Skip to main content

Kong Gateway EUVDEUVD-2026-97300

| CVE-2026-1907 HIGH
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-10-12 Kong GHSA-gjvg-7rjg-jm9f
7.5
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: Kong
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain valid clustering client certificate and key
  2. Delivery
    Connect to Control Plane clustering port (adjacent network)
  3. Exploit
    Send specially crafted RPC request
  4. Execution
    Inject SQL into clustering database logic
  5. Impact
    Read or modify Control Plane database

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the target to run Kong Gateway in Hybrid Mode (Control Plane / Data Plane split) - standalone/DB-less deployments are not in the described attack path. The attacker must have adjacent network access to the Control Plane's clustering port (normally an internal, non-internet-facing channel between CP and DP nodes) AND possess a valid clustering client certificate and private key used for mTLS authentication. These limiting factors - Hybrid Mode only, internal clustering port reachability, and legitimate mTLS credentials (reflected as PR:L and AT:P) - substantially narrow realistic exploitation to compromised Data Plane nodes or insiders with stolen cluster credentials.

Impact

Kong rates this CVSS 4.0 7.5 (High) with vector AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N and total VC:H/VI:H/VA:H impact, reflecting a SQL injection that yields unauthorized read/write access to the Control Plane's backing database. Several signals temper the raw severity: the attack vector is Adjacent (AV:A), not Network, because exploitation targets the internal clustering port rather than an internet-facing API; PR:L plus AT:P encode the hard requirement for a valid clustering client certificate and key, meaning the attacker must already possess legitimately issued (or stolen) mTLS credentials and reach the CP's clustering channel. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public proof-of-concept was provided in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. Net: this is a genuine high-impact bug for Hybrid Mode operators, but realistic exploitation is gated behind credential possession and adjacent network access, making it a targeted-insider/compromised-data-plane risk rather than a mass-exploitable internet-facing one. Note the vendor supplies a 4.0 vector only; no CVSS 3.1 vector was provided, so cross-version comparison relies on an inferred 3.1 mapping.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who holds a valid Kong clustering client certificate and key (e.g., a compromised Data Plane node or stolen credential) establishes a connection to the Control Plane's clustering port in Hybrid Mode and sends specially crafted RPC requests. The malicious RPC payload is passed unsanitized into the CP's clustering database logic, triggering SQL injection that allows the attacker to read or tamper with the configuration/credential database. No public proof-of-concept was referenced in the available data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 12, 2026

SQL injection in Kong Gateway (Enterprise and Open Source) Hybrid Mode clustering logic allows an attacker who can reach the Control Plane's clustering port and present a valid mTLS client certificate and key to inject arbitrary SQL into the Control Plane's backing database, resulting in unauthorized read and write access to gateway configuration and related data. Successful exploitation yields high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the Control Plane database (CVSS 4.0 base 7.5 / assessed CVSS 3.1 8.8), but the prerequisites are substantial: the deployment must be running the Control Plane/Data Plane split, the attacker must have adjacent network access to the normally internal clustering channel, and must hold legitimate clustering credentials, which effectively limits realistic abuse to compromised Data Plane nodes or insiders with stolen cluster keys. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released fix: refer to the Kong Gateway changelog at https://developer.konghq.com/gateway/changelog/#3-13-0-2 and the advisory GHSA-vwxq-38j7-x48j (https://github.com/Kong/kong/security/advisories/GHSA-vwxq-38j7-x48j) for the exact patched release line applicable to both Kong Gateway OSS and Kong Enterprise Gateway, and upgrade the Control Plane first, then the Data Plane nodes. Because exploitation strictly requires a valid clustering client certificate and private key, treat credential rotation as a primary compensating control if patching cannot be immediate: reissue and redeploy Data Plane clustering certificates from a regenerated CA so any leaked or stolen key pair is invalidated, accepting the operational cost of a coordinated CP/DP certificate rollout and brief DP reconnection. Additionally, restrict the Control Plane clustering port so it is reachable only from known Data Plane node addresses via firewall/security-group rules and segmented internal networks - this directly defeats the AV:A requirement but will break any Data Plane that legitimately connects across network boundaries and must be validated before enforcement. As a last-resort containment measure for deployments that can tolerate it, migrating to DB-less/declarative or standalone configuration removes the Hybrid Mode clustering RPC path altogether, at the cost of losing CP-managed dynamic configuration and centralized Admin API workflows. Finally, review Control Plane database logs for anomalous or malformed queries originating from the clustering listener and, given the confirmed read/write access potential, assume configuration data on the CP database may have been tampered with if any suspicious clustering traffic is found.

Affected VersionsENISA

Kong Enterprise Gateway 3.11.0.0 <3.11.0.8
Kong Enterprise Gateway 3.12.0.0 <3.12.0.4
Kong Gateway 0 <3.9.4
Kong Enterprise Gateway 3.13.0.0 <3.13.0.2
Kong Enterprise Gateway 3.10.0.0 <3.10.0.9

Affected Packages

euvd kong_enterprise_gateway fix: 3.10.0.9, 3.11.0.8, 3.12.0.4, 3.13.0.2
euvd kong_gateway fix: 3.9.4

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a classic CWE-89 SQL injection, but it sits in an unusual and highly privileged component: Kong Gateway's Hybrid Mode Control Plane (CP). In Hybrid Mode, Data Plane (DP) nodes do not talk to the database directly; instead they maintain a persistent mTLS-authenticated connection to the CP's clustering endpoint and exchange configuration/telemetry over an RPC protocol. CVE-2026-1907 arises because the CP's handling of incoming clustering RPC requests does not correctly neutralize attacker-controlled input before it is incorporated into SQL statements executed against the CP's database, allowing a crafted RPC payload to alter query semantics. Because the CP is the single node authorized to read and write gateway configuration state, injected queries inherit that node's database privileges - hence the total (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) impact assessed in both the vendor's CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N) and the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment (AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). The AV:A, PR:L, and AT:P components of the vector are the operative constraints: the clustering port is designed to live on an internal network segment, and the RPC channel is mutually authenticated, so the attacker must already hold a trusted clustering certificate and private key. CPE data lists both kong:kong_gateway and kong:kong_enterprise_gateway with wildcarded version ranges, so the affected version set is not enumerable from CPE alone and must be taken from the vendor changelog and advisory.

Know when Kong Gateway gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Kong) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.0 HIGH

AV:A because the clustering port is an internal adjacent channel, not the public API; PR:L for the required valid client certificate; full C/I/A impact from direct SQL access to the CP database.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Kong).

CVSS VectorVendor: Kong

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 12, 2026 - 10:01 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 12, 2026 - 08:38 cve.org
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionCVE.org

A SQL Injection (SQLi) affects the Kong Gateway (Enterprise and Open Source) clustering communication logic when operating in Hybrid Mode. The issue can be triggered by sending specially crafted RPC requests to the Control Plane (CP), leading to potential unauthorized database access. Leveraging the issue requires network access to the Control Plane’s clustering port and a valid client certificate and key.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Kong Gateway (Enterprise and Open Source) deployments running in Hybrid Mode carry a high-severity SQL injection flaw (CVE-2026-1907) in the Control Plane clustering logic, where a tampered Data Plane node or an insider holding valid cluster certificates could read and alter gateway configuration data. Because the Control Plane governs routing, authentication, and policy for all connected Data Planes, a successful compromise could disrupt API traffic and enable persistent, hard-to-detect configuration tampering across the organization's API estate. Leadership should note that no vendor patch is currently available, and that exposure is limited to organizations that operate the Control Plane/Data Plane split with the clustering port reachable beyond strictly trusted peers.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict the Control Plane clustering port to a strict allowlist of Data Plane nodes using network segmentation or firewall rules; treat clustering credentials as high-value secrets and rotate mTLS certificates and keys plus Control Plane database credentials; apply least-privilege to the Control Plane database service account and enable database audit logging; monitor for anomalous SQL or unauthorized gateway configuration changes; investigate any Data Plane node suspected of compromise and revoke its clustering certificate immediately; consider disabling Hybrid Mode where operationally feasible.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Kong is a widely deployed open-source and enterprise API gateway
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Medium

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy