Skip to main content

FunnyWolf Viper EUVDEUVD-2026-96928

| CVE-2026-108584 MEDIUM
Use of Hard-coded Credentials (CWE-798)
2026-10-11 VulDB GHSA-9c5c-2g3c-vxv8
5.5
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach Viper instance or Docker image
  2. Exploit
    Access exposed /root/viper/.git/config
  3. Execution
    Extract hard-coded credentials
  4. Impact
    Reuse secrets against linked services

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Credential externalization
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Persistence, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires access to the /root/viper/.git/config file in a FunnyWolf Viper deployment (versions up to 3.1.11), where git credentials are hard-coded/embedded - per the advisory, left inside the distributed Docker image. The realistic prerequisite is obtaining the affected Docker image or reaching an environment/web path that exposes the .git directory. Limiting factors: impact is confined to disclosure of whatever credentials are stored in that git config (CVSS confidentiality LOW only, no integrity/availability impact), the product is a niche security tool with small deployment, and the stated AV:N remote vector is unconfirmed against the local file path - if the .git directory is not web-exposed, practical exploitation reduces to attackers who can already pull or access the image.

Impact

This is a low-to-moderate priority issue despite its remote attack vector. The input CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N) describes an unauthenticated, network-reachable flaw with only LOW confidentiality impact and no integrity or availability impact, consistent with CWE-798 (hard-coded credentials) leaking via an exposed /root/viper/.git/config file - the referenced advisory frames this as a Docker image git-credential leak. Exploitation maturity is E:P (proof-of-concept) and a public exploit exists, but there is NO EPSS score provided in the input and NO CISA KEV listing, so there is no evidence of widespread or automated exploitation - this points to opportunistic/targeted interest rather than mass exploitation. A key conflict to verify: the vector claims AV:N (remote/network) yet the affected element is a local filesystem path (/root/viper/.git/config), which typically implies either local image/container access or a web-exposed .git directory; the VulDB-sourced description is vague on the exact exposure mechanism - verify with the GitHub advisory and vendor. Net: real but bounded risk, driven by credential disclosure rather than direct code execution.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker obtains or reaches a Viper deployment (e.g., pulls the public Docker image or accesses an environment where the .git/config is reachable) and reads /root/viper/.git/config, which contains hard-coded/embedded credentials. A public proof-of-concept exploit has been released, lowering the skill needed to locate and extract the leaked secrets, which could then be reused against the associated git repository or related services.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 11, 2026

Hard-coded git credentials embedded in the distributed Docker image of FunnyWolf Viper up to and including version 3.1.11 are recoverable from the file /root/viper/.git/config, granting whoever obtains the image - or reaches a deployment that exposes the .git directory - access to the secrets stored there. Publicly available exploit code exists, published alongside a GitHub advisory and a VulDB submission, so the technique is trivially reproducible; there is no CISA KEV entry, so confirmed active exploitation in the wild is not established. With CVSS 4.0 scoring 5.5 (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) but only LOW confidentiality impact and no integrity or availability effect, this is best treated as a low-to-moderate credential-disclosure issue rather than a pre-authentication remote compromise.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch or fixed version is identified in the available data, so remediation is operational and must be performed by anyone running an affected image. Treat the credential in /root/viper/.git/config as compromised first: revoke and rotate the corresponding git host token or password (and any other secret that file exposes) before anything else, since removing the file after the image has been pulled or mirrored does not undo the disclosure. Then rebuild images without version-control metadata - add .git to .dockerignore, avoid cloning the repository into the image layer in the first place, and use multi-stage builds or a shallow tarball copy so no .git directory exists at /root/viper/; the trade-off is that in-image git metadata, sometimes used for version stamping, must be replaced by an explicit build argument or environment variable. Supply git credentials at build time through BuildKit secrets or a credential helper instead of embedding them in remote URLs, since secrets passed as ARG/ENV land in image history just as visibly. Where images cannot be rebuilt immediately, block access to /.git/ paths at the reverse proxy (nginx/Apache deny rules) and restrict registry and image pull permissions to trusted operators - effective against the network-vector scenario but useless against an attacker who can already pull the image, which the independent assessment calls the realistic prerequisite. Finally, audit existing deployments with image scanners or a simple docker run --rm -it <image> ls /root/viper/.git check to determine which hosts are actually affected, and monitor the git host for use of the leaked token. Cross-reference https://vuldb.com/vuln/416236 and the GitHub advisory for any later vendor fix before closing out.

Affected VersionsENISA

Viper 3.1.9
Viper 3.1.7
Viper 3.1.0
Viper 3.1.3
Viper 3.1.5
Viper 3.1.8
Viper 3.1.1
Viper 3.1.2
Viper 3.1.6
Viper 3.1.11
Viper 3.1.4
Viper 3.1.10

Affected Packages

euvd viper no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is an instance of CWE-798 (Use of Hard-coded Credentials). Git stores per-repository configuration in .git/config, and that file commonly retains a remote URL of the form https://user:token@host/org/repo.git or a credential helper entry when the repository was cloned or pushed to inside the build environment. In Viper's case, the .git directory was shipped inside the Docker image under /root/viper/, meaning the credential is baked into an immutable image layer that anyone pulling or inspecting the image can read - and that may additionally be readable over HTTP if the application's web root or a reverse-proxy misconfiguration exposes /.git/ paths. The underlying technology chain is therefore Docker image build hygiene plus git remote configuration, not a memory-safety or injection defect: no parsing bug, no privilege boundary crossing, just an artifact that should never have been committed to a release image. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:funnywolf:viper:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* enumerates all Viper releases, and the advisory scope confirms versions up to 3.1.11 are affected. Note the discrepancy between the supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L, no scope change) and the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment (also PR:N, C:L only): both agree the impact is limited to information disclosure of whatever credential material sits in that file, and both assume the remote vector is realizable, which the assessment flags as unconfirmed if the .git directory is not actually network-reachable.

Know when Viper gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 5.3 MEDIUM

Unauthenticated read of credentials from an exposed git config yields low confidentiality disclosure only; no integrity or availability impact, PR:N since no auth is needed to fetch the file.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
Oct 11, 2026 - 13:22 NVD
6.9 (MEDIUM) 5.5 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Oct 11, 2026 - 13:00 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.5

DescriptionCVE.org

A security flaw has been discovered in FunnyWolf Viper up to 3.1.11. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /root/viper/.git/config. Performing a manipulation results in hard-coded credentials. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 72% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source red-team/intranet penetration tool, tiny production footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

48
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy