PiExtract SOOP-CLM CVE-2025-11674
MEDIUMAttack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with privileged account
-
DeliverySubmit attacker-controlled URL to fetch feature
-
ExploitServer issues forged internal request
-
ExecutionRead local files or probe internal hosts
-
ImpactExfiltrate server data and internal topology
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated session with HIGH privileges (PR:H) on the SOOP-CLM application - the description explicitly scopes this to 'privileged remote attackers,' meaning an administrative or equivalently trusted account is a hard prerequisite. The vulnerable behavior is a server-side URL-fetch/resource-retrieval function that accepts attacker-influenced destinations, enabling the server to read local files or reach internal network resources. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and the attack is network-reachable (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) once privileged access is held. Primary limiting factors: the high privilege requirement (significantly shrinks the viable attacker set to insiders or post-compromise actors) and the product's limited, likely regional deployment footprint. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity SSRF (CWE-918) in PiExtract's SOOP-CLM, rated CVSS 4.0 6.9 (MEDIUM). The provided CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N) is internally consistent with the description: network-reachable, low complexity, but requiring HIGH privileges (PR:H), yielding high confidentiality impact (reading server files) with limited subsequent-system exposure (SC:L, internal network probing). The PR:H requirement is the dominant risk-limiting factor - this is explicitly described as exploitable only by 'privileged remote attackers,' so it is a post-authentication issue usable by an already-trusted or compromised privileged account, not a pre-auth mass-exploitation threat. EPSS is low at 0.36% (27th percentile), the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, and no public exploit code was identified, so the exploitation-probability signals align downward and do not conflict. Net assessment: a real but contained issue best prioritized for defense-in-depth and insider/post-compromise hardening rather than emergency patching; the high-privilege gate plus obscure product footprint make widespread opportunistic exploitation unlikely. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already holds privileged (administrative) access to a SOOP-CLM instance - or who has compromised such an account - supplies a crafted URL to a feature that fetches remote resources, causing the server to issue requests on the attacker's behalf. This is used to read local server files or to enumerate and probe otherwise-unreachable internal network hosts and services. No public proof-of-concept exploit was identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in PiExtract's SOOP-CLM lets a privileged, already-authenticated user (PR:H, equivalent to an administrator or trusted operator account) coerce the application server into fetching attacker-chosen destinations, which the assessed CVSS:3.1 vector scores as high confidentiality impact (C:H, S:C) with no integrity or availability effect. The attacker can read server-side files or probe internal network services and metadata endpoints that are not directly reachable from outside the hosting environment. Exploitation requires a high-privilege session, so the practical risk is concentrated among insiders or actors who have already compromised an administrative account; the EPSS is low at 0.36% (27th percentile), no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and there is no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV).
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version is identified in the provided data, so remediation must begin by consulting the TWCERT/CC advisories (https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10422-e06c3-2.html and https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10421-5cf6b-1.html) for the vendor's official fix or hotfix and applying it as soon as it is published; because the vulnerability requires a high-privilege session, the most effective immediate compensating control is to tightly limit and audit administrative accounts in SOOP-CLM, enforcing MFA and removing standing privileges so that a compromised operator credential cannot be used to pivot. In parallel, constrain the server's egress: block outbound traffic from the SOOP-CLM host to RFC1918/RFC6598 ranges, loopback, and link-local/metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and allow only explicitly required external destinations via a forward proxy or host firewall - the trade-off is that any legitimate server-side fetch integrations must be added to the allowlist or they will break. Where the product permits, disable or restrict the URL-fetch/import feature that accepts user-supplied destinations, and run the service under a low-privilege OS account with no access to sensitive local files (note that this reduces but does not eliminate file-read via the application's own file permissions). Finally, monitor SOOP-CLM hosts for anomalous outbound requests to internal addresses as a detection measure, and network-segment the appliance so that even a successful SSRF reaches only non-sensitive internal services.
Affected ProductsAI
The affected product is SOOP-CLM, a security/log-management platform developed by PiExtract (Taiwan). The supplied data does not include CPE identifiers or an explicit version range, so affected versions cannot be enumerated from the available intelligence; the coordinating vendor advisory is the TWCERT/CC publication at https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10422-e06c3-2.html (English) and https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10421-5cf6b-1.html (Traditional Chinese), which should be consulted for the precise build/version matrix. Deployment appears regionally concentrated (Taiwan-centric government and enterprise customers), which materially limits the exposed population. Any SOOP-CLM instance that exposes its authenticated interface to a network - including internal corporate networks - should be treated as in scope until version data is confirmed.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery), rooted in a server-side URL-fetch or resource-retrieval function in SOOP-CLM that accepts an attacker-influenced destination without validating it against a trusted-destination allowlist or blocking internal address ranges. Because the request originates from the SOOP-CLM host itself, it inherits that host's network position and trust relationships, allowing retrieval of local files (file:// style or local-path handling) and reaching services bound only to loopback, RFC1918 ranges, or cloud instance metadata endpoints. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N) indicates no attack prerequisites, no user interaction, and impact limited to confidentiality - high on the vulnerable system and low on subsequent systems - while the independent assessment restates this as CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N, confirming the SSRF crosses a security boundary (scope change) to reach internal resources that a normal user of the application could not. The absence of integrity and availability impact is consistent with a read/probe-only primitive rather than code execution or data destruction.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N
Network-reachable SSRF needing high-privilege auth (PR:H); scope changes (S:C) as the server reaches internal systems, with high confidentiality (file read) but no integrity/availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (cert).
CVSS VectorVendor: cert
DescriptionCVE.org
SOOP-CLM developed by PiExtract has a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability, allowing privileged remote attackers to read server files or probe internal network information.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB