Skip to main content

WP User Frontend EUVDEUVD-2026-96225

| CVE-2026-96574 MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-10 Wordfence GHSA-49jc-5c97-fh4p
6.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Register subscriber-level account
  2. Delivery
    Submit crafted wpuf_payment_method payload
  3. Exploit
    Bypass sanitize_text_field via gateway keyword
  4. Execution
    Store malicious script in transaction
  5. Persist
    Admin opens transactions list
  6. Impact
    Script executes in admin session

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated account with subscriber-level privileges or higher on a site running WP User Frontend ≤4.3.12 with its payment/transaction submission flow in use. The specific prerequisite is that the attacker control the 'wpuf_payment_method' parameter and append a valid gateway keyword (e.g. 'bank') to the HTML payload so that sanitize_text_field() returns only the keyword for routing while the full raw malicious value is persisted. Execution is deferred and depends on a victim - typically an administrator - later viewing the page (the admin transactions list) where the stored value is rendered unescaped. Limiting factors: the account requirement rules out fully unauthenticated attack, and impact is only realized when a privileged user opens the affected page.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity, authenticated Stored XSS (CWE-79) in the WP User Frontend plugin, confirmed and reported by Wordfence with a CVSS 3.1 base of 6.4 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). The signals are consistent with a real but second-tier priority rather than an emergency: the network attack vector and low complexity lower the bar, but PR:L means the attacker must already hold at least a subscriber account, which caps mass unauthenticated weaponization. No EPSS score was supplied and the vulnerability is NOT in CISA KEV, and no public exploit code is referenced - so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The scope-changed (S:C) impact and low C/I (confidentiality and integrity) reflect classic stored-XSS consequences: the injected script executes in another user's (typically an administrator viewing the transactions list) browser session, enabling session/account compromise that can escalate beyond the attacker's own low privileges. Net assessment: credible and worth patching promptly on affected sites, but not a drop-everything issue absent evidence of active exploitation. Note the technique relies on a sanitization bypass of sanitize_text_field(), which lowers the practical barrier for a motivated low-privileged user.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker registers or already holds a subscriber-level account on a WordPress site running WP User Frontend ≤4.3.12 and submits a payment/transaction where the 'wpuf_payment_method' value is a malicious HTML/script payload suffixed with a valid gateway keyword like 'bank'. The sanitizer returns only 'bank' for routing while storing the full raw payload, which is later rendered unescaped in the admin transactions list; when an administrator opens that page the script executes in their authenticated session. No public exploit code is referenced, but the described bypass is concrete and reproducible.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 10, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in the WP User Frontend WordPress plugin (all versions up to and including 4.3.12) allows any authenticated user with subscriber-level access or higher to persist arbitrary JavaScript that executes when a privileged user - typically an administrator - opens the affected transactions page. The root cause is insufficient sanitization and output escaping of the 'wpuf_payment_method' parameter: attackers bypass sanitize_text_field() by appending a valid gateway keyword such as 'bank' to the HTML payload, so the filter returns only the keyword for gateway routing while the full raw malicious value is stored and later rendered unescaped in the admin transactions list. Wordfence reported the issue with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.4 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N); no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and there is no confirmed evidence of active exploitation (no CISA KEV listing).

RemediationAI

Upgrade WP User Frontend beyond version 4.3.12; the plugin Trac changeset https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3722911/wp-user-frontend/trunk/includes/Admin/List_Table_Transactions.php modifies the admin transactions list rendering on trunk, so this is an upstream fix whose corresponding released patched version is not independently confirmed - verify the installed version against the vendor advisory at https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/12f1cbc1-42c1-4ace-88ec-8aa981367c85?source=cve before treating a given release as fixed. If upgrading immediately is not possible, compensating controls include temporarily disabling the plugin's payment/transaction submission flow so no untrusted user can supply 'wpuf_payment_method' (trade-off: front-end paid submissions stop working), restricting the ability to submit payments to trusted roles only or disabling open subscriber registration (trade-off: legitimate members lose self-service access), and auditing the wpuf transactions database records and admin transactions screen for injected script content, removing any suspicious rows. Note that because execution is deferred until a privileged user opens the affected admin page, clearing stored payloads and forcing administrator session re-authentication after cleanup reduces residual risk; generic WAF rules are of limited value here since the payload is stored server-side and delivered from the site itself.

Affected VersionsENISA

User Frontend – Membership, User Registration, User Profile, User Directory & Content Restriction with Frontend Post Submission 0 ≤4.3.12

Affected Packages

euvd user_frontend_membership_user_registration_user_profile_user_directory_content_restriction_with_frontend_post_submission no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

WP User Frontend is a wedevs plugin for WordPress providing membership, front-end post submission, user registration, profile and directory features, with a built-in payment/transaction flow that supports gateways such as Bank. The vulnerability is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation), specifically the stored variant, arising from a routing-versus-storage mismatch: the 'wpuf_payment_method' value passes through sanitize_text_field() in wpuf-functions.php (around line 2498) and includes/Frontend/Payment.php (around lines 503 and 566) to determine which gateway class handles the submission, while the original raw value is persisted and subsequently printed without escaping in the admin transactions table (includes/Admin/List_Table_Transactions.php, around line 204) and handled near Lib/Gateway/Bank.php line 102. Because sanitize_text_field() strips tags but the attacker appends a legitimate gateway keyword like 'bank', the sanitized result still looks valid for routing decisions while the unsanitized payload is retained in the database and later emitted in an administrative HTML context. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:wedevs:user_frontend_-_membership,_user_registration,_user_profile,_user_directory_&_content_restriction_with_frontend_post_submission confirms the wedevs plugin as the affected product. The CVSS scope change (S:C) and low confidentiality/integrity impact reflect that injected script executes in the higher-privileged administrator session viewing the transactions page.

Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Wordfence) PRIMARY 6.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.4 MEDIUM

Network-reachable submission by a low-privileged authenticated user (PR:L), straightforward documented bypass (AC:L), stored payload executing in a different user's context (S:C) with limited C/I and no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The User Frontend - Membership, User Registration, User Profile, User Directory & Content Restriction with Frontend Post Submission plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'wpuf_payment_method' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.12 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The bypass technique involves appending a valid gateway keyword such as 'bank' to the HTML payload, causing sanitize_text_field() to yield only the keyword for routing purposes while the full malicious raw value is stored and later rendered unescaped.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 89% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
common WordPress membership/frontend plugin, tens of thousands of installs, not universal
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2024-1698 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 27

SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a

CVE-2023-6875 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 11

The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i

CVE-2024-1512 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 17

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base

CVE-2024-4295 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 05

The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in

CVE-2024-50498 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 28

Remote code execution in the WP Query Console WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.0) by Ajit Bohra allows u

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy