Skip to main content

Search in Place EUVDEUVD-2026-95604

| CVE-2026-95598 HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-09 Patchstack GHSA-hxjm-crxw-qfjw
7.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Craft malicious search URL with XSS payload
  2. Delivery
    Deliver link via phishing to site user
  3. Exploit
    Victim clicks and payload reflects in response
  4. Execution
    Script executes in victim browser context
  5. Impact
    Steal session or perform actions as user

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to trick a user of the WordPress site into interacting with a crafted link or page (CVSS UI:R) that targets the Search in Place plugin's search request handling, where attacker-supplied input is reflected into the generated web page without proper neutralization. No attacker authentication is required (PR:N), and the attack is deliverable remotely (AV:N), but the dependency on victim interaction is the key limiting factor - the payload only fires when a targeted user (ideally a logged-in administrator, to maximize impact) follows the malicious request. The site must be running Search in Place version 1.5.5 or earlier with the vulnerable search functionality reachable.

Impact

This is a reflected cross-site scripting (CWE-79) flaw in the codepeople 'Search in Place' WordPress plugin, versions up to and including 1.5.5, reported by Patchstack. The supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L) scores 7.1 (High), with the elevated score driven largely by the scope change (S:C), which is standard Patchstack methodology for XSS that executes in the victim's browser context. The signals point to a modest real-world priority rather than an urgent one: there is no CISA KEV listing (no confirmed active exploitation), no EPSS score was provided (exploitation probability unknown), and no public exploit code is referenced - only the Patchstack database advisory. Critically, exploitation is gated by UI:R (user interaction required): an attacker cannot exploit this autonomously but must lure a victim into clicking a crafted link or visiting a malicious page, which substantially lowers the realistic attack likelihood compared to a zero-interaction network flaw. The PR:N value confirms no authentication is needed by the attacker, but reflected XSS inherently depends on delivering a payload to a target user. Net assessment: a legitimate issue worth patching on a normal cadence, not an emergency - the 7.1 High rating overstates practical urgency given the required user interaction, the typically limited (low) impact of reflected XSS, and the absence of any exploitation or POC signal.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a URL pointing to the vulnerable Search in Place search endpoint with a malicious script embedded in a reflected parameter, then delivers it to a victim via phishing email, a malicious link, or a hostile web page. When the victim (potentially an authenticated site administrator) clicks the link, the script executes in their browser in the context of the WordPress site, enabling session/cookie theft, actions on the victim's behalf, or redirection. No public exploit code is referenced, but reflected XSS payloads of this kind are trivial to construct.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 09, 2026

Reflected cross-site scripting in the codepeople 'Search in Place' WordPress plugin, versions up to and including 1.5.5, lets remote attackers supply input through the plugin's search handling that is echoed back into the generated page without proper neutralization. Because the assessed vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, no attacker authentication is needed, but the payload only executes when a victim follows a crafted link or visits a malicious page; targeting a logged-in administrator maximizes impact since the script runs in the site's origin. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not reported as confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV); exploitation is limited by the user-interaction requirement.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, and no fixed version is stated in the supplied data, so the safest immediate action is to deactivate and remove the Search in Place plugin from WordPress until codepeople publishes a corrected release (trade-off: the site loses in-page/live search, so plan an alternative search solution or a theme-native search). If removal is not business-acceptable, apply virtual patching at the edge: deploy WAF rules (for example Patchstack or Wordfence virtual patches, or custom ModSecurity rules) that block script and event-handler patterns in the plugin's search parameters - accepting the trade-off of possible false positives on unusual legitimate search strings - and add a Content-Security-Policy that disallows inline script (script-src without 'unsafe-inline'), recognizing this may break other site scripts. Do not rely on client-side input filtering alone, since reflected XSS depends on server-side output encoding, and remind privileged users not to follow unsolicited or unexpected links into the site, particularly while logged in as an administrator. Monitor the Patchstack advisory at https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/search-in-place/vulnerability/wordpress-search-in-place-plugin-1-5-5-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve for the release of a patched version, and treat any future tagged release above 1.5.5 as the upgrade target once it is confirmed by the vendor.

Affected VersionsENISA

Search in Place 0 ≤1.5.5

Affected Packages

euvd search_in_place no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation, i.e. classic reflected XSS) in the Search in Place plugin for WordPress, a PHP plugin from vendor codepeople that adds in-page/live search behavior to a site. The affected code path takes attacker-controlled request input - presumably a search term or related query parameter - and reflects it into HTML output without context-appropriate output encoding, so markup or script content supplied by the attacker is parsed by the victim's browser as part of the page. The CVSS vector supplied (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, with our independent assessment adjusting availability impact to A:N) reflects a network-reachable, low-complexity issue requiring no privileges but requiring victim interaction; the S:C scope-change rating indicates the injected script executes with the privileges of the hosting WordPress site's origin rather than being confined to the vulnerable component, which is why a compromised admin session is the high-value outcome. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:codepeople:search_in_place:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the codepeople Search in Place product family, with the vendor description bounding affected releases at 1.5.5 and earlier.

Know when Search In Place gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 6.1 MEDIUM

Remote unauthenticated reflected XSS needing victim interaction (UI:R); scope change (S:C) as script runs in browser context; low confidentiality/integrity impact, no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in codepeople Search in Place search-in-place allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Search in Place: from n/a through 1.5.5.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A reflected cross-site scripting flaw in the 'Search in Place' WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.5.5) allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute script in the browser of anyone who clicks a crafted link - most damaging when the visitor is a logged-in site administrator. Because that script runs in the site's own origin, a successful lure can lead to full administrative takeover of the affected website, affecting the organization's public presence, customer trust, and any data or transactions handled through it. There is currently no vendor patch, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, so risk is driven by exposure of the plugin rather than evidence of active targeting.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: deactivate or remove the 'Search in Place' plugin; apply WAF or virtual-patching rules targeting script injection in its search parameters; restrict wp-admin by IP allowlist/VPN with MFA; limit administrator browsing while authenticated; and monitor for unexpected admin account, content, or plugin changes.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 94% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche WordPress search plugin, limited install base
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy