N600R
Monthly
Remote command injection in TOTOLINK N600R firmware 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106 allows unauthenticated network attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by supplying shell metacharacters in the `ntp_server` parameter to the `getCurrentTime` handler at `/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi`. A public proof-of-concept demonstrating popen-based injection is available on GitHub, confirmed by the CVSS 4.0 E:P exploit maturity indicator, meaning exploitation requires minimal attacker skill. No vendor-released patch has been identified in available intelligence, leaving internet-exposed devices unmitigated.
Stack-based buffer overflow in the TOTOLINK N600R router (firmware 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106) lets remote attackers corrupt memory by supplying an oversized Hostname argument to the setSystemConfig function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution on the device. Publicly available exploit code exists (disclosed via VulDB and a GitHub write-up), though the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV. VulDB scores it CVSS 4.0 9.3 (Critical), reflecting high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Remote command injection in TOTOLINK N600R firmware 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106 allows unauthenticated network attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by supplying shell metacharacters in the `ntp_server` parameter to the `getCurrentTime` handler at `/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi`. A public proof-of-concept demonstrating popen-based injection is available on GitHub, confirmed by the CVSS 4.0 E:P exploit maturity indicator, meaning exploitation requires minimal attacker skill. No vendor-released patch has been identified in available intelligence, leaving internet-exposed devices unmitigated.
Stack-based buffer overflow in the TOTOLINK N600R router (firmware 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106) lets remote attackers corrupt memory by supplying an oversized Hostname argument to the setSystemConfig function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution on the device. Publicly available exploit code exists (disclosed via VulDB and a GitHub write-up), though the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV. VulDB scores it CVSS 4.0 9.3 (Critical), reflecting high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.