Command Injection
Monthly
OS command injection in Shibby Tomato 1.28.0000 router firmware allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the start_dhcpc function in /sbin/rc, reachable through the Web UI. Publicly available exploit code exists per the VulDB advisory. The project has been discontinued and superseded by FreshTomato, meaning no upstream fix from the original maintainer is expected.
Command injection in nvm (Node Version Manager) versions through 0.40.4 allows attackers controlling the configured Node.js/io.js mirror to execute arbitrary shell commands as the user running nvm. Mirror-supplied version strings flow unsanitized into an `eval`'d curl/wget invocation in `nvm_download()` and into an awk program in `nvm_get_checksum()`, enabling injection via constructs like `$(id)`. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-3c52-35h2-gfmm) and committed regression tests demonstrate the bug class, and CVSS 7.5 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R) reflects that the default TLS-protected nodejs.org mirror is unaffected.
Unauthenticated OS command injection in the API of Progress ADC products - LoadMaster, ECS Connections Manager, Object Scale Connection Manager, and MOVEit WAF - allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the appliance by supplying unsanitized input to multiple command endpoints. The flaw carries a CVSS of 9.8 (pre-auth, network-reachable) and publicly available exploit code exists (a GitHub PoC and watchTowr Labs write-up), though EPSS remains low at 0.30% and CISA SSVC currently rates exploitation status as 'none'. Fixed builds (7.2.63.2 and 7.2.54.18) are available from Progress.
Authenticated remote command injection in GX Earth ONT (Optical Network Terminal) devices allows attackers with valid web management credentials to execute arbitrary OS commands as root via multiple diagnostic functions in the device's web interface. The flaw, reported by CERT-In and tracked as CIVN-2026-0288, carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 8.7 (High) reflecting low attack complexity and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
Command injection in the Supermicro AS-2115HS-TNR BMC's SMTP service allows an authenticated administrator to inject crafted characters into the SMTP configuration, causing the underlying system to execute unintended OS commands during process invocation. Successful exploitation can yield arbitrary code execution on the baseboard management controller, denial of service, or persistent compromise of the management plane. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Command injection in Acer Connect M6E 5G Portable WiFi Router allows authenticated adjacent-network attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by submitting VPN network profile configuration files containing unsanitized special characters. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.5 reflects high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the router, though exploitation requires high privileges and adjacent (not internet-facing) network access. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not on the CISA KEV list.
Command injection in the Acer Connect M6E 5G Portable WiFi Router allows authenticated remote attackers to install arbitrary applications or execute operating system commands by abusing internal operation codes (opcodes) whose permission checks are not properly enforced. The flaw carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.4 (Critical) due to network reach, low attack complexity, and scope-changing impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated remote command injection in Acer Connect M6E 5G Portable WiFi Router (firmware ≤ M6E_AI_1.00.000019) allows attackers to inject OS commands via the FieldX MDM adb messaging topic, which forwards unverified payloads to Runtime.exec(). The CVSS 4.0 score of 10.0 with network attack vector and no authentication required indicates a critical, trivially exploitable flaw; no public exploit identified at time of analysis but the simplicity of the bug pattern makes weaponization straightforward.
Command injection in Cloud Foundry BOSH Director (all versions prior to v282.1.12) allows an authenticated release uploader to achieve arbitrary OS command execution on the Director by embedding shell metacharacters in the jobs[].name field of a release.MF manifest inside an uploaded tarball. The unsafe value flows from ReleaseJob#unpack into a /bin/sh -c invocation via Bosh::Common::Exec.sh, so payloads such as $(...) or ; are interpreted by the shell during release unpacking. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; no CISA KEV listing, but the Cloud Foundry Foundation has published an advisory and a fixed release.
Command injection in Cloud Foundry BOSH versions prior to v282.1.12 allows an attacker who can upload a release tarball to execute arbitrary shell commands on the BOSH Director host by embedding shell metacharacters in the package name field of the release.MF manifest. The flaw stems from PackagePersister.validate_tgz interpolating the unsanitized name into a `tar -tf` invocation executed through `/bin/sh -c`, with model-level validation occurring only after the shell-out. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the bug is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated remote command execution affects T3 Technology CPE routers (models T625Pro v1.0.07 and T6825G v1.0.03) through an undocumented debug CGI endpoint that processes attacker-supplied query strings as root-level shell commands. SSVC characterizes this as POC-available with total technical impact, and a public advisory has been published on GitHub, though it is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Remote command execution in openlabs docker-wkhtmltopdf-aas (up to commit 9f50579) allows unauthenticated attackers to run arbitrary OS commands by sending a crafted POST request to the app.py PDF conversion endpoint. The CVSS 9.8 rating reflects network-reachable, no-privilege, no-interaction exploitation, and while no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the referenced source line (app.py#L40) makes the injection sink trivially discoverable for any attacker reviewing the repository.
Remote code execution in Microsoft SharePoint Server (2016 Enterprise, 2019, and Subscription Edition) allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server by submitting crafted serialized data that triggers unsafe deserialization. The CVSS 8.0 vector requires low privileges and user interaction, and no public exploit is identified at time of analysis. The flaw is significant because SharePoint servers typically run with high privileges inside enterprise environments and frequently host sensitive collaboration data.
Remote code execution in PraisonAI praisonaiagents <=1.6.39 and PraisonAI <=4.6.39 allows authenticated attackers to fully escape the execute_code() subprocess sandbox by leveraging print.__self__ to reach the real builtins module and reconstructing __import__ at runtime. The flaw defeats prior patches for CVE-2026-39888, CVE-2026-34938, and CVE-2026-40158, enabling arbitrary OS command execution on the host wherever agent input can be influenced via prompt injection or direct code submission. Publicly available exploit code exists in the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-4mr5-g6f9-cfrh), and EPSS/KEV signals are not yet published for this newly disclosed novel bypass.
Command injection in JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.1.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by abusing the filename completion feature when a developer interacts with a crafted filename. The flaw is locally exploitable with user interaction required and has high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Authenticated OS command injection in Dokploy 0.28.8 and earlier lets any organization member execute arbitrary system commands on remote servers managed by the PaaS via the /listen-deployment WebSocket endpoint, resulting in full server compromise. With a CVSS 9.9 (scope changed) and low-privilege precondition, the flaw effectively turns any low-tier org account into a foothold on every connected host. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vendor security advisory (GHSA-r73h-qr3p-hf7f) confirms the issue.
Command injection in Dokploy 0.29.1 and earlier allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands on the host by abusing the Docker file upload feature's unsanitized destinationPath parameter. The CVSS 9.9 score reflects scope change to the underlying host from a containerized context, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis though the GHSA advisory provides sufficient technical detail to reconstruct one.
Command injection in Dokploy 0.29.0 and earlier allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands on the host by deleting a Docker registry whose registryUrl contains shell metacharacters. The deleteRegistry function in packages/server/src/services/registry.ts passes registryUrl unescaped into docker logout, while the adjacent docker login call correctly uses shEscape() - making this a clear regression. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the root cause is documented in the vendor's GHSA advisory.
Authenticated OS command injection in Dokploy 0.28.8 and earlier lets admin or owner users execute arbitrary shell commands on remote servers managed by the PaaS through the application.updateTraefikConfig tRPC endpoint. The flaw stems from unsanitized shell interpolation in an echo call, granting full command execution across any host the Dokploy controller manages. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the high-privilege admin context combined with cross-server reach makes this a meaningful post-compromise escalation path.
Cross-tenant remote code execution in Dokploy 0.26.7 and earlier allows any authenticated user to hijack scheduled tasks belonging to other organizations and execute arbitrary scripts on the Dokploy host or managed remote servers. The schedule router fails to enforce organization and role authorization, so knowledge of a scheduleId/serverId is sufficient to create, modify, or trigger server-type schedules that run attacker-controlled shell commands. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the trivial authorization bypass combined with built-in script execution makes this a high-priority issue for multi-tenant Dokploy deployments.
Authenticated command injection in Dokploy 0.26.6 and earlier enables any logged-in user to run arbitrary OS commands as root via the /docker-container-logs WebSocket endpoint. The tail and since parameters are concatenated into shell commands without validation, yielding a CVSS 9.9 (Scope:Changed) issue affecting this self-hosted PaaS. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Remote unauthenticated command injection in the Acer Predator Connect W6x router enables root-level code execution via crafted MQTT messages, scoring a maximum 10.0 CVSS v4.0 across all impact metrics including subsequent system impact. The flaw was disclosed by Acer and tracked in the ENISA EUVD as EUVD-2026-33269, but no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Affects firmware W6x_GBL_2.00.000005 and earlier, with no special authentication or user interaction required.
Command injection in the Acer Predator Connect W6x router allows authenticated high-privilege attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands by submitting a crafted MAC address through the Wi-Fi device blocking feature. The flaw stems from insufficient input sanitization on a value that is passed to a shell context, and at the time of analysis no public exploit has been identified and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV. With a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.6, the bug confers full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact on the device itself.
Command injection in Dulwich (pure-Python Git implementation) versions >= 0.24.0 and < 1.2.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands when a victim merges an attacker-controlled branch and has a custom merge driver configured that references the %P placeholder. The ProcessMergeDriver passes attacker-controlled file paths from the git tree into subprocess.run with shell=True, so a path like 'x; touch /tmp/pwned #' is interpreted as a shell metacharacter sequence. Publicly available exploit code exists (working POC in the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-9277-mp7x-85jf); no public exploit in CISA KEV at time of analysis.
Argument-injection command execution in Mintplex Labs AnythingLLM before 1.13.0 lets an attacker who can chat with an agent turn ripgrep into a script executor: the filesystem-search-files skill forwards an LLM-controlled pattern as a positional argument without a '--' separator, so a pattern like '--pre=/bin/sh' makes ripgrep run /bin/sh on every file it walks. Combined with the sibling filesystem-write-text-file skill to stage an attacker-controlled script, this yields arbitrary command execution inside the server container, which is exploitable out-of-the-box because the filesystem plugin ships enabled by default in the official Docker image. SSVC rates technical impact as total; a proof-of-concept exists but there is no public exploit weaponization and EPSS is low (0.05%).
Remote code execution in ScadaBR allows authenticated users to abuse exposed server-side methods to create and execute arbitrary JavaScript that runs as root, resulting in full host compromise. The CVSS 9.9 rating reflects scope change and complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, and no public exploit is identified at time of analysis despite the issue being formally reported by Tenable Research (TRA-2026-46).
Command injection in Zed code editor versions prior to 0.229.0 allows bypass of the terminal tool's permission allowlist through bash arithmetic expansion syntax $((...)) nested inside permitted commands like echo. Because Zed is increasingly used with AI agent workflows that execute shell commands on behalf of the user, the bypass effectively neutralizes the safety boundary intended to gate dangerous operations. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-c99f-97vf-4h5h provides sufficient detail for a working PoC to be reconstructed.
Remote code execution in Zed code editor versions prior to 0.227.1 occurs when a user opens a folder containing a malicious .git/config file that abuses the core.fsmonitor Git configuration option. The flaw triggers even in untrusted mode, defeating the safety boundary users expect when opening unknown repositories, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis though the advisory is published by the vendor.
Remote command execution in Zed code editor versions prior to 0.227.1 occurs when opening SSH or WSL remote terminals because environment variable keys are passed into a shell command string without quoting or validation. An attacker who can influence project terminal settings (for example, through a shared or malicious project) can embed shell expansions such as $(...) into env var keys, achieving arbitrary command execution on the remote host as the victim user when they open a terminal. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the issue is fixed in Zed 0.227.1.
Command injection in the rpmuncompress utility of RPM allows local attackers to execute arbitrary commands when a victim extracts a maliciously crafted ZIP, 7z, or GEM archive whose top-level folder name contains shell metacharacters. The flaw affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 through 10 and downstream products including OpenShift Container Platform 4, Satellite 6, Red Hat Hardened Images, and Quarkus Native Builder. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue requires user interaction with an attacker-supplied archive, but successful exploitation yields full code execution under the extracting user's identity.
Remote code execution as root in InHand Networks industrial cellular routers (IR302, IR305, IR315, IR615) allows unauthenticated network attackers to inject operating system commands through the IPSec VPN feature. The CVSS 9.8 score reflects network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Remote unauthenticated command injection in the ZeroTier VPN feature of InHand Networks IR302, IR305, IR315, and IR615 industrial routers grants ROOT-level code execution on affected devices. The flaw carries a CVSS 9.8 critical rating with no authentication required, exposing industrial network gateways to full compromise; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vendor (InHand Networks PSA-2026-05) has acknowledged the issue.
Remote root command injection in InHand Networks industrial routers (IR302, IR305, IR315, IR615) allows unauthenticated network attackers to fully compromise affected devices via the WireGuard VPN feature. With CVSS 9.8 and no required privileges or user interaction, this flaw grants attackers ROOT-level control over edge industrial networking equipment. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a vendor advisory (InHand-PSA-2026-05) has been published.
Remote root command injection in InHand Networks IR302, IR305, IR315, and IR615 industrial cellular routers allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root via the Admin Access feature. The flaw affects IR302 V3.5.108, IR305/IR315/IR615 V1.0.118, and earlier firmware, with CVSS 9.8 reflecting network-reachable, no-auth exploitation; no public exploit identified at time of analysis but vendor PSA-2026-05 confirms the issue.
Remote code execution in Yamcs (the open-source mission control framework, yamcs-core) before 5.12.7 lets an authenticated operator holding the ChangeMissionDatabase privilege overwrite a Python (Jython) algorithm via the Mission Database REST API and run arbitrary OS commands on the host. The Jython script engine is invoked without a sandbox, so injected algorithm text can import java.lang.Runtime and shell out. Publicly available exploit code exists (a full PoC is published in the GitHub Security Advisory), but the issue is not listed in CISA KEV and no public in-the-wild exploitation is identified.
Arbitrary OS command execution in Microsoft's UFO intelligent-automation framework (tagged releases up to and including v3.0.0) lets a local, low-privileged attacker who can write or modify a per-session action JSON record plant a malicious shell action that is executed via PowerShell when the session is resumed or replayed. The injected command runs with the privileges of the UFO process user, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (CVSS 7.8, CWE-78). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS or CISA KEV data was supplied to gauge exploitation likelihood.
Local privilege escalation via OS command injection in pam_usb before 0.8.7 lets a low-privileged local user execute arbitrary commands as root. The flaw lives in src/tmux.c, which reads the attacker-controllable $TMUX environment variable and interpolates its socket-path component, unsanitised, inside a double-quoted string passed to popen(); a value containing a double-quote breaks out of the quoting and injects shell syntax that runs in the root-context PAM stack. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS or CISA KEV data was supplied, but the CVSS 8.8 (scope-changed) rating reflects straightforward, low-complexity root compromise.
Root command injection in pam_usb prior to 0.8.7 lets a local high-privileged user - or an attacker who can present a removable device with an attacker-chosen filesystem UUID - embed shell metacharacters (e.g. $(id>/tmp/rce)) that execute as root when an administrator runs pamusb-conf --reset-pads. A second injection path passes the userName value from the XML configuration directly to os.system() in pamusb-agent. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; the issue is fixed in 0.8.7.
Local privilege escalation in pam_usb prior to 0.8.7 lets a low-privileged user gain the elevated privileges of the pam_usb tool chain by abusing the pamusb-pinentry helper. The helper trusts the PINENTRY_FALLBACK_APP environment variable and executes its value directly, so any process able to set that variable before pamusb-pinentry runs can have an arbitrary binary executed. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is fixed in version 0.8.7; the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-jxrj-q67x-wr4c) is the sole reference.
Unauthorized OS command execution in Tanium Connect allows an attacker holding low-privilege authenticated access to run arbitrary commands on the host, achieving full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The CVSS 8.8 (network vector, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction) reflects an authenticated remote code execution issue rooted in command injection (CWE-78). No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV; EPSS data was not provided.
Command injection in Atril (MATE document viewer) and related forks Evince/Xreader allows attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands when a victim opens a maliciously crafted document. The fix, shipped in Atril 1.26.3 and 1.28.4, quotes user-supplied strings passed to the ev_spawn command line, indicating unsanitized input was being interpolated into a spawned subprocess. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but disclosure on oss-security and Debian LTS advisories suggests Linux desktop distributions are actively patching.
Command injection in the Sherlock username-hunting tool's CI/CD pipeline (versions prior to 0.16.1) allows any GitHub user to run arbitrary commands on the project's GitHub Actions runner. The flaw lives in the validate_modified_targets.yml workflow, which uses the dangerous pull_request_target trigger; simply opening a pull request executes attacker-controlled code with no approval, review, or merge required. Fixed in 0.16.1; with a CVSS of 9.3 it is a high-severity supply-chain issue, though no public exploit was identified at time of analysis and the technique class is well documented.
Authenticated command injection in TP-Link Archer BE450 v1 and BE7200 v1 routers lets an admin-level user run arbitrary OS commands with elevated privileges via the web management interface. The flaw stems from improper input validation (CWE-20): crafted input supplied through the management UI is passed to backend system commands without adequate sanitization, enabling full device compromise. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS 4.0 vector scopes exploitation to the adjacent network by an already-authenticated administrator.
Local arbitrary code execution in Raynet rvia 12.6 Update 8 and earlier lets a low-privileged local user inject operating-system commands through the application's Java search feature, which assembles a `find` command from an attacker-controlled path without properly terminating the search criteria (CWE-77 OS command injection). A working proof-of-concept exploit script is publicly available on GitHub (Wise-Security/CVE-2026-38945), and CISA's SSVC framework rates the technical impact as total, though it marks the issue as not automatable and requiring local access. No EPSS score and no CISA KEV listing were supplied, so there is no public exploit identified as actively exploited at time of analysis.
Unauthenticated remote command injection in the Netis AC1200 Router (model NC21, firmware V4.0.1.4296) allows any LAN-resident attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands as the router's runtime user via a single HTTP POST to /cgi-bin/skk_set.cgi. The password and new_pwd_confirm parameters are concatenated into a shell invocation without sanitization, and exploitation requires no credentials. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, though the disclosure repository documents the technique (base64-encoded backtick payloads), and EPSS scoring (0.21%) suggests limited broad exploitation pressure despite the trivial attack complexity.
OS command injection in sipeed picoclaw v0.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass an incomplete denylist-based sanitizer in the ExecTool component and execute arbitrary shell commands on the host. The guardCommand() function in pkg/tools/shell.go relies on only eight regex denylist patterns, which is insufficient to block the wide range of shell metacharacters and command-chaining techniques available to an attacker. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though a third-party gist documenting the issue is referenced from NVD.
OS command injection in the @pensar/apex Node.js agent package (versions 0.0.58 and earlier) lets a remote, unauthenticated attacker run arbitrary operating-system commands by smuggling shell metacharacters into the smart_enumerate tool's url or extensions inputs. The vulnerable createSmartEnumerateTool() routine in src/core/agent/tools.ts builds a shell command string by concatenating those untrusted values and passes it to Node.js child_process.exec(), which spawns a shell that interprets the injected characters, executing them with the privileges of the agent process. CVSS is 8.8 (network vector, low complexity, no privileges, but user/agent interaction required); the source data shows no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS score, and a referenced researcher gist may contain proof-of-concept detail though exploit code is not confirmed in the structured input.
OS command injection in MB connect line / Helmholz mbNET and REX industrial remote-maintenance routers (mbNET.mini up to 3.0.2, REX200/250 and mbNET/mbNET.rokey up to 8.4.4, REX100 up to 3.0.2) lets a high-privilege authenticated user poison the device's configuration generator so that a tainted value is later passed unsanitized to a system execute call, producing arbitrary command execution with total loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability. The flaw was reported through CERT@VDE (advisory VDE-2026-054) and tracked as EUVD-2026-32151. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is low (0.07%, 22nd percentile), and CISA's SSVC framework rates current exploitation as none.
OS command injection in Perl's HTTP::Daemon before 6.17 (libwww-perl) lets remote unauthenticated attackers execute commands as the daemon process UID when request-derived input reaches the send_file() method. The method opened its string argument with Perl's 2-argument open(), whose magic prefixes ('| cmd', 'cmd |', '> path', '>> path') spawn subprocesses or write/truncate files; the read-pipe form additionally leaks subprocess stdout into the HTTP response body. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing, but the upstream fix is released (6.17) and the patch diff is public, so the root cause is fully disclosed.
OS command injection in Tanium Connect lets an authenticated, low-privileged user execute arbitrary commands on the underlying host, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise (CVSS 8.8). The flaw affects Connect branches 5.26, 5.29, and 5.37 below their respective fixed builds and is tagged as RCE/Command Injection. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS estimates exploitation probability at a low 0.07% (22nd percentile).
Host-level code execution in Lumiverse AI chat application (versions prior to 0.9.7) allows admin-authenticated attackers to run arbitrary commands on the host by submitting a malicious Spindle extension whose package.json defines lifecycle scripts. The Spindle build pipeline invokes bun install before its static safety scan and without script execution disabled, so code runs at install time on the server rather than at runtime in any sandboxed bundle. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Local privilege escalation in OpenVPN Connect 3.5.1 through 3.8.1 on macOS allows unprivileged local users to execute arbitrary OS commands as root by abusing an exposed local IPC channel to the privileged background service. The flaw carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.4 with scope change (SC:H/SI:H/SA:H), and SSVC rates technical impact as total, though there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is only 0.04%.
Remote code execution in Twenty CRM versions 1.7.7 through 1.16.7 allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands on the database server by chaining SQL injection in the REST API groupBy endpoint with PostgreSQL's COPY TO PROGRAM functionality. The unsanitized timeZone parameter is interpolated directly into raw SQL via JavaScript template literals, and exploitation succeeds whenever the application's Postgres role holds superuser privileges. Publicly available exploit code exists per SSVC, though EPSS scoring (0.15%) suggests exploitation activity has not yet become widespread.
Command injection in Vowpal Wabbit's GitHub Actions CI workflow allows an
Authenticated command injection in luci-app-https-dns-proxy through version 2025.12.29-5 allows a low-privileged LuCI user holding the luci.https-dns-proxy ACL permission to execute arbitrary commands as root on OpenWrt devices via shell metacharacters in the 'name' parameter of a ubus RPC call to setInitAction. Publicly available exploit code exists (Exploit-DB 52521, VulnCheck advisory), though EPSS remains low at 0.06% and the package is an optional community add-on not installed by default. Core OpenWrt installations are unaffected; only systems that explicitly opted into this LuCI add-on are at risk.
Command injection in the gitoxide Rust library (gix-submodule crate before 0.82.0, gix before 0.83.0) allows attackers controlling a repository's .gitmodules file to bypass the CommandForbiddenInModulesConfiguration guard and achieve arbitrary command execution when Submodule::update() runs against a previously-initialized submodule. The flaw stems from gix_submodule::File::update() checking only whether a same-named section exists in .git/config rather than verifying that the update value itself originated from that trusted source, so an attacker-supplied 'update = !cmd' falls through to execution. Publicly available exploit code exists (PoC referenced by VulnCheck and Anthropic), though EPSS is low (0.02%) and the issue is not in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via crafted print job descriptions. The flaw stems from unescaped expansion of the client-controlled '%J' substitution token into the configured 'print command', enabling shell metacharacter injection. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and EPSS scores exploitation probability at only 0.08%, but CVSS 9.0 with scope change reflects high potential impact on any Samba host exposing print services.
OS command injection in the Totolink N300RH router (firmware 6.1c.1353_B20190305) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the admpass argument sent to the setPasswordCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the SSVC framework rates technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though EPSS remains low at 0.20%. The flaw is reachable over the network without authentication or user interaction, giving an attacker full control of the device.
OS command injection in FastNetMon Community Edition through 1.2.9 lets an authenticated network attacker execute arbitrary shell commands via the MikroTik router integration plugin by influencing argv[] values passed to the unsanitized _log() function. The flaw mirrors a previously disclosed Juniper plugin issue in the same project, and while a public technical write-up exists at lorikeetsecurity.com, no public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified, with EPSS at 0.05% (17th percentile).
Configuration injection in FastNetMon Community Edition through 1.2.9 allows an attacker who controls the attacker IP string passed to the Juniper integration plugin to inject arbitrary Juniper NETCONF set/delete commands, leading to full router compromise. The flaw lives in the PHP-based Juniper plugin where unsanitized argv input is interpolated into NETCONF commands, and although no public exploit identified at time of analysis (EPSS 0.03%), the technical impact is rated total under SSVC and CVSS scores 8.1.
OS command injection in FastNetMon Community Edition (through 1.2.9) lets attacker-controlled input reach an unescaped exec() call inside the Juniper router integration plugin, enabling arbitrary shell command execution on the host. The flaw lives in the _log() function of src/juniper_plugin/fastnetmon_juniper.php, where the $msg argument (built from argv[1]-argv[3]: attack IP, direction, power) is concatenated directly into a shell command. Although rated CVSS 9.8, practical exploitation is gated: FastNetMon's C++ core currently feeds IPs through inet_ntoa(), which only yields safe dotted-decimal strings, so injection requires the script to be driven directly or by a third-party orchestrator. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the 'enable' parameter of the setParentalRules function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and while the EPSS score of 0.89% (76th percentile) suggests moderate predicted exploitation likelihood, the network-accessible attack surface on an edge device elevates real-world risk significantly.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'mac' parameter sent to the setAccessDeviceCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and SSVC rates the technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile). No CISA KEV listing has been published at time of analysis.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the admpass parameter sent to the setPasswordCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists and the flaw is reachable over the network without user interaction, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis indicates active in-the-wild abuse via CISA KEV.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the Comment parameter handled by the setIpQosRules function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists and the SSVC framework rates the technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis as actively exploited in the CISA KEV catalog. EPSS sits at 0.89% (76th percentile), suggesting moderate but non-trivial exploitation interest.
Remote OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands through the setWanCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi by manipulating the 'enabled' parameter. Publicly available exploit code exists, and with CVSS 4.0 score of 8.9 (network-reachable, low complexity, no privileges required), exposed devices face high risk despite an EPSS score of 0.89% (76th percentile) indicating moderate near-term exploitation probability.
OS command injection in Totolink A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the FileName argument in the UploadFirmwareFile function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB reporting, and SSVC rates this as automatable with total technical impact, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile) indicating no broad mass-exploitation campaign yet observed.
Remote OS command injection in TOTOLINK A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the setOpenVpnCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi by manipulating the 'enabled' argument. Publicly available exploit code exists, raising the risk of opportunistic attacks against exposed devices, though EPSS scoring (0.89%, 76th percentile) suggests moderate but not yet widespread exploitation. The flaw stems from improper neutralization of OS command elements (CWE-78) in the router's Web Management Interface.
OS command injection in TOTOLINK A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the FileName parameter in the UploadOpenVpnCert function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB disclosure, and SSVC scoring indicates the flaw is automatable with total technical impact, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile). The vulnerability is no public exploit identified in CISA KEV, but POC availability combined with network-reachable management interface elevates real-world risk.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the servername parameter of the setOpenVpnCertGenerationCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists (GitHub PoC), and although the EPSS score is modest (0.89%, 76th percentile), the CVSS 4.0 score of 8.9 reflects network-reachable, no-privilege, no-interaction exploitation with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No CISA KEV listing has been recorded at the time of analysis.
OS command injection in Totolink A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'enable' argument passed to the setL2tpServerCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists (published on GitHub), though EPSS probability remains modest at 0.94% (76th percentile), and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
OS command injection in Totolink A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'enable' parameter sent to the setQosCfg function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi in the Web Management Interface. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB submission, and the SSVC framework rates technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though EPSS probability remains modest at 0.89%.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the wscDisabled parameter sent to the setWiFiWpsCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB disclosure, though EPSS probability remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile) and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'enable' argument passed to the setMacFilterRules function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB, and SSVC categorizes the technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile).
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the bgProtection parameter in the setWiFiAdvancedCfg function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB, and SSVC classifies the issue as automatable with total technical impact, though EPSS exploitation probability remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile).
Authenticated OS command execution in NEC Platforms Aterm MR51FN (before Ver. 3.4.0) and CM51FD (before Ver. 1.2.0) routers lets an attacker who already holds administrator credentials to the web console inject arbitrary operating-system commands over an adjacent network. Impact is total (confidentiality, integrity and availability all High per CVSS 4.0), effectively giving full control of the affected device, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is low (0.34%, 57th percentile). Exploitation is gated behind administrator access and adjacent (not internet-wide) reach, so this is a privilege-escalation-to-device-takeover primitive rather than a remote unauthenticated compromise.
OS command injection in the TOTOLINK A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'enable' parameter passed to the setStaticDhcpRules function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists and SSVC rates this as automatable with total technical impact, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile). Exploitation requires no authentication or user interaction, making any internet-exposed management interface a high-priority target.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the firewallType parameter sent to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the SSVC framework rates the technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though it is not currently listed in CISA KEV. EPSS sits at 0.89% (76th percentile), suggesting moderate but not yet widespread opportunistic exploitation.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the 'enable' parameter of the setRemoteCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, raising the practical risk despite the device not being listed in CISA KEV; EPSS sits at 0.89% (76th percentile), reflecting moderate predicted exploitation likelihood.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'enable' parameter passed to the setGameSpeedCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, raising the practical threat despite a modest EPSS score of 0.89% (76th percentile). No active exploitation has been confirmed via CISA KEV at time of analysis.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands by manipulating the 'provider' argument passed to the setDdnsCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists (CVSS 4.0 base 8.9, EPSS 0.89%), and no CISA KEV listing has been issued, but the combination of zero-privilege network exploitation and a working PoC against consumer/SOHO networking gear makes this a high-priority issue for any exposed device.
OS command injection in the TOTOLINK A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'mode' parameter sent to the setScheduleCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists (published via VulDB and a GitHub PoC), though there is no public exploit identified as actively exploited in the wild and EPSS probability is modest at 0.89%. The flaw resides in the device's Web Management Interface and can be triggered over the network without user interaction, making any internet-exposed device immediately at risk.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the resetFlags parameter handled by the setUpgradeFW function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the SSVC framework classifies exploitation as automatable with total technical impact, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile).
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands through the setLanguageCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. The flaw is triggered by manipulating the lang argument in the Web Management Interface, with publicly available exploit code existing and SSVC classifying the issue as automatable with total technical impact. EPSS sits at 0.89% (76th percentile), indicating moderate but non-trivial exploitation probability.
Remote OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'command' argument in the setTracerouteCfg function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the CVSS 4.0 vector confirms network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation without authentication or user interaction, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile) and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the ip parameter handled by the setDiagnosisCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the CVSS 4.0 score of 8.9 reflects high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. EPSS is moderate at 0.89% (76th percentile), and the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Cross-tenant remote code execution in Nezha Monitoring dashboard (versions >= 1.4.0, < 1.14.15-0.20260517022419-d7526351cf97) allows any authenticated RoleMember user to execute arbitrary shell commands as root on every monitored agent host in the deployment. The flaw stems from cron API endpoints being gated by commonHandler instead of adminHandler, combined with a vacuous-true permission check when the Servers list is empty, enabling fanout to all tenants' servers. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a complete proof-of-concept is included in the GitHub Security Advisory.
Command injection in Microsoft 365 Copilot for iOS allows remote unauthenticated attackers to tamper with system integrity over the network when a user is convinced to interact with malicious content. The flaw carries a critical CVSS score of 9.3 with a scope change indicating impact beyond the vulnerable component, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis. An official vendor patch is available via MSRC.
Information disclosure in Microsoft 365 Copilot lets an unauthorized remote attacker inject specially crafted command elements over the network to read data they should not have access to. The flaw is a command-injection weakness (CWE-77) whose impact is confined to confidentiality (C:H, no integrity or availability effect), and it was reported by Microsoft with a patch issued through the MSRC update guide. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is very low (0.06%), and CISA SSVC records exploitation status as none.
Remote code execution in Microsoft Power Pages allows an unauthorized network attacker to inject and execute arbitrary operating-system commands via improperly neutralized special elements (CWE-77). Because Power Pages is a Microsoft-hosted, low-code website-building SaaS platform, the flaw affects the service surface Microsoft exposes to tenants, and a successful attack yields full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the EPSS score is very low (0.07%), but the CVSS 9.8 rating and 'total' technical impact make it a high-severity issue.
OS command injection in Shibby Tomato 1.28.0000 router firmware allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the start_dhcpc function in /sbin/rc, reachable through the Web UI. Publicly available exploit code exists per the VulDB advisory. The project has been discontinued and superseded by FreshTomato, meaning no upstream fix from the original maintainer is expected.
Command injection in nvm (Node Version Manager) versions through 0.40.4 allows attackers controlling the configured Node.js/io.js mirror to execute arbitrary shell commands as the user running nvm. Mirror-supplied version strings flow unsanitized into an `eval`'d curl/wget invocation in `nvm_download()` and into an awk program in `nvm_get_checksum()`, enabling injection via constructs like `$(id)`. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-3c52-35h2-gfmm) and committed regression tests demonstrate the bug class, and CVSS 7.5 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R) reflects that the default TLS-protected nodejs.org mirror is unaffected.
Unauthenticated OS command injection in the API of Progress ADC products - LoadMaster, ECS Connections Manager, Object Scale Connection Manager, and MOVEit WAF - allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the appliance by supplying unsanitized input to multiple command endpoints. The flaw carries a CVSS of 9.8 (pre-auth, network-reachable) and publicly available exploit code exists (a GitHub PoC and watchTowr Labs write-up), though EPSS remains low at 0.30% and CISA SSVC currently rates exploitation status as 'none'. Fixed builds (7.2.63.2 and 7.2.54.18) are available from Progress.
Authenticated remote command injection in GX Earth ONT (Optical Network Terminal) devices allows attackers with valid web management credentials to execute arbitrary OS commands as root via multiple diagnostic functions in the device's web interface. The flaw, reported by CERT-In and tracked as CIVN-2026-0288, carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 8.7 (High) reflecting low attack complexity and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
Command injection in the Supermicro AS-2115HS-TNR BMC's SMTP service allows an authenticated administrator to inject crafted characters into the SMTP configuration, causing the underlying system to execute unintended OS commands during process invocation. Successful exploitation can yield arbitrary code execution on the baseboard management controller, denial of service, or persistent compromise of the management plane. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Command injection in Acer Connect M6E 5G Portable WiFi Router allows authenticated adjacent-network attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by submitting VPN network profile configuration files containing unsanitized special characters. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.5 reflects high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the router, though exploitation requires high privileges and adjacent (not internet-facing) network access. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not on the CISA KEV list.
Command injection in the Acer Connect M6E 5G Portable WiFi Router allows authenticated remote attackers to install arbitrary applications or execute operating system commands by abusing internal operation codes (opcodes) whose permission checks are not properly enforced. The flaw carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.4 (Critical) due to network reach, low attack complexity, and scope-changing impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated remote command injection in Acer Connect M6E 5G Portable WiFi Router (firmware ≤ M6E_AI_1.00.000019) allows attackers to inject OS commands via the FieldX MDM adb messaging topic, which forwards unverified payloads to Runtime.exec(). The CVSS 4.0 score of 10.0 with network attack vector and no authentication required indicates a critical, trivially exploitable flaw; no public exploit identified at time of analysis but the simplicity of the bug pattern makes weaponization straightforward.
Command injection in Cloud Foundry BOSH Director (all versions prior to v282.1.12) allows an authenticated release uploader to achieve arbitrary OS command execution on the Director by embedding shell metacharacters in the jobs[].name field of a release.MF manifest inside an uploaded tarball. The unsafe value flows from ReleaseJob#unpack into a /bin/sh -c invocation via Bosh::Common::Exec.sh, so payloads such as $(...) or ; are interpreted by the shell during release unpacking. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; no CISA KEV listing, but the Cloud Foundry Foundation has published an advisory and a fixed release.
Command injection in Cloud Foundry BOSH versions prior to v282.1.12 allows an attacker who can upload a release tarball to execute arbitrary shell commands on the BOSH Director host by embedding shell metacharacters in the package name field of the release.MF manifest. The flaw stems from PackagePersister.validate_tgz interpolating the unsanitized name into a `tar -tf` invocation executed through `/bin/sh -c`, with model-level validation occurring only after the shell-out. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the bug is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated remote command execution affects T3 Technology CPE routers (models T625Pro v1.0.07 and T6825G v1.0.03) through an undocumented debug CGI endpoint that processes attacker-supplied query strings as root-level shell commands. SSVC characterizes this as POC-available with total technical impact, and a public advisory has been published on GitHub, though it is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Remote command execution in openlabs docker-wkhtmltopdf-aas (up to commit 9f50579) allows unauthenticated attackers to run arbitrary OS commands by sending a crafted POST request to the app.py PDF conversion endpoint. The CVSS 9.8 rating reflects network-reachable, no-privilege, no-interaction exploitation, and while no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the referenced source line (app.py#L40) makes the injection sink trivially discoverable for any attacker reviewing the repository.
Remote code execution in Microsoft SharePoint Server (2016 Enterprise, 2019, and Subscription Edition) allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server by submitting crafted serialized data that triggers unsafe deserialization. The CVSS 8.0 vector requires low privileges and user interaction, and no public exploit is identified at time of analysis. The flaw is significant because SharePoint servers typically run with high privileges inside enterprise environments and frequently host sensitive collaboration data.
Remote code execution in PraisonAI praisonaiagents <=1.6.39 and PraisonAI <=4.6.39 allows authenticated attackers to fully escape the execute_code() subprocess sandbox by leveraging print.__self__ to reach the real builtins module and reconstructing __import__ at runtime. The flaw defeats prior patches for CVE-2026-39888, CVE-2026-34938, and CVE-2026-40158, enabling arbitrary OS command execution on the host wherever agent input can be influenced via prompt injection or direct code submission. Publicly available exploit code exists in the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-4mr5-g6f9-cfrh), and EPSS/KEV signals are not yet published for this newly disclosed novel bypass.
Command injection in JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.1.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by abusing the filename completion feature when a developer interacts with a crafted filename. The flaw is locally exploitable with user interaction required and has high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Authenticated OS command injection in Dokploy 0.28.8 and earlier lets any organization member execute arbitrary system commands on remote servers managed by the PaaS via the /listen-deployment WebSocket endpoint, resulting in full server compromise. With a CVSS 9.9 (scope changed) and low-privilege precondition, the flaw effectively turns any low-tier org account into a foothold on every connected host. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vendor security advisory (GHSA-r73h-qr3p-hf7f) confirms the issue.
Command injection in Dokploy 0.29.1 and earlier allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands on the host by abusing the Docker file upload feature's unsanitized destinationPath parameter. The CVSS 9.9 score reflects scope change to the underlying host from a containerized context, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis though the GHSA advisory provides sufficient technical detail to reconstruct one.
Command injection in Dokploy 0.29.0 and earlier allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands on the host by deleting a Docker registry whose registryUrl contains shell metacharacters. The deleteRegistry function in packages/server/src/services/registry.ts passes registryUrl unescaped into docker logout, while the adjacent docker login call correctly uses shEscape() - making this a clear regression. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the root cause is documented in the vendor's GHSA advisory.
Authenticated OS command injection in Dokploy 0.28.8 and earlier lets admin or owner users execute arbitrary shell commands on remote servers managed by the PaaS through the application.updateTraefikConfig tRPC endpoint. The flaw stems from unsanitized shell interpolation in an echo call, granting full command execution across any host the Dokploy controller manages. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the high-privilege admin context combined with cross-server reach makes this a meaningful post-compromise escalation path.
Cross-tenant remote code execution in Dokploy 0.26.7 and earlier allows any authenticated user to hijack scheduled tasks belonging to other organizations and execute arbitrary scripts on the Dokploy host or managed remote servers. The schedule router fails to enforce organization and role authorization, so knowledge of a scheduleId/serverId is sufficient to create, modify, or trigger server-type schedules that run attacker-controlled shell commands. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the trivial authorization bypass combined with built-in script execution makes this a high-priority issue for multi-tenant Dokploy deployments.
Authenticated command injection in Dokploy 0.26.6 and earlier enables any logged-in user to run arbitrary OS commands as root via the /docker-container-logs WebSocket endpoint. The tail and since parameters are concatenated into shell commands without validation, yielding a CVSS 9.9 (Scope:Changed) issue affecting this self-hosted PaaS. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Remote unauthenticated command injection in the Acer Predator Connect W6x router enables root-level code execution via crafted MQTT messages, scoring a maximum 10.0 CVSS v4.0 across all impact metrics including subsequent system impact. The flaw was disclosed by Acer and tracked in the ENISA EUVD as EUVD-2026-33269, but no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Affects firmware W6x_GBL_2.00.000005 and earlier, with no special authentication or user interaction required.
Command injection in the Acer Predator Connect W6x router allows authenticated high-privilege attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands by submitting a crafted MAC address through the Wi-Fi device blocking feature. The flaw stems from insufficient input sanitization on a value that is passed to a shell context, and at the time of analysis no public exploit has been identified and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV. With a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.6, the bug confers full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact on the device itself.
Command injection in Dulwich (pure-Python Git implementation) versions >= 0.24.0 and < 1.2.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands when a victim merges an attacker-controlled branch and has a custom merge driver configured that references the %P placeholder. The ProcessMergeDriver passes attacker-controlled file paths from the git tree into subprocess.run with shell=True, so a path like 'x; touch /tmp/pwned #' is interpreted as a shell metacharacter sequence. Publicly available exploit code exists (working POC in the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-9277-mp7x-85jf); no public exploit in CISA KEV at time of analysis.
Argument-injection command execution in Mintplex Labs AnythingLLM before 1.13.0 lets an attacker who can chat with an agent turn ripgrep into a script executor: the filesystem-search-files skill forwards an LLM-controlled pattern as a positional argument without a '--' separator, so a pattern like '--pre=/bin/sh' makes ripgrep run /bin/sh on every file it walks. Combined with the sibling filesystem-write-text-file skill to stage an attacker-controlled script, this yields arbitrary command execution inside the server container, which is exploitable out-of-the-box because the filesystem plugin ships enabled by default in the official Docker image. SSVC rates technical impact as total; a proof-of-concept exists but there is no public exploit weaponization and EPSS is low (0.05%).
Remote code execution in ScadaBR allows authenticated users to abuse exposed server-side methods to create and execute arbitrary JavaScript that runs as root, resulting in full host compromise. The CVSS 9.9 rating reflects scope change and complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, and no public exploit is identified at time of analysis despite the issue being formally reported by Tenable Research (TRA-2026-46).
Command injection in Zed code editor versions prior to 0.229.0 allows bypass of the terminal tool's permission allowlist through bash arithmetic expansion syntax $((...)) nested inside permitted commands like echo. Because Zed is increasingly used with AI agent workflows that execute shell commands on behalf of the user, the bypass effectively neutralizes the safety boundary intended to gate dangerous operations. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-c99f-97vf-4h5h provides sufficient detail for a working PoC to be reconstructed.
Remote code execution in Zed code editor versions prior to 0.227.1 occurs when a user opens a folder containing a malicious .git/config file that abuses the core.fsmonitor Git configuration option. The flaw triggers even in untrusted mode, defeating the safety boundary users expect when opening unknown repositories, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis though the advisory is published by the vendor.
Remote command execution in Zed code editor versions prior to 0.227.1 occurs when opening SSH or WSL remote terminals because environment variable keys are passed into a shell command string without quoting or validation. An attacker who can influence project terminal settings (for example, through a shared or malicious project) can embed shell expansions such as $(...) into env var keys, achieving arbitrary command execution on the remote host as the victim user when they open a terminal. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the issue is fixed in Zed 0.227.1.
Command injection in the rpmuncompress utility of RPM allows local attackers to execute arbitrary commands when a victim extracts a maliciously crafted ZIP, 7z, or GEM archive whose top-level folder name contains shell metacharacters. The flaw affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 through 10 and downstream products including OpenShift Container Platform 4, Satellite 6, Red Hat Hardened Images, and Quarkus Native Builder. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue requires user interaction with an attacker-supplied archive, but successful exploitation yields full code execution under the extracting user's identity.
Remote code execution as root in InHand Networks industrial cellular routers (IR302, IR305, IR315, IR615) allows unauthenticated network attackers to inject operating system commands through the IPSec VPN feature. The CVSS 9.8 score reflects network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Remote unauthenticated command injection in the ZeroTier VPN feature of InHand Networks IR302, IR305, IR315, and IR615 industrial routers grants ROOT-level code execution on affected devices. The flaw carries a CVSS 9.8 critical rating with no authentication required, exposing industrial network gateways to full compromise; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vendor (InHand Networks PSA-2026-05) has acknowledged the issue.
Remote root command injection in InHand Networks industrial routers (IR302, IR305, IR315, IR615) allows unauthenticated network attackers to fully compromise affected devices via the WireGuard VPN feature. With CVSS 9.8 and no required privileges or user interaction, this flaw grants attackers ROOT-level control over edge industrial networking equipment. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a vendor advisory (InHand-PSA-2026-05) has been published.
Remote root command injection in InHand Networks IR302, IR305, IR315, and IR615 industrial cellular routers allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root via the Admin Access feature. The flaw affects IR302 V3.5.108, IR305/IR315/IR615 V1.0.118, and earlier firmware, with CVSS 9.8 reflecting network-reachable, no-auth exploitation; no public exploit identified at time of analysis but vendor PSA-2026-05 confirms the issue.
Remote code execution in Yamcs (the open-source mission control framework, yamcs-core) before 5.12.7 lets an authenticated operator holding the ChangeMissionDatabase privilege overwrite a Python (Jython) algorithm via the Mission Database REST API and run arbitrary OS commands on the host. The Jython script engine is invoked without a sandbox, so injected algorithm text can import java.lang.Runtime and shell out. Publicly available exploit code exists (a full PoC is published in the GitHub Security Advisory), but the issue is not listed in CISA KEV and no public in-the-wild exploitation is identified.
Arbitrary OS command execution in Microsoft's UFO intelligent-automation framework (tagged releases up to and including v3.0.0) lets a local, low-privileged attacker who can write or modify a per-session action JSON record plant a malicious shell action that is executed via PowerShell when the session is resumed or replayed. The injected command runs with the privileges of the UFO process user, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (CVSS 7.8, CWE-78). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS or CISA KEV data was supplied to gauge exploitation likelihood.
Local privilege escalation via OS command injection in pam_usb before 0.8.7 lets a low-privileged local user execute arbitrary commands as root. The flaw lives in src/tmux.c, which reads the attacker-controllable $TMUX environment variable and interpolates its socket-path component, unsanitised, inside a double-quoted string passed to popen(); a value containing a double-quote breaks out of the quoting and injects shell syntax that runs in the root-context PAM stack. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS or CISA KEV data was supplied, but the CVSS 8.8 (scope-changed) rating reflects straightforward, low-complexity root compromise.
Root command injection in pam_usb prior to 0.8.7 lets a local high-privileged user - or an attacker who can present a removable device with an attacker-chosen filesystem UUID - embed shell metacharacters (e.g. $(id>/tmp/rce)) that execute as root when an administrator runs pamusb-conf --reset-pads. A second injection path passes the userName value from the XML configuration directly to os.system() in pamusb-agent. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; the issue is fixed in 0.8.7.
Local privilege escalation in pam_usb prior to 0.8.7 lets a low-privileged user gain the elevated privileges of the pam_usb tool chain by abusing the pamusb-pinentry helper. The helper trusts the PINENTRY_FALLBACK_APP environment variable and executes its value directly, so any process able to set that variable before pamusb-pinentry runs can have an arbitrary binary executed. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is fixed in version 0.8.7; the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-jxrj-q67x-wr4c) is the sole reference.
Unauthorized OS command execution in Tanium Connect allows an attacker holding low-privilege authenticated access to run arbitrary commands on the host, achieving full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The CVSS 8.8 (network vector, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction) reflects an authenticated remote code execution issue rooted in command injection (CWE-78). No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV; EPSS data was not provided.
Command injection in Atril (MATE document viewer) and related forks Evince/Xreader allows attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands when a victim opens a maliciously crafted document. The fix, shipped in Atril 1.26.3 and 1.28.4, quotes user-supplied strings passed to the ev_spawn command line, indicating unsanitized input was being interpolated into a spawned subprocess. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but disclosure on oss-security and Debian LTS advisories suggests Linux desktop distributions are actively patching.
