Red Hat Edge Manager 1
Monthly
Unauthenticated path traversal in gvproxy, the network forwarder shipped in the gvisor-tap-vsock package (used by Podman Desktop, Red Hat OpenShift/CRC tooling and related Red Hat products), lets an attacker who can reach the /services/forwarder/expose control endpoint supply an arbitrary socket path that is passed unsanitised to os.Remove, resulting in deletion of arbitrary files on the host. The defect is reachable without credentials (PR:N) but requires adjacent/guest-side network access to the forwarder API (AV:A), which is normally bound to the virtual network rather than exposed as a routed internet service; impact is limited to integrity and availability (no data disclosure). No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the flaw is not listed as confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV); an upstream fix exists in gvisor-tap-vsock PR #718. The vendor score of 9.3 (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H) reflects low-complexity, unauthenticated access combined with a scope change and High integrity/availability impact, and the actual risk depends heavily on whether the forwarder control API is reachable by an untrusted guest or adjacent host.
Cross-tenant TLS configuration leakage in flightctl (shipped as Red Hat Edge Manager 1 and embedded in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2) lets an authenticated organization user have their HTTPS git repository's TLS settings - potentially InsecureSkipVerify, a custom CA bundle, or their own mTLS client certificate - applied to another organization's concurrent git.Clone operations, because the device-render worker installs each per-repository tls.Config into go-git's process-global Protocols map. Exploitation requires a multi-tenant deployment that renders devices for several organizations concurrently from a shared goroutine pool and is inherently non-deterministic (AC:H) since the attacker cannot control which tenant's configuration wins; single-tenant or serialized-rendering deployments are not exposed. The vendor scores this 6.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N) while our independent assessment rates privileges as PR:L because defining an HTTPS git repository only needs a normal authenticated tenant/organization account; no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no EPSS score was provided.
Unauthenticated path traversal in gvproxy, the network forwarder shipped in the gvisor-tap-vsock package (used by Podman Desktop, Red Hat OpenShift/CRC tooling and related Red Hat products), lets an attacker who can reach the /services/forwarder/expose control endpoint supply an arbitrary socket path that is passed unsanitised to os.Remove, resulting in deletion of arbitrary files on the host. The defect is reachable without credentials (PR:N) but requires adjacent/guest-side network access to the forwarder API (AV:A), which is normally bound to the virtual network rather than exposed as a routed internet service; impact is limited to integrity and availability (no data disclosure). No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the flaw is not listed as confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV); an upstream fix exists in gvisor-tap-vsock PR #718. The vendor score of 9.3 (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H) reflects low-complexity, unauthenticated access combined with a scope change and High integrity/availability impact, and the actual risk depends heavily on whether the forwarder control API is reachable by an untrusted guest or adjacent host.
Cross-tenant TLS configuration leakage in flightctl (shipped as Red Hat Edge Manager 1 and embedded in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2) lets an authenticated organization user have their HTTPS git repository's TLS settings - potentially InsecureSkipVerify, a custom CA bundle, or their own mTLS client certificate - applied to another organization's concurrent git.Clone operations, because the device-render worker installs each per-repository tls.Config into go-git's process-global Protocols map. Exploitation requires a multi-tenant deployment that renders devices for several organizations concurrently from a shared goroutine pool and is inherently non-deterministic (AC:H) since the attacker cannot control which tenant's configuration wins; single-tenant or serialized-rendering deployments are not exposed. The vendor scores this 6.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N) while our independent assessment rates privileges as PR:L because defining an HTTPS git repository only needs a normal authenticated tenant/organization account; no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no EPSS score was provided.