Ggml
Monthly
Local attackers can achieve heap buffer overflow in llama.cpp versions before b8146 through integer overflow in the GGUF file parsing function, enabling arbitrary code execution with high integrity and confidentiality impact. The vulnerability stems from undersized heap allocation followed by unvalidated writes of over 528 bytes of attacker-controlled data, bypassing a previous fix for the same component. This affects systems running vulnerable LLM inference implementations on local machines where user interaction is required to trigger the malicious GGUF file processing.
Llama.cpp server endpoints fail to validate the n_discard parameter from JSON input, allowing negative values that trigger out-of-bounds memory writes when the context buffer fills. This memory corruption vulnerability affects LLM inference operations and can be exploited remotely without authentication to crash the service or achieve code execution; public exploit code exists and no patch is currently available.
CVE-2025-52566 is a signed vs. unsigned integer overflow vulnerability in llama.cpp's tokenizer (llama_vocab::tokenize function) that enables heap buffer overflow during text tokenization. This affects all versions of llama.cpp prior to b5721, and attackers can trigger the vulnerability with specially crafted text input during the inference process, potentially achieving code execution with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The vulnerability requires local access and user interaction but has a high CVSS score of 8.6; KEV status and active exploitation data are not currently available, but the patch exists in version b5721.
A buffer overflow vulnerability in llama.cpp (CVSS 8.8). High severity vulnerability requiring prompt remediation. Vendor patch is available.
Arbitrary memory write in llama.cpp's RPC server allows remote unauthenticated attackers to corrupt arbitrary memory addresses via the unsafe `data` pointer in the `rpc_tensor` structure, leading to full code execution on the host running the inference service. The flaw earned a maximum CVSS 10.0 (scope changed) and publicly available exploit code exists, though it is not yet listed in CISA KEV; EPSS sits at 5.68% (90th percentile), reflecting elevated but not widespread targeting. Fixed in release b3561.
llama.cpp provides LLM inference in C/C++. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available.
llama.cpp provides LLM inference in C/C++. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. This Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability could allow attackers to read data from memory outside the intended buffer boundaries.
llama.cpp provides LLM inference in C/C++. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. This NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability could allow attackers to crash the application by dereferencing a null pointer.
Llama.cpp is LLM inference in C/C++. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.
Remote code execution in llama.cpp (GGUF library) allows attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by tricking a user into loading a maliciously crafted .gguf model file, exploiting a heap-based buffer overflow in the header.n_kv parsing logic at commit 18c2e17. Publicly available exploit code exists, though EPSS rates real-world exploitation probability low at 0.15% (35th percentile), reflecting the user-interaction requirement. The flaw was reported by Cisco Talos and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability of any system loading untrusted GGUF models.
Remote code execution in llama.cpp (commit 18c2e17) occurs when the GGUF library's gguf_fread_str function parses a maliciously crafted .gguf model file, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow rooted in integer overflow handling (CWE-190). Any user or service loading an untrusted GGUF model into a vulnerable llama.cpp build can be compromised, with publicly available exploit code increasing accessibility despite a low EPSS score of 0.15%.
Heap-based buffer overflow in llama.cpp's GGUF library header parser (commit 18c2e17) enables code execution when a victim loads a maliciously crafted .gguf model file. The CWE-190 integer overflow in the n_tensors field corrupts heap allocations, leading to attacker-controlled memory writes. Publicly available exploit code exists, though EPSS remains low at 0.15% (35th percentile), and there is no public exploit identified as actively used per CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in llama.cpp (commit 18c2e17) is possible when a victim loads a malicious .gguf model file, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow in the GGUF library's GGUF_TYPE_ARRAY/GGUF_TYPE_STRING parsing routines. Publicly available exploit code exists, though EPSS rates near-term mass exploitation probability as low (0.19%, 41st percentile) and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in llama.cpp (commit 18c2e17) is possible when a user opens a malicious .gguf model file, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow in the GGUF library's info->ne handling. Publicly available exploit code exists, though EPSS estimates exploitation probability at 0.48% (65th percentile), reflecting moderate but not widespread targeting risk against this AI inference runtime.
