Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malicious URL with XSS payload
-
DeliveryDeliver link to site admin via phishing
-
ExploitVictim clicks, payload reflected unsanitized
-
ExecutionScript executes in victim browser session
-
ImpactHijack session or perform actions as victim
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an attacker to deliver a crafted link reflecting unsanitized input through the Ambed WordPress theme (version 1.0.0 or earlier) and to convince a victim - typically a logged-in administrator or site visitor - to click it (UI:R in the CVSS vector). No authentication is needed to craft or send the payload (PR:N), but the attack cannot succeed without that victim interaction, and it is limited to sites actually running the Ambed theme at <=1.0.0; sites on a patched version or a different theme are not affected. The reflected (non-persistent) nature means the payload must be freshly delivered to each victim rather than stored on the server. |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity reflected XSS requiring no privileges but mandating user interaction (UI:R), with a changed scope (S:C) reflecting that injected script executes in the victim's browser context rather than the vulnerable component itself. Impact is uniformly Low across C/I/A, consistent with reflected XSS rather than a server-side code-execution flaw, which is why the score lands at 7.1 (High) rather than Critical. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided in the intelligence, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - there is no signal of active or probable near-term exploitation. The practical bar is meaningful: an attacker cannot act autonomously but must lure an authenticated administrator or visitor into clicking a crafted link, so despite the 'unauthenticated' injection vector the attack is social-engineering-dependent. Net assessment: a legitimate High-severity web flaw worth patching, but its real-world risk is moderated by the UI:R requirement, the low deployment footprint of this specific theme, and the absence of any exploitation evidence - treat as routine prioritization, not an emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a URL for a vulnerable Ambed theme endpoint that reflects attacker-controlled input into the page without sanitization, then delivers it via phishing email or a malicious link to a site administrator or visitor. When the victim clicks the link, the injected JavaScript executes in their browser session in the context of the WordPress site, enabling session/cookie theft or actions on their behalf. No public exploit code was identified, and successful exploitation depends on the victim opening the attacker's link (UI:R). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 10, 2026
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Ambed WordPress theme (all versions up to and including 1.0.0) allows unauthenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary script in a victim's browser by delivering a crafted link that reflects unsanitized input through the theme. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, score 7.1) confirms the attack is network-reachable, low complexity, and requires no privileges to send, but it cannot succeed without convincing a targeted user - typically a logged-in administrator or a site visitor - to click the crafted URL. Only sites actively running the Ambed theme at 1.0.0 or earlier are exposed, there is no confirmed actively exploited status (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and because the vector is reflected rather than stored, the payload must be re-delivered for each victim.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch or fixed version is identified in the available data for CVE-2026-62064 - the sole reference is the Patchstack disclosure record (https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/theme/ambed/vulnerability/wordpress-ambed-theme-1-0-0-reflected-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability), not a vendor release note, so remediation must currently rely on compensating controls. The most effective action is to stop running the vulnerable theme entirely: deactivate and uninstall Ambed 1.0.0 and migrate to any actively maintained WordPress theme, accepting the trade-off that site layout, templates and any theme-specific customizations or widgets must be rebuilt. If Ambed cannot be removed immediately, restrict exposure by auditing and stripping the theme's user-facing input handling where feasible, and place a WAF or reverse proxy rule in front of the site that rejects or escapes reflected script payloads (common XSS metacharacters, event handlers, and javascript: URIs) on requests to Ambed theme endpoints; be aware that signature-based WAF filtering is bypassable via encoding and obfuscation and is a stopgap, not a fix. Administrators should also inventory all WordPress sites for the presence of the bracketweb/ambed theme, monitor the Patchstack entry and any vendor channel for a patched release before assuming the issue is resolved, and treat the UI:R requirement as a social-engineering risk vector by training privileged users not to follow unsolicited links carrying unexpected query parameters.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation, i.e. cross-site scripting) in the Ambed WordPress theme, distributed by vendor bracketweb and identified in the affected CPE as cpe:2.3:a:bracketweb:ambed:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, which covers the whole theme version line including the reported 1.0.0 release. This is specifically a reflected (non-persistent) XSS: user-supplied input, most plausibly a request parameter handled by the theme's front-end templates, is echoed back into the generated HTML response without adequate HTML/attribute/JavaScript context encoding, so the browser of the person who loads the crafted URL parses attacker-controlled markup as script. The CVSS vector's S:C (changed scope) reflects that the injected script executes in the victim's browser/site origin rather than inside the vulnerable PHP component, which is why the vector includes C:L/I:L/A:L - limited but real confidentiality, integrity and availability impact on the user's session and on the page. The WordPress theme attack surface matters here: themes are public-facing by definition, so no authentication is needed to reach the vulnerable code path (PR:N), and the PR:N/UI:R combination means the only barrier is social engineering of a click. Themes frequently lag behind core/plugin patch cadence and are often bundled or unmaintained, which extends the exposure window for installations pinned at 1.0.0.
Know when Ambed gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Reflected XSS is remotely triggerable with no privileges (AV:N/PR:N) but needs victim click (UI:R); script runs in browser so scope changes (S:C) with Low C/I/A.
Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).
CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack
DescriptionCVE.org
Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Ambed <= 1.0.0 versions.
Executive ViewAI
Organizations running the Ambed WordPress theme (versions 1.0.0 and earlier) on public-facing websites face a high-severity reflected cross-site scripting risk that could allow attackers to hijack administrator sessions or deface sites. The vulnerability is unauthenticated but requires a victim to click a crafted link; no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Leadership should prioritize identifying exposed sites and implementing interim mitigations.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include deactivating or removing the Ambed theme, deploying web application firewall rules to filter reflected cross-site scripting attempts, enforcing a strict Content Security Policy, restricting administrative access to trusted IP addresses, and monitoring for suspicious authentication activity.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
EUVD-2026-96479
GHSA-v673-h6mc-wr47
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB