Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain network MITM/relay position
  2. Delivery
    Present forged or mismatched certificate
  3. Exploit
    Trigger improper certificate validation in AD FS/.NET
  4. Execution
    Spoof trusted federation identity
  5. Impact
    Impersonate endpoint and capture/relay auth tokens

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V12 - Secure Communication Certificate validation
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires AD FS (or a .NET application using the affected System.Security.Cryptography.Xml / .NET Framework certificate-validation path) to be reachable by the attacker over the network, and the attacker must be able to supply a certificate that the flawed validation improperly trusts - in practice a man-in-the-middle/relay position or a crafted forged certificate presented to the federation endpoint. No authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction is needed (UI:N), so default AD FS deployments are in scope once network-reachable. The principal limiting factor is CVSS AC:H: the attacker must first obtain the privileged network/intercept position or construct a certificate that bypasses validation, which raises the bar above trivial remote exploitation. Impact is confined to spoofing/impersonation (C:H/I:H) with no availability effect (A:N), and the flaw does not cross a trust/scope boundary (S:U).

Impact

Signals are moderate and largely consistent. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:N, base 7.4) describes an unauthenticated, network-reachable spoofing flaw rooted in improper certificate validation (CWE-295), but the AC:H metric is the key moderating factor - successful exploitation realistically requires a privileged network position or the ability to present a crafted/forged certificate, not a simple one-shot request. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. No SSVC decision data was provided. The notable tension is between the advisory title ('AD FS') and the EUVD affected-version list, which is dominated by .NET Framework, System.Security.Cryptography.Xml, Windows Server and even Visual Studio - this indicates the real defect lives in the underlying .NET XML/cryptography certificate-validation code consumed by AD FS, which broadens the patch footprint well beyond AD FS servers; verify applicability per deployed component. Net: a credible, Microsoft-confirmed and patched spoofing issue worth prioritizing on internet-facing AD FS/federation endpoints, but AC:H plus the absence of any exploitation signal places it below drop-everything critical.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker positioned to intercept or inject traffic between a client and an AD FS federation endpoint (or a .NET application using the affected XML/crypto certificate-validation path) presents a certificate that is improperly accepted as valid. Because the flawed validation does not correctly reject the forged or mismatched certificate, the attacker spoofs a trusted identity/endpoint and can impersonate it to harvest tokens or relay authentication. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS AC:H reflects that the attacker must first achieve the network/MITM position or craft a suitable certificate.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Spoofing and identity impersonation in Microsoft Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) let an unauthenticated network attacker get forged or intercepted certificates accepted as trusted, undermining the integrity of federated authentication. Affected deployments are AD FS running on Windows Server 2012 R2 through Windows Server 2025, along with the underlying .NET Framework certificate-validation components (3.5, 4.6.2 through 4.8.1) and System.Security.Cryptography.Xml, plus Visual Studio 2022 17.14 and Visual Studio 2026 18.10. The assessed vector is CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N (7.4), meaning no credentials or user interaction are needed but the attacker must first obtain a privileged network/intercept position or craft a certificate that slips past validation; impact is limited to confidentiality and integrity, with no availability effect. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and CISA KEV does not list this issue, but a vendor patch is available and should be applied promptly given the authentication-bypass potential in default, network-exposed AD FS deployments.

RemediationAI

Patch status: vendor-released fixes are available through the Microsoft Security Response Center update guide for CVE-2026-96222 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-96222). Apply the cumulative updates that bring affected hosts to the fixed builds: Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23470, Windows Server 2016 / Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.9612, Windows Server 2019 / Windows 10 1809 to 10.0.17763.9376, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761, and Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33650, including all Server Core installations. In parallel, update the framework and library components: .NET Framework 4.8 to 4.8.4811.0, 4.8.1 to 4.8.9363.0, 4.6.2/4.7/4.7.1/4.7.2 to 4.7.4150.0, and .NET Framework 3.5 to 2.0.50727.9188 with 3.0.30729.9171 (combined 3.5 and 4.x installs must satisfy both baselines), plus System.Security.Cryptography.Xml to 8.0.5 or later. Developer workstations running Visual Studio 2022 17.14 should move to 17.14.42 and Visual Studio 2026 18.10 to 18.10.4. Where immediate patching is not possible, reduce the attack surface by restricting network reachability to AD FS federation endpoints (adfs/services/trust and metadata endpoints) to trusted client networks, since the flaw requires a network-reachable path plus an attacker-controlled or relayed certificate - the trade-off is that genuinely remote or partner-facing federation clients will break until exceptions are added. Enforce strict TLS and certificate pinning on AD FS endpoints and on .NET services using the affected certificate-validation path, and validate or pin the expected issuer chains so a forged certificate cannot be substituted; this adds operational maintenance whenever legitimate certificates rotate. Monitor AD FS and .NET application logs for anomalous token issuance, unexpected issuer or token-signing certificate acceptance, and unusual relay or MITM traffic patterns; this is detection rather than prevention and generates false positives during certificate rollover. Because no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, prioritize internet-facing AD FS deployments and any .NET applications using System.Security.Cryptography.Xml for the earliest patch windows.

Affected VersionsENISA

Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8.1 4.8.0.0 <4.8.9363.0
System.Security.Cryptography.Xml 10.0.0 <8.0.5
Microsoft .NET Framework 4.6.2/4.7/4.7.1/4.7.2 4.7.0 <4.7.4150.0
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 4.8.0 <4.8.4811.0
Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.14 17.14.0 <17.14.42
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 4.8.0 <2.0.50727.9073 AND 3.0.30729.9070 AND 4.8.4811.0
Microsoft Visual Studio 2026 version 18.10 18.10.0 <18.10.4
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 3.5.0 <2.0.50727.9188 AND 3.0.30729.9171
Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 4.7.0 <2.0.50727.9073 AND 3.0.30729.9070 AND 4.7.4150.0
Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.6.2/4.7/4.7.1/4.7.2 3.0.0.0 <2.0.50727.8987 AND 3.0.30729.8982 AND 4.7.4150.0
Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8.1 4.8.1 <2.0.50727.9188 AND 3.0.30729.9171 AND 4.8.9363.0
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612

Affected Packages

nuget system.security.cryptography.xml fix: 8.0.5
euvd microsoft_net_framework_4_6_2_4_7_4_7_1_4_7_2 fix: 4.7.4150.0
euvd microsoft_net_framework_4_8 fix: 4.8.4811.0
euvd microsoft_net_framework_4_8_1 fix: 4.8.9363.0
euvd microsoft_visual_studio_2022_version_17_14 fix: 17.14.42
euvd microsoft_visual_studio_2026_version_18_10 fix: 18.10.4
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 17 packages in nuget, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-295, Improper Certificate Validation, in the certificate-validation path shared by AD FS and the .NET Framework / System.Security.Cryptography.Xml stack. AD FS relies on X.509 certificate chain building and trust decisions to validate token-signing and token-encryption certificates used in SAML and WS-Federation flows; when that validation logic accepts a certificate it should reject - for example one presented through a relay or man-in-the-middle position, or a forged certificate whose chain is not properly verified - the federation service treats attacker-controlled material as a trusted issuer. The same flaw class reaches .NET applications that perform certificate validation through the affected .NET Framework builds or System.Security.Cryptography.Xml (10.0.0 before 8.0.5), so the exposure is not confined to AD FS itself. Because the CVSS vector is AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N, exploitation is remote and unauthenticated with no user interaction, but the high attack-complexity value reflects the prerequisite of winning a privileged network position (MITM/relay) or constructing a certificate that bypasses validation. There is no scope change and no availability impact: the outcome is spoofing/impersonation of a trusted identity or service rather than code execution or denial of service, which aligns with the 'Authentication Bypass' tag on this record.

Know when Active Directory Federation Services gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.4 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 7.4 HIGH

Network-reachable and unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N), but AC:H because the attacker needs an intercept position or forged certificate; spoofing yields C:H/I:H with no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Red Hat 7.4 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 nvd
HIGH 7.4

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper certificate validation in Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

Technical POC Analysis

The flaw is CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation) in the .NET class KeyInfoX509Data, shipped in the NuGet package System.Security.Cryptography.Xml (verified in the advisory for this CVE).

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity identity spoofing flaw in Microsoft Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS), deployed across Windows Server 2012 R2 through 2025, could allow an attacker to have forged or intercepted certificates accepted as trusted, undermining the integrity of federated authentication across the organization. Successful abuse would let an adversary impersonate trusted identities and access systems and data that rely on AD FS, affecting employees, partners, and any application federated through this platform. Because AD FS is a central trust anchor for single sign-on, leadership should treat this as a priority identity-integrity issue despite the absence of confirmed exploitation and the fact that the attacker requires a privileged network position or a highly crafted certificate.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 53% exploitable
Prevalence
High
AD FS plus underlying .NET Framework/Windows Server - widely deployed enterprise identity stack
Threat Intel
2
1 sources
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
8 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD 🇯🇵JVN NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment NEWS GHSA MSRC Vendor GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +37
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Vendor StatusVendor

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy