Skip to main content

Anesta WordPress Theme EUVDEUVD-2026-96521

| CVE-2026-66567 CRITICAL
Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502)
2026-10-10 Patchstack GHSA-xm2p-xf7g-7qxp
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach WordPress site over network
  2. Delivery
    Submit crafted serialized PHP object
  3. Exploit
    Trigger unsafe unserialize() in theme
  4. Execution
    Invoke available POP gadget chain
  5. Impact
    Achieve code execution or data compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Safe deserialization, type allowlists
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the target site to run the Anesta WordPress theme at version 1.5.3 or earlier and to expose the vulnerable input that reaches an unsafe unserialize() call; no authentication or user interaction is needed (PR:N/UI:N). The practical limiting factor for PHP Object Injection is the presence of a usable POP gadget chain in the theme, WordPress core, or another active plugin - without a reachable gadget chain, the injection may not yield code execution or meaningful impact despite the 9.8 rating. The specific vulnerable parameter/endpoint is not named in the provided data and should be confirmed from the Patchstack advisory.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 9.8) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact - on paper a top-priority issue. The underlying weakness (CWE-502, PHP Object Injection) supports that rating ONLY when an exploitable POP gadget chain is reachable in the theme or a loaded WordPress plugin/core; absent a usable gadget chain, real-world impact of object injection is frequently lower than the 9.8 implies, so the CVSS likely represents a worst-case ceiling rather than a guaranteed outcome. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the provided data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; the only source is a single Patchstack advisory. The signals are therefore consistent (high CVSS matched by an unauthenticated network CWE-502) but thin on corroboration - no independent exploitation-probability or exploitation-status data accompanies the severity rating, so the priority rests on severity and ease of exploitation rather than on confirmed in-the-wild activity.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote, unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted request to a WordPress site running the Anesta theme (<= 1.5.3) containing a serialized PHP object in an input that the theme passes to unserialize(). If a suitable POP gadget chain is present in the theme, WordPress core, or another active plugin, the injected object triggers that chain on deserialization, potentially leading to code execution, file operations, or data disclosure. No public POC is identified in the provided data.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 10, 2026

Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in the Anesta WordPress theme (versions up to and including 1.5.3) lets a remote attacker supply a crafted serialized payload that is passed to an unsafe unserialize() call in the theme's code. Because exploitation needs no credentials and no user interaction (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 9.8), the realistic impact hinges on whether the site exposes a usable POP gadget chain in the theme, WordPress core, or another active plugin - if such a chain exists, the injected object can trigger file operations, SQL, or code execution with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, the issue is not listed in CISA KEV, and no EPSS score was included in the available intelligence; the vulnerable endpoint/parameter is not named in the supplied data and should be confirmed from the Patchstack advisory.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data, so the first action is to consult the Patchstack advisory (https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/theme/anesta/vulnerability/wordpress-anesta-theme-1-5-3-php-object-injection-vulnerability) for a fixed Anesta release and upgrade to it as soon as one is published. Until then, the highest-confidence mitigation is to deactivate and remove the Anesta theme if it is not in active use - a disabled theme is never loaded and the vulnerable unserialize() path is unreachable, with the trade-off that any site design or customizations built on it must be replaced. If the theme must remain active, deploy virtual patching: a WAF rule or Patchstack-style managed rule that blocks serialized-object payloads (strings matching O:<length>:"Classname") on the theme's request parameters, accepting the risk of false positives on legitimate form submissions that carry serialized data. Restrict access to the specific vulnerable endpoint/parameter once identified in the advisory, for example by requiring authentication or IP allowlisting at the reverse proxy, and reduce gadget availability by auditing and removing unused plugins - particularly ones that expose file-write, file-delete, or eval-capable magic methods - since a PHP object injection without a POP chain cannot escalate to full impact. Monitor theme files and WordPress logs for unexpected deserialization errors or object-injection payload fragments, and re-check the advisory regularly because patch status for this theme is not confirmed by the supplied data.

Affected VersionsENISA

Anesta n/a ≤1.5.3

Affected Packages

euvd anesta no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data) in a PHP-based WordPress theme. PHP's unserialize() reconstructs arbitrary objects from attacker-controlled strings; when those strings reach magic methods such as __wakeup(), __destruct(), or __toString() during object destruction or property access, an attacker can steer execution through a Property-Oriented Programming (POP) gadget chain assembled from classes already loaded by the theme, WordPress core, or co-installed plugins. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:ancorathemes:anesta:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the affected package as the Anesta theme published by Ancorathemes, with the wildcard indicating all versions in the reported range up to 1.5.3. Unlike a memory-corruption bug, PHP object injection is payload-dependent: the injection point itself is only the entry condition, and meaningful impact (file deletion, arbitrary file write, SQL injection, or RCE) requires a gadget chain whose terminal method performs a dangerous operation. This dependence on ambient gadget availability is why a 9.8 base score can overstate real-world exploitability on sites with a minimal plugin set. The vulnerability was reported through Patchstack, whose advisory (linked in the references) is the authoritative source for the specific vulnerable parameter and endpoint.

Know when PHP gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

Unauthenticated, network-reachable, low-complexity deserialization (PR:N/AV:N/AC:L); high C/I/A reflects the worst-case object-injection outcome assuming a reachable gadget chain.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in Anesta <= 1.5.3 versions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Every website running the Anesta WordPress theme at version 1.5.3 or earlier is exposed to an unauthenticated attacker who can potentially seize control of the site - its content, its data, and the server environment it runs on - without needing any credentials or user action. Because no vendor patch has been released, there is no straightforward fix, and because WordPress themes are internet-facing by design, affected sites remain continuously reachable until the theme is removed or otherwise neutralized. Leadership should care because a compromised marketing or e-commerce site can be repurposed to host malware, redirect customers, or serve as an entry point into shared hosting and connected business systems, creating brand, regulatory, and downstream operational exposure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: deactivate or uninstall the Anesta theme (versions up to and including 1.5.3) on all internet-facing sites; if the theme must remain active, deploy virtual patching at the WAF/CDN to block serialized-object payloads to the theme's endpoints and restrict or IP-allow-list access to those paths; retrieve the Patchstack advisory to confirm the affected endpoint and parameter, then monitor and alert on requests to it; reduce the attack surface by removing unused plugins and keeping WordPress core current, since exploitation depends on the availability of a usable POP gadget chain; and perform a compromise assessment for web shells, rogue administrator accounts, modified core files, and anomalous outbound traffic on any site that has already been exposed.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 76% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche commercial WordPress theme from a single vendor (AncoraThemes)
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

49
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Insecure deserialization occurs when an application converts serialized data (a stream of bytes representing an object's state) back into a living object without proper validation.

More in PHP

View all
CVE-2019-11043 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 28

In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it

CVE-2012-1823 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 11

sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c in PHP before 5.3.12 and 5.4.x before 5.4.2, when configured as a CGI script (aka php-cgi), does not

CVE-2016-1555 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 21

(1) boardData102.php, (2) boardData103.php, (3) boardDataJP.php, (4) boardDataNA.php, and (5) boardDataWW.php in Netgear

CVE-2018-11138 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 31

The '/common/download_agent_installer.php' script in the Quest KACE System Management Appliance 8.0.318 is accessible by

CVE-2024-11680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 26

ProjectSend versions prior to r1720 are affected by an improper authentication vulnerability. Rated critical severity (C

CVE-2025-49113 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 02

Roundcube Webmail contains a critical PHP object deserialization vulnerability (CVE-2025-49113, CVSS 9.9) that allows au

CVE-2017-9841 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 27

Util/PHP/eval-stdin.php in PHPUnit before 4.8.28 and 5.x before 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP c

CVE-2025-0108 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 12

Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS management web interface contains an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers

CVE-2021-25298 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2021-25296 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2013-4983 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 10

The get_referers function in /opt/ws/bin/sblistpack in Sophos Web Appliance before 3.7.9.1 and 3.8 before 3.8.1.1 allows

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy