Skip to main content

Lenovo One Client CVE-2025-13152

HIGH
Uncontrolled Search Path Element (CWE-427)
2025-12-10 psirt@lenovo.com
8.5
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: lenovo
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain local authenticated foothold
  2. Delivery
    Plant malicious DLL in searched path
  3. Exploit
    Trigger Lenovo One Client to load DLL
  4. Execution
    Execute code at elevated privilege
  5. Impact
    Achieve full host compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V13 - Configuration Search path element control
Exploitation Conditions

Requires the attacker to already be a local, authenticated user on a Windows host with Lenovo One Client installed (PR:L, AV:L). Exploitation depends on placing a malicious DLL in a filesystem location that a Lenovo One Client process searches ahead of the legitimate library and then getting that process to load it. Limiting factors: no remote/network access is possible, the product must be installed (not universal even on Lenovo hardware), and the attacker needs write access to a directory in the DLL search path. No user interaction by a second party is required (UI:N).

Impact

This is a local privilege-escalation issue via DLL hijacking (CWE-427), and the signals converge on genuine-but-not-urgent priority. The vendor CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) confirms the attacker must already have local, authenticated access - this is not a remote or network-reachable flaw despite the 8.5 headline score, which is inflated by the CVSS 4.0 scoring of full high C/I/A impact. EPSS is very low at 0.14% (2nd percentile), consistent with a local-only, non-wormable EoP that requires an existing foothold. There is no CISA KEV listing, no public POC, and the report originates from Lenovo's own internal security assessment (psirt@lenovo.com) rather than field observation of exploitation. The practical read: a real defense-in-depth issue for machines running Lenovo One Client, useful to a local attacker chaining to SYSTEM/elevated privileges, but not a mass-exploitation or emergency-patch scenario. Note the input Tag 'Information Disclosure' conflicts with the actual impact - this is code execution / privilege escalation, not disclosure.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A local authenticated user (or malware running in that user's context) plants a malicious DLL in a directory searched before the legitimate one by a Lenovo One Client process, then triggers the vulnerable component to load it, executing attacker code at the elevated privilege level of that process. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis; the flaw was found during Lenovo's internal assessment. Low attack complexity means a working DLL-plant is straightforward once the search-order gap is known.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 25, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Lenovo One Client on Windows allows an authenticated local attacker to execute code with elevated privileges via DLL hijacking (CWE-427). The attacker must write a malicious DLL to a directory searched by the application; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.14%, 2nd percentile). The vendor rates this 8.5 (CVSS 4.0), while our independent assessment yields a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8 (High).

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Consult Lenovo's advisory at https://iknow.lenovo.com.cn/detail/435007 and https://one.lenovo.com/ for updates or patches. As compensating controls until a patch is available, restrict write permissions to the Lenovo One Client installation directory and other directories in the DLL search path to administrators only; this may prevent legitimate application updates if not carefully configured. Enable safe DLL search mode (e.g., via SetDefaultDllDirectories) or ensure the application loads libraries using absolute paths, though this may require code changes from the vendor. Monitor for suspicious DLL files placed in application directories. Given the low EPSS score (0.14%), prioritize remediation based on exposure and risk tolerance.

Affected ProductsAI

Lenovo One Client on Windows. No specific version range was provided in the input data; the Lenovo advisory at https://iknow.lenovo.com.cn/detail/435007 should be consulted for affected version details. The product is not universally installed on all Lenovo hardware, so exposure is limited to systems where the client is present. The issue affects local users who can write to a directory in the DLL search path.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Lenovo One Client is a Windows application for Lenovo systems. The vulnerability is a classic DLL hijacking issue (CWE-427: Uncontrolled Search Path Element). When the application loads a dynamic-link library (DLL), it may search directories such as the current working directory or the application directory before system directories. An attacker with local access and write permissions to one of these directories can place a malicious DLL with the same name as a legitimate one, causing the application to load and execute the attacker's code with the application's privileges, thereby escalating to higher integrity. The CVSS vector (AV:L/PR:L/UI:N) confirms the attack is local, requires low privileges, and needs no user interaction. The assessed impact is full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H) within the vulnerable component, though scope is unchanged (S:U).

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (lenovo) PRIMARY 8.5 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local authenticated user plants a DLL loaded by a higher-privileged process, so AV:L/PR:L with low complexity and full C/I/A at the elevated context; scope unchanged.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (lenovo).

CVSS VectorVendor: lenovo

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A potential DLL hijacking vulnerability was reported in Lenovo One Client during an internal security assessment that could allow a local authenticated user to execute code with elevated privileges.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Lenovo One Client on Windows is affected by a high-severity local privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2025-13152) that could allow an attacker with local access to execute code with elevated privileges. While no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the vulnerability poses a risk to corporate endpoints where Lenovo One Client is installed, potentially enabling attackers to compromise sensitive data or move laterally. Leadership should prioritize mitigation because a successful exploit could undermine endpoint security and lead to broader network compromise.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict write access to application installation directories, enforce application whitelisting to block unauthorized DLL loads, monitor for suspicious DLL activity in Lenovo One Client processes, and consider uninstalling the software if not business-critical.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Lenovo cross-device sync client, common on Lenovo consumer PCs but optional
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Medium

Priority Score

42
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0
CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

CVE-2026-96951 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then

CVE-2025-24054 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 11

External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy