Skip to main content

MxChat CVE-2025-10705

MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2025-10-23 security@wordfence.com
5.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach public WordPress AJAX endpoint
  2. Exploit
    Submit crafted internal/metadata URL
  3. Execution
    Server fetches attacker-chosen destination
  4. Impact
    Probe internal services or cloud metadata

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the MxChat PDF processing path be reachable via the mxchat_handle_chat_request AJAX action on a WordPress site running MxChat ≤2.4.6; the attacker must supply a URL that the plugin fetches during PDF handling. No authentication, user interaction, or non-default configuration is indicated - the AJAX action is callable by unauthenticated users (PR:N/UI:N). Realistic impact is LIMITED by the blind nature of the SSRF (no response returned to the attacker) and by any outbound network egress filtering: the attack is only materially dangerous where the WordPress server can reach sensitive internal services or a cloud metadata endpoint. Effective exploitation value therefore depends heavily on the victim's network segmentation and egress controls rather than on special plugin settings.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity, low-priority issue that should not jump the patch queue despite being remotely and unauthenticatedly reachable. The signals are consistent rather than conflicting: the NVD/Wordfence CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N, 5.3) correctly reflects that an unauthenticated network attacker can trigger the flaw with low complexity, but the impact is capped at low confidentiality with no integrity or availability effect - appropriate for a BLIND SSRF (CWE-918) where the attacker cannot directly read the response. The EPSS score of 0.29% (20th percentile) reinforces low real-world exploitation likelihood, and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing. No SSVC decision point data was supplied in the input. The practical risk is that of an SSRF primitive - internal network/port probing, hitting cloud metadata endpoints, or pivoting to other internal services - rather than direct data theft or code execution on the WordPress host. Net: real but low urgency; prioritize patching where the WordPress host sits adjacent to sensitive internal services or a cloud metadata service (e.g., AWS IMDSv1).

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted request to the plugin's mxchat_handle_chat_request AJAX endpoint supplying an attacker-controlled URL to the PDF processing feature, causing the WordPress server to issue an HTTP request to that destination. Because the SSRF is blind, the attacker cannot read the response body directly but can use it to probe internal hosts/ports, reach cloud metadata services, or interact with internal-only endpoints inferred through timing or side effects. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026

Blind server-side request forgery in the MxChat - AI Chatbot for WordPress plugin (mxchat-basic) up to and including version 2.4.6 lets remote attackers coerce the WordPress server into making HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations through the unauthenticated mxchat_handle_chat_request AJAX action, which passes user-supplied URLs into the plugin's PDF processing routine without adequate validation. Because the CVSS vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, no credentials or victim interaction are required, but impact is confined to confidentiality (C:L) with no integrity or availability effect, and the blind nature of the flaw means the attacker never sees the fetched response - real-world risk therefore hinges on whether the host can reach sensitive internal services or a cloud metadata endpoint. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and CISA KEV does not list this CVE; EPSS is only 0.29% (20th percentile), consistent with a moderate-severity, low-priority issue that should not jump the patch queue despite being remotely and unauthenticatedly reachable.

RemediationAI

Apply the upstream fix: the code change addressing the missing URL validation is recorded in the WordPress.org plugin Trac changeset https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3378505/, so administrators should update the MxChat - AI Chatbot for WordPress plugin beyond version 2.4.6 as soon as a patched release is published, verifying the installed version in the WordPress Plugins screen (an exact patched version number beyond 2.4.6 is not independently confirmed from the provided data - the changeset itself is the confirmed upstream fix reference). The vendor advisory with remediation detail is at https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c6ca63b8-b437-4e34-a57e-c3d956fbd102?source=cve. Where immediate updating is not possible, compensating controls should target the abuse path rather than adding generic layers: block or rate-limit requests to admin-ajax.php with the action=mxchat_handle_chat_request parameter at the WAF or reverse proxy (side effect: legitimate chatbot traffic stops working), or deactivate the plugin's chat/PDF feature if it is not in production use, since the exposure exists purely through that unauthenticated AJAX action. Restricting outbound egress from the WordPress host to an allow-list of the AI/LLM API endpoints and CDN hosts the plugin legitimately needs is the highest-value mitigation because it neutralizes SSRF reachability regardless of the plugin version (trade-off: can break other plugins, update checks, or webhooks that share the host), and blocking access to the cloud metadata endpoint 169.254.169.254 or enforcing IMDSv2 should be done in parallel to prevent credential theft. Finally, log and alert on unusual outbound requests originating from PHP-FPM/webserver processes to internal address ranges to detect attempted exploitation.

Affected ProductsAI

The affected product is the MxChat - AI Chatbot for WordPress plugin distributed on WordPress.org under the slug mxchat-basic (MxChat Basic), in all versions up to and including 2.4.6; the vulnerable URL-handling code in the PDF processing path is present in the tagged 2.4.1 source of includes/class-mxchat-integrator.php (WordPress Trac references at lines 1090, 1108 and 2360). No CPE string was supplied in the NVD data for this CVE, so identification should be done by plugin slug and version rather than by CPE matching; any WordPress site with MxChat enabled and version <= 2.4.6 is in scope. The vendor advisory is available at https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c6ca63b8-b437-4e34-a57e-c3d956fbd102?source=cve, and the upstream code change is recorded at https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3378505/.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) arising from insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs in the MxChat plugin's PDF processing functionality. MxChat integrates an AI chatbot into WordPress and exposes an AJAX endpoint, mxchat_handle_chat_request, which is registered so that unauthenticated visitors can call it (the WordPress admin-ajax.php pattern with nopriv handling) - hence PR:N in the assessed vector. Within that flow, the plugin's integrator class (class-mxchat-integrator.php, with the relevant fetch logic visible around lines 1090, 1108 and 2360 of the 2.4.1 tag in the WordPress plugin Trac) retrieves a caller-influenced URL while handling PDF content, without restricting the destination host, scheme, or resolved IP range. This allows classic SSRF primitives: probing internal-only HTTP services, reaching loopback or RFC1918 addresses, and potentially reading cloud instance metadata (for example 169.254.169.254) if the WordPress host has unrestricted egress. The request is blind - the fetched body is not returned to the attacker, so exfiltration depends on secondary channels or on acting through internal services - and the CVSS impact is limited to low confidentiality with no integrity or availability component. The WordPress.org plugin repository changeset 3378505 corresponds to the upstream code change addressing this behavior, and the Wordfence advisory (c6ca63b8-b437-4e34-a57e-c3d956fbd102) is the vendor-side disclosure record.

Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (wordfence) PRIMARY 5.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.3 MEDIUM

Unauthenticated remote AJAX endpoint (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N/AC:L); blind SSRF yields only limited information disclosure (C:L) with no integrity/availability impact and unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The MxChat - AI Chatbot for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.6. This is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs in the PDF processing functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make the WordPress server perform HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations via the mxchat_handle_chat_request AJAX action.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 80% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche WordPress AI-chatbot plugin, modest install base
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2024-1698 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 27

SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a

CVE-2023-6875 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 11

The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i

CVE-2024-1512 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 17

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base

CVE-2024-4295 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 05

The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in

CVE-2024-50498 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 28

Remote code execution in the WP Query Console WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.0) by Ajit Bohra allows u

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy