
9.8
CVE-2025-24813 CRITICAL POC
9.8
CVE-2015-1701 HIGH POC
7.8
CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5
CVE-2014-6324 HIGH POC
8.8

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Medium
Product Status
Container suse/hpc/warewulf4-x86_64/sle-hpc-node:15.7.20.5.1 Image SLES15-SP7-BYOS-Azure Image SLES15-SP7-BYOS-EC2 Image SLES15-SP7-BYOS-GCE Image SLES15-SP7-CHOST-BYOS-Aliyun Image SLES15-SP7-CHOST-BYOS-Azure Image SLES15-SP7-CHOST-BYOS-EC2 Image SLES15-SP7-CHOST-BYOS-GCE Image SLES15-SP7-CHOST-BYOS-GDC Image SLES15-SP7-CHOST-BYOS-SAP-CCloud Image SLES15-SP7-EC2 Image SLES15-SP7-EC2-ECS-HVM Image SLES15-SP7-GCE Image SLES15-SP7-GCE-3P Image SLES15-SP7-HPC-BYOS-Azure Image SLES15-SP7-HPC-BYOS-EC2 Image SLES15-SP7-HPC-BYOS-GCE Image SLES15-SP7-Hardened-BYOS-Azure Image SLES15-SP7-Hardened-BYOS-EC2 Image SLES15-SP7-Hardened-BYOS-GCE Image SLES15-SP7-SAPCAL-Azure Image SLES15-SP7-SAPCAL-EC2 Image SLES15-SP7-SAPCAL-GCE Affected
Image SLES15-SP7-Azure-3P Image SLES15-SP7-Azure-Basic Image SLES15-SP7-Azure-Standard Image SLES15-SP7-HPC-Azure Affected
Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-Azure Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-Azure-3P Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-Azure-LI-BYOS-Production Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-Azure-VLI-BYOS-Production Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-BYOS-Azure Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-BYOS-EC2 Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-BYOS-GCE Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-EC2 Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-GCE Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-GCE-3P Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-Hardened-Azure Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-Hardened-BYOS-Azure Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-Hardened-BYOS-EC2 Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-Hardened-BYOS-GCE Image SLES15-SP7-SAP-Hardened-GCE Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7 Fixed

Share

CVE-2025-37791 vulnerability details – vuln.today
Back

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy