Skip to main content

Azure Event Grid EUVDEUVD-2026-95396

| CVE-2026-83947 MEDIUM
Missing Authorization (CWE-862)
2026-10-08 microsoft GHSA-hf67-p98c-9g49
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with low-privilege Azure identity
  2. Exploit
    Abuse missing authorization check in Event Grid
  3. Execution
    Publish spoofed events to topic/domain
  4. Impact
    Downstream subscribers trust and act on forged events

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold a valid, low-privilege authorized identity within the Azure environment (CVSS PR:L) - it is NOT remote-unauthenticated. The core condition is the missing authorization check (CWE-862) in Azure Event Grid, which lets an authenticated principal perform event publishing/routing actions across an authorization boundary they should not cross, enabling spoofing of trusted event sources. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: valid Azure authentication is mandatory, no user interaction is involved but the attacker must have network access to the Event Grid endpoint, and because it is a Microsoft-managed cloud service the fix is applied server-side by the vendor rather than requiring customer action. Impact is integrity-only (C:N/A:N) - no data disclosure or denial of service.

Impact

This is a genuine but conditional priority, not an inflated high-CVSS issue. The CVSS 3.1 base vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N) describes a low-complexity, network-reachable integrity attack that requires some pre-existing authorization (PR:L) and no user interaction, with a scope change (S:C) indicating impact beyond the vulnerable component - consistent with Event Grid forwarding spoofed events to downstream consumers. The temporal metrics are telling and internally consistent: E:U (Unproven exploit), RL:O (Official fix available), RC:C (Confirmed) - meaning Microsoft has confirmed and patched the flaw but no exploit is known. There is NO EPSS score, NO CISA KEV listing, and NO POC in the provided data, so exploitation is currently theoretical. Signals align rather than conflict: a vendor-confirmed, patched, authenticated spoofing flaw with no evidence of weaponization. The main caveat is the gap between a 'missing authorization' / spoofing mechanism and the PR:L rating - defenders should confirm with Microsoft exactly which Azure role or scope an attacker needs, since that determines whether this is cross-tenant/cross-resource or merely within an already-trusted boundary.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker holding a low-privilege but valid Azure identity abuses a missing authorization check in Azure Event Grid to publish or route events they should not be allowed to, impersonating a trusted event source. Downstream subscribers and handlers that trust Event Grid-delivered events then process forged messages as legitimate. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS exploit maturity is Unproven (E:U).

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: Vendor states no customer action required.
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026

Spoofing of trusted event sources in Microsoft Azure Event Grid is possible because the service fails to enforce an authorization check on event publishing and routing operations (CWE-862). Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold a valid, low-privilege identity in the Azure environment (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N), so this is not a remote-unauthenticated attack: an authorized principal who can reach the Event Grid endpoint over the network can push events across an authorization boundary they should not cross, undermining the integrity of event-driven workflows. Impact is integrity-only with no confidentiality or availability loss, scope is assessed as changed, no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and because Event Grid is a Microsoft-managed cloud service the fix is applied server-side by the vendor rather than by customers themselves.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: remediation for CVE-2026-83947 is delivered server-side by Microsoft as the operator of Azure Event Grid, so customers cannot install a fix themselves and should instead track the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83947 and Microsoft's service health communications for confirmation that the authorization check has been deployed in their regions. Because this is a managed-service fix, the main residual risk window is the period before the vendor rollout completes, and no customer-side upgrade version number is specified in the available data. As compensating controls during that window, restrict which principals hold Event Grid Data Sender or Contributor roles by auditing and tightening Azure RBAC role assignments and removing unnecessary role assignments, since the vulnerability still requires a valid low-privilege authenticated identity (PR:L); trade-off is that tightening these roles can break legitimate automated publishers and subscription provisioning workflows, so changes should be tested against existing event sources. Additionally, segment Event Grid resources into separate topics and domains with narrowly scoped custom roles and private endpoints so that a single compromised low-privilege identity cannot publish across the whole tenant, and monitor event delivery logs for unexpected publishers or duplicated event sources to detect cross-boundary spoofing attempts - trade-off is increased operational overhead and potential connectivity issues for publishers that are not permitted to use private networking. These measures reduce blast radius but do not eliminate the underlying missing authorization check, so they are interim only and should not be treated as a substitute for the vendor fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

Azure Event Grid System - (version not specified)

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Azure Event Grid is a Microsoft-managed publish/subscribe (pub/sub) event routing backplane used to deliver system, custom, and partner events from sources such as Azure resources, Blob Storage, Resource Manager, and third-party SaaS providers to subscribers like Functions, Logic Apps, Service Bus queues, and webhooks. The assigned CWE-862 (Missing Authorization) describes the root cause class: the service performs authentication of the caller but omits or improperly scopes the authorization decision, so a principal holding only low privileges is permitted to perform operations reserved for a more privileged or differently scoped role. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N indicates the vulnerable component is reached over the network, the attacker must be authenticated (a low-privilege authorized identity, not an anonymous outsider), no user interaction is required, and the authorization failure crosses a security scope boundary (S:C). Only integrity is affected - the attacker can spoof event sources and inject or misroute events, but cannot read protected data or cause denial of service. The associated CPE cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_event_grid_system:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, which is consistent with a continuously deployed cloud service where the affected build is not pinned to a customer-installable version. The CVSS temporal/environmental-style metrics on the source score (E:U, RL:O, RC:C) reflect an unproven exploit and an official vendor fix, and no EPSS probability or CISA KEV entry was included in the supplied intelligence feeds.

Know when Azure Event Grid System gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY HIGH
NVD 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
ENISA EUVD HIGH
vuln.today AI 7.7 HIGH

Network-reachable (AV:N) and low-complexity (AC:L) but requires an existing authorized identity (PR:L); spoofing yields integrity impact (I:H) on downstream consumers, hence scope change (S:C) and C:N/A:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Oct 15, 2026 - 18:52 NVD
HIGH MEDIUM
CVSS changed
Oct 15, 2026 - 18:52 NVD
7.7 (HIGH) 6.5 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Oct 08, 2026 - 22:15 cve.org
HIGH 7.7

DescriptionNVD

Missing authorization in Azure Event Grid allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Azure Event Grid contains a high-severity authorization flaw that allows an authenticated low-privilege user to spoof trusted event sources, potentially corrupting event-driven business workflows across organizational boundaries. This integrity-only issue affects any organization relying on Event Grid for automated processes, and the changed scope means a compromise could impact systems beyond the immediate Azure environment. Leadership should prioritize verifying that Microsoft's server-side fix has been applied and review event authorization configurations.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 71% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely used managed Azure eventing service in cloud deployments
Threat Intel
2
1 sources
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:N/A
Service Type
Hosted
Vendor-managed, no client patch needed
Data Quality
8 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
Vendor states no customer action required
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

37
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: +5

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy