Powerjob
Monthly
Remote code execution in PowerJob Server 5.1.2 (and likely earlier releases) stems from a predictable/hardcoded HS256 signing key used for the server's JWT authentication, letting an unauthenticated remote attacker forge valid admin session tokens and drive PowerJob's job-execution features to run arbitrary code. PowerJob is an open-source distributed task-scheduling framework, and because the secret is derived by a default provider rather than randomly generated, any exposed instance is trivially impersonatable. Publicly available exploit code exists (a proof-of-concept gist), though there is no CISA KEV listing or confirmed in-the-wild exploitation at time of analysis.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in PowerJob Worker 5.1.2 (and likely earlier) stems from the /worker/deployContainer HTTP endpoint being reachable on the default transport port with no authentication, letting a remote attacker deploy and run an arbitrary container/module and thereby execute code on the worker host. PowerJob is a widely-forked open-source Java distributed job-scheduling framework, and the worker component is the execution plane that runs scheduled tasks. A public gist referenced alongside the advisory appears to contain proof-of-concept material, though the entry is not listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code injection in PowerJob 5.1.0, 5.1.1, and 5.1.2 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via the GroovyEvaluator.evaluate function in the OpenAPI endpoint /openApi/addWorkflowNode by manipulating the nodeParams argument. The vulnerability exploits unsafe Groovy code evaluation without input sanitization, enabling full remote code execution with a low CVSS complexity score (6.9/10). No public exploit code is confirmed at time of analysis, and the vendor has not yet responded to the early disclosure notification.
Server-side request forgery in PowerJob up to version 5.1.2 allows authenticated remote attackers to manipulate the targetIp and targetPort arguments in the checkConnectivity function of the Network Request Handler component, enabling SSRF attacks with low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Publicly available exploit code exists; however, the EPSS score of 0.03% indicates minimal real-world exploitation probability despite the public exploit availability, suggesting this vulnerability has seen limited active abuse.
Powerjob >= 3.20 is vulnerable to SQL injection via the version parameter. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.
An incorrect access control vulnerability in powerjob 4.3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via the interface for querying via appId parameter to /container/list. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.
PowerJob v4.3.3 was discovered to contain a remote command execution (RCE) vulnerability via the instanceId parameter at /instance/detail. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available and no vendor patch available.
PowerJob V4.3.1 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control that allows for remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.
PowerJob V4.3.2 has unauthorized interface that causes remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.
PowerJob V4.3.1 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control via the create user/save interface. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available and no vendor patch available.
PowerJob V4.3.1 is vulnerable to Insecure Permissions. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available and no vendor patch available.
PowerJob V4.3.1 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control via the create app interface. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available and no vendor patch available.
Remote code execution in PowerJob Server 5.1.2 (and likely earlier releases) stems from a predictable/hardcoded HS256 signing key used for the server's JWT authentication, letting an unauthenticated remote attacker forge valid admin session tokens and drive PowerJob's job-execution features to run arbitrary code. PowerJob is an open-source distributed task-scheduling framework, and because the secret is derived by a default provider rather than randomly generated, any exposed instance is trivially impersonatable. Publicly available exploit code exists (a proof-of-concept gist), though there is no CISA KEV listing or confirmed in-the-wild exploitation at time of analysis.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in PowerJob Worker 5.1.2 (and likely earlier) stems from the /worker/deployContainer HTTP endpoint being reachable on the default transport port with no authentication, letting a remote attacker deploy and run an arbitrary container/module and thereby execute code on the worker host. PowerJob is a widely-forked open-source Java distributed job-scheduling framework, and the worker component is the execution plane that runs scheduled tasks. A public gist referenced alongside the advisory appears to contain proof-of-concept material, though the entry is not listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code injection in PowerJob 5.1.0, 5.1.1, and 5.1.2 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via the GroovyEvaluator.evaluate function in the OpenAPI endpoint /openApi/addWorkflowNode by manipulating the nodeParams argument. The vulnerability exploits unsafe Groovy code evaluation without input sanitization, enabling full remote code execution with a low CVSS complexity score (6.9/10). No public exploit code is confirmed at time of analysis, and the vendor has not yet responded to the early disclosure notification.
Server-side request forgery in PowerJob up to version 5.1.2 allows authenticated remote attackers to manipulate the targetIp and targetPort arguments in the checkConnectivity function of the Network Request Handler component, enabling SSRF attacks with low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Publicly available exploit code exists; however, the EPSS score of 0.03% indicates minimal real-world exploitation probability despite the public exploit availability, suggesting this vulnerability has seen limited active abuse.
Powerjob >= 3.20 is vulnerable to SQL injection via the version parameter. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.
An incorrect access control vulnerability in powerjob 4.3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via the interface for querying via appId parameter to /container/list. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.
PowerJob v4.3.3 was discovered to contain a remote command execution (RCE) vulnerability via the instanceId parameter at /instance/detail. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available and no vendor patch available.
PowerJob V4.3.1 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control that allows for remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.
PowerJob V4.3.2 has unauthorized interface that causes remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.
PowerJob V4.3.1 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control via the create user/save interface. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available and no vendor patch available.
PowerJob V4.3.1 is vulnerable to Insecure Permissions. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available and no vendor patch available.
PowerJob V4.3.1 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control via the create app interface. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available and no vendor patch available.