Local attackers can achieve heap buffer overflow in llama.cpp versions before b8146 through integer overflow in the GGUF file parsing function, enabling arbitrary code execution with high integrity and confidentiality impact. The vulnerability stems from undersized heap allocation followed by unvalidated writes of over 528 bytes of attacker-controlled data, bypassing a previous fix for the same component. This affects systems running vulnerable LLM inference implementations on local machines where user interaction is required to trigger the malicious GGUF file processing.
Llama.cpp server endpoints fail to validate the n_discard parameter from JSON input, allowing negative values that trigger out-of-bounds memory writes when the context buffer fills. This memory corruption vulnerability affects LLM inference operations and can be exploited remotely without authentication to crash the service or achieve code execution; public exploit code exists and no patch is currently available.
CVE-2025-52566 is a signed vs. unsigned integer overflow vulnerability in llama.cpp's tokenizer (llama_vocab::tokenize function) that enables heap buffer overflow during text tokenization. This affects all versions of llama.cpp prior to b5721, and attackers can trigger the vulnerability with specially crafted text input during the inference process, potentially achieving code execution with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The vulnerability requires local access and user interaction but has a high CVSS score of 8.6; KEV status and active exploitation data are not currently available, but the patch exists in version b5721.
A buffer overflow vulnerability in llama.cpp (CVSS 8.8). High severity vulnerability requiring prompt remediation. Vendor patch is available.
Arbitrary memory write in llama.cpp's RPC server allows remote unauthenticated attackers to corrupt arbitrary memory addresses via the unsafe `data` pointer in the `rpc_tensor` structure, leading to full code execution on the host running the inference service. The flaw earned a maximum CVSS 10.0 (scope changed) and publicly available exploit code exists, though it is not yet listed in CISA KEV; EPSS sits at 5.68% (90th percentile), reflecting elevated but not widespread targeting. Fixed in release b3561.
llama.cpp provides LLM inference in C/C++. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available.
llama.cpp provides LLM inference in C/C++. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. This Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability could allow attackers to read data from memory outside the intended buffer boundaries.
llama.cpp provides LLM inference in C/C++. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. This NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability could allow attackers to crash the application by dereferencing a null pointer.
Llama.cpp is LLM inference in C/C++. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required, low attack complexity. No vendor patch available.
Remote code execution in llama.cpp (GGUF library) allows attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by tricking a user into loading a maliciously crafted .gguf model file, exploiting a heap-based buffer overflow in the header.n_kv parsing logic at commit 18c2e17. Publicly available exploit code exists, though EPSS rates real-world exploitation probability low at 0.15% (35th percentile), reflecting the user-interaction requirement. The flaw was reported by Cisco Talos and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability of any system loading untrusted GGUF models.
Remote code execution in llama.cpp (commit 18c2e17) occurs when the GGUF library's gguf_fread_str function parses a maliciously crafted .gguf model file, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow rooted in integer overflow handling (CWE-190). Any user or service loading an untrusted GGUF model into a vulnerable llama.cpp build can be compromised, with publicly available exploit code increasing accessibility despite a low EPSS score of 0.15%.
Heap-based buffer overflow in llama.cpp's GGUF library header parser (commit 18c2e17) enables code execution when a victim loads a maliciously crafted .gguf model file. The CWE-190 integer overflow in the n_tensors field corrupts heap allocations, leading to attacker-controlled memory writes. Publicly available exploit code exists, though EPSS remains low at 0.15% (35th percentile), and there is no public exploit identified as actively used per CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in llama.cpp (commit 18c2e17) is possible when a victim loads a malicious .gguf model file, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow in the GGUF library's GGUF_TYPE_ARRAY/GGUF_TYPE_STRING parsing routines. Publicly available exploit code exists, though EPSS rates near-term mass exploitation probability as low (0.19%, 41st percentile) and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in llama.cpp (commit 18c2e17) is possible when a user opens a malicious .gguf model file, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow in the GGUF library's info->ne handling. Publicly available exploit code exists, though EPSS estimates exploitation probability at 0.48% (65th percentile), reflecting moderate but not widespread targeting risk against this AI inference runtime.