Skip to main content

Remote Desktop Gateway EUVDEUVD-2026-99139

| CVE-2026-70033 HIGH
Memory Leak (CWE-401)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-x4f6-7rhv-jqw4
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify internet-facing RD Gateway
  2. Delivery
    Send repeated crafted connection requests
  3. Exploit
    Trigger unreleased memory allocations (CWE-401)
  4. Execution
    Exhaust server memory resources
  5. Impact
    Deny service to legitimate remote users

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Resource cleanup, leak prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the target host to have the Remote Desktop Gateway (RD Gateway) role service installed, running, and reachable over the network - this is not present on default Windows Server installs, so only servers deliberately configured as RD Gateways are affected. Where that role is deployed (frequently internet-facing on TCP 443 to broker remote desktop sessions), the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates no authentication, no credentials, and no user interaction are needed to trigger the memory leak. Limiting factors: the attack affects availability only (no data exposure or code execution), impact is cumulative/resource-exhaustion rather than instantaneous, and exposure is bounded to hosts running the RD Gateway role within the enumerated unpatched Windows Server build ranges.

Impact

Signals converge on a moderate, availability-only risk. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, 7.5 HIGH) describes a remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated denial of service with no confidentiality or integrity impact - consistent with the CWE-401 memory leak described. CISA's SSVC framework aligns and tempers this: Exploitation=none (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable=yes (the unauthenticated network trigger can be scripted at scale), and Technical Impact=partial (service disruption, not full system control). The vulnerability is NOT in CISA KEV and no POC is referenced, so this is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. No EPSS score was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the input. Net: this is a genuine patch-worthy issue for internet-exposed RD Gateway servers because the memory leak can be driven remotely without credentials and is automatable, but it is not an emergency - there is no evidence of active exploitation and the impact is limited to availability (service exhaustion/crash), not data theft or code execution. CONFLICT TO NOTE: the input Tag 'Authentication Bypass' contradicts both the description (a memory-leak DoS) and the CVSS impact triad (C:N/I:N/A:H); treat the tag as erroneous, not as evidence of an auth-bypass capability.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker locates an internet-facing Remote Desktop Gateway (commonly exposed on TCP 443 for remote access) and repeatedly sends connection requests that each cause the service to allocate memory that is never released. Over time the leaked memory exhausts available resources, degrading or crashing the RD Gateway Service and cutting off legitimate remote-access users. The CVSS AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N vector confirms this needs only network reach with no authentication, credentials, or user interaction; no public exploit code is currently identified.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 1.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Unauthenticated network traffic against the Remote Desktop Gateway (RD Gateway) role service on unpatched Windows Server builds causes a memory leak that is never released, progressively exhausting server memory until the gateway can no longer broker remote desktop sessions (CWE-401, CVSS 7.5, availability-only). Only hosts where the RD Gateway role service is installed, running, and reachable over the network are affected - typically internet-facing servers listening on TCP 443 - while servers without that role are not in scope. CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation: none and Technical Impact: partial, with Automatable: yes, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis; a vendor patch is available, so exposure is bounded to the enumerated pre-patch build ranges.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released fixes from Microsoft: update Windows Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26434, Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23470, Windows Server 2016 (and Windows 10 1607) to 10.0.14393.9612, Windows Server 2019 (and Windows 10 1809) to 10.0.17763.9376, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761, and Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33650, per the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70033. Prioritize internet-facing RD Gateway hosts, since the pre-authentication, network-reachable nature of the leak means an exposed gateway can be driven into memory exhaustion without credentials; apply the update in a maintenance window because the RD Gateway service restarts and active RDP sessions brokered through it will drop. If patching cannot be performed immediately, the highest-value control is reducing reachability: place the RD Gateway behind a VPN or an allow-listed source-IP/geo restriction rather than exposing TCP 443 (and UDP 3391) directly to the internet, accepting the trade-off that legitimate mobile and remote users lose direct connectivity and must connect through the restricted path. Because no configuration switch is documented to disable the leak, operational mitigations should be treated as temporary: monitor gateway memory consumption and process growth and restart the RD Gateway service (or the host) before exhaustion to shed leaked memory - this only resets the leak and disconnects active sessions, so it must be repeated for as long as the system is unpatched. Where the role is not required, uninstalling the RD Gateway role service removes the attack surface entirely, and segmenting gateways from backend session hosts limits the blast radius to the gateway itself. There is no vendor-released patch gap to compensate for here; the update is available, and residual risk is confined to hosts that remain unpatched within the listed build ranges.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The underlying issue is CWE-401, Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime - a classic memory leak in which the RD Gateway service allocates buffers or session objects per request and fails to free them after their effective lifetime, so consumption grows monotonically with request volume rather than returning to a baseline. RD Gateway is an optional Windows Server role service that publishes internal RDP endpoints to external clients using RDP over HTTPS (typically TCP 443, with UDP 3391 for the RDP-UDP transport when enabled), which is why the CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H is authenticated-free and network-reachable: an attacker needs no credentials, no user interaction, and no pre-existing session, only the ability to send requests to the gateway endpoint. The result is cumulative resource exhaustion rather than instantaneous corruption - no confidentiality or integrity impact, no code execution, and Scope: Unchanged - so the practical effect is degraded or refused service once memory pressure causes the service or host to become unresponsive. The associated tagging as an authentication bypass is consistent with the PR:N vector in that the leak can be induced before any authentication completes, and because SSVC marks the issue Automatable: yes, a scripted, repeated request pattern is sufficient, which raises the risk of sustained availability loss on internet-facing gateways. Note that the enumerated Windows 10 1607 and 1809 entries reflect shared servicing branches rather than the presence of the RD Gateway server role in client SKUs; the practical risk concentrates on Windows Server hosts explicitly configured with the role.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Remote unauthenticated memory-leak DoS needing no interaction gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N; impact is availability-only (A:H) with no confidentiality or integrity effect.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Missing release of memory after effective lifetime in Remote Desktop Gateway Service allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

An unauthenticated network-based memory exhaustion flaw in the Windows Server Remote Desktop Gateway role allows any internet-reachable server running that role to be gradually drained of memory until it stops brokering remote desktop sessions. Because RD Gateway is typically the internet-facing entry point for remote workforce access, the organizations most exposed are those relying on it for remote connectivity rather than those without the role deployed. Leadership should care because sustained loss of the gateway can disrupt remote work and administrative access for entire user populations, even though no data confidentiality or integrity risk is involved and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. Where patching is delayed, mitigate by limiting network reachability to RD Gateway endpoints (restrict TCP 443 to known source ranges, place behind VPN or WAF where feasible), enable automatic service recovery and scheduled service restarts to release leaked memory, and monitor server memory and RD Gateway session-brokering health for early signs of exhaustion.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.1%
Top 34% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Widely deployed Windows Server remote-access role across enterprise environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 1.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0
CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy