Db Replacer Extension For Joomla
Monthly
Broken CSRF token enforcement across 23 Regular Labs AJAX-based Joomla extensions allows authenticated lower-privileged users to directly invoke privileged endpoints, or allows any attacker to perform those operations via a cross-site request forgery attack against an authenticated victim. The affected surface spans virtually the entire Regular Labs extension portfolio, from Advanced Module Manager through Sourcerer, covering all versions from 1.0.0 up to per-extension maximums. No public exploit or active exploitation has been confirmed; EPSS is 0.13%, consistent with the UI:R requirement that prevents mass automated attack.
Database corruption or site takeover in DB Replacer extension for Joomla versions 1.0.0 through 8.2.7 allows unauthorized backend users or CSRF attacks to perform database replacements, risking major data corruption. The vulnerability arises from inconsistent enforcement of Super User permission and CSRF token validation on administrative routes and replacement requests. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and EPSS estimates a low 0.2% probability of exploitation.
Broken CSRF token enforcement across 23 Regular Labs AJAX-based Joomla extensions allows authenticated lower-privileged users to directly invoke privileged endpoints, or allows any attacker to perform those operations via a cross-site request forgery attack against an authenticated victim. The affected surface spans virtually the entire Regular Labs extension portfolio, from Advanced Module Manager through Sourcerer, covering all versions from 1.0.0 up to per-extension maximums. No public exploit or active exploitation has been confirmed; EPSS is 0.13%, consistent with the UI:R requirement that prevents mass automated attack.
Database corruption or site takeover in DB Replacer extension for Joomla versions 1.0.0 through 8.2.7 allows unauthorized backend users or CSRF attacks to perform database replacements, risking major data corruption. The vulnerability arises from inconsistent enforcement of Super User permission and CSRF token validation on administrative routes and replacement requests. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and EPSS estimates a low 0.2% probability of exploitation.