Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconAttacker identifies WordPress site running Theme Editor ≤ 3.1
-
DeliveryCrafts auto-submitting HTML form targeting admin-ajax.php ms_update action
-
ExploitDelivers forged link to WordPress administrator via phishing
-
InstallAdmin loads attacker page with active authenticated session
-
C2Browser auto-submits POST with session cookies attached
-
ExecutePlugin processes request without nonce validation
-
ImpactChild theme CSS overwritten with attacker-controlled content
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Anti-CSRF tokens, SameSite cookies
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires two concrete conditions: the target WordPress site must have the Theme Editor plugin (≤ 3.1) installed and activated, and a user holding the WordPress Administrator role must be tricked into loading an attacker-controlled page while their authenticated session is active - this is the User Interaction Required (UI:R) constraint in the CVSS vector. The AJAX action ms_update must be reachable, which is true in all standard plugin installations with no additional configuration needed. Exploitation is limited by: the mandatory administrator action (the attack silently fails if no admin loads the malicious page), the impact scope being restricted to CSS overwrite of child themes only with no code execution path, no data read capability, and no availability impact, and the requirement that the administrator's session cookie be valid and unexpired at the moment the forged request fires. No non-default configuration, specific platform variant, or authenticated attacker credential is required beyond the victim's admin session. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.3 Medium score is calibrated appropriately for this vulnerability. The AV:N/AC:L/PR:N combination makes the attack remotely triggerable with no attacker-side authentication or complex preconditions, but UI:R - mandatory administrator interaction - introduces meaningful friction that prevents automated or opportunistic exploitation. Impact is bounded to integrity of child theme CSS (I:L), with no confidentiality exposure or availability disruption. No EPSS data was provided in the intelligence, and neither KEV status nor POC availability was indicated, supporting an assessment of no confirmed active exploitation. Real-world risk is moderate rather than critical: successful exploitation modifies visual presentation rather than executing code or exfiltrating data, which limits the blast radius. However, CSS injection over a site's theme is not entirely benign - an attacker could inject malicious overlay styles to facilitate UI-redressing or credential-harvesting phishing within the legitimate domain, which marginally elevates practical impact beyond what the raw CVSS integer suggests. The mandatory admin interaction remains the single most important limiting factor for defender prioritization. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker discovers a WordPress site running Theme Editor ≤ 3.1, then constructs a malicious HTML page containing a hidden auto-submitting form that POSTs to the target's wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with action=ms_update and attacker-chosen CSS content, such as styles that overlay a fake login prompt on top of the legitimate site. The attacker delivers the URL to a WordPress administrator via phishing email or a compromised comment on a third-party site; when the administrator loads the attacker's page while their WordPress session is active, the browser automatically attaches their session cookies to the forged request, and the plugin processes it without any nonce check, silently replacing child theme CSS. No public POC code has been identified, though this follows a well-documented CSRF pattern against WordPress AJAX endpoints that is trivially reproducible by an attacker with basic web knowledge. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 01, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in the Theme Editor WordPress plugin (all versions ≤ 3.1) enables modification of child theme CSS styles by exploiting absent nonce validation on the ms_update AJAX action. An unauthenticated network attacker who social-engineers a logged-in WordPress administrator into loading a crafted page can silently overwrite child theme CSS without any direct interaction with the WordPress backend. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis; the mandatory administrator interaction (UI:R in CVSS) is the primary friction limiting opportunistic mass exploitation.
RemediationAI
Update the Theme Editor plugin to a version beyond 3.1 that includes nonce validation on the ms_update AJAX handler; verify the available release at https://wordpress.org/plugins/theme-editor/#developers. No explicit patched version number is confirmed in the available intelligence - check the changelog for a release that addresses CSRF in the ms_update action. If no patched version is available or upgrade is not immediately feasible, the most effective compensating control is to deactivate and remove the Theme Editor plugin and use an alternative CSS editing method such as the native WordPress Customizer (which has its own nonce handling). As a secondary control, restrict wp-admin access by IP allowlist at the web server or WAF layer, reducing the attack surface to sessions originating from trusted networks only - note this may impact legitimate remote administration workflows. A Web Application Firewall rule blocking cross-origin POST requests to admin-ajax.php with action=ms_update can also mitigate this specific vector without disabling the plugin, though WAF rule accuracy should be validated in a staging environment first.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The Theme Editor plugin (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:mndpsingh287:theme_editor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is a WordPress plugin enabling administrators to edit theme CSS and files from the dashboard. The vulnerable handler, ms_update, is an AJAX action registered in ms_theme_editor_controller.php (lines 13 and 60 per the WordPress plugin Trac source). WordPress AJAX endpoints rely on nonce tokens - short-lived cryptographic values tied to the authenticated session - to verify request legitimacy and prevent cross-origin abuse. The absence of nonce validation (CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery) means any HTTP POST that triggers the ms_update action will be processed if the victim's authenticated session cookie is present, which browsers attach automatically to same-origin and certain cross-origin requests. The root cause class is a classic CSRF: no origin verification, no token check, reliance solely on session state.
Know when Theme Editor gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Network-reachable, no attacker privileges needed, but mandatory admin UI:R interaction; impact limited to child theme CSS integrity only.
Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).
CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence
DescriptionCVE.org
The Theme Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the ms_update AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify child theme CSS styles via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.
More in Theme Editor
View allCross-Site Request Forgery in WordPress Theme Editor plugin versions through 3.2 enables unauthenticated attackers to in
The Theme Editor WordPress plugin before 2.6 did not validate the GET file parameter before passing it to the download_f
EUVD-2025-210579
GHSA-5f44-9hfv-q32p
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB