HCL Unica CVE-2025-31993
CRITICALAttack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach COM web interface
-
DeliverySubmit crafted URL/host input
-
ExploitServer fetches attacker-controlled target
-
ExecutionPivot to internal/metadata endpoints
-
ImpactExfiltrate internal data or credentials
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must be able to send a crafted request to a network-reachable instance of HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management and reach the specific input field that accepts a URL/host value which the server then fetches; per CVSS PR:N/UI:N no authentication or user interaction is required. The precise vulnerable parameter or feature is not named in the available data. Realistic exploitation is limited by whether the application is exposed to the attacker's network segment (internal vs. internet-facing deployment) and by what internal services or metadata endpoints are reachable from the server - SSRF value depends heavily on the surrounding network and egress controls. |
| Impact | Signals here are strongly divergent and warrant a tempered priority rather than treating the 9.8 at face value. The supplied CVSS:3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) describes a remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity flaw with full triple impact - but a CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery very rarely yields native High integrity AND High availability impact on the vulnerable host itself; the C:H/I:H/A:H combination looks inflated for an SSRF and the unchanged-scope (S:U) is also questionable, since SSRF value usually comes from pivoting to OTHER internal systems (scope change). This suggests the vendor-assigned score is conservative/worst-case rather than tightly reasoned. Countervailing exploitation signals are weak: EPSS is only 0.24% (14th percentile), this CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, and no public exploit or POC is referenced - so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Net: a genuinely exploitable unauthenticated SSRF in an internet-reachable marketing application is worth patching promptly because SSRF commonly enables internal reconnaissance, cloud-metadata credential theft, and lateral movement - but the near-floor EPSS and absence of KEV/POC indicate this is not under active mass exploitation and should be prioritized below products with confirmed in-the-wild activity. The impact subscores should be independently verified with HCL before accepting 9.8 as the operative risk. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker who can reach the Unica Centralized Offer Management web interface submits a crafted input (e.g., a URL/host parameter) that the server fetches without validation, coercing the server into making attacker-controlled outbound requests. This is used to reach internal-only services or a cloud metadata endpoint to harvest credentials and map the internal network. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so exploitation would require an attacker to develop their own request. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
Server-side request forgery in HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management lets unauthenticated, remote attackers steer the application server into issuing requests to attacker-chosen URLs or internal hosts, exposing internal services, management interfaces, or cloud metadata endpoints reachable from the server. The vendor rates this 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), but the independent assessment (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N) treats only confidentiality as high, with limited integrity effect and no availability impact, so the signals are divergent and a tempered priority is warranted rather than treating the 9.8 at face value. Exploitation status is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is low at 0.24% (~14th percentile), and there is no evidence of confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) activity.
RemediationAI
HCL has published advisory KB0124422 (https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0124422), which is the authoritative source for the vendor fix and the releases in which it is delivered; the provided data does not specify an exact patched version, so that advisory must be consulted to identify and apply the appropriate update. Until the vendor patch is applied, the most effective compensating control is to constrain what the server can reach: enforce strict outbound egress filtering that denies requests to RFC1918 private ranges, loopback, and link-local cloud metadata addresses such as 169.254.169.254, accepting that legitimate integrations calling internal endpoints may break and require narrowly scoped allowlist exceptions. Place Unica Centralized Offer Management behind network segmentation so it is not reachable from untrusted or internet-facing segments, and front it with a reverse proxy or WAF rule that rejects requests carrying user-supplied URLs or host values, though such rules can be bypassed with encoding tricks and require tuning. If the feature accepting URL or host input is not required in the deployment, disable it entirely; otherwise restrict access to the affected endpoints to trusted administrative networks, with the trade-off of reduced availability for legitimate remote users. Because authentication requirements are unconfirmed from available data beyond the CVSS PR:N vectors, treating all reachable callers as potentially unauthenticated is the safer posture.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The issue is a classic CWE-918 server-side request forgery rooted in improper input validation: the application accepts a user-supplied URL or host value and performs a server-side fetch against it without sufficient validation of the destination. Because the request originates from the Unica Centralized Offer Management server rather than the attacker, the server's own network position, proxy configuration, and trust relationships determine what an attacker can reach. The independent assessment's increased scope score (S:C, versus S:U in the NVD score) captures that the vulnerable component and the component impacted by the attack are different security authorities, which is typical when the server is used as a pivot into an internal network or cloud metadata service. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:hcltech:unica_centralized_offer_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, indicating the vendor advisory has not enumerated specific affected release ranges. The precise vulnerable parameter or feature is not named in the available data, and the practical value of the SSRF depends heavily on surrounding network segmentation and egress controls.
Know when Unica Centralized Offer Management gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Unauthenticated remote SSRF (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N), scope-changed (S:C) as it reaches other systems; primarily confidentiality (C:H) with limited integrity, no direct availability impact.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionNVD
HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management is vulnerable to a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An attacker can exploit improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server.
Executive ViewAI
HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management is affected by a critical server-side request forgery flaw that lets unauthenticated remote attackers direct the application server to reach internal services, management interfaces, or cloud metadata endpoints. This creates a potential path to sensitive infrastructure and credential exposure, making the product a high-value target if exposed to untrusted networks. Because no vendor patch is available, leadership should prioritize immediate containment, outbound traffic control, and close monitoring until a fix can be deployed.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include restricting network exposure, enforcing outbound egress allowlisting, blocking cloud metadata endpoints and internal management interfaces, and monitoring for anomalous server-side requests.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
Affected Products (CPE)NVD
Information disclosure in HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management allows unauthenticated remote attackers to obtain sensi
Authorization bypass in HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management allows a remote, authenticated user to read database reco
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB