Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessSubmit benign comment to get email approved
-
DeliverySubmit comment with crafted script in 'comment' field
-
ExploitPayload auto-approved and stored unsanitized
-
ExecutionVisitor loads injected page
-
ImpactScript executes in visitor browser session
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that site comments be enabled and that the attacker first have one comment approved from their email address; on default WordPress installations only the first comment per email is held for moderation, after which subsequent comments auto-approve and the unsanitized 'comment' value is stored and output to visitors. The limiting factors are this initial moderation gate (the basis for AC:H) and the dependence on standard WordPress comment auto-approval behavior - sites that require manual approval of all comments, disable comments, or use additional moderation would substantially blunt exploitation. No authentication is required (PR:N), and the payload fires on ordinary page views without special attacker-controlled user interaction. |
| Impact | This is a stored XSS (CWE-79) in the CleanTalk Anti-Spam WordPress plugin (≤6.88), assessed by Wordfence at CVSS 5.4 (Medium) with vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N. The signals are internally consistent and point to a real but moderate-priority issue rather than a critical one. On the exploitability side: network vector (AV:N) and no privileges (PR:N) mean unauthenticated remote attackers can reach it, which raises concern; however, AC:H is justified because exploitation is gated on a precondition - the attacker's comment must first be approved, and on default WordPress only the first comment from a given email is moderated before subsequent ones auto-approve. The scope change (S:C) plus low confidentiality/integrity impact (C:L/I:L, A:N) correctly captures that the payload executes in visitors' browser context, not on the server. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. Net: a genuine, broadly-reachable unauthenticated stored-XSS worth patching promptly on affected sites, but the Medium severity, moderation precondition, and absence of any exploitation/POC signal argue against emergency prioritization over higher-CVSS or KEV-listed items. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker submits a blog/post comment containing a malicious script in the 'comment' field; after an initial comment from their email is approved, default WordPress auto-approves their subsequent comments, so the XSS payload is stored and rendered to every visitor who views that page. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and the attack is throttled by the one-time moderation step (reflected in AC:H). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 10, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in the CleanTalk Anti-Spam WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 6.88) allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts into comment fields, which then execute for any visitor viewing the affected page. Exploitation requires the attacker to first get one comment approved from their email address; default WordPress auto-approval then allows subsequent comments to store the payload without moderation. No public exploit code or active exploitation is identified at time of analysis, and the issue is rated CVSS 5.4 Medium (CWE-79).
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patched version is specified in the provided data; consult the Wordfence advisory for update guidance. As an immediate workaround, disable automatic comment approval by requiring manual moderation of all comments (reduces risk but increases administrative overhead) or disable comments entirely on affected pages (eliminates the vector but prevents user engagement). Additionally, a web application firewall or security plugin that filters XSS payloads in comment fields can provide a temporary layer of defense, though such measures may cause false positives. Upgrade to a version newer than 6.88 when a patched release becomes available, and monitor the vendor's plugin page for updates.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a stored cross-site scripting (CWE-79) vulnerability in the CleanTalk Anti-Spam plugin's handling of the WordPress 'comment' parameter. Insufficient input sanitization and output escaping in the plugin's ContactsEncoder classes (as referenced in plugin version 6.88, files lib/Cleantalk/Common/ContactsEncoder/ContactsEncoder.php and lib/Cleantalk/ApbctWP/ContactsEncoder/ContactsEncoder.php) allow script payloads to be saved and later rendered without encoding. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:cleantalk:anti-spam_by_cleantalk_-_spam_protection_without_captcha:* confirms all versions up to 6.88 are affected. Exploitation is constrained by WordPress comment moderation: the attacker must get one comment approved from their email address, after which default WordPress behavior auto-approves subsequent comments from the same email, enabling the stored payload to reach site visitors. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N reflects the network attack vector, high complexity due to the moderation gate, no required privileges or user interaction, and low confidentiality/integrity impact with scope change.
Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Unauthenticated remote input (AV:N/PR:N), but AC:H because a prior comment must be approved; stored XSS executes in victim browsers (S:C) with limited C/I impact and no availability loss.
Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).
CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence
DescriptionCVE.org
The Anti-Spam by CleanTalk - Spam Protection Without CAPTCHA plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'comment' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 6.88 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability is exploitable once a comment from the attacker's email address has been approved; on default WordPress installations, only the first comment from a given email address is held for moderation, meaning subsequent comments auto-approve and immediately expose the payload to site visitors.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
More in Wordpress Plugin
View allThe Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil
Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote
The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner
The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut
The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via
The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based
SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a
The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base
The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in
Remote code execution in the WP Query Console WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.0) by Ajit Bohra allows u
EUVD-2026-96064
GHSA-xx63-6r6g-3hcj
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB