Code Injection
Monthly
Arbitrary PHP code execution in Twig templating engine versions 3.15.0 through 3.25.x allows attackers who control template source to inject raw PHP into the compiled template via the `_self.(<string>)` dynamic-attribute macro-reference path, fully bypassing the SandboxExtension. The flaw executes injected code at template-load time, before any SecurityPolicy check runs, rendering even a globally-enabled empty allowlist sandbox ineffective. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vendor advisory describes the bypass mechanism in enough detail that PoC development is straightforward.
PHP code injection in Twig template engine versions before 3.26.0 allows attackers controlling template names in `{% use %}` tags to break out of compiled cache file string literals and execute arbitrary PHP code. The flaw bypasses the Twig sandbox entirely because `SecurityPolicy` unconditionally permits `{% use %}` regardless of `allowedTags` configuration. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-7p85-w9px-jpjp) discloses the full exploitation primitive.
Transcript malleability in the Plonky3 p3-challenger crate (MultiField32Challenger) allows a malicious prover to craft distinct observation streams that collapse to identical Fiat-Shamir challenges, breaking the soundness binding of the SNARK transcript. Affected versions are p3-challenger < 0.4.3 and 0.5.0-0.5.2, with fixes shipped in 0.4.3 and 0.5.3. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; risk is primarily to ZK proof system integrity rather than confidentiality.
Unsafe default code execution in InternLM LMDeploy (<=0.12.3) lets a malicious Hugging Face model repository run arbitrary Python on the host whenever a user loads it through any LMDeploy CLI (serve, calibrate, gptq, awq). The library hardcodes transformers.AutoConfig.from_pretrained(..., trust_remote_code=True) in get_model_arch and related helpers with no flag, env var, or warning to opt out, overriding HF Transformers' default-secure stance. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires the user to load an untrusted repo, so risk is hardening-level rather than network-reachable RCE.
Arbitrary code execution in InternLM lmdeploy <= 0.12.3 occurs because trust_remote_code=True is hardcoded across HuggingFace model-loading call sites in lmdeploy/archs.py and lmdeploy/utils.py. An attacker who can influence the model_path passed to an lmdeploy serving process can point it at a malicious HuggingFace repository, causing Transformers to download and execute attacker-controlled Python code with the privileges of the serving daemon. Publicly available exploit code exists in the GHSA advisory, and an upstream fix has been merged via PR #4511 (fixed in 0.13.0).
Unauthenticated remote code execution in phenixdigital phoenix_storybook 0.5.0 through versions before 1.1.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Elixir code on the server by abusing the psb-assign WebSocket event to inject HEEx template expressions. The flaw stems from attribute values being interpolated verbatim into HEEx templates that are then compiled and evaluated with full Kernel imports and no sandbox. Publicly available exploit code exists via the upstream commit and GHSA advisory, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis for in-the-wild use; CVSS 4.0 score is 9.5.
Code injection in Mesalvo Meona Client Launcher Component (through 19.06.2020 15:11:49) and Meona Server Component (through 2025.04 5+323020) allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to execute code on other users' systems via crafted input that crosses a scope boundary, with user interaction required on the victim side. CVSS 9.0 reflects the cross-user/cross-system impact (Scope:Changed) and full CIA compromise; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The product is a clinical/healthcare workflow platform, so successful exploitation can pivot between hospital workstations and the server tier.
Remote code execution in Eclipse GlassFish allows attackers with administrative access to the Administration Console to execute arbitrary operating system commands as the application service user. The flaw stems from improper input handling in admin panel requests (CWE-94), and while CVSS rates it 9.1 due to scope change and full CIA impact, exploitation requires high privileges (PR:H). No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Authenticated code injection in Apache OFBiz versions prior to 24.09.06 allows remote attackers with low-privileged accounts to execute arbitrary code via improperly neutralized directives in dynamically evaluated expressions. The flaw combines CWE-94 code injection with eval injection, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (CVSS 8.8). No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS rates near-term exploitation at 0.03% (8th percentile), but SSVC flags the issue as automatable, raising the risk of scripted abuse once a POC emerges.
LDAP injection in Apache OFBiz before 24.09.06 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject special characters into LDAP queries, bypassing authentication or extracting directory data with high confidentiality and integrity impact. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is very low (0.03%), but the CVSS 9.1 rating and CISA SSVC 'total' technical impact make it a meaningful patching priority. A vendor patch is available in version 24.09.06.
Arbitrary code execution in Scalar Astro v0.1.13 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to upload malicious SVG files through the scalar_url query parameter of the Scalar Proxy endpoint. The flaw stems from inadequate validation in the proxy's file handling logic and, per CVSS, requires no authentication or user interaction, though EPSS rates real-world exploitation probability at only 0.02%. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though a related XSS/Open-Redirect proof-of-concept repository is referenced.
Remote code execution in the amazon-redshift-python-driver (versions prior to 2.1.14) allows a malicious or compromised Redshift server, or a man-in-the-middle attacker positioned on the network path, to execute arbitrary Python code on any client that connects. The root cause is unsafe use of Python's eval() against untrusted server-supplied data inside the vector_in() function. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.3 and PR:N/UI:N vector make this a high-priority client-side supply-chain-style risk.
Pre-authenticated server-side template injection in Verbb Formie (a forms plugin for Craft CMS) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to submit crafted values into Hidden fields configured with a Custom default value, which are then evaluated as Twig during submission handling. Successful exploitation can lead to arbitrary code execution and full compromise of the Craft site depending on template sandbox behavior. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-x7m9-mwc2-g6w2 and patch commit are publicly disclosed.
Remote code execution in ChromaDB Python (version 1.0.0 and later) allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server by submitting a malicious model repository with trust_remote_code enabled via the /api/v2/tenants/{tenant}/databases/{db}/collections endpoint. The flaw carries a maximum CVSS 4.0 score of 10.0 and was disclosed publicly by HiddenLayer; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though detailed research has been published.
Code injection vulnerability in the Command-Line Client of P4 Server (Helix Core) prior to version 2025.2 Patch 2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability requires user interaction but no authentication, with a CVSS 7.7 score indicating high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Perforce has released a patch in version 2025.2 Patch 2.
Metric injection in the Perl module Net::Statsd::Lite through version 0.10.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary StatsD metrics by smuggling control characters (CRLF) into metric names or values that the library forwards without sanitization. The flaw was disclosed on the oss-security mailing list on 2026-05-18 by maintainer Robert Rothenberg, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; EPSS is very low (0.03%, 8th percentile), reflecting limited mass-exploitation interest in a niche telemetry library.
Metric injection in the Perl module Net::Statsd::Tiny before version 0.3.8 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary statsd metrics by smuggling newline, colon, or pipe characters through untrusted metric names or set values. The CVSS 8.2 score reflects high integrity impact from forged telemetry, and while a vendor patch is available, no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.
Remote code execution in MCP Calculate Server versions before 0.1.1 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via unsanitized mathematical expressions passed to eval(). The vulnerability stems from processing user-supplied math expressions without input validation, enabling injection of malicious Python code. While no public exploit or active exploitation has been identified, the network-accessible attack vector and lack of required authentication make this a critical risk for exposed instances.
Code injection in Apache Flink's SQL engine allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary code on TaskManagers through malicious SQL queries. The vulnerability affects JSON functions in versions 1.15.0+ and LIKE expressions with ESCAPE clauses in versions 1.17.0+, where user-controlled strings are interpolated into generated Java code without proper escaping. Apache has released patches in versions 1.20.4, 2.0.2, 2.1.2 and 2.2.1.
Local code execution in electerm 3.0.6 through 3.8.8 allows any same-user process to send a crafted JSON payload to electerm's single-instance IPC socket/pipe, causing the application to open tabs with attacker-controlled exec paths, arguments, environment variables, and post-connect scripts that spawn arbitrary local processes. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the GHSA advisory and patch commit confirm the vulnerability is real, scored CVSS 4.0 9.3 (Critical), and fixed in version 3.9.0 by filtering dangerous tab properties on the IPC boundary.
Remote code execution in DeepSeek-TUI (Rust CLI tool for AI-assisted development) allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands on developer workstations via prompt injection in project files. When a developer opens a malicious repository and creates any task using the task_create tool, spawned sub-agents inherit insecure defaults (allow_shell=true, auto_approve=true) that enable silent shell execution without user approval. The attack leverages project files like AGENTS.md to inject malicious instructions disguised as documentation standards, causing the AI agent to execute attacker-controlled commands. Publicly available exploit code exists (full PoC in advisory). CVSS 9.6 reflects scope change (C) and user interaction requirement (UI:R), indicating high severity conditional on social engineering. No EPSS or KEV data available; real-world risk depends on DeepSeek-TUI adoption in developer workflows.
Remote code execution in DeepSeek-TUI versions 0.3.0 through 0.8.22 allows malicious repository owners to execute arbitrary code on developer workstations without user approval. The vulnerability chains two attack primitives: (1) the run_tests tool auto-executes cargo test with ApprovalRequirement::Auto, compiling and running arbitrary Rust code in test files, build scripts, and proc macros; (2) the AGENTS.md file is automatically loaded into the LLM system prompt and can inject instructions directing the model to invoke run_tests at session start. Publicly available exploit code exists demonstrating full attack chain from repository clone to remote code execution. Fixed in version 0.8.23 released 2025. CVSS 9.6 reflects network attack vector with scope change, though exploitation requires user interaction (opening the malicious repository).
Code execution in Electerm (npm package, versions <= 3.8.8) allows attackers to achieve persistent local-pty code execution by tricking users into importing malicious bookmark JSON files or by compromising configured sync targets (Gist/WebDAV). The flaw stems from unsafe handling of bookmark fields (`exec*`) and global config entries, which are executed when a bookmark is opened or when sync is applied. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no vendor-released patch is identified at time of analysis.
Crabbox versions before 0.12.0 leak local secrets through environment variable forwarding during remote command execution. When users run commands against malicious or compromised repositories, attackers exploit overly permissive environment variable allowlisting in repository-local configuration files to exfiltrate API tokens, cloud credentials, and broker tokens into the remote execution environment. The vendor released v0.12.0 on May 12, 2026 with fixes including `--allow-env` explicit allowlisting and `--env-from-profile` for safer secret forwarding. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the attack surface is straightforward for attackers controlling repository configuration.
Account takeover in ApostropheCMS password reset flow allows remote attackers to steal password reset tokens via Host header injection. When apos.baseUrl is not configured (common in development and some production deployments), the password reset mechanism trusts the attacker-controlled HTTP Host header to construct reset URLs, causing victims to receive legitimate reset emails with links pointing to attacker domains. Clicking the link delivers valid reset tokens to the attacker, enabling full account compromise. CVSS 8.1 (High) with network attack vector, low complexity, and no privileges required. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the vulnerability is straightforward to exploit given the detailed technical disclosure in the GitHub security advisory.
Remote code execution in HuggingFace Diffusers library (versions < 0.38.0) allows attackers to execute arbitrary Python code when victims load malicious pipelines from Hugging Face Hub repositories. The vulnerability bypasses the trust_remote_code=True safeguard through a type coercion flaw where None values are interpolated as 'None.py' filenames. Attackers can achieve silent code execution by publishing repositories containing a malicious None.py file alongside legitimate-looking configuration, requiring only that victims call DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained() on the attacker's repository. EPSS data not available; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Vendor-released patch: version 0.38.0.
Argument injection in the n8n workflow automation platform's Git node allows authenticated users with workflow edit privileges to inject CLI flags into the Git Push operation, enabling arbitrary file read from the n8n server and potentially full host compromise. The flaw affects n8n versions prior to 1.123.43, 2.20.7, and 2.22.1, and is rated CVSS 9.4 (4.0) with no public exploit identified at time of analysis. EPSS is low at 0.04% (14th percentile), and the bug is classified under CWE-88 (Argument Injection).
Remote code execution in CoreShop's GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline allows unauthenticated attackers to compromise the build infrastructure and exfiltrate repository secrets by submitting a malicious pull request. The vulnerability stems from the dangerous combination of pull_request_target trigger with unverified code checkout, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary commands (bin/console) on GitHub-hosted runners with access to sensitive credentials including PIMCORE_SECRET and PIMCORE_PRODUCT_KEY. This 'Pwn Request' attack pattern (CWE-94: Code Injection) affects version 5.0.0 with no vendor patch currently released. The attack requires zero authentication (PR:N) and low complexity (AC:L), representing a critical supply chain security risk for organizations using CoreShop.
HTTP response header injection in cPanel, WHM, and WP Squared allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary headers via the unsanitized `status` query parameter of the `/unprotected/nova_error` endpoint. CVSS 8.3 reflects the changed scope (S:C) with low impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, consistent with CRLF-style header injection that can pivot into cache poisoning, session fixation, or open redirect chains. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is low at 0.07%, but a vendor patch is already available.
Authenticated remote code execution in CubeCart v6 prior to 6.7.3 allows an admin with documents-edit permission to embed raw PHP into the Invoice Editor template, which is later written to a predictable files/print.<md5>.php path that the bundled .htaccess explicitly exposes to unauthenticated visitors. SSVC rates technical impact as total and a POC exists, though EPSS remains very low (0.04%) and the issue is not on CISA KEV - no public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond researcher disclosure.
Authenticated server-side template injection in CubeCart v6 prior to 6.7.0 allows administrative users to achieve remote code execution by injecting Smarty template syntax into multiple admin-facing modules including Email Templates, Invoices, Documents, and Contact Forms. The flaw stems from evaluating user-supplied content through the Smarty engine without enabling Smarty Security Policies, granting OS-level command execution on the underlying server. Currently no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is very low at 0.04%, and the issue is not on CISA KEV.
Authenticated server-side template injection in CubeCart v6 before 6.7.0 lets administrators escape the Smarty template sandbox and invoke native PHP functions through modules such as Email Templates and Documents. Attackers can call readgzfile() to exfiltrate configuration secrets and error_log() with message_type=3 to drop a PHP webshell, yielding full remote code execution. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a SSVC 'poc' status and an upstream commit hardening the Smarty allowlist indicate the technique is documented.
Local code injection in Palo Alto Networks Prisma Browser on macOS lets an authenticated non-admin user abuse an exposed AppleScript/Apple Event handler to send unauthorized commands to the browser, with high impact on confidentiality and integrity. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is very low (0.02%), but SSVC rates the technical impact as total once the local foothold exists. Affects all Prisma Browser releases prior to 146.16.6.165 on macOS.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Mapfish Print (org.mapfish.print) allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a code injection flaw in the Dynamic table feature. The vulnerability carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.3 with network-accessible, low-complexity exploitation requiring no privileges or user interaction. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the GHSA advisory and four parallel patched release lines indicate vendor-confirmed severity.
Pre-authentication remote code execution in ChurchCRM before 7.3.2 allows unauthenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary code through the setup wizard's unsanitized DB_PASSWORD field. This vulnerability exists because the patch for CVE-2026-39337 was incomplete, leaving the original CWE-94 code injection fully exploitable; publicly available exploit code exists (SSVC exploitation status: poc), and CISA's SSVC framework rates it as automatable with total technical impact. Despite the maximum CVSS score of 10.0, EPSS estimates only a 0.27% 30-day exploitation probability (51st percentile), indicating it is not yet observed in widespread automated campaigns.
Authenticated administrators with Admin Console access to FileMaker Cloud can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the underlying host by bypassing front-end restrictions on OS Script schedule types. This vulnerability affects all FileMaker Cloud versions prior to 2.22.0.5 and requires high-privilege administrative credentials to exploit. Despite the network attack vector and total technical impact (full system compromise), the low EPSS score (0.13%, 32nd percentile) and SSVC assessment indicating no observed exploitation suggest this is not being actively exploited in the wild, likely due to the high privilege requirement limiting the attacker pool to malicious insiders or compromised admin accounts.
Authenticated remote code execution in Wing FTP Server 8.1.2 lets a domain administrator inject arbitrary Lua code by abusing the session serialization routine, which writes session values into Lua source without escaping closing delimiters. When the poisoned session is later reloaded through loadfile(), the attacker's Lua executes on the server. Publicly available exploit code exists (Exploit-DB 52589, VulnCheck advisory), but there is no evidence of active exploitation and EPSS is very low (0.09%).
Agentic workflow injection in nnU-Net's GitHub Actions issue-triage automation (prior to 2.4.1) lets any logged-in GitHub user hijack a command-capable Claude agent by opening a crafted issue. Because the workflow embeds untrusted issue title/body directly into the LLM prompt and grants the agent authenticated gh permissions to comment and relabel issues, an external attacker can steer it beyond triage into performing repository actions on their behalf. A proof-of-concept is indicated (SSVC exploitation=poc), but EPSS is very low (0.04%) and it is not in CISA KEV, so no active exploitation is confirmed.
Remote code execution in SPIP versions before 4.4.14 lets network attackers run arbitrary code as the web server user through the public space, but only when the CMS runs behind certain nginx configurations. The flaw (CWE-94 code injection) bypasses SPIP's built-in security screen, so that mitigation offers no protection. It was reported by VulnCheck and carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.2, though there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA SSVC records exploitation status as none.
Remote code execution in SPIP versions before 4.4.14 lets authenticated users of the private space (backend) run arbitrary PHP in the web server context, bypassing SPIP's built-in security screen ("anti-intrusion") protections. The flaw is a CWE-94 code injection reported by VulnCheck and carries a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7; a vendor patch is available, though there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS estimates only a 0.20% 30-day exploitation probability.
Remote code execution in Microsoft Dynamics 365 (on-premises) versions 9.0 and 9.1 (prior to 9.1.44.15) lets an authenticated attacker inject and execute arbitrary code across the network with a scope change beyond the vulnerable component. Rated CVSS 9.9, the flaw yields total confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is low (0.07%, 21st percentile). Microsoft has released a fixed build (9.1.44.15).
Remote code execution in Microsoft Data Formulator versions prior to 0.7 lets an unauthorized attacker run arbitrary code by inducing a user to interact with malicious content (CWE-94 code injection). The flaw is network-reachable and requires no authentication, but does require user interaction (CVSS 3.1 8.8, AV:N/UI:R). A vendor patch is available; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS probability is very low (0.06%).
Code injection in protobufjs-cli's pbjs static generator allows attackers who control protocol buffer schemas to inject malicious JavaScript code into generated output files. The vulnerability affects npm packages protobufjs-cli versions ≤1.2.0 and 2.0.0-2.0.1, with patches released in versions 1.2.1 and 2.0.2. Exploitation requires low complexity with authenticated network access and user interaction (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C), achieving high confidentiality and integrity impact but no availability impact. No CISA KEV listing or public exploit code identified at time of analysis, though GitHub advisory confirms the vulnerability with released patches.
Remote code execution in protobufjs (npm package) versions ≤7.5.5 and 8.0.0-8.0.1 allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript by supplying a malicious protobuf schema with crafted default values in bytes fields. When applications load untrusted protobuf descriptors and call toObject() with defaults enabled, attacker-controlled expressions are emitted into generated conversion functions and executed in the application context. Vendor-released patches are available in versions 7.5.6 and 8.0.2. No public exploit code identified at time of analysis, though the vulnerability is straightforward to weaponize given the clear preconditions in the advisory.
Prototype pollution in protobuf.js type lookup tables enables remote code execution via code injection into generated encode/decode functions. Affects npm package protobuf.js versions ≤7.5.5 and 8.0.0-8.0.1. Exploitation requires chaining with a separate prototype pollution vulnerability-applications must first allow Object.prototype pollution, then invoke protobufjs code generation on attacker-influenced schemas. Vendor-released patches available (v7.5.6, v8.0.2). CVSS 8.1 (High) reflects network vector but high attack complexity (AC:H) due to multi-step prerequisite. No evidence of active exploitation (not in CISA KEV), public exploit code not identified at time of analysis.
Authentication-layer injection in OX Dovecot Pro (versions up to and including 2.4.3 and 3.1.4) arises from a flaw in the 'safe' template filter: when 'safe' is applied during variable expansion, every subsequent pipeline stage on the same string inherits the 'safe' designation, so attacker-controlled data that should be escaped is passed through unescaped. Because variable expansion is used to build authentication backend queries, this enables SQL or LDAP injection by remote unauthenticated attackers. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS exploitation probability is negligible (0.01%, 2nd percentile).
Remote code execution in Cognee v0.4.0 and earlier allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via the notebook cell execution API endpoint. The vulnerability stems from unsafe use of Python's exec() function without sandboxing or validation, enabling complete system compromise with server process privileges. While not actively exploited (not in KEV), the vulnerability is automatable with total technical impact per SSVC framework, though EPSS indicates low exploitation probability at 0.06%.
Arbitrary code execution occurs in the llm CLI tool (versions through 0.27.1) when attackers social-engineer victims into running crafted commands containing malicious Python code in the --functions argument. The tool directly executes this code via unsafe exec() without sanitization, enabling full system compromise. CVSS 9.8 assigns network attack vector and no authentication, but real-world exploitation requires local command execution by a tricked user, creating a significant disparity between the vector and actual attack prerequisites. EPSS score of 0.02% (5th percentile) suggests minimal automated exploitation risk, and no active exploitation or public POC has been identified at time of analysis.
Remote code execution in PySyft Datasite/Server versions 0.9.5 and earlier allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Python code on the server through the function submission mechanism. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation and sandboxing of user-submitted Python functions decorated with @sy.syft_function(), which are executed using unsafe exec() and eval() calls after approval. With an EPSS score of 0.04% and no current KEV listing, this appears to be a high-severity vulnerability without confirmed active exploitation.
Remote code execution in superduper (Python library) through version 0.10.0 allows unauthenticated network attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by submitting malicious query strings with embedded Python code. The _parse_op_part() function in query.py uses unsafe eval() with inadequate context restrictions, enabling attackers to import modules (such as os) and achieve complete server compromise. EPSS score is low (0.07%, 20th percentile) and no active exploitation is confirmed (CISA KEV absent), but SSVC framework rates technical impact as total. User interaction is required (CVSS UI:R), reducing automated exploitation risk. Authentication requirements not confirmed from available data - CVSS vector shows PR:N (no privileges required) but UI:R suggests user-triggered queries.
Arbitrary code execution in optimate's neural_magic_training.py allows remote attackers to execute Python code by supplying a malicious directory path containing a crafted module.py file. The _load_model() function directly executes file contents via Python's exec() without validation. CVSS 9.8 reflects network vector with no authentication, but EPSS score of 0.02% (5th percentile) indicates very low observed exploitation probability. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV). Vulnerability exists in commit a6d302f912b481c94370811af6b11402f51d377f from July 2024. Affects organizations using optimate for neural network model optimization.
Remote code execution in Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART) versions through 1.20.1 allows unauthenticated network attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via unsafe eval() usage in the Kubeflow robustness evaluation component. The vulnerability accepts unsanitized user input for LossFn and Optimizer parameters in PyTorch model evaluations, enabling complete system compromise. With CVSS 9.8 but only 0.06% EPSS score (18th percentile), this represents a severe theoretical risk that has not yet manifested in widespread exploitation. No public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability requires specific deployment of ART's Kubeflow integration component.
Remote code execution in Guardrails AI through version 0.6.7 occurs when installing validator packages via the Hub mechanism. The guardrails hub install command dynamically executes post-installation scripts from Hub manifests without validating the script path or content, allowing attackers who publish malicious packages to achieve arbitrary code execution on victim systems during package installation. With CVSS 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) but only 0.06% EPSS (18th percentile), this represents a supply chain attack requiring user-initiated installation rather than widespread automated exploitation. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV), and patch availability not confirmed from available data.
Sandbox escape leading to remote code execution in @nyariv/sandboxjs (a JavaScript-in-JavaScript sandbox library) versions <= 0.9.5 allows sandboxed code to break out and run arbitrary host JavaScript. By reading Function.caller on a sandbox-defined function, attacker-controlled code recovers the privileged internal LispType.Call op and invokes it with forged operands to leak blocked host statics, rebuild the real Function constructor, and execute host code (e.g. child_process.execSync). CVSS is 10.0 and a working proof-of-concept is published in the GHSA advisory, but this is no public exploit identified as actively exploited - EPSS is only 0.05% (15th percentile), consistent with a newly disclosed library bug rather than mass exploitation.
Remote code execution in OWASP BLT versions prior to 2.1.2 enables attackers to execute arbitrary code with repository write permissions via malicious GitHub pull requests. The vulnerability exploits a GitHub Actions workflow misconfiguration where pull_request_target triggers execute code directly from attacker-controlled forks without proper validation. EPSS data not available; no confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV); publicly disclosed via GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-cgvj-qg2h-cqfh.
Remote code execution in angular-expressions versions ≤1.5.1 allows unauthenticated network attackers to escape the expression sandbox via malicious filter payloads and execute arbitrary system commands with no user interaction required. CVSS 9.3 (Critical) with confirmed public exploit code available. Vendor-released patch in version 1.5.2 addresses the sandbox escape. Affects applications using angular-expressions as a standalone module for evaluating user-supplied Angular.JS expressions.
Arbitrary code execution in the Dao-AILab flash-attention training framework (all revisions up to and including commit e724e2588cbe754beb97cf7c011b5e7e34119e62) arises because its checkpoint-loading paths call PyTorch's torch.load() without weights_only=True, permitting pickle-based deserialization of attacker-controlled objects. Any user who warmstarts or evaluates a model from an untrusted checkpoint file triggers code execution on their host. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, EPSS is negligible (0.02%), and SSVC records exploitation as 'none' - this is a latent supply-chain/ML-artifact risk rather than an actively exploited one.
Arbitrary code execution in the flash-attention project's training script (up to commit e724e2588cbe754beb97cf7c011b5e7e34119e62) allows an attacker to run Python code by supplying a malicious Hydra configuration. The script registers Python's eval() as a Hydra resolver named 'eval', so any config value using the ${eval:...} syntax is executed when a victim launches training with that configuration. No public exploit has been identified and EPSS probability is very low (0.02%), but SSVC rates the flaw as automatable with partial technical impact.
Remote code execution in QuickJS-NG 0.12.1 allows unauthenticated network attackers to execute arbitrary code through the js_mapped_arguments_mark function. The vulnerability enables attackers to achieve code injection with low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact via network-accessible JavaScript engine exploitation. EPSS score of 0.02% (5th percentile) indicates very low predicted exploitation probability, and no active exploitation has been publicly reported at time of analysis.
Filter-expression injection in Spring AI's MilvusVectorStore allows remote unauthenticated attackers to manipulate vector database queries by injecting malicious filter expressions through unsanitized document IDs. Affects Spring AI 1.0.0-1.0.6 and 1.1.0-1.1.5. VMware has released patches in versions 1.0.7 and 1.1.6. CVSS 8.6 (High) with network attack vector and no privileges required. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV) and no public POC identified at time of analysis.
Arbitrary code execution and privileged token theft affects Postiz (gitroomhq/postiz-app) prior to commit da44801 through an insecure GitHub Actions 'Pwn Request' pattern in the Build and Publish PR Docker Image workflow. Because the workflow triggers on pull_request_target with 'permissions: write-all' yet checks out and builds the untrusted fork head (Dockerfile.dev), any unauthenticated GitHub user can open a fork PR with a malicious Dockerfile.dev to run code on the runner and exfiltrate a write-all GITHUB_TOKEN, effectively hijacking the repository's CI/CD supply chain. Rated CVSS 10.0 with SSVC technical impact 'total' and automatable 'yes', but EPSS is low (0.14%) with no public exploit or KEV listing at time of analysis.
Arbitrary code generation in Babel's `@babel/plugin-transform-modules-systemjs` (and `@babel/preset-env` when configured with `modules: "systemjs"`) allows an attacker who can supply crafted source code to a build pipeline to make Babel emit output that executes arbitrary code at runtime. Affected are plugin versions >= 7.12.0 through 7.29.3 and 8.0.0-alpha.0 through 8.0.0-alpha.12; only setups that compile untrusted, attacker-supplied code with the SystemJS module transform are impacted. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is very low (0.02%), but the CWE-94 code-injection nature and CVSS 8.2 warrant prompt patching of exposed build systems.
LDAP Filter Injection in Zitadel's identity provider implementation allows unauthenticated remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames and extract sensitive LDAP directory attributes through blind injection techniques. The vulnerability exists in Zitadel versions 2.71.11-2.71.19, 3.1.0-3.4.9, and 4.0.0-4.14.0 when LDAP is configured as an identity provider. Exploitation requires no authentication (CVSS PR:N) and has network attack vector (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L), resulting in high confidentiality impact (C:H) but no authentication bypass capability. Vendor-released patches are available for 3.x (3.4.10) and 4.x (4.15.0) branches. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the attack technique is well-documented in security research.
Remote code execution in ai-scanner versions 1.0.0 through 1.4.0 allows authenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript code via the BrowserAutomation::PlaywrightService component. The vulnerability has a Critical CVSS score of 9.9 with scope change, enabling cross-boundary compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Vendor-released patch available in version 1.4.1 as of April 13, 2026, with GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-r27j-xxgx-f5vr confirming the fix.
Remote code execution in math-codegen npm package versions prior to 0.4.3 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via string literal injection into the cg.parse() function. The vulnerability stems from unsanitized string literals being injected directly into new Function() bodies, enabling full command execution on any application exposing math evaluation endpoints that process user input. EPSS score not available, but this is a critical unauthenticated RCE requiring no special conditions beyond user input reaching the vulnerable parser. Vendor-released patch available in version 0.4.3.
Remote code execution in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions prior to 15.0.2.1 enables unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Perl code via the GINA UI. The vulnerability stems from an endpoint passing unsanitized user input directly to Perl's eval function, allowing complete system compromise. Reported by Switzerland's national CERT (NCSC.ch), this represents a critical pre-authentication attack surface requiring immediate patching.
Remote code execution in Apache CloudStack allows authenticated account users to execute arbitrary code on KVM hypervisor hosts by registering malicious templates with unsanitized filenames. Affects CloudStack 4.11.0 through 4.20.2.0 and 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.0.0 when using KVM hypervisors. Despite high CVSS (8.8), EPSS exploitation probability is very low (0.04%, 11th percentile) and CISA SSVC reports no active exploitation. Vendor-released patches are available in versions 4.20.3.0 and 4.22.0.1.
Command injection in Notepad Next versions prior to 0.14 allows arbitrary code execution when opening a specially crafted file. The detectLanguageFromExtension() function directly interpolates file extensions into a Lua script without sanitization, and because the full Lua standard libraries (os, io, package) are unconditionally loaded, an attacker can execute system commands by embedding Lua code in a malicious filename. Vendor-released patch available in version 0.14 (commit f3ca1b10). EPSS data not available; no CISA KEV listing indicates no confirmed widespread exploitation at time of analysis.
Remote code execution in Firefox ESR's WebRTC component allows unauthenticated network attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution with complete system compromise. The vulnerability affects Firefox ESR versions prior to 140.10.2 and carries a critical CVSS score of 9.8 with network attack vector requiring no authentication or user interaction. Despite the critical severity, EPSS probability remains exceptionally low at 0.01% (0th percentile) with no evidence of active exploitation, suggesting limited awareness or exploitation complexity despite the automatable nature assessed by CISA SSVC framework.
Server-Side Template Injection in Open Notebook v1.8.3 enables arbitrary Python code execution and OS command execution within the Docker container through unsanitized user input in transformation features. The vulnerability requires local access (CVSS AV:L) but no authentication or user interaction, making it exploitable by any application user with access to the transformation creation interface. No public exploit code identified at time of analysis, though the GitHub security advisory provides technical details for reproduction.
Remote code execution in Hugging Face diffusers library (all versions < 0.38.0) bypasses the trust_remote_code=False security gate when users load models via DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained. Three distinct attack vectors exist: cross-repository custom_pipeline parameters, local snapshots combined with Hub custom_pipeline references, and local snapshots containing malicious custom component files. The vulnerability stems from implementing the trust_remote_code check in DiffusionPipeline.download() instead of at the actual dynamic module load point, allowing multiple code paths to skip the security control entirely. Vendor-released patch: diffusers 0.38.0 (confirmed by GitHub advisory GHSA-98h9-4798-4q5v and PR #13448). No public exploit identified at time of analysis; exploitation requires user interaction (loading a model from an attacker-controlled source).
vm2 npm package versions 3.9.6 through 3.10.5 allow sandbox escape through prototype pollution of host-realm intrinsic objects. Attackers execute arbitrary code by leveraging flawed proxy bridge implementation that writes sandbox mutations directly to shared host Object.prototype, Array.prototype, and Function.prototype instead of isolating changes to the sandbox realm. This vulnerability was patched in vm2 v3.11.0 as part of a coordinated release addressing 13 security advisories. Publicly available exploit code exists with minimal attack complexity (CVSS AC:L) requiring no authentication or user interaction (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N).
Remote code execution in vm2 Node.js sandbox library (versions ≤3.10.5) allows attackers to escape isolation and execute arbitrary system commands by exploiting incomplete host Object protections. Attackers leverage JavaScript prototype chain manipulation to obtain host-context symbols, enabling injection of malicious code into Node.js inspection routines. Publicly available exploit code exists with working proof-of-concept demonstrating command execution via child_process. CVSS 10.0 (Critical) with network attack vector and no authentication required. Fixed in vm2 3.11.0, part of coordinated release addressing 13 sandbox-escape vulnerabilities.
Prototype chain manipulation in vm2 Node.js sandbox library enables complete sandbox escape and remote code execution via util.inspect handler leakage. Attackers can exploit BaseHandler.getPrototypeOf through crafted objects to access host process primitives and execute arbitrary system commands. Public exploit code exists (vendor-published PoC demonstrates child_process.execSync execution). Fixed in vm2 version 3.11.0 alongside 12 other critical sandbox escape vulnerabilities in coordinated security release.
Internal infrastructure disclosure in the free5GC UDM network function (Go package github.com/free5gc/udm, versions <= v1.4.2) lets unauthenticated remote attackers leak the internal address and API layout of the UDR. Six GET handlers in the nudm-sdm Subscriber Data Management service skip the validator.IsValidSupi() check, so a SUPI path parameter containing control characters (e.g. a NULL byte) propagates into the UDM-to-UDR URL, breaks Go's net/url parser, and is echoed back inside a 500 SYSTEM_FAILURE error detail. Publicly available exploit code exists (a curl-based PoC is published in the advisory and CVSS marks exploit maturity as Proof-of-Concept), but it is not listed in CISA KEV and no EPSS score was provided; impact is limited to confidentiality of infrastructure metadata that aids further intrusion rather than direct data theft or code execution.
SQL injection in ChestnutCMS v1.5.10 lets an admin-backend user manipulate the content parameter of the cms_content template tag, which is passed unsanitized into a SQL query that executes when the template is rendered. Tagged by the reporter as SQLi/Code-Injection/RCE, it can expose or corrupt database contents and potentially escalate toward code execution. A public technical writeup exists, but EPSS is 0.00% and there is no public exploit identified as actively used at time of analysis.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in PraisonAI (pip package `praisonai`, versions 4.5.139 through 4.6.31) allows attackers to run arbitrary Python in the server process by pointing the recipe runner at a malicious `tools.py`. This is a patch-coverage bypass of CVE-2026-40287: the earlier fix gated auto-import of `tools.py` behind the `PRAISONAI_ALLOW_LOCAL_TOOLS=true` env var in `tool_resolver.py` and `api/call.py`, but a third sink in `templates/tool_override.py` was left unguarded and executes on every recipe run. Publicly available exploit code exists (working PoC and confirmed execution in the advisory), though EPSS is only 0.02% and SSVC exploitation status is 'none'.
Arbitrary code execution via Git hook redirection in GitPython 3.1.48 and earlier allows local authenticated users to inject malicious core.hooksPath configuration through newline characters in config_writer().set_value(). Publicly available exploit code exists. The vulnerability enables persistent repository poisoning where attacker-controlled hooks execute with the privileges of any user performing Git operations (commit, merge, checkout) on the poisoned repository. Particularly dangerous in multi-tenant environments like MLRun, DVC, MLflow, or Kedro where shared repositories enable privilege escalation across user contexts. Fixed in GitPython 3.1.49.
Spring Expression Language injection in Valtimo (open-source business process platform) allows authenticated ADMIN users to execute arbitrary OS commands and exfiltrate credentials. The vulnerability exists in DocumentMigrationService (versions 12.0.0-12.31.0 and 13.0.0-13.22.0) and the Condition framework (13.4.0-13.22.0), both of which use StandardEvaluationContext to evaluate user-supplied SpEL expressions without restrictions. Attackers can invoke Runtime.exec(), access environment variables containing database passwords and API keys, and load arbitrary Java classes. Vendor-released patches are available (12.32.0, 13.23.0). No public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS data not available.
Remote code execution in Scramble API documentation generator versions 0.13.2 through 0.13.21 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code when documentation endpoints are publicly accessible and validation rules reference user-controlled input. Fixed in version 0.13.22. The CVSS score of 9.4 (Critical) reflects the network-accessible, low-complexity attack requiring no authentication, though exploitation requires specific configuration where documentation endpoints remain enabled and validation rules incorporate request-supplied data. No active exploitation (CISA KEV) or public POC identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub security advisory provides full technical details enabling reproduction.
LDAP filter injection in Netflix Lemur certificate management platform allows authenticated users with valid LDAP credentials to escalate privileges to administrator by injecting metacharacters into the username field during login. Attackers manipulate group membership queries to gain unauthorized admin roles, enabling access to all certificates, private keys via /certificates/<id>/key endpoint, and CA configurations. Vendor-released patch confirmed in version 1.9.0 (GitHub advisory GHSA-3r34-vq8m-39gh). CVSS 8.1 indicates high confidentiality and integrity impact with low attack complexity from network-authenticated attackers. No public exploit code identified at time of analysis, though detailed reproduction steps exist in the advisory.
Remote code execution in GeoVision GV-ASWeb 6.2.0 allows authenticated users with System Setting permissions to execute arbitrary commands by bypassing frontend restrictions through crafted HTTP POST requests to the ASWebCommon.srf backend endpoint. This authenticated network-accessible vulnerability achieves full system compromise (confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact) with low attack complexity. No public exploit code or active exploitation confirmed at time of analysis, though EPSS data unavailable for risk contextualization.
Remote code execution in Grav CMS versions prior to 2.0.0-beta.2 allows authenticated administrators to deploy malicious PHP web shells by uploading crafted ZIP files through the Direct Install tool at /admin/tools/direct-install. The vulnerability combines insufficient ZIP archive content validation (Zip Slip primitive via path traversal) with the design-level acceptance of arbitrary plugin PHP code. Publicly available exploit code exists, demonstrating automated login, nonce extraction, malicious plugin upload, and persistent shell deployment. CVSS 9.1 (Critical) reflects network-accessible RCE with scope change, though exploitation requires high privileges (admin role). No EPSS or KEV data available at time of analysis.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in AVideo ≤29.0 allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browsers of any logged-in users through a WebSocket message relay bypass. An attacker obtains a WebSocket token without authentication from plugin/YPTSocket/getWebSocket.json.php, connects to the WebSocket server, and sends a crafted message with autoEvalCodeOnHTML nested under the json field instead of msg. The incomplete server-side sanitization from prior fix c08694bf6 (GHSA-gph2-j4c9-vhhr) only strips autoEvalCodeOnHTML from $json['msg'], but the relay function msgToResourceId() preferentially selects $msg['json'] as the outbound message carrier. The payload bypasses sanitization, reaches the victim's browser via WebSocket relay, and executes through eval() at plugin/YPTSocket/script.js:573-575. Vendor-released patch: commit 9f3006f9a (recursive stripping across all message carriers). No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the advisory includes functional proof-of-concept Python code.
Environment variable injection in OpenClaw npm package versions before 2026.4.9 allows local attackers with low privileges to compromise application behavior through malicious workspace .env files. Attackers can redirect update sources to serve backdoored packages, modify gateway URLs and ClawHub resolution endpoints to intercept traffic, and override browser executable paths to launch attacker-controlled binaries. Vendor-released patch: version 2026.4.9, with fix also present in latest npm release 2026.4.14. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but exploitation requires only an untrusted repository with a crafted .env file opened by a victim user.
Server-Side Template Injection in ERPNext v15.103.1 and earlier allows remote code execution through malicious email templates. Attackers with email template editing permissions can inject Jinja2 expressions that execute arbitrary Python code on the server when templates are rendered. SSVC framework confirms POC availability and automatable exploitation with total technical impact. CVSS 9.8 reflects network-reachable critical severity, though the 0.02% EPSS score (5th percentile) suggests limited real-world exploitation attempts to date, likely due to the permission prerequisite.
Remote code execution as root in nginx-ui versions before 2.3.8 via unauthenticated backup restore within 10-minute startup window. Attackers exploit the completely unauthenticated /api/restore endpoint during initial installation to upload malicious backup archives that overwrite app.ini configuration with injected OS commands in TestConfigCmd setting. After automatic application restart, command injection triggers with privileges of the nginx-ui process - typically root in Docker deployments. EPSS data not available; no active exploitation reported but publicly disclosed via GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-4pvg-prr3-9cxr. Patch released in version 2.3.8.
Server-side template injection in OpenMRS Core allows authenticated users with 'Manage Concepts' privilege to execute arbitrary Java code by injecting malicious Apache Velocity templates into concept reference range criteria fields. The vulnerability stems from unsafe VelocityEngine initialization without sandbox restrictions (no SecureUberspector), enabling unrestricted Java reflection. Exploitation persists across all facility users whenever observations are validated against the compromised concept, creating a persistent remote code execution vector. Fixed in versions 2.7.9 and 2.8.6 via migration from Velocity to sandboxed Spring Expression Language (SpEL) with SimpleEvaluationContext. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV), but proof-of-concept details available from researcher advisory at machinespirits.com.
Arbitrary code execution in PPTAgent allows local attackers to execute Python code by exploiting unsafe eval() of LLM-generated content with unrestricted builtins. The framework's agentic architecture passes AI-generated code directly to eval() with full builtin access, enabling execution of arbitrary system commands. Patch available via commit 418491a which restricts eval() globals to an empty builtins dictionary and adds path traversal protections. CVSS 8.6 with local attack vector and user interaction requirement; no evidence of active exploitation or public POC at time of analysis.
Sandbox escape leading to remote code execution in the vm2 Node.js sandbox library affects all versions prior to 3.11.0, where the JavaScript SuppressedError mechanism (combined with DisposableStack disposal) lets untrusted code running inside the sandbox reach a host constructor and execute arbitrary commands on the underlying server. Any application that relies on vm2 to safely run attacker-controlled or untrusted JavaScript is fully compromised, with a working proof-of-concept published in the GHSA advisory. There is publicly available exploit code but no confirmed active exploitation; the SSVC framework rates it POC, automatable, with total technical impact, while EPSS remains low at 0.06%.
Arbitrary PHP code execution in Twig templating engine versions 3.15.0 through 3.25.x allows attackers who control template source to inject raw PHP into the compiled template via the `_self.(<string>)` dynamic-attribute macro-reference path, fully bypassing the SandboxExtension. The flaw executes injected code at template-load time, before any SecurityPolicy check runs, rendering even a globally-enabled empty allowlist sandbox ineffective. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vendor advisory describes the bypass mechanism in enough detail that PoC development is straightforward.
PHP code injection in Twig template engine versions before 3.26.0 allows attackers controlling template names in `{% use %}` tags to break out of compiled cache file string literals and execute arbitrary PHP code. The flaw bypasses the Twig sandbox entirely because `SecurityPolicy` unconditionally permits `{% use %}` regardless of `allowedTags` configuration. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-7p85-w9px-jpjp) discloses the full exploitation primitive.
Transcript malleability in the Plonky3 p3-challenger crate (MultiField32Challenger) allows a malicious prover to craft distinct observation streams that collapse to identical Fiat-Shamir challenges, breaking the soundness binding of the SNARK transcript. Affected versions are p3-challenger < 0.4.3 and 0.5.0-0.5.2, with fixes shipped in 0.4.3 and 0.5.3. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; risk is primarily to ZK proof system integrity rather than confidentiality.
Unsafe default code execution in InternLM LMDeploy (<=0.12.3) lets a malicious Hugging Face model repository run arbitrary Python on the host whenever a user loads it through any LMDeploy CLI (serve, calibrate, gptq, awq). The library hardcodes transformers.AutoConfig.from_pretrained(..., trust_remote_code=True) in get_model_arch and related helpers with no flag, env var, or warning to opt out, overriding HF Transformers' default-secure stance. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires the user to load an untrusted repo, so risk is hardening-level rather than network-reachable RCE.
Arbitrary code execution in InternLM lmdeploy <= 0.12.3 occurs because trust_remote_code=True is hardcoded across HuggingFace model-loading call sites in lmdeploy/archs.py and lmdeploy/utils.py. An attacker who can influence the model_path passed to an lmdeploy serving process can point it at a malicious HuggingFace repository, causing Transformers to download and execute attacker-controlled Python code with the privileges of the serving daemon. Publicly available exploit code exists in the GHSA advisory, and an upstream fix has been merged via PR #4511 (fixed in 0.13.0).
Unauthenticated remote code execution in phenixdigital phoenix_storybook 0.5.0 through versions before 1.1.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Elixir code on the server by abusing the psb-assign WebSocket event to inject HEEx template expressions. The flaw stems from attribute values being interpolated verbatim into HEEx templates that are then compiled and evaluated with full Kernel imports and no sandbox. Publicly available exploit code exists via the upstream commit and GHSA advisory, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis for in-the-wild use; CVSS 4.0 score is 9.5.
Code injection in Mesalvo Meona Client Launcher Component (through 19.06.2020 15:11:49) and Meona Server Component (through 2025.04 5+323020) allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to execute code on other users' systems via crafted input that crosses a scope boundary, with user interaction required on the victim side. CVSS 9.0 reflects the cross-user/cross-system impact (Scope:Changed) and full CIA compromise; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The product is a clinical/healthcare workflow platform, so successful exploitation can pivot between hospital workstations and the server tier.
Remote code execution in Eclipse GlassFish allows attackers with administrative access to the Administration Console to execute arbitrary operating system commands as the application service user. The flaw stems from improper input handling in admin panel requests (CWE-94), and while CVSS rates it 9.1 due to scope change and full CIA impact, exploitation requires high privileges (PR:H). No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Authenticated code injection in Apache OFBiz versions prior to 24.09.06 allows remote attackers with low-privileged accounts to execute arbitrary code via improperly neutralized directives in dynamically evaluated expressions. The flaw combines CWE-94 code injection with eval injection, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (CVSS 8.8). No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS rates near-term exploitation at 0.03% (8th percentile), but SSVC flags the issue as automatable, raising the risk of scripted abuse once a POC emerges.
LDAP injection in Apache OFBiz before 24.09.06 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject special characters into LDAP queries, bypassing authentication or extracting directory data with high confidentiality and integrity impact. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is very low (0.03%), but the CVSS 9.1 rating and CISA SSVC 'total' technical impact make it a meaningful patching priority. A vendor patch is available in version 24.09.06.
Arbitrary code execution in Scalar Astro v0.1.13 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to upload malicious SVG files through the scalar_url query parameter of the Scalar Proxy endpoint. The flaw stems from inadequate validation in the proxy's file handling logic and, per CVSS, requires no authentication or user interaction, though EPSS rates real-world exploitation probability at only 0.02%. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though a related XSS/Open-Redirect proof-of-concept repository is referenced.
Remote code execution in the amazon-redshift-python-driver (versions prior to 2.1.14) allows a malicious or compromised Redshift server, or a man-in-the-middle attacker positioned on the network path, to execute arbitrary Python code on any client that connects. The root cause is unsafe use of Python's eval() against untrusted server-supplied data inside the vector_in() function. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.3 and PR:N/UI:N vector make this a high-priority client-side supply-chain-style risk.
Pre-authenticated server-side template injection in Verbb Formie (a forms plugin for Craft CMS) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to submit crafted values into Hidden fields configured with a Custom default value, which are then evaluated as Twig during submission handling. Successful exploitation can lead to arbitrary code execution and full compromise of the Craft site depending on template sandbox behavior. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-x7m9-mwc2-g6w2 and patch commit are publicly disclosed.
Remote code execution in ChromaDB Python (version 1.0.0 and later) allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server by submitting a malicious model repository with trust_remote_code enabled via the /api/v2/tenants/{tenant}/databases/{db}/collections endpoint. The flaw carries a maximum CVSS 4.0 score of 10.0 and was disclosed publicly by HiddenLayer; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though detailed research has been published.
Code injection vulnerability in the Command-Line Client of P4 Server (Helix Core) prior to version 2025.2 Patch 2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability requires user interaction but no authentication, with a CVSS 7.7 score indicating high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Perforce has released a patch in version 2025.2 Patch 2.
Metric injection in the Perl module Net::Statsd::Lite through version 0.10.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary StatsD metrics by smuggling control characters (CRLF) into metric names or values that the library forwards without sanitization. The flaw was disclosed on the oss-security mailing list on 2026-05-18 by maintainer Robert Rothenberg, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; EPSS is very low (0.03%, 8th percentile), reflecting limited mass-exploitation interest in a niche telemetry library.
Metric injection in the Perl module Net::Statsd::Tiny before version 0.3.8 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary statsd metrics by smuggling newline, colon, or pipe characters through untrusted metric names or set values. The CVSS 8.2 score reflects high integrity impact from forged telemetry, and while a vendor patch is available, no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.
Remote code execution in MCP Calculate Server versions before 0.1.1 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via unsanitized mathematical expressions passed to eval(). The vulnerability stems from processing user-supplied math expressions without input validation, enabling injection of malicious Python code. While no public exploit or active exploitation has been identified, the network-accessible attack vector and lack of required authentication make this a critical risk for exposed instances.
Code injection in Apache Flink's SQL engine allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary code on TaskManagers through malicious SQL queries. The vulnerability affects JSON functions in versions 1.15.0+ and LIKE expressions with ESCAPE clauses in versions 1.17.0+, where user-controlled strings are interpolated into generated Java code without proper escaping. Apache has released patches in versions 1.20.4, 2.0.2, 2.1.2 and 2.2.1.
Local code execution in electerm 3.0.6 through 3.8.8 allows any same-user process to send a crafted JSON payload to electerm's single-instance IPC socket/pipe, causing the application to open tabs with attacker-controlled exec paths, arguments, environment variables, and post-connect scripts that spawn arbitrary local processes. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the GHSA advisory and patch commit confirm the vulnerability is real, scored CVSS 4.0 9.3 (Critical), and fixed in version 3.9.0 by filtering dangerous tab properties on the IPC boundary.
Remote code execution in DeepSeek-TUI (Rust CLI tool for AI-assisted development) allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands on developer workstations via prompt injection in project files. When a developer opens a malicious repository and creates any task using the task_create tool, spawned sub-agents inherit insecure defaults (allow_shell=true, auto_approve=true) that enable silent shell execution without user approval. The attack leverages project files like AGENTS.md to inject malicious instructions disguised as documentation standards, causing the AI agent to execute attacker-controlled commands. Publicly available exploit code exists (full PoC in advisory). CVSS 9.6 reflects scope change (C) and user interaction requirement (UI:R), indicating high severity conditional on social engineering. No EPSS or KEV data available; real-world risk depends on DeepSeek-TUI adoption in developer workflows.
Remote code execution in DeepSeek-TUI versions 0.3.0 through 0.8.22 allows malicious repository owners to execute arbitrary code on developer workstations without user approval. The vulnerability chains two attack primitives: (1) the run_tests tool auto-executes cargo test with ApprovalRequirement::Auto, compiling and running arbitrary Rust code in test files, build scripts, and proc macros; (2) the AGENTS.md file is automatically loaded into the LLM system prompt and can inject instructions directing the model to invoke run_tests at session start. Publicly available exploit code exists demonstrating full attack chain from repository clone to remote code execution. Fixed in version 0.8.23 released 2025. CVSS 9.6 reflects network attack vector with scope change, though exploitation requires user interaction (opening the malicious repository).
Code execution in Electerm (npm package, versions <= 3.8.8) allows attackers to achieve persistent local-pty code execution by tricking users into importing malicious bookmark JSON files or by compromising configured sync targets (Gist/WebDAV). The flaw stems from unsafe handling of bookmark fields (`exec*`) and global config entries, which are executed when a bookmark is opened or when sync is applied. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no vendor-released patch is identified at time of analysis.
Crabbox versions before 0.12.0 leak local secrets through environment variable forwarding during remote command execution. When users run commands against malicious or compromised repositories, attackers exploit overly permissive environment variable allowlisting in repository-local configuration files to exfiltrate API tokens, cloud credentials, and broker tokens into the remote execution environment. The vendor released v0.12.0 on May 12, 2026 with fixes including `--allow-env` explicit allowlisting and `--env-from-profile` for safer secret forwarding. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the attack surface is straightforward for attackers controlling repository configuration.
Account takeover in ApostropheCMS password reset flow allows remote attackers to steal password reset tokens via Host header injection. When apos.baseUrl is not configured (common in development and some production deployments), the password reset mechanism trusts the attacker-controlled HTTP Host header to construct reset URLs, causing victims to receive legitimate reset emails with links pointing to attacker domains. Clicking the link delivers valid reset tokens to the attacker, enabling full account compromise. CVSS 8.1 (High) with network attack vector, low complexity, and no privileges required. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the vulnerability is straightforward to exploit given the detailed technical disclosure in the GitHub security advisory.
Remote code execution in HuggingFace Diffusers library (versions < 0.38.0) allows attackers to execute arbitrary Python code when victims load malicious pipelines from Hugging Face Hub repositories. The vulnerability bypasses the trust_remote_code=True safeguard through a type coercion flaw where None values are interpolated as 'None.py' filenames. Attackers can achieve silent code execution by publishing repositories containing a malicious None.py file alongside legitimate-looking configuration, requiring only that victims call DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained() on the attacker's repository. EPSS data not available; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Vendor-released patch: version 0.38.0.
Argument injection in the n8n workflow automation platform's Git node allows authenticated users with workflow edit privileges to inject CLI flags into the Git Push operation, enabling arbitrary file read from the n8n server and potentially full host compromise. The flaw affects n8n versions prior to 1.123.43, 2.20.7, and 2.22.1, and is rated CVSS 9.4 (4.0) with no public exploit identified at time of analysis. EPSS is low at 0.04% (14th percentile), and the bug is classified under CWE-88 (Argument Injection).
Remote code execution in CoreShop's GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline allows unauthenticated attackers to compromise the build infrastructure and exfiltrate repository secrets by submitting a malicious pull request. The vulnerability stems from the dangerous combination of pull_request_target trigger with unverified code checkout, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary commands (bin/console) on GitHub-hosted runners with access to sensitive credentials including PIMCORE_SECRET and PIMCORE_PRODUCT_KEY. This 'Pwn Request' attack pattern (CWE-94: Code Injection) affects version 5.0.0 with no vendor patch currently released. The attack requires zero authentication (PR:N) and low complexity (AC:L), representing a critical supply chain security risk for organizations using CoreShop.
HTTP response header injection in cPanel, WHM, and WP Squared allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary headers via the unsanitized `status` query parameter of the `/unprotected/nova_error` endpoint. CVSS 8.3 reflects the changed scope (S:C) with low impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, consistent with CRLF-style header injection that can pivot into cache poisoning, session fixation, or open redirect chains. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is low at 0.07%, but a vendor patch is already available.
Authenticated remote code execution in CubeCart v6 prior to 6.7.3 allows an admin with documents-edit permission to embed raw PHP into the Invoice Editor template, which is later written to a predictable files/print.<md5>.php path that the bundled .htaccess explicitly exposes to unauthenticated visitors. SSVC rates technical impact as total and a POC exists, though EPSS remains very low (0.04%) and the issue is not on CISA KEV - no public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond researcher disclosure.
Authenticated server-side template injection in CubeCart v6 prior to 6.7.0 allows administrative users to achieve remote code execution by injecting Smarty template syntax into multiple admin-facing modules including Email Templates, Invoices, Documents, and Contact Forms. The flaw stems from evaluating user-supplied content through the Smarty engine without enabling Smarty Security Policies, granting OS-level command execution on the underlying server. Currently no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is very low at 0.04%, and the issue is not on CISA KEV.
Authenticated server-side template injection in CubeCart v6 before 6.7.0 lets administrators escape the Smarty template sandbox and invoke native PHP functions through modules such as Email Templates and Documents. Attackers can call readgzfile() to exfiltrate configuration secrets and error_log() with message_type=3 to drop a PHP webshell, yielding full remote code execution. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a SSVC 'poc' status and an upstream commit hardening the Smarty allowlist indicate the technique is documented.
Local code injection in Palo Alto Networks Prisma Browser on macOS lets an authenticated non-admin user abuse an exposed AppleScript/Apple Event handler to send unauthorized commands to the browser, with high impact on confidentiality and integrity. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is very low (0.02%), but SSVC rates the technical impact as total once the local foothold exists. Affects all Prisma Browser releases prior to 146.16.6.165 on macOS.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Mapfish Print (org.mapfish.print) allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a code injection flaw in the Dynamic table feature. The vulnerability carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.3 with network-accessible, low-complexity exploitation requiring no privileges or user interaction. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the GHSA advisory and four parallel patched release lines indicate vendor-confirmed severity.
Pre-authentication remote code execution in ChurchCRM before 7.3.2 allows unauthenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary code through the setup wizard's unsanitized DB_PASSWORD field. This vulnerability exists because the patch for CVE-2026-39337 was incomplete, leaving the original CWE-94 code injection fully exploitable; publicly available exploit code exists (SSVC exploitation status: poc), and CISA's SSVC framework rates it as automatable with total technical impact. Despite the maximum CVSS score of 10.0, EPSS estimates only a 0.27% 30-day exploitation probability (51st percentile), indicating it is not yet observed in widespread automated campaigns.
Authenticated administrators with Admin Console access to FileMaker Cloud can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the underlying host by bypassing front-end restrictions on OS Script schedule types. This vulnerability affects all FileMaker Cloud versions prior to 2.22.0.5 and requires high-privilege administrative credentials to exploit. Despite the network attack vector and total technical impact (full system compromise), the low EPSS score (0.13%, 32nd percentile) and SSVC assessment indicating no observed exploitation suggest this is not being actively exploited in the wild, likely due to the high privilege requirement limiting the attacker pool to malicious insiders or compromised admin accounts.
Authenticated remote code execution in Wing FTP Server 8.1.2 lets a domain administrator inject arbitrary Lua code by abusing the session serialization routine, which writes session values into Lua source without escaping closing delimiters. When the poisoned session is later reloaded through loadfile(), the attacker's Lua executes on the server. Publicly available exploit code exists (Exploit-DB 52589, VulnCheck advisory), but there is no evidence of active exploitation and EPSS is very low (0.09%).
Agentic workflow injection in nnU-Net's GitHub Actions issue-triage automation (prior to 2.4.1) lets any logged-in GitHub user hijack a command-capable Claude agent by opening a crafted issue. Because the workflow embeds untrusted issue title/body directly into the LLM prompt and grants the agent authenticated gh permissions to comment and relabel issues, an external attacker can steer it beyond triage into performing repository actions on their behalf. A proof-of-concept is indicated (SSVC exploitation=poc), but EPSS is very low (0.04%) and it is not in CISA KEV, so no active exploitation is confirmed.
Remote code execution in SPIP versions before 4.4.14 lets network attackers run arbitrary code as the web server user through the public space, but only when the CMS runs behind certain nginx configurations. The flaw (CWE-94 code injection) bypasses SPIP's built-in security screen, so that mitigation offers no protection. It was reported by VulnCheck and carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.2, though there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA SSVC records exploitation status as none.
Remote code execution in SPIP versions before 4.4.14 lets authenticated users of the private space (backend) run arbitrary PHP in the web server context, bypassing SPIP's built-in security screen ("anti-intrusion") protections. The flaw is a CWE-94 code injection reported by VulnCheck and carries a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7; a vendor patch is available, though there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS estimates only a 0.20% 30-day exploitation probability.
Remote code execution in Microsoft Dynamics 365 (on-premises) versions 9.0 and 9.1 (prior to 9.1.44.15) lets an authenticated attacker inject and execute arbitrary code across the network with a scope change beyond the vulnerable component. Rated CVSS 9.9, the flaw yields total confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is low (0.07%, 21st percentile). Microsoft has released a fixed build (9.1.44.15).
Remote code execution in Microsoft Data Formulator versions prior to 0.7 lets an unauthorized attacker run arbitrary code by inducing a user to interact with malicious content (CWE-94 code injection). The flaw is network-reachable and requires no authentication, but does require user interaction (CVSS 3.1 8.8, AV:N/UI:R). A vendor patch is available; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS probability is very low (0.06%).
Code injection in protobufjs-cli's pbjs static generator allows attackers who control protocol buffer schemas to inject malicious JavaScript code into generated output files. The vulnerability affects npm packages protobufjs-cli versions ≤1.2.0 and 2.0.0-2.0.1, with patches released in versions 1.2.1 and 2.0.2. Exploitation requires low complexity with authenticated network access and user interaction (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C), achieving high confidentiality and integrity impact but no availability impact. No CISA KEV listing or public exploit code identified at time of analysis, though GitHub advisory confirms the vulnerability with released patches.
Remote code execution in protobufjs (npm package) versions ≤7.5.5 and 8.0.0-8.0.1 allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript by supplying a malicious protobuf schema with crafted default values in bytes fields. When applications load untrusted protobuf descriptors and call toObject() with defaults enabled, attacker-controlled expressions are emitted into generated conversion functions and executed in the application context. Vendor-released patches are available in versions 7.5.6 and 8.0.2. No public exploit code identified at time of analysis, though the vulnerability is straightforward to weaponize given the clear preconditions in the advisory.
Prototype pollution in protobuf.js type lookup tables enables remote code execution via code injection into generated encode/decode functions. Affects npm package protobuf.js versions ≤7.5.5 and 8.0.0-8.0.1. Exploitation requires chaining with a separate prototype pollution vulnerability-applications must first allow Object.prototype pollution, then invoke protobufjs code generation on attacker-influenced schemas. Vendor-released patches available (v7.5.6, v8.0.2). CVSS 8.1 (High) reflects network vector but high attack complexity (AC:H) due to multi-step prerequisite. No evidence of active exploitation (not in CISA KEV), public exploit code not identified at time of analysis.
Authentication-layer injection in OX Dovecot Pro (versions up to and including 2.4.3 and 3.1.4) arises from a flaw in the 'safe' template filter: when 'safe' is applied during variable expansion, every subsequent pipeline stage on the same string inherits the 'safe' designation, so attacker-controlled data that should be escaped is passed through unescaped. Because variable expansion is used to build authentication backend queries, this enables SQL or LDAP injection by remote unauthenticated attackers. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS exploitation probability is negligible (0.01%, 2nd percentile).
Remote code execution in Cognee v0.4.0 and earlier allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via the notebook cell execution API endpoint. The vulnerability stems from unsafe use of Python's exec() function without sandboxing or validation, enabling complete system compromise with server process privileges. While not actively exploited (not in KEV), the vulnerability is automatable with total technical impact per SSVC framework, though EPSS indicates low exploitation probability at 0.06%.
Arbitrary code execution occurs in the llm CLI tool (versions through 0.27.1) when attackers social-engineer victims into running crafted commands containing malicious Python code in the --functions argument. The tool directly executes this code via unsafe exec() without sanitization, enabling full system compromise. CVSS 9.8 assigns network attack vector and no authentication, but real-world exploitation requires local command execution by a tricked user, creating a significant disparity between the vector and actual attack prerequisites. EPSS score of 0.02% (5th percentile) suggests minimal automated exploitation risk, and no active exploitation or public POC has been identified at time of analysis.
Remote code execution in PySyft Datasite/Server versions 0.9.5 and earlier allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Python code on the server through the function submission mechanism. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation and sandboxing of user-submitted Python functions decorated with @sy.syft_function(), which are executed using unsafe exec() and eval() calls after approval. With an EPSS score of 0.04% and no current KEV listing, this appears to be a high-severity vulnerability without confirmed active exploitation.
Remote code execution in superduper (Python library) through version 0.10.0 allows unauthenticated network attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by submitting malicious query strings with embedded Python code. The _parse_op_part() function in query.py uses unsafe eval() with inadequate context restrictions, enabling attackers to import modules (such as os) and achieve complete server compromise. EPSS score is low (0.07%, 20th percentile) and no active exploitation is confirmed (CISA KEV absent), but SSVC framework rates technical impact as total. User interaction is required (CVSS UI:R), reducing automated exploitation risk. Authentication requirements not confirmed from available data - CVSS vector shows PR:N (no privileges required) but UI:R suggests user-triggered queries.
Arbitrary code execution in optimate's neural_magic_training.py allows remote attackers to execute Python code by supplying a malicious directory path containing a crafted module.py file. The _load_model() function directly executes file contents via Python's exec() without validation. CVSS 9.8 reflects network vector with no authentication, but EPSS score of 0.02% (5th percentile) indicates very low observed exploitation probability. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV). Vulnerability exists in commit a6d302f912b481c94370811af6b11402f51d377f from July 2024. Affects organizations using optimate for neural network model optimization.
Remote code execution in Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART) versions through 1.20.1 allows unauthenticated network attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via unsafe eval() usage in the Kubeflow robustness evaluation component. The vulnerability accepts unsanitized user input for LossFn and Optimizer parameters in PyTorch model evaluations, enabling complete system compromise. With CVSS 9.8 but only 0.06% EPSS score (18th percentile), this represents a severe theoretical risk that has not yet manifested in widespread exploitation. No public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability requires specific deployment of ART's Kubeflow integration component.
Remote code execution in Guardrails AI through version 0.6.7 occurs when installing validator packages via the Hub mechanism. The guardrails hub install command dynamically executes post-installation scripts from Hub manifests without validating the script path or content, allowing attackers who publish malicious packages to achieve arbitrary code execution on victim systems during package installation. With CVSS 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) but only 0.06% EPSS (18th percentile), this represents a supply chain attack requiring user-initiated installation rather than widespread automated exploitation. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV), and patch availability not confirmed from available data.
Sandbox escape leading to remote code execution in @nyariv/sandboxjs (a JavaScript-in-JavaScript sandbox library) versions <= 0.9.5 allows sandboxed code to break out and run arbitrary host JavaScript. By reading Function.caller on a sandbox-defined function, attacker-controlled code recovers the privileged internal LispType.Call op and invokes it with forged operands to leak blocked host statics, rebuild the real Function constructor, and execute host code (e.g. child_process.execSync). CVSS is 10.0 and a working proof-of-concept is published in the GHSA advisory, but this is no public exploit identified as actively exploited - EPSS is only 0.05% (15th percentile), consistent with a newly disclosed library bug rather than mass exploitation.
Remote code execution in OWASP BLT versions prior to 2.1.2 enables attackers to execute arbitrary code with repository write permissions via malicious GitHub pull requests. The vulnerability exploits a GitHub Actions workflow misconfiguration where pull_request_target triggers execute code directly from attacker-controlled forks without proper validation. EPSS data not available; no confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV); publicly disclosed via GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-cgvj-qg2h-cqfh.
Remote code execution in angular-expressions versions ≤1.5.1 allows unauthenticated network attackers to escape the expression sandbox via malicious filter payloads and execute arbitrary system commands with no user interaction required. CVSS 9.3 (Critical) with confirmed public exploit code available. Vendor-released patch in version 1.5.2 addresses the sandbox escape. Affects applications using angular-expressions as a standalone module for evaluating user-supplied Angular.JS expressions.
Arbitrary code execution in the Dao-AILab flash-attention training framework (all revisions up to and including commit e724e2588cbe754beb97cf7c011b5e7e34119e62) arises because its checkpoint-loading paths call PyTorch's torch.load() without weights_only=True, permitting pickle-based deserialization of attacker-controlled objects. Any user who warmstarts or evaluates a model from an untrusted checkpoint file triggers code execution on their host. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, EPSS is negligible (0.02%), and SSVC records exploitation as 'none' - this is a latent supply-chain/ML-artifact risk rather than an actively exploited one.
Arbitrary code execution in the flash-attention project's training script (up to commit e724e2588cbe754beb97cf7c011b5e7e34119e62) allows an attacker to run Python code by supplying a malicious Hydra configuration. The script registers Python's eval() as a Hydra resolver named 'eval', so any config value using the ${eval:...} syntax is executed when a victim launches training with that configuration. No public exploit has been identified and EPSS probability is very low (0.02%), but SSVC rates the flaw as automatable with partial technical impact.
Remote code execution in QuickJS-NG 0.12.1 allows unauthenticated network attackers to execute arbitrary code through the js_mapped_arguments_mark function. The vulnerability enables attackers to achieve code injection with low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact via network-accessible JavaScript engine exploitation. EPSS score of 0.02% (5th percentile) indicates very low predicted exploitation probability, and no active exploitation has been publicly reported at time of analysis.
Filter-expression injection in Spring AI's MilvusVectorStore allows remote unauthenticated attackers to manipulate vector database queries by injecting malicious filter expressions through unsanitized document IDs. Affects Spring AI 1.0.0-1.0.6 and 1.1.0-1.1.5. VMware has released patches in versions 1.0.7 and 1.1.6. CVSS 8.6 (High) with network attack vector and no privileges required. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV) and no public POC identified at time of analysis.
Arbitrary code execution and privileged token theft affects Postiz (gitroomhq/postiz-app) prior to commit da44801 through an insecure GitHub Actions 'Pwn Request' pattern in the Build and Publish PR Docker Image workflow. Because the workflow triggers on pull_request_target with 'permissions: write-all' yet checks out and builds the untrusted fork head (Dockerfile.dev), any unauthenticated GitHub user can open a fork PR with a malicious Dockerfile.dev to run code on the runner and exfiltrate a write-all GITHUB_TOKEN, effectively hijacking the repository's CI/CD supply chain. Rated CVSS 10.0 with SSVC technical impact 'total' and automatable 'yes', but EPSS is low (0.14%) with no public exploit or KEV listing at time of analysis.
Arbitrary code generation in Babel's `@babel/plugin-transform-modules-systemjs` (and `@babel/preset-env` when configured with `modules: "systemjs"`) allows an attacker who can supply crafted source code to a build pipeline to make Babel emit output that executes arbitrary code at runtime. Affected are plugin versions >= 7.12.0 through 7.29.3 and 8.0.0-alpha.0 through 8.0.0-alpha.12; only setups that compile untrusted, attacker-supplied code with the SystemJS module transform are impacted. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is very low (0.02%), but the CWE-94 code-injection nature and CVSS 8.2 warrant prompt patching of exposed build systems.
LDAP Filter Injection in Zitadel's identity provider implementation allows unauthenticated remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames and extract sensitive LDAP directory attributes through blind injection techniques. The vulnerability exists in Zitadel versions 2.71.11-2.71.19, 3.1.0-3.4.9, and 4.0.0-4.14.0 when LDAP is configured as an identity provider. Exploitation requires no authentication (CVSS PR:N) and has network attack vector (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L), resulting in high confidentiality impact (C:H) but no authentication bypass capability. Vendor-released patches are available for 3.x (3.4.10) and 4.x (4.15.0) branches. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the attack technique is well-documented in security research.
Remote code execution in ai-scanner versions 1.0.0 through 1.4.0 allows authenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript code via the BrowserAutomation::PlaywrightService component. The vulnerability has a Critical CVSS score of 9.9 with scope change, enabling cross-boundary compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Vendor-released patch available in version 1.4.1 as of April 13, 2026, with GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-r27j-xxgx-f5vr confirming the fix.
Remote code execution in math-codegen npm package versions prior to 0.4.3 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via string literal injection into the cg.parse() function. The vulnerability stems from unsanitized string literals being injected directly into new Function() bodies, enabling full command execution on any application exposing math evaluation endpoints that process user input. EPSS score not available, but this is a critical unauthenticated RCE requiring no special conditions beyond user input reaching the vulnerable parser. Vendor-released patch available in version 0.4.3.
Remote code execution in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions prior to 15.0.2.1 enables unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Perl code via the GINA UI. The vulnerability stems from an endpoint passing unsanitized user input directly to Perl's eval function, allowing complete system compromise. Reported by Switzerland's national CERT (NCSC.ch), this represents a critical pre-authentication attack surface requiring immediate patching.
Remote code execution in Apache CloudStack allows authenticated account users to execute arbitrary code on KVM hypervisor hosts by registering malicious templates with unsanitized filenames. Affects CloudStack 4.11.0 through 4.20.2.0 and 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.0.0 when using KVM hypervisors. Despite high CVSS (8.8), EPSS exploitation probability is very low (0.04%, 11th percentile) and CISA SSVC reports no active exploitation. Vendor-released patches are available in versions 4.20.3.0 and 4.22.0.1.
Command injection in Notepad Next versions prior to 0.14 allows arbitrary code execution when opening a specially crafted file. The detectLanguageFromExtension() function directly interpolates file extensions into a Lua script without sanitization, and because the full Lua standard libraries (os, io, package) are unconditionally loaded, an attacker can execute system commands by embedding Lua code in a malicious filename. Vendor-released patch available in version 0.14 (commit f3ca1b10). EPSS data not available; no CISA KEV listing indicates no confirmed widespread exploitation at time of analysis.
Remote code execution in Firefox ESR's WebRTC component allows unauthenticated network attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution with complete system compromise. The vulnerability affects Firefox ESR versions prior to 140.10.2 and carries a critical CVSS score of 9.8 with network attack vector requiring no authentication or user interaction. Despite the critical severity, EPSS probability remains exceptionally low at 0.01% (0th percentile) with no evidence of active exploitation, suggesting limited awareness or exploitation complexity despite the automatable nature assessed by CISA SSVC framework.
Server-Side Template Injection in Open Notebook v1.8.3 enables arbitrary Python code execution and OS command execution within the Docker container through unsanitized user input in transformation features. The vulnerability requires local access (CVSS AV:L) but no authentication or user interaction, making it exploitable by any application user with access to the transformation creation interface. No public exploit code identified at time of analysis, though the GitHub security advisory provides technical details for reproduction.
Remote code execution in Hugging Face diffusers library (all versions < 0.38.0) bypasses the trust_remote_code=False security gate when users load models via DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained. Three distinct attack vectors exist: cross-repository custom_pipeline parameters, local snapshots combined with Hub custom_pipeline references, and local snapshots containing malicious custom component files. The vulnerability stems from implementing the trust_remote_code check in DiffusionPipeline.download() instead of at the actual dynamic module load point, allowing multiple code paths to skip the security control entirely. Vendor-released patch: diffusers 0.38.0 (confirmed by GitHub advisory GHSA-98h9-4798-4q5v and PR #13448). No public exploit identified at time of analysis; exploitation requires user interaction (loading a model from an attacker-controlled source).
vm2 npm package versions 3.9.6 through 3.10.5 allow sandbox escape through prototype pollution of host-realm intrinsic objects. Attackers execute arbitrary code by leveraging flawed proxy bridge implementation that writes sandbox mutations directly to shared host Object.prototype, Array.prototype, and Function.prototype instead of isolating changes to the sandbox realm. This vulnerability was patched in vm2 v3.11.0 as part of a coordinated release addressing 13 security advisories. Publicly available exploit code exists with minimal attack complexity (CVSS AC:L) requiring no authentication or user interaction (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N).
Remote code execution in vm2 Node.js sandbox library (versions ≤3.10.5) allows attackers to escape isolation and execute arbitrary system commands by exploiting incomplete host Object protections. Attackers leverage JavaScript prototype chain manipulation to obtain host-context symbols, enabling injection of malicious code into Node.js inspection routines. Publicly available exploit code exists with working proof-of-concept demonstrating command execution via child_process. CVSS 10.0 (Critical) with network attack vector and no authentication required. Fixed in vm2 3.11.0, part of coordinated release addressing 13 sandbox-escape vulnerabilities.
Prototype chain manipulation in vm2 Node.js sandbox library enables complete sandbox escape and remote code execution via util.inspect handler leakage. Attackers can exploit BaseHandler.getPrototypeOf through crafted objects to access host process primitives and execute arbitrary system commands. Public exploit code exists (vendor-published PoC demonstrates child_process.execSync execution). Fixed in vm2 version 3.11.0 alongside 12 other critical sandbox escape vulnerabilities in coordinated security release.
Internal infrastructure disclosure in the free5GC UDM network function (Go package github.com/free5gc/udm, versions <= v1.4.2) lets unauthenticated remote attackers leak the internal address and API layout of the UDR. Six GET handlers in the nudm-sdm Subscriber Data Management service skip the validator.IsValidSupi() check, so a SUPI path parameter containing control characters (e.g. a NULL byte) propagates into the UDM-to-UDR URL, breaks Go's net/url parser, and is echoed back inside a 500 SYSTEM_FAILURE error detail. Publicly available exploit code exists (a curl-based PoC is published in the advisory and CVSS marks exploit maturity as Proof-of-Concept), but it is not listed in CISA KEV and no EPSS score was provided; impact is limited to confidentiality of infrastructure metadata that aids further intrusion rather than direct data theft or code execution.
SQL injection in ChestnutCMS v1.5.10 lets an admin-backend user manipulate the content parameter of the cms_content template tag, which is passed unsanitized into a SQL query that executes when the template is rendered. Tagged by the reporter as SQLi/Code-Injection/RCE, it can expose or corrupt database contents and potentially escalate toward code execution. A public technical writeup exists, but EPSS is 0.00% and there is no public exploit identified as actively used at time of analysis.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in PraisonAI (pip package `praisonai`, versions 4.5.139 through 4.6.31) allows attackers to run arbitrary Python in the server process by pointing the recipe runner at a malicious `tools.py`. This is a patch-coverage bypass of CVE-2026-40287: the earlier fix gated auto-import of `tools.py` behind the `PRAISONAI_ALLOW_LOCAL_TOOLS=true` env var in `tool_resolver.py` and `api/call.py`, but a third sink in `templates/tool_override.py` was left unguarded and executes on every recipe run. Publicly available exploit code exists (working PoC and confirmed execution in the advisory), though EPSS is only 0.02% and SSVC exploitation status is 'none'.
Arbitrary code execution via Git hook redirection in GitPython 3.1.48 and earlier allows local authenticated users to inject malicious core.hooksPath configuration through newline characters in config_writer().set_value(). Publicly available exploit code exists. The vulnerability enables persistent repository poisoning where attacker-controlled hooks execute with the privileges of any user performing Git operations (commit, merge, checkout) on the poisoned repository. Particularly dangerous in multi-tenant environments like MLRun, DVC, MLflow, or Kedro where shared repositories enable privilege escalation across user contexts. Fixed in GitPython 3.1.49.
Spring Expression Language injection in Valtimo (open-source business process platform) allows authenticated ADMIN users to execute arbitrary OS commands and exfiltrate credentials. The vulnerability exists in DocumentMigrationService (versions 12.0.0-12.31.0 and 13.0.0-13.22.0) and the Condition framework (13.4.0-13.22.0), both of which use StandardEvaluationContext to evaluate user-supplied SpEL expressions without restrictions. Attackers can invoke Runtime.exec(), access environment variables containing database passwords and API keys, and load arbitrary Java classes. Vendor-released patches are available (12.32.0, 13.23.0). No public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS data not available.
Remote code execution in Scramble API documentation generator versions 0.13.2 through 0.13.21 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code when documentation endpoints are publicly accessible and validation rules reference user-controlled input. Fixed in version 0.13.22. The CVSS score of 9.4 (Critical) reflects the network-accessible, low-complexity attack requiring no authentication, though exploitation requires specific configuration where documentation endpoints remain enabled and validation rules incorporate request-supplied data. No active exploitation (CISA KEV) or public POC identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub security advisory provides full technical details enabling reproduction.
LDAP filter injection in Netflix Lemur certificate management platform allows authenticated users with valid LDAP credentials to escalate privileges to administrator by injecting metacharacters into the username field during login. Attackers manipulate group membership queries to gain unauthorized admin roles, enabling access to all certificates, private keys via /certificates/<id>/key endpoint, and CA configurations. Vendor-released patch confirmed in version 1.9.0 (GitHub advisory GHSA-3r34-vq8m-39gh). CVSS 8.1 indicates high confidentiality and integrity impact with low attack complexity from network-authenticated attackers. No public exploit code identified at time of analysis, though detailed reproduction steps exist in the advisory.
Remote code execution in GeoVision GV-ASWeb 6.2.0 allows authenticated users with System Setting permissions to execute arbitrary commands by bypassing frontend restrictions through crafted HTTP POST requests to the ASWebCommon.srf backend endpoint. This authenticated network-accessible vulnerability achieves full system compromise (confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact) with low attack complexity. No public exploit code or active exploitation confirmed at time of analysis, though EPSS data unavailable for risk contextualization.
Remote code execution in Grav CMS versions prior to 2.0.0-beta.2 allows authenticated administrators to deploy malicious PHP web shells by uploading crafted ZIP files through the Direct Install tool at /admin/tools/direct-install. The vulnerability combines insufficient ZIP archive content validation (Zip Slip primitive via path traversal) with the design-level acceptance of arbitrary plugin PHP code. Publicly available exploit code exists, demonstrating automated login, nonce extraction, malicious plugin upload, and persistent shell deployment. CVSS 9.1 (Critical) reflects network-accessible RCE with scope change, though exploitation requires high privileges (admin role). No EPSS or KEV data available at time of analysis.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in AVideo ≤29.0 allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browsers of any logged-in users through a WebSocket message relay bypass. An attacker obtains a WebSocket token without authentication from plugin/YPTSocket/getWebSocket.json.php, connects to the WebSocket server, and sends a crafted message with autoEvalCodeOnHTML nested under the json field instead of msg. The incomplete server-side sanitization from prior fix c08694bf6 (GHSA-gph2-j4c9-vhhr) only strips autoEvalCodeOnHTML from $json['msg'], but the relay function msgToResourceId() preferentially selects $msg['json'] as the outbound message carrier. The payload bypasses sanitization, reaches the victim's browser via WebSocket relay, and executes through eval() at plugin/YPTSocket/script.js:573-575. Vendor-released patch: commit 9f3006f9a (recursive stripping across all message carriers). No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the advisory includes functional proof-of-concept Python code.
Environment variable injection in OpenClaw npm package versions before 2026.4.9 allows local attackers with low privileges to compromise application behavior through malicious workspace .env files. Attackers can redirect update sources to serve backdoored packages, modify gateway URLs and ClawHub resolution endpoints to intercept traffic, and override browser executable paths to launch attacker-controlled binaries. Vendor-released patch: version 2026.4.9, with fix also present in latest npm release 2026.4.14. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but exploitation requires only an untrusted repository with a crafted .env file opened by a victim user.
Server-Side Template Injection in ERPNext v15.103.1 and earlier allows remote code execution through malicious email templates. Attackers with email template editing permissions can inject Jinja2 expressions that execute arbitrary Python code on the server when templates are rendered. SSVC framework confirms POC availability and automatable exploitation with total technical impact. CVSS 9.8 reflects network-reachable critical severity, though the 0.02% EPSS score (5th percentile) suggests limited real-world exploitation attempts to date, likely due to the permission prerequisite.
Remote code execution as root in nginx-ui versions before 2.3.8 via unauthenticated backup restore within 10-minute startup window. Attackers exploit the completely unauthenticated /api/restore endpoint during initial installation to upload malicious backup archives that overwrite app.ini configuration with injected OS commands in TestConfigCmd setting. After automatic application restart, command injection triggers with privileges of the nginx-ui process - typically root in Docker deployments. EPSS data not available; no active exploitation reported but publicly disclosed via GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-4pvg-prr3-9cxr. Patch released in version 2.3.8.
Server-side template injection in OpenMRS Core allows authenticated users with 'Manage Concepts' privilege to execute arbitrary Java code by injecting malicious Apache Velocity templates into concept reference range criteria fields. The vulnerability stems from unsafe VelocityEngine initialization without sandbox restrictions (no SecureUberspector), enabling unrestricted Java reflection. Exploitation persists across all facility users whenever observations are validated against the compromised concept, creating a persistent remote code execution vector. Fixed in versions 2.7.9 and 2.8.6 via migration from Velocity to sandboxed Spring Expression Language (SpEL) with SimpleEvaluationContext. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV), but proof-of-concept details available from researcher advisory at machinespirits.com.
Arbitrary code execution in PPTAgent allows local attackers to execute Python code by exploiting unsafe eval() of LLM-generated content with unrestricted builtins. The framework's agentic architecture passes AI-generated code directly to eval() with full builtin access, enabling execution of arbitrary system commands. Patch available via commit 418491a which restricts eval() globals to an empty builtins dictionary and adds path traversal protections. CVSS 8.6 with local attack vector and user interaction requirement; no evidence of active exploitation or public POC at time of analysis.
Sandbox escape leading to remote code execution in the vm2 Node.js sandbox library affects all versions prior to 3.11.0, where the JavaScript SuppressedError mechanism (combined with DisposableStack disposal) lets untrusted code running inside the sandbox reach a host constructor and execute arbitrary commands on the underlying server. Any application that relies on vm2 to safely run attacker-controlled or untrusted JavaScript is fully compromised, with a working proof-of-concept published in the GHSA advisory. There is publicly available exploit code but no confirmed active exploitation; the SSVC framework rates it POC, automatable, with total technical impact, while EPSS remains low at 0.06%.