Command injection in the Sherlock username-hunting tool's CI/CD pipeline (versions prior to 0.16.1) allows any GitHub user to run arbitrary commands on the project's GitHub Actions runner. The flaw lives in the validate_modified_targets.yml workflow, which uses the dangerous pull_request_target trigger; simply opening a pull request executes attacker-controlled code with no approval, review, or merge required. Fixed in 0.16.1; with a CVSS of 9.3 it is a high-severity supply-chain issue, though no public exploit was identified at time of analysis and the technique class is well documented.
Authenticated command injection in TP-Link Archer BE450 v1 and BE7200 v1 routers lets an admin-level user run arbitrary OS commands with elevated privileges via the web management interface. The flaw stems from improper input validation (CWE-20): crafted input supplied through the management UI is passed to backend system commands without adequate sanitization, enabling full device compromise. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS 4.0 vector scopes exploitation to the adjacent network by an already-authenticated administrator.
Local arbitrary code execution in Raynet rvia 12.6 Update 8 and earlier lets a low-privileged local user inject operating-system commands through the application's Java search feature, which assembles a `find` command from an attacker-controlled path without properly terminating the search criteria (CWE-77 OS command injection). A working proof-of-concept exploit script is publicly available on GitHub (Wise-Security/CVE-2026-38945), and CISA's SSVC framework rates the technical impact as total, though it marks the issue as not automatable and requiring local access. No EPSS score and no CISA KEV listing were supplied, so there is no public exploit identified as actively exploited at time of analysis.
Unauthenticated remote command injection in the Netis AC1200 Router (model NC21, firmware V4.0.1.4296) allows any LAN-resident attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands as the router's runtime user via a single HTTP POST to /cgi-bin/skk_set.cgi. The password and new_pwd_confirm parameters are concatenated into a shell invocation without sanitization, and exploitation requires no credentials. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, though the disclosure repository documents the technique (base64-encoded backtick payloads), and EPSS scoring (0.21%) suggests limited broad exploitation pressure despite the trivial attack complexity.
OS command injection in sipeed picoclaw v0.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass an incomplete denylist-based sanitizer in the ExecTool component and execute arbitrary shell commands on the host. The guardCommand() function in pkg/tools/shell.go relies on only eight regex denylist patterns, which is insufficient to block the wide range of shell metacharacters and command-chaining techniques available to an attacker. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though a third-party gist documenting the issue is referenced from NVD.
OS command injection in the @pensar/apex Node.js agent package (versions 0.0.58 and earlier) lets a remote, unauthenticated attacker run arbitrary operating-system commands by smuggling shell metacharacters into the smart_enumerate tool's url or extensions inputs. The vulnerable createSmartEnumerateTool() routine in src/core/agent/tools.ts builds a shell command string by concatenating those untrusted values and passes it to Node.js child_process.exec(), which spawns a shell that interprets the injected characters, executing them with the privileges of the agent process. CVSS is 8.8 (network vector, low complexity, no privileges, but user/agent interaction required); the source data shows no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS score, and a referenced researcher gist may contain proof-of-concept detail though exploit code is not confirmed in the structured input.
OS command injection in MB connect line / Helmholz mbNET and REX industrial remote-maintenance routers (mbNET.mini up to 3.0.2, REX200/250 and mbNET/mbNET.rokey up to 8.4.4, REX100 up to 3.0.2) lets a high-privilege authenticated user poison the device's configuration generator so that a tainted value is later passed unsanitized to a system execute call, producing arbitrary command execution with total loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability. The flaw was reported through CERT@VDE (advisory VDE-2026-054) and tracked as EUVD-2026-32151. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is low (0.07%, 22nd percentile), and CISA's SSVC framework rates current exploitation as none.
OS command injection in Perl's HTTP::Daemon before 6.17 (libwww-perl) lets remote unauthenticated attackers execute commands as the daemon process UID when request-derived input reaches the send_file() method. The method opened its string argument with Perl's 2-argument open(), whose magic prefixes ('| cmd', 'cmd |', '> path', '>> path') spawn subprocesses or write/truncate files; the read-pipe form additionally leaks subprocess stdout into the HTTP response body. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing, but the upstream fix is released (6.17) and the patch diff is public, so the root cause is fully disclosed.
OS command injection in Tanium Connect lets an authenticated, low-privileged user execute arbitrary commands on the underlying host, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise (CVSS 8.8). The flaw affects Connect branches 5.26, 5.29, and 5.37 below their respective fixed builds and is tagged as RCE/Command Injection. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS estimates exploitation probability at a low 0.07% (22nd percentile).
Host-level code execution in Lumiverse AI chat application (versions prior to 0.9.7) allows admin-authenticated attackers to run arbitrary commands on the host by submitting a malicious Spindle extension whose package.json defines lifecycle scripts. The Spindle build pipeline invokes bun install before its static safety scan and without script execution disabled, so code runs at install time on the server rather than at runtime in any sandboxed bundle. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Local privilege escalation in OpenVPN Connect 3.5.1 through 3.8.1 on macOS allows unprivileged local users to execute arbitrary OS commands as root by abusing an exposed local IPC channel to the privileged background service. The flaw carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.4 with scope change (SC:H/SI:H/SA:H), and SSVC rates technical impact as total, though there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is only 0.04%.
Remote code execution in Twenty CRM versions 1.7.7 through 1.16.7 allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands on the database server by chaining SQL injection in the REST API groupBy endpoint with PostgreSQL's COPY TO PROGRAM functionality. The unsanitized timeZone parameter is interpolated directly into raw SQL via JavaScript template literals, and exploitation succeeds whenever the application's Postgres role holds superuser privileges. Publicly available exploit code exists per SSVC, though EPSS scoring (0.15%) suggests exploitation activity has not yet become widespread.
Command injection in Vowpal Wabbit's GitHub Actions CI workflow allows an
Authenticated command injection in luci-app-https-dns-proxy through version 2025.12.29-5 allows a low-privileged LuCI user holding the luci.https-dns-proxy ACL permission to execute arbitrary commands as root on OpenWrt devices via shell metacharacters in the 'name' parameter of a ubus RPC call to setInitAction. Publicly available exploit code exists (Exploit-DB 52521, VulnCheck advisory), though EPSS remains low at 0.06% and the package is an optional community add-on not installed by default. Core OpenWrt installations are unaffected; only systems that explicitly opted into this LuCI add-on are at risk.
Command injection in the gitoxide Rust library (gix-submodule crate before 0.82.0, gix before 0.83.0) allows attackers controlling a repository's .gitmodules file to bypass the CommandForbiddenInModulesConfiguration guard and achieve arbitrary command execution when Submodule::update() runs against a previously-initialized submodule. The flaw stems from gix_submodule::File::update() checking only whether a same-named section exists in .git/config rather than verifying that the update value itself originated from that trusted source, so an attacker-supplied 'update = !cmd' falls through to execution. Publicly available exploit code exists (PoC referenced by VulnCheck and Anthropic), though EPSS is low (0.02%) and the issue is not in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via crafted print job descriptions. The flaw stems from unescaped expansion of the client-controlled '%J' substitution token into the configured 'print command', enabling shell metacharacter injection. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and EPSS scores exploitation probability at only 0.08%, but CVSS 9.0 with scope change reflects high potential impact on any Samba host exposing print services.
OS command injection in the Totolink N300RH router (firmware 6.1c.1353_B20190305) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the admpass argument sent to the setPasswordCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the SSVC framework rates technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though EPSS remains low at 0.20%. The flaw is reachable over the network without authentication or user interaction, giving an attacker full control of the device.
OS command injection in FastNetMon Community Edition through 1.2.9 lets an authenticated network attacker execute arbitrary shell commands via the MikroTik router integration plugin by influencing argv[] values passed to the unsanitized _log() function. The flaw mirrors a previously disclosed Juniper plugin issue in the same project, and while a public technical write-up exists at lorikeetsecurity.com, no public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified, with EPSS at 0.05% (17th percentile).
Configuration injection in FastNetMon Community Edition through 1.2.9 allows an attacker who controls the attacker IP string passed to the Juniper integration plugin to inject arbitrary Juniper NETCONF set/delete commands, leading to full router compromise. The flaw lives in the PHP-based Juniper plugin where unsanitized argv input is interpolated into NETCONF commands, and although no public exploit identified at time of analysis (EPSS 0.03%), the technical impact is rated total under SSVC and CVSS scores 8.1.
OS command injection in FastNetMon Community Edition (through 1.2.9) lets attacker-controlled input reach an unescaped exec() call inside the Juniper router integration plugin, enabling arbitrary shell command execution on the host. The flaw lives in the _log() function of src/juniper_plugin/fastnetmon_juniper.php, where the $msg argument (built from argv[1]-argv[3]: attack IP, direction, power) is concatenated directly into a shell command. Although rated CVSS 9.8, practical exploitation is gated: FastNetMon's C++ core currently feeds IPs through inet_ntoa(), which only yields safe dotted-decimal strings, so injection requires the script to be driven directly or by a third-party orchestrator. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the 'enable' parameter of the setParentalRules function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and while the EPSS score of 0.89% (76th percentile) suggests moderate predicted exploitation likelihood, the network-accessible attack surface on an edge device elevates real-world risk significantly.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'mac' parameter sent to the setAccessDeviceCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and SSVC rates the technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile). No CISA KEV listing has been published at time of analysis.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the admpass parameter sent to the setPasswordCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists and the flaw is reachable over the network without user interaction, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis indicates active in-the-wild abuse via CISA KEV.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the Comment parameter handled by the setIpQosRules function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists and the SSVC framework rates the technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis as actively exploited in the CISA KEV catalog. EPSS sits at 0.89% (76th percentile), suggesting moderate but non-trivial exploitation interest.
Remote OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands through the setWanCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi by manipulating the 'enabled' parameter. Publicly available exploit code exists, and with CVSS 4.0 score of 8.9 (network-reachable, low complexity, no privileges required), exposed devices face high risk despite an EPSS score of 0.89% (76th percentile) indicating moderate near-term exploitation probability.
OS command injection in Totolink A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the FileName argument in the UploadFirmwareFile function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB reporting, and SSVC rates this as automatable with total technical impact, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile) indicating no broad mass-exploitation campaign yet observed.
Remote OS command injection in TOTOLINK A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the setOpenVpnCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi by manipulating the 'enabled' argument. Publicly available exploit code exists, raising the risk of opportunistic attacks against exposed devices, though EPSS scoring (0.89%, 76th percentile) suggests moderate but not yet widespread exploitation. The flaw stems from improper neutralization of OS command elements (CWE-78) in the router's Web Management Interface.
OS command injection in TOTOLINK A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the FileName parameter in the UploadOpenVpnCert function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB disclosure, and SSVC scoring indicates the flaw is automatable with total technical impact, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile). The vulnerability is no public exploit identified in CISA KEV, but POC availability combined with network-reachable management interface elevates real-world risk.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the servername parameter of the setOpenVpnCertGenerationCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists (GitHub PoC), and although the EPSS score is modest (0.89%, 76th percentile), the CVSS 4.0 score of 8.9 reflects network-reachable, no-privilege, no-interaction exploitation with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No CISA KEV listing has been recorded at the time of analysis.
OS command injection in Totolink A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'enable' argument passed to the setL2tpServerCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists (published on GitHub), though EPSS probability remains modest at 0.94% (76th percentile), and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
OS command injection in Totolink A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'enable' parameter sent to the setQosCfg function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi in the Web Management Interface. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB submission, and the SSVC framework rates technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though EPSS probability remains modest at 0.89%.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the wscDisabled parameter sent to the setWiFiWpsCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB disclosure, though EPSS probability remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile) and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'enable' argument passed to the setMacFilterRules function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB, and SSVC categorizes the technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile).
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the bgProtection parameter in the setWiFiAdvancedCfg function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB, and SSVC classifies the issue as automatable with total technical impact, though EPSS exploitation probability remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile).
Authenticated OS command execution in NEC Platforms Aterm MR51FN (before Ver. 3.4.0) and CM51FD (before Ver. 1.2.0) routers lets an attacker who already holds administrator credentials to the web console inject arbitrary operating-system commands over an adjacent network. Impact is total (confidentiality, integrity and availability all High per CVSS 4.0), effectively giving full control of the affected device, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is low (0.34%, 57th percentile). Exploitation is gated behind administrator access and adjacent (not internet-wide) reach, so this is a privilege-escalation-to-device-takeover primitive rather than a remote unauthenticated compromise.
OS command injection in the TOTOLINK A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'enable' parameter passed to the setStaticDhcpRules function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists and SSVC rates this as automatable with total technical impact, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile). Exploitation requires no authentication or user interaction, making any internet-exposed management interface a high-priority target.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the firewallType parameter sent to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the SSVC framework rates the technical impact as total with automatable exploitation, though it is not currently listed in CISA KEV. EPSS sits at 0.89% (76th percentile), suggesting moderate but not yet widespread opportunistic exploitation.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the 'enable' parameter of the setRemoteCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, raising the practical risk despite the device not being listed in CISA KEV; EPSS sits at 0.89% (76th percentile), reflecting moderate predicted exploitation likelihood.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'enable' parameter passed to the setGameSpeedCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, raising the practical threat despite a modest EPSS score of 0.89% (76th percentile). No active exploitation has been confirmed via CISA KEV at time of analysis.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands by manipulating the 'provider' argument passed to the setDdnsCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists (CVSS 4.0 base 8.9, EPSS 0.89%), and no CISA KEV listing has been issued, but the combination of zero-privilege network exploitation and a working PoC against consumer/SOHO networking gear makes this a high-priority issue for any exposed device.
OS command injection in the TOTOLINK A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'mode' parameter sent to the setScheduleCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists (published via VulDB and a GitHub PoC), though there is no public exploit identified as actively exploited in the wild and EPSS probability is modest at 0.89%. The flaw resides in the device's Web Management Interface and can be triggered over the network without user interaction, making any internet-exposed device immediately at risk.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the resetFlags parameter handled by the setUpgradeFW function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the SSVC framework classifies exploitation as automatable with total technical impact, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile).
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands through the setLanguageCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. The flaw is triggered by manipulating the lang argument in the Web Management Interface, with publicly available exploit code existing and SSVC classifying the issue as automatable with total technical impact. EPSS sits at 0.89% (76th percentile), indicating moderate but non-trivial exploitation probability.
Remote OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by manipulating the 'command' argument in the setTracerouteCfg function of /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the CVSS 4.0 vector confirms network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation without authentication or user interaction, though EPSS remains modest at 0.89% (76th percentile) and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
OS command injection in the Totolink A8000RU router (firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the ip parameter handled by the setDiagnosisCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the CVSS 4.0 score of 8.9 reflects high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. EPSS is moderate at 0.89% (76th percentile), and the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Cross-tenant remote code execution in Nezha Monitoring dashboard (versions >= 1.4.0, < 1.14.15-0.20260517022419-d7526351cf97) allows any authenticated RoleMember user to execute arbitrary shell commands as root on every monitored agent host in the deployment. The flaw stems from cron API endpoints being gated by commonHandler instead of adminHandler, combined with a vacuous-true permission check when the Servers list is empty, enabling fanout to all tenants' servers. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a complete proof-of-concept is included in the GitHub Security Advisory.
Command injection in Microsoft 365 Copilot for iOS allows remote unauthenticated attackers to tamper with system integrity over the network when a user is convinced to interact with malicious content. The flaw carries a critical CVSS score of 9.3 with a scope change indicating impact beyond the vulnerable component, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis. An official vendor patch is available via MSRC.
Information disclosure in Microsoft 365 Copilot lets an unauthorized remote attacker inject specially crafted command elements over the network to read data they should not have access to. The flaw is a command-injection weakness (CWE-77) whose impact is confined to confidentiality (C:H, no integrity or availability effect), and it was reported by Microsoft with a patch issued through the MSRC update guide. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is very low (0.06%), and CISA SSVC records exploitation status as none.
Remote code execution in Microsoft Power Pages allows an unauthorized network attacker to inject and execute arbitrary operating-system commands via improperly neutralized special elements (CWE-77). Because Power Pages is a Microsoft-hosted, low-code website-building SaaS platform, the flaw affects the service surface Microsoft exposes to tenants, and a successful attack yields full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the EPSS score is very low (0.07%), but the CVSS 9.8 rating and 'total' technical impact make it a high-severity issue.